logo
#

Latest news with #CallMebyYourName

Charles Barkley's Exchange With Timothée Chalamet Catches Attention
Charles Barkley's Exchange With Timothée Chalamet Catches Attention

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Business
  • Yahoo

Charles Barkley's Exchange With Timothée Chalamet Catches Attention

Charles Barkley's Exchange With Timothée Chalamet Catches Attention originally appeared on Athlon Sports. When the New York Knicks play at Madison Square Garden, especially when they're involved in a game of great importance, one will see plenty of celebrities sitting at or near the courtside. Advertisement On any given night, one can see celebrities such as comedian Jon Stewart; actor Ben Stiller; actor, screenwriter and director Spike Lee and former Knicks stars such as Patrick Ewing, John Starks and Bernard King. For Game 5 of the Eastern Conference finals against the Indiana Pacers on Thursday, actor Timothée Chalamet was on hand, and before the game started, he linked up with Charles Barkley of Turner Sports' "Inside the NBA" for a moment. Barkley even said, "Thank you for taking care of my boy Ernie [Johnson]," to Chalamet. Fans reacted on X to the exchange between the two. Advertisement "Awesome!" wrote one user. "No way chuck knows who he is," added another user. "Chuck and Timothée Chalamet linking up feels like your dad meeting your favorite barista," another user chimed in. "One's all vibes and cheekbones, the other thinks oat milk is a government scam. I don't know what they talked about, but I guarantee it ended with Chuck saying, 'You ever eat possum?'" "What does continued success even mean??" a fourth user wrote. "Chuck clout chasing hard" "Chuck's mentorship shines," a fifth user declared. Advertisement "Jet looking for his hug lol," another user wrote. Chalamet got his breakout role when he appeared in "Homeland" in 2012. Five years later, he earned plenty of respect in show business when he played the lead role in "Call Me by Your Name," and he earned a nomination for Best Actor at the Academy Awards as a result. He grew up in New York City and has been a Knicks fan for many years. French-American actor Timothee Chalamet sits with Ben Stiller during a 2025 NBA Playoff game between the Indiana Pacers and the New York Knicks.© Wendell Cruz-Imagn Images On Thursday, the Knicks faced elimination, but they responded in a resounding way. They jumped on the Pacers early and prevented the Pacers from igniting their deadly fast break. Offensively, New York got 32 points on 12-of-18 shooting from Jalen Brunson and 24 points, as well as 13 rebounds, from Karl-Anthony Towns. Advertisement As a result, New York won 111-94, and now the pressure is on the Pacers for Game 6. The winner of Game 6 at Gainbridge Fieldhouse may very well end up winning this series. Related: Anthony Edwards Makes Painful Admission After Timberwolves' Playoff Elimination This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on May 30, 2025, where it first appeared.

Kylie Jenner wants the Kardashian sisters to 'keep their hands off' of Timothée Chalamet; fears they would snatch him
Kylie Jenner wants the Kardashian sisters to 'keep their hands off' of Timothée Chalamet; fears they would snatch him

Time of India

time6 days ago

  • Entertainment
  • Time of India

Kylie Jenner wants the Kardashian sisters to 'keep their hands off' of Timothée Chalamet; fears they would snatch him

Kylie Jenner found her Timothée Chalamet, and plans to keep him all to herself - even if it means warning the Kardashian sisters to keep their hands off the 29-year-old. The report suggests that Jenner fears her now-single sisters would turn him against her or worse - snatch him for themselves. Kylie Jenner doesn't trust her sisters According to Radar Online, the 27-year-old music mogul has been vigilant about the Kardashian sisters cosying up to him whenever they get the chance. While the 'Call Me by Your Name' actor has been spending time with Jenner's kids and the momager, Kris Jenner , the reality star doesn't trust her other single sisters. 'Kylie loves her sisters dearly, but she doesn't trust them further than she can throw them, especially now that Kendall [Jenner], Kim and Khloé are all single,' the insider stated. Previously, at the Vanity Fair Oscars Party, Kylie allowed Kim and Kendall to hang around Timothée for a while, but it only led to their mouths hanging open as they fawned all over him. Jenner is convinced that the sisters would grab him with their long nails if they got to know about Timothée's charm and charisma, and she certainly doesn't want that. Kim Kardashian has a flirtatious relationship with Travis Barker To attest to the fact, Kim previously had a flirtatious relationship with Travis Barker ( Kourtney Kardashian 's husband) when she was Paris Hilton 's closet organiser, as confirmed by him in his 2015 memoir. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 40대 이상이고 PC가 있으세요? 그럼 이 게임을 정말 좋아하실 거예요! Sea of Conquest 플레이하기 Undo While they never had any intimacy, Kim and Travis went on a couple of dates. 'So Kylie is keeping her eye on Kim, who's still a big flirt around Travis as far as she can tell,' the source added. Khloé Kardashian is insecure about... Amid the competitiveness, Kylie doesn't want her sisters to tell all the embarrassing stories about her, particularly Khloé. The insider added that Kylie feels a little tension around her elder sister, as Khloé is insecure about her looks and needs constant reassurance about her being gorgeous. As far as Kendall goes, the report added that she usually hugs everybody in the room, and Kylie wants none of it around her dear Timothée Chalamet. Check out our list of the latest Hindi , English , Tamil , Telugu , Malayalam , and Kannada movies . Don't miss our picks for the best Hindi movies , best Tamil movies, and best Telugu films .

Why ‘screenshot' folder is most exposing part of your phone
Why ‘screenshot' folder is most exposing part of your phone

Gulf Today

time25-05-2025

  • General
  • Gulf Today

Why ‘screenshot' folder is most exposing part of your phone

A multitude of near-identical wedding guest dress options. A butter bean salad recipe that some healthier, more organised and optimised version of me might one day eat for lunch. A now-outdated meme about the papal conclave. A Hinge profile so monumentally dispiriting that it needed to be recorded for sociological purposes (the 'fun fact' related to his previous job... in a morgue). So, so many QR codes. These are just a few highlights of the digital junk collecting dust in the screenshot folder on my phone. Since getting a smartphone about a decade ago, I've become an inveterate screenshotter. Seen something that I might want to buy, at some distant point in the future, if I suddenly undergo a drastic change of financial circumstances? My thumb and forefinger spring to either side of my phone, ready to capture it. Spotted a hairstyle, a recipe or weird exercise that future me might try? A news story that might one day spark some groundbreaking idea? The self-help podcast episode that might change my life, but I can't quite be bothered to listen to right now? Might as well hoard it away, just in case, like an optimistic squirrel burying nuts for winter. And so while some people can track their whims and moods by looking back at what they've typed out in their Notes app, I can do something similar by looking back at this particular sub-folder. At least my Notes app has some semblance of order, filled with shopping lists and the books I've read. My screenshots follow zero logic; flicking through them feels a bit like taking part in some weird cognitive test. A bus timetable sits next to a Gemma Collins quote, which in turn sits next to an advert for a pilates and breathwork retreat. No wonder I'm constantly running out of cloud space. And this collection of pictures feels weirdly personal, too — you could probably glean a lot about the sort of person I'd like to be from analysing all the stuff I've filed away under 'just in case'. More organised. More assertive. Better dressed. Timothée Chalamet Curator of a home filled with expensive abstract vases. A glance at my photo app reveals that I am currently clinging to just under 2,000 screenshots, compared to around 6,000 actual photos. That's a ratio of around one screenshot for every three proper pictures. When you put it like that, it's more than a little bit depressing (it certainly doesn't say anything good about my screen time, either). The earliest one dates back to 2018: for some reason, it's a scene from the end of the film Call Me by Your Name, where Timothée Chalamet cries as the credits roll. What value is this grainy picture of a sobbing Timmy adding to my life? Absolutely nothing. And in the time I've been hanging on to this objectively pointless collection of pixels, Chalamet's CMBYN co-star Armie Hammer has been 'cancelled' and attempted to mount a comeback. My screenshot back catalogues soon force me to confront another big question. Why have I stored up so many memes relating to the works of Andrew Lloyd Webber? It's not like I'm going to have to deliver a musical theatre-themed stand-up set any time soon. Beyond the jokes, though, I do find some more personal mementos, like a simple screengrab of a Facebook message from my then-teenage sister, which must have amused me at the time, back in 2019. 'Can u quit ur job and we book a great holiday?' it says. Its bluntness makes me laugh now; who among us can honestly say they've never wanted to do this? I've got plenty of other silly exchanges like this stored away in screenshot form, even though the conversations still exist elsewhere. Of course, we don't just screenshot the chats that make us smile; many of us are also guilty of keeping our friends abreast of any unfolding drama by sending dispatches from various WhatsApp groups, so we can get a second opinion (does that full stop look really abrupt to you?) or just receive some commiserations.

The History of Sound review: a tender romance that whispers when it should roar
The History of Sound review: a tender romance that whispers when it should roar

Irish Examiner

time23-05-2025

  • Entertainment
  • Irish Examiner

The History of Sound review: a tender romance that whispers when it should roar

The History of Sound ★★½ The History of Sound, directed with delicacy by Oliver Hermanus, is a tender, albeit timid, romantic affair. It stars Paul Mescal and Josh O'Connor as two young men who meet at a bar in Boston in 1917, when the former discovers the latter playing a familiar song at the piano. Lightning strikes. Soon, they take off on a journey across the American heartland, recording folk songs and exploring forbidden love. There's a quiet intimacy at the core of the film, but it's wrapped in so much aesthetic gauze that you begin to wonder if it's trying to mute its own heartbeat. The source material — a short story by Ben Shattuck — is slight, and the film stretches it thin over nearly two hours, offering little in the way of surprise. Mescal plays Lionel, all clenched jaw and repressed emotion, while O'Connor's David is more poised, more inwardly unravelled, concealing pain beneath a thin sheet of charm. Mescal and O'Connor do the work here — it's a job well done, and we've come to expect that from these supremely talented actors. In many ways, this finds both performers in their comfort zones. Neither needs to break a sweat. Both are capable of great nuance—and they do find moments of unspoken connection that linger—but too often, they're asked to portray longing rather than truly live it. You can almost hear the director whispering, 'Slow it down, make it tragic.' It's finely curated, sure—but curated to within an inch of its life, leaving little room for exploration or emotional spontaneity. Admittedly, the film is easy on the eye, with cinematographer Alexander Dynan bathing every frame in nostalgia. The screen is coated in autumnal browns and frosty blues. There's rich Americana too: golden fields, dusty towns, handwritten notes, creaking wood, and scratchy recordings. However, beauty without bite starts to feel like a trick of the light rather than true emotional substance. The queerness at the heart of The History of Sound is handled with tenderness — but also with a frustrating level of timidity. In a post- Call Me by Your Name world, it's not enough to just hint and yearn—audiences now expect filmmakers to go there. The central relationship (and the audience) deserved higher stakes, more complexity, more mess. Instead, we get a series of desirous pauses, eyes meeting across campfires, lips almost touching in the dark. That's the keyword — almost. The film almost broke the internet, the audience almost clapped, the film was almost a triumph. That's not to say the film is without merit. It's a handsome, haunted film that might well devastate a patient viewer in the right mood. But for this critic, it felt like being handed a love letter that had been sanded down until the words barely registered. Sometimes, restraint is powerful — as Mescal has proven before. Other times, it's just another word for holding back.

Major newspapers ran a summer reading list. AI made up its book titles.
Major newspapers ran a summer reading list. AI made up its book titles.

Boston Globe

time21-05-2025

  • Entertainment
  • Boston Globe

Major newspapers ran a summer reading list. AI made up its book titles.

Advertisement Many pointed out quotes attributed to experts and professors who don't seem to exist, or at least don't have a significant online presence. Similarly, some pieces in the package featured quotes that social media sleuths said could not be found online — such as one from Brianna Madia, the author of a van-life book called 'Nowhere for Very Long,' talking about hammock culture to Outside Magazine in 2023. Interviews she did with the magazine in 2019 and 2017 did not feature any discussion on hammocks, and she does not appear in any of the magazine's 2023 stories online. The section's 'Summer reading list for 2025' recommended not only fake books such as 'Tidewater Dreams' by Isabel Allende and 'The Last Algorithm' by Andy Weir, but also imaginary titles from authors Brit Bennett, Taylor Jenkins Reid, Min Jin Lee, and Rebecca Makkai. (The list does feature some real books, including Françoise Sagan's 'Bonjour Tristesse' and André Aciman's 'Call Me by Your Name.') Advertisement 'It is unacceptable for any content we provide to our readers to be inaccurate. We value our readers' trust in our reporting and take this very seriously,' Victor Lim, senior director of audience development for Chicago Public Media, said in a statement. 'We've historically relied on content partners for this information, but given recent developments, it's clear we must actively evaluate new processes and partnerships to ensure we continue meeting the full range of our readers' needs,' he added. Lisa Hughes, the publisher and CEO of the Philadelphia Inquirer, said the special section was removed from the e-edition after the discovery was made. 'Using artificial intelligence to produce content, as was apparently the case with some of the Heat Index material, is a violation of our own internal policies and a serious breach,' she said in a statement to The Washington Post. Much of the content for the section was written by Marco Buscaglia, a Chicago-based freelance writer who used AI chatbots during the writing process, he told The Post in an interview Tuesday. Buscaglia said the insert, which he began writing in February with a March deadline, wasn't written with any specific cities in mind, and he didn't know which newspapers would run it. Buscaglia said there was 'no excuse' for not double-checking his work. When he started writing the recommended books list, Buscaglia said, he considered looking at Goodreads or calling local bookstores for recommendations. But instead, he asked AI chatbots for help. (Buscaglia said he was unsure which chatbot he used, though he said it was either ChatGPT or Claude.) Advertisement 'I'm very responsible about it. I do check things out, but in this case, I mean, I totally missed it,' he said about using AI in his reporting. 'I feel like, if given the opportunity, I would approach these things differently and have a lot, you know, obviously better set of filters.' 'I do feel that it also misrepresents the Sun-Times, the Philadelphia Inquirer,' he said, adding: 'I feel bad about that, too - that the papers somehow [get] associated with that.' The misstep comes as the media industry wrestles with the advent of AI. Large language models and AI chatbots don't always search the web for information, relying on preinstalled knowledge, which can lead them to spit out incorrect or misleading information. Critics have said that newspapers that use AI tools risk exposing readers to low-quality reporting and misinformation, contributing to a rising mistrust of journalism.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store