logo
#

Latest news with #ClareBambra

Britain's high streets turning into ‘ghosts towns' and are now overrun with vape shops and takeaways
Britain's high streets turning into ‘ghosts towns' and are now overrun with vape shops and takeaways

The Sun

time22-05-2025

  • Health
  • The Sun

Britain's high streets turning into ‘ghosts towns' and are now overrun with vape shops and takeaways

BRITAIN'S high streets are turning into 'ghost towns', a report warns. The decline — which has sped up over the last decade — has seen assets such as banks, pharmacies, libraries and public loos vanish. 2 And many areas are now overrun by vape shops, bookies and takeaways. The change is most stark in deprived areas struggling with health and economic inequalities in the North, according to research by academics at Health Equity North. Professor Clare Bambra, from Newcastle University, said: 'You should be able to walk down a high street and feel the uniqueness, culture and identity of that community. 'Through innovative design, better public transport, and measures that promote people over cars, we can re-think these spaces so they become 'go-tos' rather than 'ghost towns'.' Her colleague Prof Adam Todd added: 'Our high streets feel like a shadow of themselves. "Protecting these spaces for the next generation isn't just about restoring them to some nostalgic vision of town centres past.' Since 2014, the number of takeaway shops has risen 24 per cent across England — 30 per cent in the most deprived areas. The amount of vape shops has risen 1,200 per cent in that time, while there are three times more bookies now in poorer places. Why are so many pubs and bars closing? 2

Britain's high streets turning into ‘ghosts towns' and now overrun with vape shops and takeaways
Britain's high streets turning into ‘ghosts towns' and now overrun with vape shops and takeaways

Scottish Sun

time22-05-2025

  • Business
  • Scottish Sun

Britain's high streets turning into ‘ghosts towns' and now overrun with vape shops and takeaways

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) BRITAIN'S high streets are turning into 'ghost towns', a report warns. The decline — which has sped up over the last decade — has seen assets such as banks, pharmacies, libraries and public loos vanish. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Britain's high streets are turning into 'ghost towns', a report has warned Credit: John Gunion - The Sun Glasgow And many areas are now overrun by vape shops, bookies and takeaways. The change is most stark in deprived areas struggling with health and economic inequalities in the North, according to research by academics at Health Equity North. Professor Clare Bambra, from Newcastle University, said: 'You should be able to walk down a high street and feel the uniqueness, culture and identity of that community. 'Through innovative design, better public transport, and measures that promote people over cars, we can re-think these spaces so they become 'go-tos' rather than 'ghost towns'.' read more on uk news SLAVE PROBE Popular sea shanty band who play Glastonbury are at centre of SLAVERY probe Her colleague Prof Adam Todd added: 'Our high streets feel like a shadow of themselves. "Protecting these spaces for the next generation isn't just about restoring them to some nostalgic vision of town centres past.' Since 2014, the number of takeaway shops has risen 24 per cent across England — 30 per cent in the most deprived areas. The amount of vape shops has risen 1,200 per cent in that time, while there are three times more bookies now in poorer places. Why are so many pubs and bars closing? 2 Many areas are now overrun by vape shops, bookies and takeaways Credit: Alamy Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme - Sun Club.

Easington worst hit by Pip cuts, study claims
Easington worst hit by Pip cuts, study claims

BBC News

time02-05-2025

  • Business
  • BBC News

Easington worst hit by Pip cuts, study claims

A former mining town will be the worst affected by planned cuts to disability benefits, researchers have to restrict eligibility for Personal Independence Payments (Pip) were announced in Equity North used government figures to estimate the reduction in Pip and divided it by the amount of working age people in each of England's parliamentary constituencies. They found Easington in County Durham is likely to be the worst hit to the tune of £409 per working age person per Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) said it was creating a "sustainable welfare system" which would help support sick and disabled people "break down barriers [and] unlock work". Using the same methodology, Health Equity North reported northern constituencies faced the greatest loss to their local economies, with areas in Merseyside making up six of the top addition to Easington, Blackpool South and the North East constituencies of Houghton and Sunderland South and Hartlepool complete the the other end of the scale, Bristol Central shows the lowest loss of £62.30 per working age constituent. 'Already struggling' Prof Clare Bambra at Newcastle University, who was involved in the research, said the team calculated figures per "working person" to show the "economic effect on a whole area".She said: "Every Pip claimant in Easington who loses money then doesn't have money to spend in local shops."It's not just Pip claimants who lose out."Prof Bambra said Parliament should not "rush through" the reforms, adding: "Those areas that will lose most from this proposal were already decimated by austerity, Covid and the cost of living crisis."They have worse health than other regions and their local services and economies are already struggling."Losses of this magnitude risk worsening the situation for everyone living in these deprived constituencies." 'Drive up employment' A DWP spokesperson said: "As part of our Plan For Change, we're creating a sustainable welfare system that delivers proper support to help sick and disabled people break down barriers, unlock work, boost living standards and grow the economy."This is on top of our Get Britain Working White Paper which set out the biggest employment reforms in a generation - backed by £240m - working across government and with our mayors, local leaders, the NHS and employers to drive up employment and opportunity."There are 3.7 million people receiving Pip in England and Wales, with the benefit only available to people between 16 and the state pension level of support is based on how high claimants score based on their level of difficulty performing day-to-day DWP has said it expects about 370,000 current Pip recipients to no longer qualify for the support as a result of the changes to eligibility 430,000 future recipients are expected to receive less than they would have work and pensions secretary has said eligibility would be tightened from November 2026. Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.

Labour seats set to suffer worst economic impact of welfare reforms
Labour seats set to suffer worst economic impact of welfare reforms

The Herald Scotland

time02-05-2025

  • Business
  • The Herald Scotland

Labour seats set to suffer worst economic impact of welfare reforms

The study, which examined the drop in spending locally as a result of fewer Pip claimants being eligible under the changes, also found that the most deprived areas stand to lose nearly three times more than the wealthiest. (PA Graphics) The latest data shows there are 3.7 million people receiving Pip in England and Wales. The level of financial support provided is based on how high claimants score based on their level of difficulty performing day-to-day activities. Changes to Pip assessments are part of a push to reduce the welfare bill and get more people into employment. The 'pathways to work' Green Paper, published in March, includes a plan to require a minimum score of four points in at least one category to qualify for the 'daily living' component of Pip. The age at which young people transition from disability living allowance for children will also be increased from 16 to 18. The research by Health Equity North, led by academics from Newcastle University, the University of Sheffield and the University of Manchester, found the changes would have the most impact in the North East and the North West, with average per person losses of £269 and £231 respectively. These regions are followed by Yorkshire and the Humber (£206), the West Midlands (£191) and the East Midlands (£185). At constituency level, the worst hit are Easington in County Durham (£409 per person), Liverpool Walton (£403) and Knowsley (£389). The analysis showed these losses to economies could total between £23.4 million and £26.2 million every year by 2029/30, with the most deprived constituencies losing an annual £265 per person compared to £96 in the least deprived. The 10 worst-hit constituencies are all represented by Labour MPs in so-called 'red wall' areas. The remaining seven are Bootle; Blackpool South; Birkenhead; Hartlepool; Houghton & Sunderland South; Liverpool West, Derby; and Wallasey. The lowest economic impacts were identified in in Bristol Central (£62 per working-age person), Oxford and West Abingdon (£66) and Wimbledon (£67), equating to £5 million, £4.7 million and £4.9 million per year respectively. The research also found the Pip reforms would disproportionately affect areas with the lowest levels of life expectancy in England. The Green Paper says fewer than one in five Pip claimants are in employment and people in receipt of the support are 'less likely to leave the benefit now than when it was first introduced'. 'This is having a significant drag on living standards and is a major driver of poverty,' it adds. A Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) impact assessment of the changes to social security in the spring statement estimated there will be an additional 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, in relative poverty by 2030. The assessment states that this estimate does not include the impact of funding to support people into work, 'which we expect to mitigate the poverty impact'. Clare Bambra, academic co-director of Health Equity North and professor of public health at Newcastle University, said Parliament should not 'rush through' the Government's plans without considering the wider impact. She added: 'Those areas that will lose most from this proposal were already decimated by austerity, Covid and the cost-of-living crisis. 'They have worse health than other regions and their local services and economies are already struggling. 'Losses of this magnitude risk worsening the situation for everyone living in these deprived constituencies.' Luke Munford, also a director of Health Equity North and a senior lecturer in Health Economics, at the University of Manchester, said: 'While we acknowledge the Government's desire to reduce costs and encourage people into work, we urge MPs to consider the potential impact of this proposal to thousands of people in their constituencies before casting their vote.' The conclusions of the study were based on figures provided in response to freedom of information requests and publicly available data from the DWP and the Office for National Statistics. A DWP spokesperson said: 'As part of our Plan For Change, we're creating a sustainable welfare system that delivers proper support to help sick and disabled people break down barriers, unlock work, boost living standards, and grow the economy. 'This is on top of our Get Britain Working White Paper, which set out the biggest employment reforms in a generation – backed by £240 million – working across government and with our mayors, local leaders, the NHS, and employers to drive up employment and opportunity and grow the economy.'

Labour seats set to suffer worst economic impact of welfare reforms
Labour seats set to suffer worst economic impact of welfare reforms

Western Telegraph

time01-05-2025

  • Business
  • Western Telegraph

Labour seats set to suffer worst economic impact of welfare reforms

A seat-by-seat analysis of the potential consequences of the Government's plan to tighten the eligibility criteria for the personal independence payment (Pip) showed businesses in some places face collective annual losses of more than £20 million. The study, which examined the drop in spending locally as a result of fewer Pip claimants being eligible under the changes, also found that the most deprived areas stand to lose nearly three times more than the wealthiest. (PA Graphics) The latest data shows there are 3.7 million people receiving Pip in England and Wales. The level of financial support provided is based on how high claimants score based on their level of difficulty performing day-to-day activities. Changes to Pip assessments are part of a push to reduce the welfare bill and get more people into employment. The 'pathways to work' Green Paper, published in March, includes a plan to require a minimum score of four points in at least one category to qualify for the 'daily living' component of Pip. The age at which young people transition from disability living allowance for children will also be increased from 16 to 18. Those areas that will lose most from this proposal were already decimated by austerity, Covid and the cost-of-living crisis. They have worse health than other regions and their local services and economies are already struggling Clare Bambra, Newcastle University The research by Health Equity North, led by academics from Newcastle University, the University of Sheffield and the University of Manchester, found the changes would have the most impact in the North East and the North West, with average per person losses of £269 and £231 respectively. These regions are followed by Yorkshire and the Humber (£206), the West Midlands (£191) and the East Midlands (£185). At constituency level, the worst hit are Easington in County Durham (£409 per person), Liverpool Walton (£403) and Knowsley (£389). The analysis showed these losses to economies could total between £23.4 million and £26.2 million every year by 2029/30, with the most deprived constituencies losing an annual £265 per person compared to £96 in the least deprived. One in five The number of Pip claimants who are in employment The Green Paper The 10 worst-hit constituencies are all represented by Labour MPs in so-called 'red wall' areas. The remaining seven are Bootle; Blackpool South; Birkenhead; Hartlepool; Houghton & Sunderland South; Liverpool West, Derby; and Wallasey. The lowest economic impacts were identified in in Bristol Central (£62 per working-age person), Oxford and West Abingdon (£66) and Wimbledon (£67), equating to £5 million, £4.7 million and £4.9 million per year respectively. The research also found the Pip reforms would disproportionately affect areas with the lowest levels of life expectancy in England. The Green Paper says fewer than one in five Pip claimants are in employment and people in receipt of the support are 'less likely to leave the benefit now than when it was first introduced'. 'This is having a significant drag on living standards and is a major driver of poverty,' it adds. Losses of this magnitude risk worsening the situation for everyone living in these deprived constituencies Clare Bambra, Newcastle University A Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) impact assessment of the changes to social security in the spring statement estimated there will be an additional 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, in relative poverty by 2030. The assessment states that this estimate does not include the impact of funding to support people into work, 'which we expect to mitigate the poverty impact'. Clare Bambra, academic co-director of Health Equity North and professor of public health at Newcastle University, said Parliament should not 'rush through' the Government's plans without considering the wider impact. She added: 'Those areas that will lose most from this proposal were already decimated by austerity, Covid and the cost-of-living crisis. 'They have worse health than other regions and their local services and economies are already struggling. While we acknowledge the Government's desire to reduce costs and encourage people into work, we urge MPs to consider the potential impact of this proposal to thousands of people in their constituencies before casting their vote Luke Munford, University of Manchester 'Losses of this magnitude risk worsening the situation for everyone living in these deprived constituencies.' Luke Munford, also a director of Health Equity North and a senior lecturer in Health Economics, at the University of Manchester, said: 'While we acknowledge the Government's desire to reduce costs and encourage people into work, we urge MPs to consider the potential impact of this proposal to thousands of people in their constituencies before casting their vote.' The conclusions of the study were based on figures provided in response to freedom of information requests and publicly available data from the DWP and the Office for National Statistics. A DWP spokesperson said: 'As part of our Plan For Change, we're creating a sustainable welfare system that delivers proper support to help sick and disabled people break down barriers, unlock work, boost living standards, and grow the economy. 'This is on top of our Get Britain Working White Paper, which set out the biggest employment reforms in a generation – backed by £240 million – working across government and with our mayors, local leaders, the NHS, and employers to drive up employment and opportunity and grow the economy.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store