Easington worst hit by Pip cuts, study claims
Using the same methodology, Health Equity North reported northern constituencies faced the greatest loss to their local economies, with areas in Merseyside making up six of the top 10.In addition to Easington, Blackpool South and the North East constituencies of Houghton and Sunderland South and Hartlepool complete the list.At the other end of the scale, Bristol Central shows the lowest loss of £62.30 per working age constituent.
'Already struggling'
Prof Clare Bambra at Newcastle University, who was involved in the research, said the team calculated figures per "working person" to show the "economic effect on a whole area".She said: "Every Pip claimant in Easington who loses money then doesn't have money to spend in local shops."It's not just Pip claimants who lose out."Prof Bambra said Parliament should not "rush through" the reforms, adding: "Those areas that will lose most from this proposal were already decimated by austerity, Covid and the cost of living crisis."They have worse health than other regions and their local services and economies are already struggling."Losses of this magnitude risk worsening the situation for everyone living in these deprived constituencies."
'Drive up employment'
A DWP spokesperson said: "As part of our Plan For Change, we're creating a sustainable welfare system that delivers proper support to help sick and disabled people break down barriers, unlock work, boost living standards and grow the economy."This is on top of our Get Britain Working White Paper which set out the biggest employment reforms in a generation - backed by £240m - working across government and with our mayors, local leaders, the NHS and employers to drive up employment and opportunity."There are 3.7 million people receiving Pip in England and Wales, with the benefit only available to people between 16 and the state pension age.The level of support is based on how high claimants score based on their level of difficulty performing day-to-day activities.The DWP has said it expects about 370,000 current Pip recipients to no longer qualify for the support as a result of the changes to eligibility criteria.Another 430,000 future recipients are expected to receive less than they would have previously.The work and pensions secretary has said eligibility would be tightened from November 2026.
Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
17 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Coroner warns parents at inquest into daughter's cancer death
Coroner warns parents at inquest into daughter's cancer death Paloma Shemirani, 23, died after refusing treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma Paloma Shemirani died in 2024 (Gareth Fuller/PA) The parents of a Cambridge graduate who refused chemotherapy after being diagnosed with cancer have both been warned about their behaviour in court during an inquest into her death. Paloma Shemirani, 23, collapsed on July 19 last year and was taken to Royal Sussex County Hospital where she died five days later. She had earlier declined treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Her mother, Kay 'Kate' Shemirani, a prominent online conspiracy theorist and her father, Dr Faramarz Shemirani, who is 'sympathetic' to his ex-wife's views, believe medical professionals are to blame for their daughter's death. Coroner Catherine Wood, presiding over the inquest at Kent and Medway Coroner's Court in Maidstone, left the court due to the behaviour of Miss Shemirani's parents on Tuesday afternoon. The inquest, which was originally scheduled to conclude on Wednesday, had been extended as the evidence and questioning of witnesses had taken longer than anticipated. On Tuesday, Mrs Shemirani, who was struck off as a nurse in 2021 after spreading harmful misinformation about Covid-19, was cross-examined by Dr Shemirani. Questioning broke down when Dr Shemirani, who is understood to have a PhD in computational fluid dynamics, tried to ask his ex-wife's opinion of medical evidence which she would then try to answer, despite warnings from the coroner. 'Mrs Shemirani, I've told you not to speak, I'll find you in contempt if you keep on speaking now,' the coroner said. 'Confine (yourself) to asking questions of this witness as a witness of fact,' she told Dr Shemirani. As Dr Shemirani argued back through his video-link, the coroner said: 'Dr Shemirani, challenge me by judicial review later' before trying to move on. 'Of course I will, of course I will,' he replied. Later, Dr Shemirani once again tried to ask questions which had already been ruled irrelevant by the coroner. 'I'm going to rise for a few minutes because I'm finding it incredibly difficult to keep you on track,' said Ms Wood. Dr Shemirani continued to speak until the coroner shouted 'Dr Shemirani, listen'. 'Your behaviour has been bordering on contemptuous to the court – when I make a ruling on something you cannot come back,' she added. Mrs Shemirani also accused osteopath Nick Gosset of lying under oath earlier in the inquest. Mr Gosset treated Miss Shemirani the day she collapsed and said she had appeared to be in the 'last stages of a very difficult disease'. Article continues below He told the court that when he inspected her, he could feel lumps in her right shoulder going all the way up into her neck, which he identified as lymphoid mass and that he 'had never seen anything like it' in 43 years of practice. Mr Gosset told the court: 'It was obvious to me that I was not the right person to be helping her, normally you see a patient like that, you would refer her (to a GP). 'Any referral was refused – when I suggested that the proper avenue of approach was through a normal, medical channel she dismissed it. On Tuesday, Paloma's mother said 'his statement under oath is completely opposed with the truth' and has argued her daughter was healthy the day she collapsed. The inquest continues on Wednesday.
The Herald Scotland
31 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Now we know why Nicola Sturgeon focused on non-binary and trans issues
Politics is among the poorest rewarded professions for those in senior leadership positions and few waste much time in cashing in while the public still remembers their name. Fewer have done it with quite the unalloyed sense of purpose as Nicola Sturgeon, who has dominated the news schedules and front pages over recent days in a way that Kim Jong Un would be proud. Read More: For a self-confessed 'painfully shy' introvert, uncomfortable in the public spotlight, the former First Minister appears to have subdued her demons, at least temporarily, in the cause of promoting her new memoir, Frankly. For anyone who has been in a coma this past week – well you haven't missed much. Selected passages published before the launch are, we have to assume, the most interesting bits, which hardly bodes well for the rest of the book. It's not that Ms Sturgeon doesn't have anything useful to say, it's that she imparts it in such a lacklustre way, as though she has a nosebleed whenever she feels what she's writing might be too engaging. The revelations, such as they are, will be familiar to anyone who follows Scottish politics closely. Alex Salmond's claim that he was a victim of a criminal conspiracy that saw him charged – and cleared – of 13 counts of sexual assault, was preposterous. 'He impugned the integrity of the institutions at the heart of Scottish democracy.' Ms Sturgeon suffered a panic attack during the 2014 independence referendum campaign due to media bias and because Salmond left her to do most of the heavy lifting. He flew to China without having read the white paper setting out the case for independence, she claims. Being arrested – and later cleared – during Operation Branchform was the worst day of her life when she felt like she had 'fallen into the plot of a dystopian novel'. While giving evidence to the Covid inquiry last year, she 'came perilously close to a breakdown' and later had to seek professional help. What is missing is the contemporaneous, insider detail that makes reading political memoirs worthwhile – snatches of candid conversation with colleagues, disagreements, colourful observations that give the reader a sense that they're getting a privileged glimpse behind the scenes. The problem with Ms Sturgeon's writing is that she remains, by her nature, a politician, which makes everything sound like a prepared statement. In media interviews about her book, she has come across as cautious, obstructive even, as though she's still defending government policy rather than her own words, offered voluntarily. None more so than over the issue which has got the redtops in a tizzy – her sexuality. Many of us had heard the rumours of supposed lesbian trysts with the former French ambassador to the UK, and the alleged purchase of a 'love nest' from Judy Murray to facilitate said trysts. All denied and laughed off by the parties themselves as well as by anyone who has more worthwhile things to think about. Rather than leave it at that, Ms Sturgeon has chosen to address the issue of her sexuality head-on, albeit in a single sentence that she has since, stubbornly refused to elaborate on. "Long-term relationships with men have accounted for more than thirty years of my life, but I have never considered sexuality, my own included, to be binary,' she wrote. 'Moreover, sexual relationships should be private matters." We can probably all agree on the latter sentence, which begs the question, why include the former? I would guess that there are vanishingly few people who give two hoots about who Ms Sturgeon goes to bed with, but there is a bigger and more profound issue at the heart of her admission. It is that she appears perfectly content to discuss her sexual orientation when she has a book to sell, but not when she was First Minister, ushering in one of the most contentious and divisive programmes around sexual identity and sexual politics in the history of this country. Did she not think that, if she is to make her own sexuality public property, it might have been more germane – to her colleagues and politicians from other parties, as well as to the voting public – to have known about it during the passage of the Gender Recognition Reform Act? Does she not regard it at all significant that she now reveals her sexuality to be 'non-binary', given the centrality of the non-binary community to the purpose of her government's gender equality programme. A working group on non-binary equality was established in 2019 and, two years later, it published a draft non-binary equality action plan that included 35 recommendations, 24 of which have since been accepted by the Scottish Government. Among the recommendations was an assurance that 'non-binary people have equal access to transition-related healthcare, regardless of gender identity, gender presentation, race, disability, neurodiversity, financial resources, postcode, or other characteristics'. The working group document stated: 'All trans and non-binary people should have equal access to treatment pathways. A large proportion of trans people identify as non-binary, but medical practitioners still often consider non-binary patients to be inherently more complex, meaning that they experience greater difficulties and delays in accessing treatment.' Irrespective of what you think about the Scottish Government's gender recognition programme, we can all accept that it is a complex and highly charged policy area that should require full transparency from all of those involved. The cases of Isla Bryson – a rapist who, after transitioning was remanded in a women's prison – and Sandie Peggie, a nurse who complained about sharing a changing room with a transgender doctor, demonstrate how the lived experience of people can quickly undermine the most well intentioned policy. I'm not suggesting that every politician should be obliged to declare their sexuality before working or voting on sensitive sexual rights policies but I come back to the question around Ms Sturgeon: why now and not then? Carlos Alba is a journalist, author, and PR consultant at Carlos Alba Media. His latest novel, There's a Problem with Dad, explores the issue of undiagnosed autism among older people
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Disability benefit cuts could have ‘maximum impact' in these five areas
Certain areas of the country have far higher rates of mobility issues, leaving them more vulnerable to DWP cuts and changes With the government's controversial Personal Independence Payments reforms currently on hold, experts are examining which regions stand to lose most from DWP reductions nationwide. A new study has used local authority figures to pinpoint the areas that would bear the brunt of any disability benefit reductions. Blackpool topped the rankings in the latest State of Mobility Issues study by mobility furniture specialists Opera Beds. The analysis revealed that almost one in five working-age residents in this locality depends on health-related support. The seaside town records elevated levels of hip fractures, blue badge usage and smoking rates when measured against national averages, earning it a mobility crisis rating of 9.02 out of 10. Blackpool also ranks as England's third most income-deprived location based on ONS figures. Experts highlighted how this diminished earning power frequently worsens health complications. The study concluded: "Cuts to sickness and disability payments could hit Blackpool harder than anywhere else, removing vital support from people already struggling with poor health and limited mobility." Following closely is Knowsley, a north-western village boasting the nation's second-steepest hip fracture figures and where 71% of residents are either overweight or obese. Nearly a sixth of working-age locals here depend on health-related financial assistance. The report highlighted: "While the area faces a mobility crisis, the Knowsley Council falls prevention scheme offers assistance and home-based assessments for those over 55 at risk of fractures or falls. This scheme demonstrates a commitment to improving the situation and aims to increase confidence and mobility among the most affected." South Tyneside was also identified as facing "maximum impact" from potential disability benefit reductions, with 14.3% of working-age residents relying on health-related benefits. The coastal borough experiences elevated levels of chronic illness and disability, resulting in significant state dependency among locals. The study cautioned that this region already struggles with overstretched local services, warning that slashing disability budgets could eliminate the final lifelines for vulnerable disabled residents. It emphasised that people might find themselves without hospital transport or vital home equipment. Hartlepool shows comparable benefit claim figures to Blackpool at approximately 17%, yet the seaside town records a considerably lower mobility crisis rating of 7.48. But, locals there would still encounter "maximum impact" from potential disability benefit reductions, the report stated. Completing the roster of towns confronting "maximum impact" from possible disability benefit cuts is Barnsley. The South Yorkshire town registers a 7.61 mobility crisis rating, with 15.2% of working-age inhabitants claiming disability-related benefits. The study scrutinised local authority data, comparing the number of benefit claimants, blue badge holders and individuals with specific conditions in various areas to calculate a mobility crisis score. This took into account the number of people afflicted with obesity, rheumatoid arthritis, type 2 diabetes, hip fractures and premature deaths from heart disease under 75 years old.
