Latest news with #DavidSteffen
Yahoo
13-06-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Community gets update on GBCI closure potential
Allouez, Wis. (WFRV) – Community members packed a special meeting at Allouez village hall on Thursday night to get an update on progress to potentially close the unpopular Green Bay Correctional Institution (GBCI). 'We have a problem right now, the facility is overcrowded and it isn't entirely safe,' said state senator Jamie Wall. 'We shouldn't just kick the can down the road indefinitely.' In his budget proposal, Governor Tony Evers included funding to eventually shutter the GBCI as part of a larger statewide prison reform package. During the meeting on Thursday night, senator Wall explained to the community how this would all work. The governor's statewide prison reform package has two distinct parts. There's a policy part to it which focuses on the treatment of prisoners with an emphasis on rehabilitation programs. The other part of the plan is modifying existing juvenile detention centers and prisons and building several new juvenile detention centers. Ashwaubenon Museum holds annual History at the Park, teaching the present about the past This would eventually allow Wisconsin's Department of Corrections officials to relocate the inmates at the GBCI to these new facilities. The goal is to shutter GBCI by 2029. 'It's just a really big deal, a big deal for Allouez, a big deal for Northeast Wisconsin, and it's a big deal for Wisconsin as a whole,' said state representative Benjamin Franklin. Wall, Franklin, and state representative David Steffen attended the special meeting in Allouez on Thursday night to debrief community members on the governor's budget proposal in regards to closing the GBCI and the potential path forward. All three men have been strong advocates for closing down the GBCI. While each legislator said that the Governor's prison reform proposal isn't perfect, they said there were major chunks of it that they could support. 'I think if you look at the overall structure that's something we can support, just need to look at the details that need a few revisions to it,' Franklin told Local 5 News. 'I think the most important thing that we can do is to take that first step on that road that the governor outlined the physical changes to the corrections system,' Wall said. 'That means standing up new juvenile centers including one here in Northeast Wisconsin.' According to Wall, budget negotiations have stalled right now. Joint Finance Committee members are in the process of modifying the governor's budget proposal and it's unknown if they'll include funding to close the GBCI in their version of the document. Wall said that as of Thursday the Joint Finance Committee hasn't reviewed budget items related to the state's department of corrections. All three legislators said they're united in finding a way to close the GBCI. It's a sentiment echoed by Allouez village leaders who have circulated a petition to close the GBCI that has thousands of signatures. Deputies in Wisconsin help guide snapping turtle safely across rural street GBCI is 126 years old. Proponents of shuttering the facility say that it's understaffed, outdated, costly to maintain, and presents dangers to the inmates living there and all those who work there as well. There's also a lack of vocational and mental health programs for inmates living there which some community members say lead to a high rate of reoffenders. 'It is the roughest, toughest prison that you can think of,' said Jeffrey Watson who said he was a former inmate at GBCI. Allouez village leaders say there's an opportunity to bring in a mixed use development on the prison's property if it were to shut down. According to a preliminary rendering of a potential development there, it could include apartments, storefronts, parks, and much more. 'I want people to be able to walk out of this meeting being very proud of our representatives,' said Allouez village president Jim Rafter who has been a leading voice in the fight to close down the GBCI. 'I believe they all want it to be closed. We have Republicans and Democrats working together to get the job done.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
12-02-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Republican legislators introduce bill to move lawsuits out of Dane County
A courtroom and a judge's gavel. (Getty Images creative) A pair of Republican legislators have introduced a proposal that would allow the parties in lawsuits against state officials filed in Wisconsin's largest, and most Democratic, counties to have the venue changed to another county court. Critics of the proposal say it amounts to an attempt to gerrymander the court system. The legislation from Rep. David Steffen (R-Howard) and Sen. Jesse James (R-Thorp) is currently circulating for co-sponsorship. Under the 'Court Fairness Bill,' if a lawsuit against certain government officials is filed in a county with a first or second class city — the designation given to cities with more than 39,500 residents — any party to the lawsuit can request a venue change to a different circuit court. The second court would be chosen randomly and no further venue changes would be allowed. Steffen told the Wisconsin Examiner that the bill was designed to allow Republicans to move lawsuits out of Dane County court because they believe they don't 'get a fair shake' when arguing in front of judges elected by the state's most Democratic voting county. Current law doesn't require lawsuits against the state government to be filed in Madison, but because most state government offices are in the capital city, many of those lawsuits are heard in the Dane County Circuit Court. 'If you are a liberal entity or individual, you increase your chance of success substantially by filing that case in the Dane County Circuit,' Steffen said. 'That type of judge shopping should not only be discouraged but prevented when possible, and so I don't believe that that is the way our Founding Fathers, both at the national or state level, envisioned courts to work where individuals or organizations are making decisions where they file based on the chance of it being a more favorable outcome.' Steffen added that he thinks the number of lawsuits filed against state government would decrease if people thought they might be heard by judges outside of Dane County. 'So by providing an option for either party to request a random selection to another circuit, we increase the public's perception and support of the decision that is made, and we decrease the number of frivolous and politically motivated lawsuits and decisions,' he said. Current law already allows parties to a lawsuit to change the venue at the appellate level. Wisconsin is divided into four appeals court districts. If a case is heard at the circuit court level in Dane County, its appeal would generally be heard in the District IV Court of Appeals, which covers 24 counties across most of southwestern and central Wisconsin. In 2011, Republicans enacted a law that allows a party in a lawsuit to request that an appeal be heard in a different district. Jeff Mandell, general counsel of the voting rights focused firm Law Forward, told the Examiner the proposal is an attempt to disenfranchise voters in cities that Republicans don't like because of the people they elect to be judges. 'It's a further attempt to gerrymander the courts,' he said. 'The gerrymandered Legislature has already gerrymandered the appellate courts and now it's trying to gerrymander the circuit courts. It is anti-democratic. It is anti-rule of law, it is inappropriate, it is inefficient, and there's no good reason for it, and here, fascinatingly, they only want it to apply to lawsuits that are filed in counties that have cities of the first or second class. So they're really just targeting counties that have larger populations or that they don't like. It's a very weird thing.' While the proposal would allow venue changes in Milwaukee County and more than a dozen counties with second class cities, Steffen said it's targeted at Dane County because he believes Republicans lose 90-95% of their cases there. 'There is no place other than downtown Madison that has a 91% concentration of a party,' he said. Mandell said Steffen is exaggerating how poorly conservative causes do in Dane County court and there's no requirement right now that lawsuits against the state be filed there. Wisconsin's judges are elected for a reason, Mandell said, and this bill would nullify the choices of hundreds of thousands of Dane County voters. 'We have elected judges in Wisconsin, and one of the theories is that we do that because our judges are responsive to and come from the community,' he said. 'So if I have an issue with the way that a local election official, or any other local official is doing something in my local area, part of the reason to bring the suit where I live is because the judge knows and understands the conditions of my local area. To then send it someplace completely different is truly bizarre.' He added that if someone were trying to sue their member of Congress, the proposal would allow that suit to get moved to another side of the state where there is less knowledge about that representative and the community that elected them. 'You are looking to the court to give you relief, but you are probably also looking for other people who are constituents of your member of Congress to know about this and be able to follow the case,' he said. 'But now the venue is going to be randomly reassigned, and it could be assigned well outside of the congressional district. The judge is no longer a constituent or doesn't know as much about the member of Congress and the local media no longer has the same kind of access. The whole thing is just really, really bizarre.' Experts also say there are a number of logistical concerns with the proposal. Bree Grossi Wilde, executive director of UW-Madison's State Democracy Research Initiative, said because of Wisconsin's political geography, the proposal wouldn't make things even. Moving a case out of Dane County doesn't give a 50-50 shot at landing that case in a conservative or liberal county because a higher number of Wisconsin's 72 counties lean conservative. 'If the concern is to try to level the playing field and have a more diverse kind of set of circuit court judges deciding these important cases that are brought against state or federal officials, or whatever it might be, then actually, it's going to swing in the opposite direction,' she said. 'It's not going to be more level. It's going to be likely more conservative judges deciding these cases.' She added that a similar bill authored by Republicans in Kentucky was struck down by that state's Supreme Court. Steffen said he's not concerned about that happening here if the bill were passed — though it's unlikely it would be signed by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers. Plus, Grossi Wilde said, because Dane County has been the venue for many of these cases for so long, there's a level of expertise and institutional knowledge in cases involving complex areas of state law such as elections. 'Sometimes it's more about expertise … these are judges that are familiar with these claims and are able to sort of manage them more efficiently,' she said, adding that 'Dane County Circuit Court has built up that bench, has built up this sort of expertise, because they're used to managing these type of cases.' Sending cases out around the state to judges who deal with many issues and are not particularly familiar with certain areas of the law — 'whether it be … civil, criminal, family, juvenile, probate … [or] complicated or constitutional claims' could burden courts and cause them not to work as well, she said. Steffen said he hadn't nailed down the details of how the new venue would be randomly selected, but suggested drawing cards or names out of a hat. But Mandell questioned what would happen if a case was filed in Milwaukee County and the name drawn out of the hat was far-away Bayfield County. 'It's highly inefficient,' he said. 'I mean … every time the court wants to hold a hearing, everybody might have to, you know, schlep all the way to Bayfield. For what purpose?' The deadline for lawmakers to sign on to the bill as co-sponsors is Feb. 18.
USA Today
06-02-2025
- Politics
- USA Today
Legislation would allow cases against federal, state officials to be heard in courts across the state
Legislation would allow cases against federal, state officials to be heard in courts across the state MADISON - Lawsuits against prominent government officials including state lawmakers, the Wisconsin governor, and the U.S. president could be moved to any county across the state, under a proposal being circulated in the state Capitol. The Republican-authored proposed bill would allow a case involving government officials filed in larger cities in Wisconsin, which lean politically toward Democrats, to be randomly assigned to any of the other circuit courts across the state at the request of one of the parties or intervenors in the case, who must be government officials. The officials would be defined as state lawmakers, the state Legislature, either house of the state Legislature, legislative committees, the governor, the lieutenant governor, the attorney general, the secretary of state, the state treasurer, the state superintendent, state department officials, the state ethics and elections commissions, the president and vice president and any member of the state's federal delegation. More: Wisconsin Supreme Court hears case that could end discredited gay conversion therapy Bill authors Rep. David Steffen of Howard and Sen. Jesse James of Thorp said the measure would ensure "fair and independent decisions." "Unfortunately, the presence of partisan power has become overwhelmingly obvious in court decisions involving partisan officials," the lawmakers said in a memo released Wednesday seeking support for the measure. "While the officials and entities that make up our branches of government represent the broad array of values and viewpoints that exist across Wisconsin, because of our capital's location in Madison, circuit court decisions involving these parties often represent, or appear to represent, just the viewpoint of the Dane County Circuit Court," the lawmakers said. The bill expands on a 2011 law that overhauled the state's court system and gave plaintiffs suing the state their pick of venue in Wisconsin. Under state law before 2011, actions brought against the state went to Dane County Circuit Court unless otherwise provided for in the law. Republican lawmakers, who often criticize Dane County judges as too liberal, wanted to change the law to allow plaintiffs to pick whichever county he or she wanted. Then-Republican Gov. Scott Walker signed the measure into law. Under the law, the trial court's decision must be appealed to an appellate court in a different region and the party choosing to appeal would select the appeals court. More: How a case before the Wisconsin Supreme Court could hamper the Tyco PFAS charges The bill would also apply to President Donald Trump and future presidents. Presidents are not often named in state lawsuits but following the 2020 election during which Trump falsely claimed he won Wisconsin, Trump sued former President Joe Biden in Wisconsin to overturn the election result favoring Biden. The state Supreme Court rejected Trump's argument. Gov. Tony Evers' office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Laura Schulte and Molly Beck can be reached at leschulte@ and
