logo
Republican legislators introduce bill to move lawsuits out of Dane County

Republican legislators introduce bill to move lawsuits out of Dane County

Yahoo12-02-2025

A courtroom and a judge's gavel. (Getty Images creative)
A pair of Republican legislators have introduced a proposal that would allow the parties in lawsuits against state officials filed in Wisconsin's largest, and most Democratic, counties to have the venue changed to another county court. Critics of the proposal say it amounts to an attempt to gerrymander the court system.
The legislation from Rep. David Steffen (R-Howard) and Sen. Jesse James (R-Thorp) is currently circulating for co-sponsorship. Under the 'Court Fairness Bill,' if a lawsuit against certain government officials is filed in a county with a first or second class city — the designation given to cities with more than 39,500 residents — any party to the lawsuit can request a venue change to a different circuit court. The second court would be chosen randomly and no further venue changes would be allowed.
Steffen told the Wisconsin Examiner that the bill was designed to allow Republicans to move lawsuits out of Dane County court because they believe they don't 'get a fair shake' when arguing in front of judges elected by the state's most Democratic voting county. Current law doesn't require lawsuits against the state government to be filed in Madison, but because most state government offices are in the capital city, many of those lawsuits are heard in the Dane County Circuit Court.
'If you are a liberal entity or individual, you increase your chance of success substantially by filing that case in the Dane County Circuit,' Steffen said. 'That type of judge shopping should not only be discouraged but prevented when possible, and so I don't believe that that is the way our Founding Fathers, both at the national or state level, envisioned courts to work where individuals or organizations are making decisions where they file based on the chance of it being a more favorable outcome.'
Steffen added that he thinks the number of lawsuits filed against state government would decrease if people thought they might be heard by judges outside of Dane County.
'So by providing an option for either party to request a random selection to another circuit, we increase the public's perception and support of the decision that is made, and we decrease the number of frivolous and politically motivated lawsuits and decisions,' he said.
Current law already allows parties to a lawsuit to change the venue at the appellate level. Wisconsin is divided into four appeals court districts. If a case is heard at the circuit court level in Dane County, its appeal would generally be heard in the District IV Court of Appeals, which covers 24 counties across most of southwestern and central Wisconsin. In 2011, Republicans enacted a law that allows a party in a lawsuit to request that an appeal be heard in a different district.
Jeff Mandell, general counsel of the voting rights focused firm Law Forward, told the Examiner the proposal is an attempt to disenfranchise voters in cities that Republicans don't like because of the people they elect to be judges.
'It's a further attempt to gerrymander the courts,' he said. 'The gerrymandered Legislature has already gerrymandered the appellate courts and now it's trying to gerrymander the circuit courts. It is anti-democratic. It is anti-rule of law, it is inappropriate, it is inefficient, and there's no good reason for it, and here, fascinatingly, they only want it to apply to lawsuits that are filed in counties that have cities of the first or second class. So they're really just targeting counties that have larger populations or that they don't like. It's a very weird thing.'
While the proposal would allow venue changes in Milwaukee County and more than a dozen counties with second class cities, Steffen said it's targeted at Dane County because he believes Republicans lose 90-95% of their cases there.
'There is no place other than downtown Madison that has a 91% concentration of a party,' he said.
Mandell said Steffen is exaggerating how poorly conservative causes do in Dane County court and there's no requirement right now that lawsuits against the state be filed there. Wisconsin's judges are elected for a reason, Mandell said, and this bill would nullify the choices of hundreds of thousands of Dane County voters.
'We have elected judges in Wisconsin, and one of the theories is that we do that because our judges are responsive to and come from the community,' he said. 'So if I have an issue with the way that a local election official, or any other local official is doing something in my local area, part of the reason to bring the suit where I live is because the judge knows and understands the conditions of my local area. To then send it someplace completely different is truly bizarre.'
He added that if someone were trying to sue their member of Congress, the proposal would allow that suit to get moved to another side of the state where there is less knowledge about that representative and the community that elected them.
'You are looking to the court to give you relief, but you are probably also looking for other people who are constituents of your member of Congress to know about this and be able to follow the case,' he said. 'But now the venue is going to be randomly reassigned, and it could be assigned well outside of the congressional district. The judge is no longer a constituent or doesn't know as much about the member of Congress and the local media no longer has the same kind of access. The whole thing is just really, really bizarre.'
Experts also say there are a number of logistical concerns with the proposal.
Bree Grossi Wilde, executive director of UW-Madison's State Democracy Research Initiative, said because of Wisconsin's political geography, the proposal wouldn't make things even. Moving a case out of Dane County doesn't give a 50-50 shot at landing that case in a conservative or liberal county because a higher number of Wisconsin's 72 counties lean conservative.
'If the concern is to try to level the playing field and have a more diverse kind of set of circuit court judges deciding these important cases that are brought against state or federal officials, or whatever it might be, then actually, it's going to swing in the opposite direction,' she said. 'It's not going to be more level. It's going to be likely more conservative judges deciding these cases.'
She added that a similar bill authored by Republicans in Kentucky was struck down by that state's Supreme Court. Steffen said he's not concerned about that happening here if the bill were passed — though it's unlikely it would be signed by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers.
Plus, Grossi Wilde said, because Dane County has been the venue for many of these cases for so long, there's a level of expertise and institutional knowledge in cases involving complex areas of state law such as elections.
'Sometimes it's more about expertise … these are judges that are familiar with these claims and are able to sort of manage them more efficiently,' she said, adding that 'Dane County Circuit Court has built up that bench, has built up this sort of expertise, because they're used to managing these type of cases.'
Sending cases out around the state to judges who deal with many issues and are not particularly familiar with certain areas of the law — 'whether it be … civil, criminal, family, juvenile, probate … [or] complicated or constitutional claims' could burden courts and cause them not to work as well, she said.
Steffen said he hadn't nailed down the details of how the new venue would be randomly selected, but suggested drawing cards or names out of a hat.
But Mandell questioned what would happen if a case was filed in Milwaukee County and the name drawn out of the hat was far-away Bayfield County.
'It's highly inefficient,' he said. 'I mean … every time the court wants to hold a hearing, everybody might have to, you know, schlep all the way to Bayfield. For what purpose?'
The deadline for lawmakers to sign on to the bill as co-sponsors is Feb. 18.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Active-duty troops deployed to California
Active-duty troops deployed to California

USA Today

time40 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Active-duty troops deployed to California

Active-duty troops deployed to California Good morning!🙋🏼‍♀️ I'm Nicole Fallert. Can you guess Chipotle's new dip? Quick look at Tuesday's news: Anti-ICE protests continued in Los Angeles for a fourth night. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ousted all 17 members of a panel that advises the CDC on the safety, efficacy and clinical needs of vaccines. The man at the center of the Supreme Court case that changed gay marriage is worried about equality. 700 Marines are heading to Los Angeles Anti-immigration raid protests continued last night as the Pentagon is set to send hundreds of Marines to support the National Guard in California as state officials say they will sue the Trump administration's decision to "trample over" Gov. Gavin Newsom's authority. The addition of active-duty troops marks a significant escalation. It comes as California officials say they will sue the Trump administration after the president ordered National Guardsmen to Los Angeles without the governor's consent and after the president even suggested Newsom should be arrested. Get more coverage on the situation in Los Angeles with USA TODAY: New Jersey governor's race will signal Democrats next move New Jersey's gubernatorial primary Tuesday is considered one of the best litmus tests for the type of candidate Democrats have an appetite for going forward. There are six Democrats seeking to succeed Gov. Phil Murphy (a fellow Democrat who is term limited). Electability remains an issue in the primary that could hobble progressives with a more aggressive approach, and give more centrist-minded contenders an opening. And many New Jersey Democrats have openly expressed concern in recent reports that their state, which tends to lean blue in presidential elections, might be turning red. Experts have warned how close — and unpredictable — this race will be. More news to know now What's the weather today? Check your local forecast here. RFK Jr. fires entire CDC vaccine advisory panel Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has fired all 17 members of a committee that advises the federal government on vaccine safety and will replace them with new members, a move that the Trump administration's critics warned would create public distrust around the government's role in promoting public health. Kennedy Jr.'s decision marks a reversal from what a key Republican senator said the Trump Cabinet member had promised during his confirmation hearings earlier this year. One medical expert told USA TODAY that Kennedy was "fixing a problem that doesn't exist." Travelers caught off guard as travel ban rules come into effect 'It's scary. It makes me worried. It affects my decisions to go home to visit my family.' ~ Randy Wicaksana, 33, an Indonesian national who has lived in the U.S. for about three years. Wicaksana said he is preparing to return home later this month to renew his visa but is increasingly uncertain about what might await him when he comes to the U.S. again. Today's talkers He was at the center of a Supreme Court case that changed gay marriage. Now, he's worried. When Jim Obergefell was sitting in the gallery at the Supreme Court on June 26, 2015, he was waiting to hear his name. The justices were preparing to rule on Obergefell v. Hodges, a case that became a landmark in the progress toward LGBTQ+ rights in the U.S. The case, which considered the rights of same-sex couples to marry, ultimately won favor with a majority of the justices, but for Obergefell, the moment wasn't, and could never be, totally complete. His husband, John Arthur, died years before the ruling was announced. Now, 10 years on, Obergefell sat down with USA TODAY to reflect on how their love for each other helped shape the fight for marriage equality in the U.S., and what progress there is to still be made in the fight for equality. Photo of the day: Ed soars If you've missed Ed the zebra's escapades this past week, the rogue zoo animal was finally caught and given an aerial trip home. He just wanted to see the world from a different point of view!

Turn ‘anger into action,' says Kentuckian leaving American Medical Association presidency
Turn ‘anger into action,' says Kentuckian leaving American Medical Association presidency

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Turn ‘anger into action,' says Kentuckian leaving American Medical Association presidency

Outgoing American Medical Association (AMA) President Bruce A. Scott, of Louisville, speaks before the House of Delegates, his last time as president. (Screenshot) In his final address as president of the American Medical Association, Kentucky's Dr. Bruce A. Scott called on the medical community to turn its 'anger into action' to protect the medical safety net now under threat in Congress. Scott, an ear, nose and throat specialist from Louisville, closed out his term as president of the AMA by slamming insurance denials and Republican proposals in Congress that he said threaten the future of medicine. 'The same House bill that brings us closer to finally tying future Medicare payment to the rising cost of running our practices also takes a step backwards by limiting access to care for millions of low income Americans,' Scott said. 'Medicare, Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act are literal lifelines for children and families for whom subsidized health coverage is the only real option.' He added: 'We must do all we can to protect the safety net and continue to educate lawmakers on how best to target waste and fraud in a system without making it tougher for vulnerable populations to access care.' In late May, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the controversial spending and tax package, dubbed the 'big, beautiful bill' by President Donald Trump who supports the measure. Many health advocates are warning it will hurt hospitals and patients. The bill, which is now in the hands of the Senate, proposes deep cuts to Medicaid, the federal-state program that pays for almost 1 in 3 Kentuckians' health care. The AMA is working 'to target the Senate as we work for improvements in this bill,' Scott said. He called for more legislative advocacy, saying that 'the times call for some anger' but 'we can channel that anger into positive action.' Among other things, Inside Higher Education reports that the bill could 'entirely reshape the student loan system.' This, Scott said during his farewell address to the AMA House of Delegates Friday in Chicago, complicates the future for an already dwindling physician workforce. The proposed lending practices in the bill would make medical education 'virtually unaffordable for many students,' he said, calling that 'simply unconscionable.' Kentucky has a well-documented physician shortage. The Kentucky Medical Association reports that most counties don't have enough primary care providers. 'Our nation should be working to bring down the cost of medical education, not erecting barriers that defer brilliant young minds from pursuing this noble profession,' he said. Meanwhile, Scott said, 'our patience is being tested by this new administration and Congress.' 'Despite all the efforts of everyone in this room and our colleagues across the country, our health care system is failing in fundamental ways. It's failing physicians and, more importantly, it is failing our patients,' Scott said. 'I'm angry because the dysfunction in health care today goes hand in hand with years of dysfunction in Congress. Physicians are bearing the brunt of a failed Medicare payment system, and while our pay has been cut 33% in 25 years, we see hospitals and even insurance companies receiving annual increases. Congress needs to know that there is no 'care' in Medicare if there are no doctors.' In addition to federal policy, Scott criticized insurance companies that deny doctor-recommended care. He said he recently had a patient with a large tumor pushing into her eye that he needed to remove surgically. Her insurance provider initially denied the procedure, recommending 'an antibiotic and a steroid nasal spray' first. 'Are you kidding me?' Scott said. 'An antibiotic and a nasal spray to treat her tumor? Without seeing the patient, without talking to the patient, without completing even one single semester of medical school, this insurance representative determined that she knew more than the patient's doctor.' Such denials lead to confusion and stress for patients, Scott said, and frustration for doctors that eventually 'become too much to overcome' and force people to leave the profession. This, he said, is 'a system that is undermining our judgment and eroding our patients' trust.' 'What insurance companies are doing to our patients is wrong,' Scott said. 'Stepping between us and our patients is wrong. Denying necessary and even life saving care is just plain wrong.' Scott's term as AMA president ends Tuesday. Michigan's Dr. Bobby Mukkamala was elected as his successor last year. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Trump vs. New England: The animosity is mutual
Trump vs. New England: The animosity is mutual

Boston Globe

time41 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump vs. New England: The animosity is mutual

Write to us at . To subscribe, . TODAY'S STARTING POINT He's hacked away billions in funding for industries that power New England's economy. He's attacked progressive values of diversity and inclusion, directed federal officers to seize immigrants off the street, and punished colleges that won't capitulate to his demands. His administration and other Republicans have even targeted Boston's mayor directly, summoning her to D.C. to testify before Congress mere weeks after giving birth. You could, in short, make the case that President Trump's second-term agenda is deliberately hostile to much of the region. Advertisement Turns out, the animosity is mutual. A strong majority of voters across Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island — roughly 68 percent — disapprove of Trump's job in office so far, while just 29 percent said they approved, according to a That assessment is far from surprising: All three states covered by the Globe survey backed former vice president Kamala Harris in November and are represented by left-leaning politicians in Congress. And while not as stark as today's New England-focused findings, Advertisement Still, our results show just how dimly many New Englanders in these states view Trump as the new administration has singled out key people, industries, and institutions here. Here are three other interesting takeaways from today's poll: Federal funding and personnel cuts are especially hurting folks in the region. David Paleologos, director of Suffolk's Political Research Center, said cuts wrought by the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, appear to be driving distaste for the administration, which he called 'a unique problem to this survey.' About 40 percent of those surveyed said they or someone close to them were affected by DOGE cuts, Paleologos said, perhaps not surprising in a region known for its hospitals, universities, and research centers. While some nationally still approve of Trump's immigration policy, many New Englanders do not. Border security and immigration — issues key to Trump's reelection — have remained Trump's most favorable policy areas nationally. A The view is decidedly different here: The vast majority of respondents said they were at least somewhat sympathetic toward migrants who have come to New England and disapproved of how federal immigration officials have handled arrests and deportations under Trump. More than half opposed deporting those living illegally in the United States. That builds on support Massachusetts voters expressed for immigrants in October in a separate Globe/Suffolk poll focused just on that state. Even in the throes of the state's migrant crisis, a majority said the state should still offer migrants temporary shelter and help them get health care and other assistance. Advertisement Voters aren't unhappy only with Trump. Democrats, for their part, are also unpopular among voters: About 56 percent said they would rate the performance of national Democratic leaders in addressing key issues as 'poor.' But Trump's dismal approval numbers come as voters here are increasingly clamoring for more resistance to his policies. Although the 2026 midterms are about 17 months away, if these surveys are any indication, it's unclear whether 🧩 1 Down: 71° POINTS OF INTEREST Roman Anthony at Fenway Park yesterday. Danielle Parhizkaran/Globe Staff Boston City Hall scandal: Marwa Khudaynazar, a fired City Hall employee, claims Mayor Michelle Wu PR: This year's Boston Marathon raised $50.4 million for nonprofits, Harassment allegation: Alex Cooper, the top-trending podcast host and former Boston University soccer player, accused the former team coach Boston budget: Wu toward housing, youth jobs, and mental health. Welcome to the show: The Red Sox Massachusetts and New England Karen Read retrial: The judge denied the defense's latest motion for a mistrial and ruled that a forensic pathologist wasn't qualified to testify for the defense Gun control: Since a 2010 Supreme Court ruling that made it easier to own a gun, the firearm mortality rate among children First Amendment: The ACLU of Rhode Island accused the Smithfield School District of Trump administration Research cuts: Federal funding for Scholarly solidarity: 24 universities, more than 12,000 Harvard alumni, and 21 state attorneys general filed briefs Strings attached: Williams College More protests: Hundreds of SEIU union members rallied at Boston City Hall to protest the arrest The Nation and the World Sly Stone : The multi-instrument musician, songwriter, vocalist, and producer was behind Sly and the Family Stone's chart-topping, psychedelia-laced funk albums. He died at age 82. ( Dems in disarray: Democratic National Committee members accused David Hogg, the DNC's 25-year-old vice chair, of leaking a recording in which the chair accused him of undermining the party. Hogg denied it. ( Israel-Hamas war: Israel's navy intercepted a boat with Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg on board that tried to deliver aid to Gaza. Israeli officials said they would send the aid to Gaza and that Thunberg refused to watch a 43-minute video of Hamas's Oct. 7, 2023 attack. ( Russia-Ukraine war: Russia launched another record-breaking number of drones and missiles against Ukraine, which said it downed nearly all of them. ( BESIDE THE POINT By Teresa Hanafin 🎓 'Superheroes with capes': Graduates of the region's colleges and universities got 🎵 Fading: What do ✈️ TikTok superstar detained: Advertisement ⚽️ Swanning: The city's new soccer club, Boston Legacy FC, has a new logo, and everybody seems to like it. ( ✍🏼 Best ever! (not): Amazon has finally admitted that its site is rife with fake reviews. Under pressure from a UK regulator, it's promising to crack down. ( 🍦 We all scream: It may be under new ownership, but the iconic 🚀 Air icon: Goodyear is marking the 100th anniversary of the launch of its first branded blimp this week by flying a few of them over land in Ohio where they used to be built. ( 💍 The Big Day: The courtship and eventual wedding of Paul English, founder of Kayak, and businesswoman Rachel Cohen Thanks for reading Starting Point. This newsletter was edited by ❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at ✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can 📬 Delivered Monday through Friday. Anjali Huynh can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store