Latest news with #EvanHouk
Yahoo
16-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Advocates say U.S. House tax cut proposal would kill clean energy investments, jobs
A solar power array. Advocates say projects that help speed the conversion to clean energy, such as solar power, could be stymied by a U.S. House proposal to repeal clean energy tax credits. (Photo by Evan Houk/Maine Morning Star) The tax cut legislation that U.S. House of Representatives Republicans are putting together in Washington includes measures that will cost thousands of jobs in Wisconsin and undercut the state's progress toward cleaner energy, according to environmental and labor advocates. To help pay for the extension of tax cuts enacted in the first Trump administration, the GOP-led House Ways and Means Committee is proposing to repeal clean energy tax credits, Politico reported this week. The tax credits were among the measures enacted in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). 'These credits are not just numbers on a balance sheet out in Washington D.C,' said Emily Pritzkow, executive director of the Wisconsin Building Trades Council, in an online press conference Wednesday. 'They are representing real jobs, real economic growth, and real progress towards Wisconsin's sustainable energy infrastructure. Since the IRA was signed into law in 2022 we have seen an unprecedented boom in clean energy development in the trades.' The press conference was hosted by Forward Together Wisconsin, a nonprofit established to inform people about the Biden administration's infrastructure and climate investments and to defend them. 'We've been seeing this real opportunity to drive energy costs down, and I cannot for the life of me understand why people want to reverse that progress,' said former Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes, president of Forward Together Wisconsin. In addition to the tax credits that the U.S. House proposal would repeal, President Donald Trump in his second term has frozen federal clean energy grants that were part of the 2022 legislation. Those include grants to establish a network of electric vehicle charging stations — prompting a lawsuit by 15 states, including Wisconsin. Solar energy investments that have boomed in the last three years are among those that are threatened by the House proposal, according to advocates. 'At a time when billions of dollars are being invested in states that overwhelmingly voted for President Trump, this proposed legislation will effectively dismantle the most successful industrial onshoring effort in U.S. history,' Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association, said in a statement this week. Since passage of the IRA, Wisconsin has seen $933 million in clean energy and transportation private-sector investments, along with just over $2 billion from federal grants and loans, according to Innovation Policy & Technology, a San Francisco climate change policy think tank. The organization tallied 61 new clean energy and transportation projects that got underway in the state, with 45 manufacturing American-made products. 'Lower investment and higher energy bills due to repealing these federal programs and tax incentives will cost nearly 5,200 Wisconsin jobs in 2030 and more than 6,400 jobs in 2035, compared to current policies,' Innovation Policy & Technology reported. The advocacy group Climate Power has calculated that without the federal support $5.4 billion for 15 planned Wisconsin clean energy projects could be in jeopardy. Of those projects, 12 — 80% — are in five congressional districts represented by Republicans, according to Climate Power. Three representatives of those districts — Bryan Steil in the 1st CD, Scott Fitzgerald in the 5th CD and Glenn Grothman in the 6th CD — voted against the IRA in 2022. The other two, Derrick Van Orden in the 3rd CD and Tony Wied in the 8th CD, weren't in office at the time but publicly opposed the legislation. John Jacobs, business manager of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 494 in Southeast Wisconsin, said the clean energy tax credits and related policies have spurred investment and employment for the union's members. 'I see first-hand how the clean energy tax credits have delivered on their promise, creating good family-sustaining union jobs across Wisconsin,' Jacobs said. 'Repealing these tax credits could be devastating to many, but would put thousands of jobs at risk and hurt a growing industry.' The tax credits were 'an investment in America,' he added. The jobs lost if the credits are repealed 'translate to economic instability for families across our state.' The IRA also included a provision that extends the value of the tax credits to nonprofit organizations and government agencies. Thanks to that benefit, called direct support payment, the Menasha Joint School District in the Fox Valley has qualified for a $4 million reimbursement from the federal government for installing rooftop solar energy and geothermal energy systems in a school currently under construction, said Brian Adesso, the school district's business services director. Once the school is complete the district expects to save $159,000 a year on its electric bill, 'which is cost savings to local taxpayers and money that can be invested back into the students and staff,' Adesso said at the Forward Wisconsin press conference. Adesso said the tax credits gave the district 'certainty' it needed to be willing to undertake the clean energy additions to the project. Killing the credits would make that choice harder for school districts and impose higher costs on local property taxpayers, he added. 'The bill making its way through Congress takes a sledgehammer to the tax credits,' Addesso said — ending some credits early and attaching 'bureaucratic restrictions that could make many of the credits unusable.' Barnes said Forward Wisconsin Together is calling on Congress to protect the clean energy initiatives. 'The people of Wisconsin deserve better,' he said. 'The country deserves better. Clean energy as we know is the future, and we have to continue to invest in it.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
11-04-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
List of proposals to reform Maine's clean energy program continues to grow
Solar panels in Damariscotta, Maine. (Photo by Evan Houk/ Maine Morning Star) The efforts to modify Maine's solar energy incentive program continued Thursday as lawmakers introduced two more proposals to rework net energy billing. The Legislature's Energy, Utilities and Technology Committee held a public hearing Thursday afternoon on the bills that as packed as the late February hearing on several proposals to tweak or toss net energy billing. Rather than scrap it altogether, the latest round of hearings focused on more ideas to amend the program by placing more limitations on new and existing projects and lowering the compensation rate. Net energy billing is a utility program designed to encourage customers to develop or participate in small-scale renewable energy projects like solar panels by offering credits to offset their electricity bills. The program's supporters see it as a tool to transition the state to clean energy that has been a scapegoat for rising energy costs. But critics argue that it's already achieved the desired environmental goals and is now just a flawed system driving up bills. There are two programs within net energy billing. First is the kilowatt hour program, which is open to all customers and provides kilowatt hour credits on participating customers' bills if they install renewable energy generators such as solar panels or join a community solar project, where customers receive a portion of a solar farm's credits. The credits expire after 12 months. The tariff rate program for nonresidential customers provides dollar credits for those who use their own projects or share in someone else's. The Public Utilities Commission sets an annual rate for the credits, which also expire after 12 months, depending on the customer's size and utility provider. With LD 1317, Sen. Rick Bennett (R-Oxford) wants to adjust the tariff rate over the next few years to eventually reach 12 cents per kilowatt-hour in 2028. Many believe Maine's net energy billing needs reform, but diverge on whether to tweak or toss Solar companies, including ReVision Energy, said that while they appreciated the attempt at a compromise, the 12 cent rate would not be sufficient. In response to Bennett saying that he landed on that amount so solar developers could still make a profit, albeit not as fast, industry representatives said that it isn't workable for projects designed with a higher compensation rate in mind. Though the rate adjustment would apply retroactively, Bennett said he tried to strike a balance with his bill to reduce costs for ratepayers without changing other rules for people who have already entered into contracts. Rep. Steven Foster (R-Dexter) proposed going further to limit the growth of net energy billing costs by reducing qualifying project size and adding termination dates with LD 1321. The bill would not only reduce the capacity of projects to 60 kilowatts from 1 megawatts, but it would also limit compensation, increase transmission costs for net energy bill participants and restrict how long someone may participate in the program to either 20 years or until Dec. 31, 2045 — whichever is sooner. Individuals who work in community solar opposed the bill, fearing it would threaten the viability of an industry they have seen bring down costs for ratepayers and create jobs for Mainers. They argued that the proposed sunset and size limits could have a chilling effect on investments in these projects that have contributed to local economies and helped reduce greenhouse gas emissions. 'Broad retroactive modifications to the core mechanisms in determining compensation under the program as these bills propose and others will have a dramatic effect on 16,000 projects in the state, more than 114,000 customers,' said Caroline Colan, legislative liaison for the Governor's Energy Office, testifying against the bills. The Maine State Chamber of Commerce supports Foster's proposal because it addresses 'concerns in a way that balances cost predictability with program flexibility,' said Government Relations Specialist Ashley Luszczki. However, she suggested a successor program that would still encourage solar development projects between 60 kilowatts and 1 megawatt. The Maine Wild Blueberry Commission was similarly supportive of LD 1321, seeing it as a means to reduce skyrocketing energy costs that they said have hit the profits of farms and other Maine businesses in recent years. However, because half of all electricity used in New England is generated using natural gas, that market is the primary driver of energy prices, according to the Governor's Energy Office. The Public Utilities Commission and the Office of Public Advocate testified neither for nor against the proposals heard Thursday. Like the two bills heard Thursday, the other proposals related to net energy billing were introduced by Republicans, who have largely opposed the program since the tenure of former Republican Gov. Paul LePage, who vetoed several legislative efforts to incentivize the proliferation of cleaner energy. Net energy billing, or Maine's version of net metering, was expanded in 2019 under Gov. Janet Mills so that customers can use renewable generators located outside of their property but within the same utility service territory, such as a community solar project. Legislation passed two years later added a goal of 750 megawatts of distributed generation through net energy billing.
Yahoo
07-03-2025
- Automotive
- Yahoo
Effort to replenish Maine's depleted EV incentive program could also reduce electricity costs
An electric vehicle charging station in Damariscotta, Maine. (Evan Houk/Maine Morning Star) Despite wanting 150,000 light-duty electric vehicles on Maine roads by the start of the next decade, the state ran out of funding for a key incentive program last year. However, a bill introduced Thursday could help fill that gap. The Legislature's Energy, Utilities and Technology held a public hearing for LD 585, which would amend language in the Efficiency Maine Trust Act to allow more flexibility in using certain program funds that are currently only used for subsidizing heat pumps. The bill would remove those limitations so certain revenue, known as forward capacity market funds, could be used for electric vehicles as well. This change, as well as other language updates proposed in the bill, could, in turn, reduce electricity costs for ratepayers, said Sen. Henry Ingwersen (D-York), the bill sponsor. The additional load from electric vehicles dilutes the rates utility companies must charge to maintain and operate the grid, which helps reduce costs for all ratepayers, Ingwersen explained. While Efficiency Maine has a variety of funding mechanisms for heat pump incentives, there aren't other revenue streams for the now-exhausted electric vehicle rebate program, said Executive Director Michael Stoddard. In mid-November, Efficiency Maine had to stop issuing EV rebates — except for those designated for low-income customers — because it exhausted the $13.5 million provided for the program when it launched in 2019. Efficiency Maine's EV rebate program offered up to $2,000 for the purchase of a new battery electric vehicle or plug-in hybrid to Mainers of any income. The rebate amount increased to $7,500 for low-income consumers and included an option to get some money back for purchasing a used hybrid or electric vehicle. Efficiency Maine originally forecasted its funding for EV rebates would last through this coming June, but Stoddard previously told Maine Morning Star that demand accelerated more than expected in the second half of last year. Stoddard shared this unexpected ramp up with the committee Thursday when they raised questions about future demand for electric vehicles. Although there was high demand last year, Stoddard reminded the committee that the language in the bill would still allow the trust to use the money on heat pumps if EV demand were to fall off. 'It gives us some discretion to move around and adjust to the market,' Stoddard said, noting that demand for heat pumps remains high. Gov. Janet Mills has encouraged the transition to heat pumps, setting a goal in 2019 of installing 100,000 by 2025. That goal was met in 2023, so the governor set a new target of another 175,000 heat pump installations by 2027. The Governor's Energy Office testified in support of the bill, seeing it as a tool to aid in an affordable energy transition. Public Advocate Heather Sanborn also supported the bill for its potential to reduce costs for customers. '[Efficiency Maine] has a track record of demonstrably driving down rates for all ratepayers,' Sanborn said. 'We think their efforts should continue.' Environmental advocates also spoke in favor of the bill for its potential to encourage more Mainers to make the switch to EVs. Given that transportation is responsible for nearly half of the state's carbon emissions, the state's climate action plan calls for the adoption of electric and hybrid vehicles to combat climate change. One member of the public spoke in opposition to the bill. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
27-02-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Many believe Maine's net energy billing needs reform, but diverge on whether to tweak or toss
Solar panels in Damariscotta, Maine. (Photo by Evan Houk/ Maine Morning Star) When Maine's solar energy incentive program was expanded in 2019, former state legislator Jeffery Hanley was at the table during those discussions. 'It was, in my eyes, a disaster then, and it's a disaster now,' he told the current members of the Energy, Utilities and Technology Committee during a public hearing Thursday. Hanley attended the hearing to speak in favor of a series of bills introduced by his fellow Republicans to repeal the state's net energy billing program. The committee heard four such proposals with the stated goal of reducing energy costs for ratepayers. The bills drew hours of testimony from people who want to see the program tossed in the bin and those who believe it works but agree it could be improved. Net energy billing is a utility program designed to encourage customers to install or participate in small-scale renewable energy projects like solar panels by offering credits to offset their electricity bills. It was expanded in 2019 so customers can use renewable energy generators located outside of their property but within the same utility service territory, such as a community solar project. That expansion, in particular, has come under fire for providing generous incentives to solar farm developers that utility customers are helping pay for. The legislators seeking to repeal the program argue it is driving up costs for ratepayers, especially small businesses and low-income households who can't afford to get solar panels. Opponents of the bills also want to lower energy costs, but many said that simply getting rid of net energy billing won't fix the problem and could create an issue for those who have transitioned to renewable energy because of the program. McCrum, a 15,000 acre potato farm and processing facility in Aroostook County, is paying $57,000 a month in public policy charges, according to an electric bill Senate Minority Leader Trey Stewart (R-Aroostook) shared with the committee while presenting LD 257. While Stewart specifically linked that charge to net energy billing, a representative from Versant Power told the committee he would get back to them with more information about what is included in that fee. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Legislators meant well when they enacted the net energy billing program; however, it grew too large, too fast and has now become a 'job-killing solar tax,' said Sen. Stacey Guerin (R-Penobscot) when presenting her bill, LD 32. She said she has heard stories from her constituents who have had to close their businesses over mounting energy costs, which she also attributed largely to increased net energy billing costs. However, the Natural Resources Council of Maine and others who testified at the hearing pointed out that volatile natural gas prices due to international events and other market factors have driven up energy costs in recent years. Hanley argued that while it isn't 'all due to the solar issue…it certainly is a component.' And for those like himself who live on a fixed income and have seen their power bill more than double from four years ago, 'This is just salt in the wound.' The most recent analysis from the Office of the Public Advocate estimates the annual ratepayer cost of operational net energy billing projects to be more than $240 million, which is higher than expected, said Public Advocate Heather Sanborn at the hearing. Committee members said that number is higher than what they had recently been told, but Sanborn said her number includes a slew of projects that came online at the end of December. While some ratepayers' bills have increased, net energy billing has also helped launch a successful solar industry in Maine and stabilize rates for the schools, grocery stores, municipal governments and other customers who have participated in the program, said Caroline Colan from the Governor's Energy Office. Ending the program raises questions about what would happen to participants, which isn't addressed in the bills, Colan added. The agency is open to modifying the program, but as written, the bills to repeal the program are 'irresponsibly blunt.' Legislature to again weigh whether clean energy credits are helping or harming Maine ratepayers The Thursday hearing also included LD 450, which has nearly identical language to the bills proposed by Guerin and Stewart, and LD 515, which seeks more specifically to undo the 2019 expansion of the program. Though she has concerns about how the program affects ratepayers, Sanborn testified neither for nor against the bill, echoing the need to modernize rather than completely scrap the program. With more than 100,000 participating ratepayers, Sanborn said she can't support bills that would erase the program without a 'legislative solution' for what would come next. Instead of the blanket approach proposed in the bills, Maine State Chamber of Commerce President Patrick Woodcock, who spoke neither for nor against the bills, offered a series of suggestions to improve the current program, including a ceiling on credits, adjusting compensation rates based on the size of the project and more utilization of energy storage, among other considerations. Though a renewable energy compensation program is not unique to Maine, Woodcock said the rates provided to large projects are more generous in comparison. Guerin touched on this during her testimony, saying that out-of-state developers have benefited by utilizing the tariff rate program, which offers a dollar credit to nonresidential customers. In 2023, legislators passed some reforms to address those criticisms. Sen. Bruce Bickford (R-Androscoggin) said he overpaid for a 9.5-acre parcel of land, but he has solar companies offering him nearly three times what he paid for the land. 'There's a lot of land in the state that is overvalued due to solar,' he told the committee when presenting his proposal, LD 359, which would change how participants are credited for the energy they produce. More specifically, it seeks to cut out the compensation given for transmission and distribution. Bickford said his bill would ensure that net energy billing remains fair, focused and beneficial to individual customers and argued it would prevent large-scale investors from dominating the resources. Though he said the bill would not penalize existing contracts, environmental advocates testified against the bill arguing that it could hurt current participants. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
06-02-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Legislature to again weigh whether clean energy subsidies are helping or harming Maine ratepayers
Solar panels in Damariscotta, Maine. (Photo by Evan Houk/ Maine Morning Star) Republican lawmakers are seeking once again to repeal a utility program that they say is not only unnecessary for achieving climate goals, but is contributing to higher energy costs for Mainers. 'It seems that if we are trying to save the environment, which seems to be my colleagues' on the other side of the aisle's argument, there are better ways to do it,' said Senate Minority Leader Trey Stewart (R-Aroostook) at a press conference Tuesday. Stewart was referring to net energy billing, a utility program designed to encourage customers to develop or participate in small-scale renewable energy projects like solar panels by offering credits to offset their electricity bills. The program's supporters see it as a tool to transition the state to clean energy that has been a scapegoat for rising energy costs. But critics argue that it's already achieved the desired environmental goals and is now just a flawed system driving up bills. In 2023, Gov. Janet Mills set a goal for Maine to reach 100% clean electricity by 2040. While that largely hinges on the state's ability to develop offshore wind in the Gulf of Maine, a recent report from the Governor's Energy Office showed that most of Maine's clean electricity needs in 2040 can be met with the state's current and planned renewable energy resources. This includes the roughly 800 megawatts of solar, hydropower and wind generated through net energy billing projects. Net energy billing has been modified multiple times since the program expanded in 2019, but the pros and cons are set to be weighed once again by the Legislature's Energy, Utilities and Technology Committee. A public hearing on two proposals to repeal net energy billing was slated for Thursday but postponed due to inclement weather. The cost of solar: rate increases, political feuds and the long-term outlook Stewart sponsored one of the bills, LD 257, while Sen. Stacey Guerin (R-Penobscot) put forth LD 32. Both seek to repeal the laws giving the Public Utilities Commission the authority to establish a net energy billing program, as well as certain related tax exemptions. It also prohibits the commission from adopting rules that would require a utility company to allow customers to participate in net energy billing. Proponents of net energy billing often highlight how the program has led to more rooftop solar and other small scale projects while its benefits and their associated savings aren't spelled out on people's power bills. However, the bills' sponsors and many of their Republican colleagues say it has only shifted costs to low-income households and driven up energy prices, even claiming it has forced businesses to close. Republicans have also said Democrats are to blame for utility rate increases, arguing that the law passed by their party's majority leaves ratepayers subsidizing the clean energy transition. But there are other factors driving up electricity prices. customers have also been picking up the tab for power restoration efforts after extreme weather events and the spike in natural gas prices from global events such as Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Information from the Governor's Energy Office underscored the role natural gas plays in the recent volatility of electricity prices. Since half of all electricity used in New England is generated using natural gas, it is the primary driver of the market price, according to the office. Net energy billing, or Maine's version of net metering, had been the target of former Republican Gov. Paul LePage, who vetoed several legislative efforts to incentivize the proliferation of cleaner energy. It was expanded in 2019 under Mills so that customers can use renewable generators located outside of their property but within the same utility service territory, such as a community solar project. Legislation passed two years later added a goal of 750 megawatts of distributed generation through net energy billing. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX There are two programs within net energy billing. First is the kilowatt hour program, which is open to all customers and provides kilowatt hour credits on a participating customers' bill if they install renewable energy generators such as solar panels on their house or join a community solar project, where customers sign up with the owner of the solar farm to receive a portion of the credits. The credits expire after 12 months. The tariff rate program for nonresidential customers provides dollar credits for those who use their own projects or share in someone else's. The Public Utilities Commission sets an annual rate for the credits, which also expire after 12 months, depending on the customer's size and utility provider. Lindsay Bourgoine, director of policy and government affairs for Revision Energy, explained that the system provides a mechanism to compensate those who generate their own energy, which gets fed back into the grid. In a presentation to the energy committee last month, the Public Utilities Commission shared that the net energy billing program has about $130 million in costs, but $160 million in direct or non-monetized benefits. Net energy billing projects sometimes pay for grid upgrades or help reduce the load on the grid during peak hours, which can help avoid costs for other customers. During the Tuesday press conference, Guerin argued that net energy billing, sometimes referred to as NEB, shifts the cost of developing renewable energy sources onto the customers who don't even use it. 'The cost increases with NEB disproportionately hurt low-income households who can't afford solar panels,' Guerin said, speaking to the fact that the funds for the credits comes from payments made by other utility customers. 'They are subsidizing the cost of wealthier homeowners while paying the sixth highest rates in the nation.' A report from the citizen-led Electric Ratepayer Advisory Council at the end of last year showed that about 100,000 households in the state are struggling to pay their energy bills with electricity rates in Maine twice the national average. Additionally, Stewart said that if the goal of the program was to incentivize solar, Maine has done that, so it doesn't 'need to pay for this failed program year after year.' The two branches of the net energy billing program have more than 110,000 participants and have created nearly 1,200 megawatts in total operational capacity, which is enough to power more than 200,000 homes, according to a recent presentation by the Public Utilities Commission to the energy committee. A cost and benefit analysis commissioned by the PUC released in April 2023 showed that net energy billing could cost Maine ratepayers $220 million per year starting in 2025. However, that same report also found that the economic benefits of net energy billing solar outweigh the costs of the program. Specifically, the analysis found that for every dollar spent on the program, ratepayers received $1.29 in benefits. Net energy billing accounts for 4% or roughly $7 of a person's energy bill, according to testimony submitted by the Natural Resources Council of Maine in opposition to the bills. And while the program's costs are part of a line item on a household's power bill, the benefits aren't, said Jack Shapiro, climate and clean energy director for the NRCM. Those benefits could include more clean energy, reduced demand for fossil fuels, less reliance on the regional grid and other downstream savings. Stewart said there is a right way and a wrong way to do renewable energy and Maine happens to have 'the worst model in the country for how to do renewables.' Instead, he would like the state to explore other options that he said wouldn't impact ratepayers as directly. Specifically, he'd like to see the Public Utilities Commission leverage more competitive bidding to bring down costs. Also, rather than prioritize solar and wind development, Stewart said hydro and nuclear power could be better options because they have more opportunity for competitive rates. Per the current net energy billing statute, the Public Utilities Commission annually establishes the rates that determine how much of a credit a customer receives under the tariff rate program. However, Shapiro said the proposed legislation doesn't take into account the ramifications of repealing net energy billing for the other 110,000-plus participants who use it, including schools that invested in installing large solar arrays. He argues that repealing the program won't have the cost-saving benefits Republicans say it will. If net energy billing were to be repealed, he said, the question becomes, 'What comes next?' Bourgoine with Revision Energy said if the program were eliminated those customers 'would overnight be left without a way to be fairly compensated for the energy they produce.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
