Latest news with #FinancialServicesandMarketsAct
Time of India
a day ago
- Business
- Time of India
Singapore HC axes WazirX restructure plan after $235-million cyber heist
In a big blow to crypto exchange WazirX, the Singapore High Court , on Wednesday, dismissed its restructuring plan submitted by Zettai Pte Ltd in November 2024, after the platform suffered a $235 million cyber theft in July last year. Sources privy to Wednesday's hearing told ET, the Singapore court observed that WazirX-operating entity Zettai Pte Ltd was not registered in India and hence the restructuring Scheme shall not be valid. The plan, proposed by Zettai, was placed before the court as part of an insolvency process after WazirX , once the largest Indian cryptocurrency exchange, lost $235 million or nearly half of its crypto reserves in a cyber theft by North Korea-based hackers in July 2024. Later in November, it proposed a rebalancing scheme which aimed to return 52% of total creditor claims through remaining liquid assets ($284 million). Though the proposal had received investors' vote, it required court sanction to take effect. ETtech However, on Wednesday, the Court quashed the plea on grounds that the scheme is not valid in India where Zettai does not operate as a registered reviewed the documents Zettai has filed in response to queries from the Singapore court. WazirX confirmed the development and said that it will appeal against the court's decision. "Our primary focus remains to begin distributions as soon as are currently evaluating all available legal options in consultation with our legal and advisory teams, and will be appealing against the decision of the Singapore High Court," it said in a statement. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories WazirX did not respond to ET's detailed query on the matter. Zettai, the Singapore-based company, is not registered with the Financial Intelligence Unit-India (FIU-IND), the financial crime watchdog that mandates reporting obligations for crypto platforms. Instead, WazirX operates in India under a separate entity, Zanmai Labs . This dismissal comes despite, former Supreme Court judge BN Srikrishna , stating his independent opinion in the matter that Indian laws do not licence or regulate crypto platforms operating in India and hence, do not hinder the plan to proceed. Interestingly, the company had registered in Panama three months ago, Zensui, where it was expected to transfer the crypto assets. This comes after the latest mandate that allows only licensed entities to distribute cryptocurrencies in the region through the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSM), which will come into effect on June 30, 2025.
Arabian Post
4 days ago
- Business
- Arabian Post
Singapore Enforces Overseas Crypto Service Ban for Unlicensed Firms
The Monetary Authority of Singapore has mandated that all locally based digital token service providers without a valid license must cease offering services to overseas clients by 30 June 2025. This directive, issued without a transitional grace period, underscores Singapore's commitment to aligning with global anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing standards. Under the Financial Services and Markets Act , entities operating from Singapore and providing digital token services abroad are required to obtain a DTSP license. This regulation applies to both individuals and corporations, regardless of whether they are already licensed under the Payment Services Act or the Securities and Futures Act . The MAS has clarified that exemptions are limited, primarily for technical service providers that do not handle client funds or digital tokens. The licensing process is stringent, with the MAS indicating approvals will be granted only in exceptional cases. Applicants must demonstrate a sound business model and provide valid reasons for operating from Singapore while serving overseas markets. Minimum requirements include a base capital of SGD 250,000 for companies and partnerships, or a cash deposit of the same amount for individuals. Additionally, firms must have at least one local resident director or partner and maintain a physical office in Singapore with staff present for a minimum of 10 days per month. ADVERTISEMENT Licensed DTSPs are subject to ongoing regulatory obligations, including comprehensive AML/CFT measures such as customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, and compliance with value transfer requirements. They must also adhere to standards for technology risk management, cyber hygiene, and business continuity planning. Regular submission of regulatory returns and clear disclosure of risk warnings to customers are mandatory. The MAS has emphasized that there will be no transitional arrangements for firms currently operating without a license. Entities must halt all overseas digital token services immediately unless they secure the necessary authorization. Failure to comply will result in regulatory penalties. This move by the MAS reflects a broader effort to prevent regulatory arbitrage and ensure that digital asset service providers operating from Singapore adhere to international standards. By enforcing strict licensing requirements and eliminating transitional leniency, Singapore aims to bolster its reputation as a secure and compliant hub for digital financial services.
The Guardian
27-02-2025
- Business
- The Guardian
‘We have to protect people': Martin Lewis on his fight to stop money worries worsening mental health
'I'm not a case study', says the money expert and broadcaster Martin Lewis, politely but firmly batting away questions about his own mental health. 'I'm not being rude to you in any way. All I want to do is let people know that like many people, I have brittle mental health, and I have experienced my dark days, but I don't see the need to make that public.' Lewis's career has been built on talking fluently and precisely but when it comes to mental health issues perhaps actions speak louder than words. The 52-year-old, who became fabulously rich in 2012 when he sold his website for a reported £87m, founded his charity, the Money and Mental Health Policy Institute, nine years ago. Of his motivation, he has spoken of his growing realisation of the 'marriage from hell' that is the combination of money problems and mental health issues. It is also known that Lewis lost his mother in a road accident two days before his 12th birthday. It made him reclusive as a teenager. On receiving his windfall from the website sale, Lewis put £9m into a fund for charitable giving. 'We have to protect people,' he says. 'We have to protect people who can't protect themselves, and we sometimes have to protect people from themselves within the mental health world.' Thanks to smart investments, the fund has enabled £12.5m in charitable donations so far, of which £4.7m has gone to the Money and Mental Health Policy Institute, and it still has £8m in its coffers. Lewis's charity has chalked up some significant policy wins in its time, including changes to rules that forced lenders to send distressing letters to people in problem debt, and the introduction of a training module for all health professionals on the links between money and mental health problems. On Thursday it received a long-desired endorsement, a 'very, very powerful Kitemark', with the announcement that it will join a handful of consumer bodies with 'super complainant' status under the Enterprise Act. A similar status is expected in relation to the Financial Services and Markets Act, widening the scope for potential activism. It may sound technical and bureaucratic, but that is the world in which Lewis works so effectively. The status gives the charity the power to raise official complaints against regulators on behalf of a group of consumers, to which they and the government must respond. It is an opportunity to tackle systemic issues that Lewis will no doubt seize. He is a inveterate doer and explains his plans while catching up with his 25,000-a-day steps target in a walk around Westfield shopping centre in White City, west London, after filming for ITV's The Martin Lewis Money Show. 'I didn't quite make it last year – I did 24,700, average. So I need to sort myself out,' he says. A first target could be the insurance industry. The charity has a 'lived experience' group of 3,000 people who provide insights into the problems people with mental health issues are facing, and the disproportionate premiums being paid for travel policies is flashing red on the dashboard. The testimony seen by the charity suggests, he says, that someone with severe depression is being charged an average of three times more than someone with no medical conditions. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'This jumps to an average of 11 times more for some for someone with severe bipolar, with some people with this condition having to pay prices at 27 times more than a person with no medical conditions,' Lewis adds. 'The problem: is that justified?' It is an opportune moment for the charity, headed by its chief executive, Helen Undy, to join the top tier of consumer bodies. The Labour government has put economic growth at the top of its to-do list, and regulators, including the Financial Conduct Authority (to the initial concern of its chief executive, Nikhil Rathi), have been told to establish it as an official objective. There is concern that the FCA's consumer duty, under which banks and other financial institutions must set higher and clearer standards of protection for customers, could be rolled back in the name of deregulation and red-tape slashing. 'Of course, I have concerns about the deregulation push,' Lewis says. 'That doesn't mean I'm necessarily opposed to it, as long as it is done sensibly … I think we have to be very careful about unintended consequences of a lack of consumer protection by pushing for growth while businesses go for short-term profit. 'There are many things that are done out there where actually businesses look at it in the short term [such as] threatening people to pay with debt letters. Hugely counterproductive. All it does is catastrophise people's finances, retrench them. They stop earning income, and you tend to collect less money. Signposting them to health [support] is better than threatening them.' Lewis is equally withering about the manner in which the government scrapped the universal winter fuel payment for pensioners who did not receive means-tested benefits, which he said seemed to have been intended to send a signal to the markets about Labour's credibility. 'A poor decision, a bad policy,' he says. 'If we are going to do this [go for growth], we need to do this cleverly, and there needs to be a little bit of listening, not just to business, but also to those people who look at what's going on for consumers. 'My worry is that if we give free rein to some of the instincts that are out there, I think it could be detrimental', he adds. 'Having said that, I do accept the need to push the growth, so I'm waiting to see the balance.' It will be comforting to many that Lewis is there to keep an eye on the scales.
