Latest news with #FourthandFourteenthAmendment
Newsweek
3 days ago
- Politics
- Newsweek
Peanut the Squirrel's Owners Seek $10M Over Death of 'Irreplaceable' Animal
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The owners of P'Nut the Squirrel and a raccoon named Fred are suing the State of New York for $10 million in damages after the animals were euthanized last year. Mark Longo and Daniela Bittner filed the lawsuit on Thursday in the New York Court of Claims, alleging constitutional violations and wrongful killing of their animals by state officials. The lawsuit names the state, the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), and the Department of Health (DOH) as defendants. Newsweek contacted Longo's Attorney Nora Constance Marino, the DEC, DOH and the State of New York for comment by email. Why It Matters The lawsuit alleges that the seizure and killing of P'Nut and Fred were not only a violation of New York's wildlife laws, but also an infringement of the owners' Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Whether such laws even apply is debatable—the plaintiffs maintain neither P'Nut nor Fred were "wild animals" under the law, but rather "companion animals." If successful, the case could set precedent for how far state agencies can go in enforcing wildlife regulations, particularly when animals are domesticated and kept in private homes. The incident unfolded just before the 2024 presidential election, sparking widespread online outrage, and even bomb threats against officials. It became a rallying point for critics of government overreach, drawing attention from public figures such as Elon Musk and Joe Rogan. P'Nut the squirrel with Mark Longo. P'Nut the squirrel with Mark Longo. @peanut_the_squirrel12 /Instagram What To Know Longo and Bittner describe P'Nut's personality and abilities as unique and irreplaceable. Fred's personality and abilities, while still developing, were showing signs he too would be unique and irreplaceable—though they intended to release him back into the wild. The animals were both kept inside their home. New York law prohibits keeping squirrels and raccoons as pets because they are classified as wild animals. Many of P'Nut's fans knew about the couple's sanctuary because of his social media presence, and many donated because of his stardom. P'Nut's likeness, antics, and image were used for promotion, endorsements, sponsorships, and marketing by way of plaintiff D&M, including on Cameo and OnlyFans. Fred was beginning to build his own online following. The couple are seeking compensatory and punitive damages, along with legal fees and costs, claiming "severe emotional distress, humiliation, and damage to reputation." According to the lawsuit, a group of DEC and DOH agents, along with other law enforcement officers, arrived at the couple's Pine City property on October 30, 2024, to execute a search warrant. Both animals were seized during the raid and later killed by state officials. DEC officials said that P'Nut bit an agent through thick leather gloves during the raid, prompting both animals to be euthanized and decapitated for rabies testing. The state has since confirmed the tests were negative. The complaint alleges the killings were "not due to a fear of rabies," but were a "senseless act of violence" and "obscene demonstration of government abuse." The plaintiffs claim they were "unlawfully detained without probable cause and subjected to an unreasonable search and seizure," and that "despite having no evidence of criminal activity, Defendants proceeded to arrest Plaintiffs and initiate baseless charges." The suit also alleges that the seizure exceeded the scope of the warrant and that requests for the animals' remains have gone unanswered. "Defendants have engaged in a pattern of conduct that has deprived Plaintiffs of their constitutional rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments," the complaint states. It adds: "The acts and omissions of the Defendants were intentional, malicious, and taken with reckless disregard for the rights of the Plaintiffs." The filing follows an earlier lawsuit in Chemung County Supreme Court targeting local and state officials over the same incident. What People Are Saying Longo told the New York Post: "This is our opportunity to make change and seek justice for P'Nut and Fred." Marino, Longo's attorney, told the newspaper: "I hope justice is done, not just for my clients, but for our civil rights, P'Nut and Fred, and all animals." The October raid and subsequent animal killings drew national attention in the final days before the presidential election. Then Republican vice-presidential nominee JD Vance said at a rally in November: "Don is fired up about P'Nut the squirrel." Donald Trump Jr. said at a rally: "Justice for Peanut! Our government will let in 16,000 rapists, they will let in 13,000 murderers, they will let in 600,000 criminals across our border, but if someone has a pet squirrel without a permit, they will go in there and kill the squirrel." Elon Musk wrote on X: "Government overreach kidnapped an orphan squirrel and executed him." What Happens Next No trial date has been set in either the Court of Claims case, or the related Chemung County action.
CBS News
13-02-2025
- CBS News
Marvin Haynes files wrongful conviction lawsuit after spending nearly 20 years in prison for murder he did not commit
MINNEAPOLIS — A wrongful conviction lawsuit has been filed on behalf of Marvin Haynes, a man released from prison in 2023 after spending almost two decades behind bars for a murder he did not commit. Haynes was sentenced to life in prison when he was 17 for the murder of flower shop employee Randy Sherer. He always maintained his innocence, and no physical evidence tied him to the crime. A judge overturned his conviction in December of 2023. The lawsuit filed by the national civil rights law firm Neufeld Scheck Brustin Hoffmann & Freidenberger, LLP seeks damages for the 19.5 years Haynes spent in prison. The complaint named the City of Minneapolis and five police officers within the homicide department. It claims the officers used suggestion and coercion to fabricate a case against Haynes while "ignoring clear evidence that he had no connection to or knowledge of the crime." "The Minneapolis Police Department officers who framed Mr. Haynes and the Department that allowed this injustice need to answer for their actions," Emma Freudenberger, a partner with NSBHF, said. The lawsuit claims Haynes' Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated. When WCCO asked for a statement on the lawsuit, a Minneapolis city spokesperson said "the city has no comment." Last November, Haynes filed a compensation claim with the Minnesota Supreme Court seeking nearly $2 million in damages. Haynes' sister Marvina fought for years to clear his name, and in 2021 the Great North Innocence Project took his case. The original murder case for Sherer has not been solved.
