Latest news with #HealeyAdministration
Yahoo
08-08-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
As EPA cut grants for solar, Gov. Healey urged they remain: ‘Affordability isn't controversial'
Editor's note: This story has been updated to state the Environmental Protection Agency moved to cancel the Solar for All program Thursday afternoon. The Healey administration and the state's U.S. senators urged the Environmental Protection Agency Thursday morning not to cancel a $7 billion grant program intended to place solar with low income households across the nation. It was for naught. EPA administrator Lee Zeldin announced on social media Thursday afternoon the administration was ending the program because the passage of the budget reconciliation bill in July eliminated its authority to run the program. 'The bottom line is this: EPA no longer has the statutory authority to administer the program or the appropriated funds to keep this boondoggle alive,' Zeldin wrote. Massachusetts was set to receive $156 million under the EPA's Solar for All program, a program that would provide zero-interest loans, solar panels at public housing and fund workforce training, all with focus on historically underserved communities. Solar for All, which the Biden administration announced last year as part of the Inflation Reduction Act, was scheduled to begin operating in Massachusetts in a few weeks, the Healey administration said. Ahead of the announced cuts, Healey's office said the funding was set to create 3,000 jobs and provide energy-bill-lowering solar for more than 29,000 households in the state. Further, it said the move would be illegal. 'Solar is the fastest and cheapest way to bring affordable energy into Massachusetts,' Healey said in a statement Thursday morning. 'Affordability isn't controversial – that's why states like Texas and Florida are building so much solar. And that's why my administration has been working hard to deliver more affordable solar to our residents and businesses through new incentives and programs like Solar for All." The EPA press office said Thursday morning the agency had not yet made a decision about the grant. Rather, it said because of the passage of the budget reconciliation bill, it was evaluating how to fully implement Congress' intent. U.S. Sen. Ed Markey, a Democrat, said states with Republican senators and governors are slated to receive $4.6 billion through the Solar for All program. 'The Solar for All program means lower electric bills for all,' Markey said in a statement. 'Any attempts to terminate these legally binding contracts would be an attack on American households, who are already facing skyrocketing energy costs and begging for relief, not political retribution.' Healey's office said the program would boost the state's solar capacity by 125 megawatts and touted the effect solar generation already has on the state. On April 20, solar arrays supplied 55% of electricity across the grid in New England, Healey's office said. It said local solar relieves stress on the grid's transmission and distribution infrastructure. U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat, said in a statement that she fought for the funding, adding that 'canceling it would be reckless and further proof that the Trump administration doesn't care about lowering costs.' A Massachusetts household that switches to solar saves about $2,400 a year, but low-income residents have typically not seen those savings. Low-income residents use the state's main solar incentive program at a rate of 6%, according to an overview of the Solar for All program published by the state. Massachusetts' program would place solar arrays at public housing authorities, for instance, as long as the installation delivered at least 20% in savings to tenants. Its funding would also go towards creating community solar projects. The Solar for All program aimed to facilitate no-interest loans with local banks and credit unions and offer technical assistance to place solar on homes where residents have an income under 80% of the area median income, the overview said. About 60 states, nonprofits and tribes received funds as part of Solar for All. Altogether, the funding was set to connect solar with 900,000 households across the nation, according to the Biden administration. One nonprofit based in Hartford, Connecticut, received almost $250 million to work with rural communities across 46 states, including Massachusetts, according to the EPA. Inclusive Prosperity Capital announced on Earth Day 2024 that the EPA awarded it part of the Solar for All funds. The CEO of Inclusive Prosperity Capital, Kerry O'Neill, said in a statement at the time that the nonprofit would use the funds with a coalition 'to build a movement of community-based solar developers who are committed to providing significant benefits to low-income and disadvantaged communities.' The nonprofit did not immediately provide comment when asked about its work in Massachusetts. more news from Western Massachusetts After another record year at the MassMutual Center, Springfield's convention promoters look forward to more visitors Holyoke DPW workers: City's contract demands slowing negotiations The no-go zone: Why are there no bathrooms at I-91 rest areas? Religion Notes: Aug. 7, 2025 Demolition to begin at vacant Mary Lane Hospital campus in Ware Read the original article on MassLive. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
07-06-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Judge turns back challenge to MBTA housing law
BOSTON (SHNS) – A Superior Court judge on Friday tossed a lawsuit brought by nine municipalities challenging the MBTA Communities Act, ruling that the controversial zoning-reform law is not an unfunded mandate. Plymouth Superior Court Justice Mark Gildea granted the Healey administration's motion to dismiss the latest challenges to the 2021 law, which supporters see as a key tool to spur development of much-needed housing in more than 170 eastern Massachusetts cities and towns. Marshfield, Middleton, Hanson, Holden, Hamilton, Duxbury, Wenham, Weston and Wrentham had each filed legal complaints against the law in recent months, contending that it should not be enforceable after the Division of Local Mandates in Auditor Diana DiZoglio's office deemed the measure an unfunded mandate. Plaintiffs said allowing multifamily housing by right in at least one reasonably sized zone as the law requires could force them to absorb significant new infrastructure costs with no state assistance. But Gildea concluded the possible costs are 'indirect,' which means the law is not an unfunded mandate, and that grant programs are available to help shoulder some of the burden. 'Even if [the law] was an unfunded mandate, the Municipalities have failed to allege sufficient facts concerning any anticipated amounts associated with future infrastructure costs beyond a speculative level,' Gildea wrote in a 40-page decision. Some of the plaintiffs laid out their own issues with the law as well, such as Middleton arguing that it should not be classified as an MBTA community and therefore should not be subject to the mandatory zoning reforms. Jason Talerman, an attorney for some of the towns, said in an email that plaintiffs are 'disappointed with the result and find the decision to be contrary to applicable law.' Most of the 177 communities subject to the law have approved new zoning reforms, putting them in compliance, according to the Healey administration. In January, the Supreme Judicial Court upheld the MBTA Communities Act as a constitutional law the attorney general can enforce with legal action. The high court required the Healey administration to redo the regulation-setting process. WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
07-06-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Judge turns back challenge to MBTA housing law; Holden among plaintiffs
Superior Court ruling dismissing MBTA Communities unfunded mandate challenge by Michael Elfland on Scribd A Superior Court judge on Friday tossed a lawsuit brought by nine municipalities challenging the MBTA Communities Act, ruling that the controversial zoning-reform law is not an unfunded mandate. Plymouth Superior Court Justice Mark Gildea granted the Healey administration's motion to dismiss the latest challenges to the 2021 law, which supporters see as a key tool to spur development of much-needed housing in more than 170 eastern Massachusetts cities and towns. Marshfield, Middleton, Hanson, Holden, Hamilton, Duxbury, Wenham, Weston and Wrentham had each filed legal complaints against the law in recent months, contending that it should not be enforceable after the Division of Local Mandates in Auditor Diana DiZoglio's office deemed the measure an unfunded mandate. More: Holden seeks short-term halt to MBTA housing law Plaintiffs said allowing multifamily housing by right in at least one reasonably sized zone as the law requires could force them to absorb significant new infrastructure costs with no state assistance. But Gildea concluded the possible costs are "indirect," which means the law is not an unfunded mandate, and that grant programs are available to help shoulder some of the burden. "Even if [the law] was an unfunded mandate, the Municipalities have failed to allege sufficient facts concerning any anticipated amounts associated with future infrastructure costs beyond a speculative level," Gildea wrote in a 40-page decision. Some of the plaintiffs laid out their own issues with the law as well, such as Middleton arguing that it should not be classified as an MBTA community and therefore should not be subject to the mandatory zoning reforms. Jason Talerman, an attorney for some of the towns, said in an email that plaintiffs are "disappointed with the result and find the decision to be contrary to applicable law." Most of the 177 communities subject to the law have approved new zoning reforms, putting them in compliance, according to the Healey administration. In January, the Supreme Judicial Court upheld the MBTA Communities Act as a constitutional law the attorney general can enforce with legal action. The high court required the Healey administration to redo the regulation-setting process. This article originally appeared on Telegram & Gazette: Judge turns back challenge to MBTA housing law
Yahoo
24-05-2025
- Health
- Yahoo
Jehlen giving voice to emerging elder affairs issues
BOSTON (SHNS) – Despite funding increases, the top senator on elder issues is raising a red flag about service cuts to programs that help keep seniors out of nursing homes. With demand for services outpacing budget increases, senators 'should be open and transparent about the fact that services to individuals are being cut to try to control the budget,' Sen. Pat Jehlen of Somerville, who co-chairs the Joint Committee on Elder Affairs, said during annual budget debate. 'This is an austerity budget. It's more money. But for many people, the services are less,' said Jehlen, who is 81 and described a friend who was able to continue working because her husband was able to access services. Jehlen filed three budget amendments to try to curb those service cuts, each of which she promoted from the Senate floor. However, she withdrew her proposals without pushing for votes. Two amendments sought to address enrollment caps and other directives from the Healey administration to tighten eligibility and rein in costs for the Enhanced Community Options Program (ECOP), which serves frail individuals who clinically qualify for nursing homes but are able to receive intensive at-home care. The other would have stopped a 6% rate cut coming down from the Healey administration to all Adult Day Health programs, which Jehlen says will result in the highest-quality, local nonprofit programs shuttering their doors. Earlier this year, the Healey administration began imposing a cap on the number of available ECOP slots, providers told the News Service, in an effort to 'manage intake.' ECOP functions as a 'middle-income' home care program for older adults who do not qualify for MassHealth but struggle to afford private care on their own. Home care workers help participants with a wide range of services, including medication assistance, help showering and cleaning, Alzheimer's and dementia care, and cooking or home delivered meals. Without the care, providers say, these individuals are reliant on help from family members or neighbors, or need to be placed in more expensive nursing homes. The new enrollment caps from the Executive Office of Aging & Independence (AGE), which outline monthly reductions for providers to reach through the end of the fiscal year, have spawned waitlists for ECOP. Older adults can still receive basic home care, but their loved ones may need to play a bigger caregiving role to bridge service gaps, said Betsey Crimmins, executive director of Mass Aging Access, which represents the state's 27 Aging Service Access Points and Area Agencies on Aging. 'It doesn't mean people don't get nothing – it means they don't get the higher level of services while they're waiting,' Crimmins told the News Service last week. 'So I think the idea is: How do you do more with less? How do you create efficiencies, and how do you make sure that people don't completely just fall through the cracks?' She added, 'These are really hard decisions, telling people that they can't get services that they need, and that if they had called in January, they would have.' Crimmins said she is querying her members to find out how many adults on the ECOP waiting list had to be admitted to nursing homes. Crimmins said she is also working with AGE to navigate potential exemptions to the new guidelines, including how to handle an older adult who needs ECOP-level care sooner than a slot is available. 'People will wait longer and receive less assistance than they would have this year. That's not likely to be remedied by any future supp budget. It will just be the new normal,' Jehlen said during Tuesday's debate. The administration has said individuals already receiving services will not get kicked off. 'Now that enrollment is capped, [those on the waitlist] may have to wait with fewer services than they need until someone else is no longer alive or goes into a nursing home,' Jehlen said. The administration in February also tightened eligibility for the program by creating a higher spending threshold on services for older adults to qualify for ECOP. One of Jehlen's amendments (#466) would have injected an additional $15 million into the elder home care services line item, which is $278.7 million in the Senate Ways and Means Committee budget. The other ($464) would have given a $4.5 million boost to the $110.7 million line item for elder home care case management. Jehlen said the state 'almost always' has to add funds through supplemental budgets for the ECOP program. The line item for elder home care services is increasing by $41 million in the Senate budget, but Jehlen said demand continues to outpace what the state has budgeted. 'There will be continued increases because more people are living longer and living longer with disabilities,' she said. 'Because of those increases in utilization, we almost always have to add funds to both of those items in a supplemental budget.' Elder home care providers for months warned they would run out money this spring without a supplemental funding infusion to fill big budget gaps amid soaring demand for services. Healey's supplemental budget in April called for steering $60 million to elder home care services, an amount the House embraced in its spending package Wednesday. Even without that money, the state has managed to continue paying providers through other funding streams, Crimmins said. The Healey administration also moved recently to cut rates for adult day health programs, which offer community-based daytime care for older adults and adults with cognitive, medical or behavioral health impairments. There are 140 such programs in the state. EOHHS proposed decreasing the per day and partial per day rates to providers for the basic level of care for adult day health services from $106.32 to $99.49 and $53.16 to $49.75, respectively. The cuts will save the state $5.59 million. The new regulations were rolled out in March, received a hearing in April, and will be effective July 1. 'The administration is not saying 'We're going to force closure of small nonprofits.' And we're not voting to close those small nonprofit places. But the administration cut will do that,' Jehlen said. Despite her strong words, Jehlen withdrew her amendment that would have required MassHealth to maintain and pay base rates to providers of adult day health services at their current rates. Asked about Jehlen's amendments and cutting services even as spending increases, Senate President Karen Spilka said it is a difficult budget year and can 'bring heartbreak… because we can't satisfy every need.' 'It's hard when you're taking a deep dive into the budget and every item, for children, for families, for veterans, for babies, for supporting families — there's so many needs out there,' Spilka said. 'We try to support them as much as we can, and we feel like we're spending, but there's still so many vulnerable populations out there in need. And we can't address it. We have one pot of money. We can't print money. That's all we can do.' Since the beginning of the pandemic, 35 adult day health programs have closed. 'In 2023, just two years ago, the [Center for Health Information and Analysis] found that salaries in adult day health were $3 to $4 less than in similar jobs, and that a third of them were running deficits. Twenty-four were at serious risk of closure. So the administration raised those rates to prevent closures. Now the administration is planning to cut those rates,' Jehlen said. MassHealth said they applied a 33% rate increase to all adult day health services in fiscal 2024. 'MassHealth remains committed to ensuring our members have access to a wide range of long-term services and supports (LTSS) programs. In the aftermath of COVID, the Commonwealth made significant investments in Adult Day Health programs to promote stability,' MassHealth spokesperson Stacey Nee said. 'As a result of these investment, the programs are in a much more stable financial position. Given the current budget climate, MassHealth is recommending reasonable adjustments to Adult Day Health rates.' A cost report analysis from fiscal 2023 shows median profitability of adult day health programs was 7.86%, and the weighted average profitability was 14.36%, MassHealth said. Jehlen said that about two-thirds of the centers are for-profit ventures, and are 'running significant profits.' Those are not the programs she's concerned about, she said. 'They often spend less on care, more on management fees, more on real estate,' she said. 'They will survive despite the rate cut.' The Somerville Democrat said she's concerned about the one-third of adult day health centers that are small- and medium-sized run by local nonprofits and family businesses, which she said often provide more direct care. 'According to CHIA, they are running significant deficits, and have for years. They are the ones that are likely to close. This will be a real loss in quality overall, and it will be a real loss for the people who have received more local, more personal care,' she said. WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
24-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Amherst receives grant funds to protect town drinking water
AMHERST, Mass. (WWLP) – The town of Amherst is one of five communities in Massachusetts that received funding from the Healey administration through the Drinking Water Supply Protection program. The Healey administration announced on Friday that the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA) will provide over $1 million in grant funding to protect drinking water resources in the state. Five cities and towns were selected to receive funds, allowing these communities to purchase land to maintain the safety and quality of drinking water for residents. Two Springfield golf courses receive $6M in clubhouse upgrades 'This funding is a critical step in ensuring that our communities have access to safe, clean drinking water,' said EEA Secretary Rebecca Tepper. 'By investing in land protection, we are not only safeguarding our vital water resources but also enhancing the quality of life for residents who rely on these resources for health and recreation.' All land secured through funds from the Drinking Water Supply Protection Program will be designated protected open space under Article 97 of the Massachusetts Constitution. The town of Amherst was awarded $218,820 in grant funds to purchase an over 50-acre wooded property in Pelham. The purchase of this property, adjacent to designated Watershed Protection Land, will protect designated Zone A surface water that contributes to the Pelham Reservoir System. Approximately one-third of Amherst's drinking water comes from the reservoir system, and it will now receive greater protection and directly benefit public health. Other communities receiving grant funds through the program are Haverhill, Falmouth, Amesbury, and Cambridge. WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
