logo
#

Latest news with #HeritageCentre

Star Wars Stormtroopers add firepower to Pembroke Dock
Star Wars Stormtroopers add firepower to Pembroke Dock

Western Telegraph

time31-05-2025

  • Entertainment
  • Western Telegraph

Star Wars Stormtroopers add firepower to Pembroke Dock

The Stormtroopers were among many re-enactors at the Heritage Centre's Falcon Fun Day on Bank Holiday Monday – an annual event which again brought Star Wars fans flocking to Pembroke Dock. The dance, featuring The Phil Dando Big Band and Forties tribute singer Peri Lynn - who as Peri Thomas was brought up locally - takes place on Saturday, June 21, in a marquee in the former Royal Dockyard. Tickets are available, at £25, from the Pembroke Dock Heritage Centre (Tel 01646 684220); Pembroke Dock Town Council offices in Dimond Street (Tel 01646 684110) or online via Eventbrite. Street food vendors will be supporting the dance.

The orphaned children of indenture
The orphaned children of indenture

IOL News

time13-05-2025

  • General
  • IOL News

The orphaned children of indenture

CHILDREN worked on the Hulett tea plantation, Kearsney, Stanger, in the early 1900s. Image: 1860 Heritage Centre TWENTY-four-year-old Gollapilli Durgy, indentured number 107821, died two years after she arrived as an indentured worker on board the Pongola from Madras in October 1904. The report of her death shows that she died at the Avoca Central Hospital on February 5, 1906, having suffered from complications that arose from severe dysentery. Durgy arrived with two children, a 7-year-old boy named Nagamma, indentured number 107822, and a 3-year-old female child, indentured number 107823, strangely named Nagamma as well. The family were indentured to the Natal Ltd, Mt Edgecombe, Verulam Sugar. In 1909, three years after Durgy had passed away, her children were apprenticed to a Mr AM Morel of Mt Edgecombe. Both children's names appeared on a Form of Contract in Apprenticing Destitute Children. The form indicated that the Protector of Indian Immigrants, James A Polkinghorne, signed the form on behalf of the children to be employed as domestic servants until they were 16 years of age, when they would be entitled to a free pass to seek other forms of employment wherever they wished. As apprentices, they were to be provided with suitable and sufficient food, washing, lodging and be paid two shillings each month. During this time of serving their apprenticeship, half their monthly wages would be paid into the Natal Government Savings Bank to be given to the children on completion of their apprenticeship on the date stipulated in the form. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Reading against the grain of the archival Form of Contract in Apprenticing Destitute Children document, we can deduce that orphaned and destitute children were part of the system of indenture from arrival to their employment placement, and were subsequently duty-bound and enslaved to a contract without volition. In this instance, Durgy's children were officially re-indentured on November 30, 1909, three years after she had passed away in 1906. A TEA estate at Kearsney, in the early 1900s. Image: 1860 Heritage Centre What was the legal status of the children during the three years after their mother passed? Who took care of the children during this time? Why was their Form of Apprenticeship signed three years after their mother had died? Was the Form of Contract in Apprenticing Destitute Children an administrative functionary of the system of indenture to hide the horror of recruiting and holding children to work as adults in growing the colonial economy? Or was this an act of kindness on the part of the Morels in 'adopting' Durgy's children? Another case of the lingering psychological impact of indenture on children was disturbingly illustrated in the sad tale of 9-year-old Goyadin Mangal, indentured number 126109. Goyadin and his 1-year-old sister, Raj Kuaria, were orphaned when their mother died on the voyage of the Pongola to Natal from Calcutta in October 1906. Both children were apprenticed as destitute children to Charles J Battle in Kearsney. Four years later, in 1910, when Goyadin was 13 years of age, he was apprenticed for a second time to a Mr A Ireland as a domestic servant, with his apprenticeship to end when he turned 16 on October 29, 1913. The correspondence that followed in the archival files on Goyadin showed a letter from the Deputy Protector, dated October 30, 1912, requesting that the Protector of Indian Immigrants grant Goyadin a pass well before his 16th birthday. The letter further revealed that Mr A Ireland and Goyadin mutually wished to cancel the contract of apprenticeship. It was stated that: 'The boy has given his employer an amount of trouble, deserting, thieving, etc, and has been in gaol and whipped twice.' The Deputy Protector proceeded to give Goyadin a pass for 10 days pending hearing from the Protector of Indian Immigrants, stating that 'he is not suitable to be given to anyone else as a house servant. He is now 15 years of age and I (the Deputy Protector) think a pass might be given to him'. CHILDREN as young as 10 worked on the Hulett tea plantation at Kearsney, north of Durban,1900. Image: SS Singh Collection Goyadin was twice apprenticed from the age of 9 to 13. His apprenticeship showed the inner workings of the system of indenture in managing orphaned children. Goyadin's case revealed the harsh reality of the life of children having to endure being whipped and jailed for deserting their employers, and how their lives were entangled in a colonial system that only sought the provision of their labour while denying their humanity. Beyond the Form of Contract in Apprenticing Destitute Children, other documents made up the employment and use of children in the system of indenture. Sir Hulett and Sons Ltd of Kearsney in the North Coast of Natal strikingly had hundreds of Contracts of Service with Minor Indian Immigrants listed in their employment registers of indentured Indians. The Kearsney Tea estates notoriously preferred the nimble hands of children and women to pick the finest leaves for tea harvesting on their tea estate. Chitaroo, indentured no. 127653, an orphan with no relatives in Natal, was signed on behalf of Resident Magistrate PB Gobal to work as a general labourer for Hulett's for two years from 1912. In the two years that Chitaroo was to be employed, he was to earn 3 shillings per month for the first year, and 4 shillings per month for the second year, until he turned 16 years, when he was entitled to a free pass. CONTRACT of Service with Minor Indian Immigrants for Chitaroo, indenture number 127653. Image: Pietermaritzburg Archives Repository, Family Search The gap in the years that Chitaroo was formally contracted points to the illegal use of children hidden within the system of indenture, given that Chitaroo's mother, 28-year-old Mohari Fali, indentured number 127652, died in 1907, a year after the family of three arrived on board the Umfuli from Calcutta in 1906. Chitaroo only officially signed a contract of service in 1912 when he was 13 years of age. What was his status in the five years from when his mother had passed away in 1907, when he was 8 years of age, and what happened to his orphaned sister, who was lost to the archive? Was this administrative fulfilment of the Form of Contract in Apprenticing Destitute Children a way of masking the horrors of plantation life, and was this merely a tick-box exercise for the Protector of Indian Immigrants in managing orphaned and destitute children? In another matter that involved JL Hulett & Sons Ltd, a letter written from their estate to the Protector of Indian Immigrants dated June 11, 1910, disputes the wages of three boys, stating that they 'beg to point out that these people are mere boys, we cannot therefore offer them men's wages, as we pointed out on previous occasion, there is no compulsion in the matter and they (the boys) have expressed their willingness to accept the wages offered and are anxious to re-indenture on this estate'. The letter goes on to compel the Protector of Indian Immigrants, stating that 'if you (the Protector) are unwilling to consent to this, we are not prepared to take them on, on any other terms'. In a response dated June 15, 1910, the Protector noted that the wages for the 16-year-old boy should have been 16 shillings, the 14-year-old boy at 7 shillings, and the 11-year-old at 5 shillings. The Protector concluded by stating that: 'My difficulty has been that it is now proposed to give these Indians less wages than they should have received in the first term of indenture.' According to eminent scholar of indenture, Brij Vilash Lal, of the 152 184 indentured workers who came to expand the colonial capital of Natal in the 19th and 20th centuries, 13% were children, 62% were men, and 25% were women. Children were a strong component that made up the system of indenture. In 165 years since the introduction of indentured labour to South Africa and beyond, one poorly-researched topic is the subject of the child and the provision of their labour within the matrix of indenture. Despite ample evidence of abuse and exploitation of children during the system of indenture, the full extent of this human tragedy is yet to be made known to the world, close to three decades into the 21st century. Selvan Naidoo Image: Supplied Naidoo is the great-grandson of Camachee, indentured number 3297, and the director of the 1860 Heritage Centre. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media. The POST

Japanese visitors plant Gingko tree at Pembroke Dock Heritage Centre
Japanese visitors plant Gingko tree at Pembroke Dock Heritage Centre

Western Telegraph

time25-04-2025

  • General
  • Western Telegraph

Japanese visitors plant Gingko tree at Pembroke Dock Heritage Centre

A sapling propagated from the famous Gingko tree which towers above the Royal Dockyard will now grow in the grounds of the town's Heritage Centre, formerly the Dockyard Chapel. In a ceremony on Thursday April 17, Japanese diplomat Mr Masaki Ikegami, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary of Japan to the United Kingdom, planted the sapling before invited guests, heritage trustees and centre volunteers. He was joined for the visit by Captain Shuzo Homma, Naval Attache at the Japanese Embassy. The original Gingko tree, in the garden of the nearby Master Shipwright's House, was gifted to the town in 1877 to mark the launch of one of the first modern warships for the Imperial Japanese Navy - which was modelled on the Royal Navy. The Armoured Corvette Hiei was built at a private shipyard at Jacob's Pill, Pennar, and its launch was a major event in Pembroke Dock, attended by the then Japanese Ambassador to the UK. Mr Masaki Ikegami and Captain Shuzo Homma from the Japanese Embassy pictured by the Ginkgo tree in the grounds of the Master Shipwright's House with the owner, Stewart Walton (left), and Rik Saldanha and John Evans of the Pembroke Dock Heritage Trust. (Image: Martin Cavaney Photography) In recent years several offspring from the Ginkgo have been nurtured at the National Botanical Gardens of Wales and some have since been returned to Japan, where they have been planted at naval bases and at the shrine to naval hero Admiral Heichahiro Togo who, as a young lieutenant, lodged in Pembroke Dock during the construction of the Hiei. The Japanese guests were welcomed by Heritage Trust Patron John Evans and chairman Rik Saldanha and others present included the Deputy Lieutenant of Dyfed, Professor Patricia Mawuli Porter; the chairman of Pembrokeshire County Council, Councillor Steve Alderman; the mayor of Pembroke Dock; Councillor Maria Williams; Welsh Assembly Member, Sam Kurtz, and Ayshea Cunniffe-Thomas from the National Botanic Garden of Wales and Simon Richards, who had both played key parts in the story of the new Ginkgo trees. Simon gave fascinating details about what is one of the oldest trees in the world, dating from the era of the dinosaurs. Also welcomed was Mrs Margaret James, wife of the late David James, well- remembered maritime historian and author, whose researches and writings over many years encompassed both the naval links between Japan and Pembroke Dock and the commemoration of Japanese sailors, casualties in the Great War, who are buried in Pembrokeshire. She was accompanied by her son, Adrian. And there was a special link to Japan through Mrs Yoriko Omae, originally from Hiroshima, who had helped David James with the commemoration of Japanese sailors at Angle and who recently retired as a staff member at the town library. Following the planting ceremony, guests visited the garden of the Master Shipwright's House, courtesy of owners Stewart and Angela Walton, to view the original Ginkgo tree.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store