logo
#

Latest news with #IsraeliAction

The stars now speaking up for Gaza: U2, Madonna, Olivia Rodrigo and Radiohead
The stars now speaking up for Gaza: U2, Madonna, Olivia Rodrigo and Radiohead

The National

timea day ago

  • Entertainment
  • The National

The stars now speaking up for Gaza: U2, Madonna, Olivia Rodrigo and Radiohead

As the situation in Gaza deteriorates by the day, more public figures have been using their platforms to speak out against Israeli action. Burying one's head in the sand, it seems, is increasingly being considered a form of complicity. Many celebrities, particularly in the music scene, have been persistently vocal about the continuing atrocities. Concert stages like the Glastonbury festival have become important platforms for activism and many musicians have organised events for the cause, such as the upcoming Together or Palestine event. Since then, a new wave of musical voices has piped up. It includes artists who have broken long silences on the issue. U2 It has branded itself as 'humanitarian' nearly since its inception, but U2 have long faced criticism for taking both sides in the Israel-Palestine conflict. Just two days after the Hamas attacks on October 7, lead singer Bono dedicated the song Pride (In the Name of Love) to the victims at the Nova music festival, altering the lyrics to: 'Early morning, October 7 / Sun is rising in the desert sky / Stars of David, they took your life / They could not take your pride.' While Bono has grown increasingly critical of Israel's actions since 2023, he has often repeated contested Israeli talking points alongside his condemnations, which has garnered controversy in pro-Palestine circles. The band's other members had stayed largely silent. That changed on August 10, when the Irish group shared a joint message on their official website and Instagram, which included individual statements from each member. The statements were notably different in tone and content. Bono's statement began by critising Hamas for the October 7 attacks before slating Israel for its 'moral failure', adding 'the government of Israel led by Benjamin Netanyahu today deserves our categorical and unequivocal condemnation'. The Edge was the only member to use the term 'genocide', also referring to it as ethnic cleansing and drawing historic parallels to Ireland. 'We are all deeply shocked and profoundly grieved by the suffering unfolding in Gaza,' he wrote. 'What we are witnessing is not a distant tragedy – it is a test of our shared humanity.' But the divide between the members' rhetoric on Gaza has only grown more stark since the statement was released. Bono wrote a solo opinion piece for The Atlantic on Monday, writing: 'Hamas had deliberately positioned themselves under civilian targets, having tunnelled their way from school to mosque to hospital' – a statement that echoes the rhetoric of many Israeli politicians. Olivia Rodrigo The singer-songwriter shared an Instagram message in July condemning the Gaza humanitarian crisis as 'horrific and completely unacceptable'. She had been quiet about the war to that point but highlighted the suffering of children and families, writing: 'There are no words to describe the heartbreak I feel witnessing the devastation that is being inflicted upon innocent people in Palestine. 'Mothers, fathers and children in Gaza are starving, dehydrated and being denied access to basic medical care and humanitarian aid. There is no child in Israel, Palestine or anywhere in the world who deserves to suffer through what we're seeing these children endure. It is horrific and completely unacceptable. To give up on them is to give up on our shared humanity.' Rodrigo also announced a personal donation to Unicef to support victims of the conflict, encouraging her followers to contribute as well. Madonna Like Bono, Madonna 's stance on Gaza has long had a 'both sides' tone. She has often framed the conflict broadly, avoiding direct condemnation of Israel's actions. Earlier this month Madonna made a post online, appealing to Pope Leo XIV to visit Gaza. The singer said the pontiff is 'the only one of us who cannot be denied entry' and should 'bring [his] light to the children before it's too late'. Madonna, who was raised Catholic, said politics could not resolve the crisis and that she was turning to 'a Man of God' to help. She explained that her own children were the motivation for the post in her caption, writing: 'Today is my son Rocco's birthday. I feel the best gift I can give to him as a mother is to ask everyone to do what they can to help save the innocent children caught in the crossfire in Gaza.' However, Madonna still did not outright condemn Israel. 'I am not pointing fingers, placing blame or taking sides. Everyone is suffering.' Radiohead For years, Radiohead 's position on the Israel-Palestine conflict – and, at times, outright dismissal of pro-Palestinian voices – has been a point of contention in the music community and beyond. The group, known for its progressive politics, has long downplayed calls to boycott or challenge Israeli policies, with many pointing out the gap between their humanitarian branding and their apparent disregard for Palestine's humanitarian crisis. In 2017, the band faced calls from artists and activists, including Roger Waters, to cancel a planned Tel Aviv concert. Singer Thom Yorke defended the performance, calling the boycott 'patronising' and stressing the band's belief in cultural exchange. Yorke later displayed a rude gesture to pro-Palestinian protesters at a 2017 Glasgow concert. In May, Yorke released a statement addressing the conflict after mounting pressure, which many criticised as not going far enough. Yorke began by acknowledging a pro-Palestinian concertgoer who shouted at him about the war during a show in Australia in 2024. Yorke said he did not engage at that moment because it didn't seem like the best time to discuss the unfolding humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. He also expressed that he was in shock that his supposed silence was being taken as complicity and struggled to find an adequate way to respond. In his statement, Yorke condemned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government, accusing them of exploiting grief to exert control over Gaza and the West Bank. He also called Israel's siege 'horrific'. 'I think Netanyahu and his crew of extremists are totally out of control and need to be stopped, and that the international community should put all the pressure it can on them to cease,' Yorke wrote. 'Their excuse of self-defence has long since worn thin and has been replaced by a transparent desire to take control of Gaza and the West Bank permanently.' Yorke also criticised Hamas, saying he believe the group 'chooses, too, to hide behind the suffering of its people'. The final part of his statement drew the most criticism, as he seemingly dismissed the 'free Palestine' cause because of the continuing hostage situation. 'At the same time the unquestioning Free Palestine refrain that surrounds us all does not answer the simple question of why the hostages have still not all been returned? For what possible reason?' Yorke wrote.

The Israelis did a great job on Iran. But there's one possible flaw in their plan
The Israelis did a great job on Iran. But there's one possible flaw in their plan

Telegraph

time13-06-2025

  • Politics
  • Telegraph

The Israelis did a great job on Iran. But there's one possible flaw in their plan

The initial strike against Iran's nuclear facilities and their internal champions has been remarkably successful from a tactical and operational standpoint. But all sides will need to think deeply about their next move since the stakes on both sides are so high. Much depends on Iran's wider response, the duration and intensity of further Israeli action and international involvement – especially from the US. At first glance, key elements of Iran's nuclear/military infrastructure have been crippled, whilst avoiding a major nuclear breach or uncontrollable escalation. The avoidance of civilian casualties also sends a clear message to the benighted Iranian people – we are after your oppressive leadership, not you. It is a message that the mullahs and their surviving senior military leadership will have to address urgently. There is one thing I might have done differently if I were in charge. In 1944 the RAF in Burma were confident that they had the coordinates of Japanese General Mutaguchi's HQ and sought permission to eliminate him. Field Marshal Slim responded: 'under no circumstances. He is an asset. I can read him like a book'. Hossein Salami took command of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Quds Force after the wily and clever Quasim Soleimani was eliminated by a US drone strike in 2020 during the last Trump presidency. Salami was a blowhard who achieved very little before the Israelis killed him. Salami, along with the Chief of Staff of the Iranian armed forces, Mohammed Baghri and his deputy, Gloamali Rashid, represented the institutionally ossified Iranian military post Soleimani. With them out of the way courtesy of the Israelis the real danger is that a capable new leadership emerges to strike back at Israel and perhaps even the US in a more indirect and effective way. The launch of 100 drones into the night sky – all to be intercepted – was an ineffectual response characteristic of the now departed leadership. The new bosses may have more effective solutions. It is understood that Ahmad Vahidi is now in charge but he may be only temporary. A former Quds force commander and IRGC intelligence branch head, Vahidi could prove to be a formidable foe if he stays in place. Other candidates include Mohammad Kazemi, head of the IRGC intelligence unit, and head of counter-intelligence, Majid Khademi. I am in no doubt that Vahidi will be mobilizing his proxies across the region and his cells in Europe for potential terror strikes in response. He will have to be a little more careful in mobilizing the militias the Quds Force sponsors in Iraq. A nowadays more confident and self-reliant Iraq may not take kindly to being used in other people's wars. In any case this is only round one, and indeed more Israeli strikes are reportedly underway. There will be quiet satisfaction in capitals across the Middle East and beyond over events so far. Internally in Iran there may also be some silent applause for the strikes against an unpopular and oppressive regime. More widely, as oil prices spike and international air travel is disrupted the rest of us will have to hold tight and hope for the best. We might just be on the verge of an effective Iranian response that the now eliminated previous leadership would have been incapable of.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store