Latest news with #JK
CNA
a day ago
- Business
- CNA
Is rivalry in marriage a good or bad thing? What should women do when the desire to win takes over?
Denise (not her real name) married her teenage sweetheart seven years ago. She admitted that the two of them 'always compete somehow' in terms of the positions they have at work, how much they are earning and where they are in their careers. 'We don't argue about this rivalry but I can feel that my husband is somehow trying to 'compete' with me,' said the 36-year-old digital marketer-entrepreneur. 'I'm not sure if it's because we have always been together … he always tries to go above and beyond what I accomplish in my career.' After having her first child four years ago, JK (who only wanted to be known by her initials), took a step back in her career. She gave up promotion opportunities because she felt that she'd have a heavier workload, which would mean she would have less time with her daughter. Her husband, whom she has been married to for eight years now, is around mostly on the weekends. 'While my husband was progressing in his career and took on better opportunities, it made me feel very frustrated as I'm a career-driven person,' said the 36-year-old who works in human resources. 'I thought that when we had kids, we would share parenting duties but, somehow, it still falls on me till today. 'He has told me that he feels jealous at times as our kids choose me over him for anything but the only advice I give him is to be home with them before they go to bed,' added the mum of two girls. Competing in your careers or for your children's affection is not uncommon in marriage. Theresa Pong, founder and counselling director at The Relationship Room, revealed that competition in relationships is natural because both partners want to feel seen, valued and appreciated for what they bring to the relationship. She cited examples where rivalry can pop up in a marriage: In parenting (who spends more time with the kids, who handles school responsibilities or who sacrifices more for the family), household contributions (who earns more, who does more housework or who manages the mental load of organising the family's schedule), as well as career and success (who has the more demanding job, who receives more recognition or who contributes more financially). Couples could also compete over seemingly minor issues pertaining to their social life, like who makes more effort to maintain friendships, how much personal time each of them sacrifices for the sake of the family, or who initiates family outings. It could also be a rivalry involving emotional labour – who remembers birthdays, plans holidays or makes more effort in maintaining family traditions. 'These often reflect a deeper need: To be recognised, to feel like an equal and to know that their role in the relationship is valued,' said Pong. EMOTIONAL MEANING BEHIND MARRIAGE RIVALRY Dr Natalie Games, clinical psychologist at Alliance Counselling, said that couples may compete for a variety of reasons, such as insecurity, a need for validation or unresolved power dynamics. And while a little friendly rivalry can be healthy and fun, ongoing competition often signals deeper issues like lack of emotional safety or misaligned values. 'The healthiest relationships are built on collaboration, where partners celebrate each other's wins and see success as shared, not rivalled,' Dr Games told CNA Women. 'We know that emotional intimacy thrives when partners champion each other rather than compete.' However, it's important to note that being competitive in a relationship isn't inherently bad. What is key is how partners respond to each other's success or independence, said Dr Games. 'It's the emotional meaning behind it that's important – if the competition is underpinned by fear, insecurity or disconnection, it becomes toxic. If it stems from admiration and playfulness, it can energise the relationship,' she explained. If left unchecked, rivalry in a marriage can quietly erode the foundation of trust and connection between partners. Dr Games said this is because, when one or both people start viewing the relationship as a competition, it shifts the dynamic from 'we're on the same team' to 'I need to win'. This can lead to resentment, jealousy and emotional distance, especially if one partner constantly feels like they're falling behind or being judged. 'Be warned that when couples compete, they can stop seeing each other as lovers or teammates and start treating each other like opponents,' said Dr Games. 'This shift reduces emotional safety and intimacy. Instead of turning to each other in vulnerability, they put up emotional walls.' Dr Games gave an example of a woman who may feel resentful about her husband's work promotion. She may cheer him on but deep down, might be feeling 'diminished' – he is soaring while she is doing the school pick-ups, helping their kids with homework and organising the family schedule. In such a situation, the woman is not 'competing for power but competing to feel seen, valued and remembered in a life where her contributions often go unnoticed', she said. CELEBRATING EACH OTHER'S WINS Denise shared that, most of the time, the rivalry in her marriage is seen 'like a friendly game'. 'We don't talk about it in a serious way but with humour. I feel like it's healthy competition because we tend to always give our best in everything we do now.' JK confessed that while she and her husband do talk about their rivalry and find solutions, 'there are also times I don't talk about it to him because I want to avoid an argument'. 'He does acknowledge that he isn't around the majority of the time and that I have sacrificed my career for the family,' she added. 'He appreciates what I have done, which makes me feel a little better but it took me many years to come to terms with the fact that I am settling with my job and not moving further, as my kids need me.' For women looking to navigate feelings of rivalry, Pong's advice is to first understand what it's pointing to – perhaps a need for more personal fulfilment, recognition or reassurance in the relationship. Then, acknowledge the emotions rather than feeling guilty about them. It's also important to have open conversations with your partner about your own aspirations and needs. 'Practise self-compassion and self-love by reminding yourself that your worth is not defined by achievements alone and celebrating your own unique journey,' Pong added. 'When both partners feel secure and valued, they can celebrate each other's wins rather than feel threatened by them.' If you've noticed yourself feeling resentful about your partner's success, constantly comparing roles or achievements, or needing to 'win' arguments or be 'the better' parent, partner or professional, it may signal that competition is taking over connection. Dr Games suggested reflecting on the root of the feelings – often, it's not about outdoing a partner but about wanting recognition or a sense of balance. 'Practising vulnerability, like saying, 'Sometimes I feel left behind when you're thriving', can open space for honest conversation,' said Dr Games. 'Therapy or journalling can help unpack deeper insecurities and shift the focus back to shared growth.' One partner's competitiveness can hurt the relationship if they downplay their other half's achievements, or compare efforts or struggles. They might feel like they're walking on eggshells or like one views the other as a rival instead of an ally. Dr Games recommended calling attention to the dynamic gently but directly. For example, say, 'I sometimes feel like we're competing and I don't want that between us'. Setting clear emotional boundaries and expressing need for mutual support can help. If the behaviour continues or turns controlling, couples counselling may be a healthy next step, said Dr Games. 'The key is self-awareness, honest communication and shifting the mindset from 'me versus you' to 'us together',' she added.
Business Wire
5 days ago
- Business
- Business Wire
JK Moving Services Ranked Among Largest Philanthropists in DC Metro Region, Helping Reduce Hunger and Protect the Environment
STERLING, Va.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- JK Moving Services, a global moving, storage, relocation, and logistics enterprise, was again named a Top Corporate Philanthropist in the greater DC region by the Washington Business Journal. The company was recognized for its $377K in corporate donations in 2024 that largely supported efforts to end hunger through the nonprofit JK Community Farm. These investments placed JK Moving 28th among the region's largest companies and were part of the company's $4M overall donations last year, which also included the cash value of its land donations. JK Moving Services, a global moving, storage, relocation, and logistics firm, was again named a Top Corporate Philanthropist in the greater DC region for its charitable investments that help end hunger and protect the environment. 'We are a company rooted in service and stewardship, and our philanthropy embraces both our commitment to environmental responsibility and community engagement,' explained JK Moving Services CEO Chuck Kuhn 'By helping reduce hunger and increase access to healthy foods while preserving the land it is grown on, we know that our philanthropic investments are helping change lives and protect our planet. We are honored to be recognized again for this commitment by the Washington Business Journal.' Among JK's most significant contributions to community welfare and environmental sustainability is the JK Community Farm, a nonprofit it founded and continues to support. Spanning 150 acres, the farm cultivates over 50 varieties of vegetables, fruits, proteins, and herbs, and is the largest chemical-free nonprofit farm in the nation. The farm relies on thousands of hours of volunteer labor from the community, local companies, and JK employees to meet its goals. The farm's primary mission is to donate 100% of its produce to local food banks and pantries, including Loudoun Hunger Relief, Food for Others, Arlington Food Assistance Center, and DC Central Kitchen. Since its inception, it has distributed more than 1 million pounds of vegetables and protein to families facing food insecurity. Last year alone, the farm grew and donated nearly 250,000 pounds of fresh, organic produce and protein. In addition to donating the land, JK also conserved the farmland so that it will be protected in perpetuity from development. Over the past decade, JK Land Holdings—part of the JK enterprise—has placed more than 22,000 acres of its purchases—nearly one-third in the Northern Virginia region—into conservation easement, ensuring vulnerable vistas and habitats are preserved and protected for future generations. Examples include: 128-acre Loudoun riverfront property that was donated to NOVA Parks; 135-acre Westpark golf course in Leesburg that is being transformed into a park; 87-acre JK Black Oak Wildlife Sanctuary; 56-acre Oakland Farm, a Potomac riverfront property; and 42 acres in St. Louis, one of Loudoun's first African American townships, to protect it from development. In line with this and as part of its focus on corporate social responsibility, 2024 also marked the completion of a critical milestone for JK: an enterprise-wide baseline carbon accounting that will further the company's efforts to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions and protect the environment. JK, along with its sister companies CapRelo and JK Land Holdings, employs nearly 1,200 people—a majority of whom live in the Washington, DC metropolitan region. The company has won numerous awards, including being recognized in prior years by the Washington Business Journal as a Best Place to Work and Top Corporate Philanthropist. ABOUT JK MOVING SERVICES For more than 40 years, JK Moving Services – the largest independently owned and operated moving company in North America – has provided local, long distance, and global relocation services to a variety of commercial, residential, and government clients. Headquartered in Sterling, Virginia and voted Independent Mover of the Year by the American Trucking Association, the company maintains a full-time, professionally trained staff of relocation and move management experts committed to providing the highest level of customer care.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
JK Moving Services Ranked Among Largest Philanthropists in DC Metro Region, Helping Reduce Hunger and Protect the Environment
Philanthropic Investments Recognized by Washington Business Journal STERLING, Va., June 05, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--JK Moving Services, a global moving, storage, relocation, and logistics enterprise, was again named a Top Corporate Philanthropist in the greater DC region by the Washington Business Journal. The company was recognized for its $377K in corporate donations in 2024 that largely supported efforts to end hunger through the nonprofit JK Community Farm. These investments placed JK Moving 28th among the region's largest companies and were part of the company's $4M overall donations last year, which also included the cash value of its land donations. "We are a company rooted in service and stewardship, and our philanthropy embraces both our commitment to environmental responsibility and community engagement," explained JK Moving Services CEO Chuck Kuhn "By helping reduce hunger and increase access to healthy foods while preserving the land it is grown on, we know that our philanthropic investments are helping change lives and protect our planet. We are honored to be recognized again for this commitment by the Washington Business Journal." Among JK's most significant contributions to community welfare and environmental sustainability is the JK Community Farm, a nonprofit it founded and continues to support. Spanning 150 acres, the farm cultivates over 50 varieties of vegetables, fruits, proteins, and herbs, and is the largest chemical-free nonprofit farm in the nation. The farm relies on thousands of hours of volunteer labor from the community, local companies, and JK employees to meet its goals. The farm's primary mission is to donate 100% of its produce to local food banks and pantries, including Loudoun Hunger Relief, Food for Others, Arlington Food Assistance Center, and DC Central Kitchen. Since its inception, it has distributed more than 1 million pounds of vegetables and protein to families facing food insecurity. Last year alone, the farm grew and donated nearly 250,000 pounds of fresh, organic produce and protein. In addition to donating the land, JK also conserved the farmland so that it will be protected in perpetuity from development. Over the past decade, JK Land Holdings—part of the JK enterprise—has placed more than 22,000 acres of its purchases—nearly one-third in the Northern Virginia region—into conservation easement, ensuring vulnerable vistas and habitats are preserved and protected for future generations. Examples include: 128-acre Loudoun riverfront property that was donated to NOVA Parks; 135-acre Westpark golf course in Leesburg that is being transformed into a park; 87-acre JK Black Oak Wildlife Sanctuary; 56-acre Oakland Farm, a Potomac riverfront property; and 42 acres in St. Louis, one of Loudoun's first African American townships, to protect it from development. In line with this and as part of its focus on corporate social responsibility, 2024 also marked the completion of a critical milestone for JK: an enterprise-wide baseline carbon accounting that will further the company's efforts to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions and protect the environment. JK, along with its sister companies CapRelo and JK Land Holdings, employs nearly 1,200 people—a majority of whom live in the Washington, DC metropolitan region. The company has won numerous awards, including being recognized in prior years by the Washington Business Journal as a Best Place to Work and Top Corporate Philanthropist. ABOUT JK MOVING SERVICES For more than 40 years, JK Moving Services – the largest independently owned and operated moving company in North America – has provided local, long distance, and global relocation services to a variety of commercial, residential, and government clients. Headquartered in Sterling, Virginia and voted Independent Mover of the Year by the American Trucking Association, the company maintains a full-time, professionally trained staff of relocation and move management experts committed to providing the highest level of customer care. View source version on Contacts Shawn Flaherty, 703-554-3609 Sign in to access your portfolio
India.com
01-06-2025
- Business
- India.com
Mukesh Ambani's Rs 15000 crore Antilia, Birla's Rs 425 cr Jatia House, Rs 6,000 crore JK house of...: 7 costliest homes in Mumbai
Mukesh Ambani's Rs 15000 crore Antilia, Birla's Rs 425 cr Jatia House, Rs 6,000 crore JK house of...: 7 costliest homes in Mumbai Owing a home might be a dream-come-true moment for most of us. However, it might not be the same for high-net worth individuals. Besides seeking spacious and lavish homes, they demand spaces that offer distinctive experiences and are culturally rich. So, here are 7 most ridiculously expensive homes owned by Indian billionaires in 'City of Dreams,' Mumbai. Antilia- Mukesh Ambani and Nita Ambani Antilia, owned by Indian billionaire Mukesh Ambani, valued at around $2,000 million (Rs 15000 crore), is the most expensive house in India and the second costliest in the world. According to GQ India, Antilia boasts multiple swimming rooms, three helipads, a spa and a spacious garage of 186 luxury cars. Mannat- Shah Rukh Khan and Gauri Khan Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan's palace is as regal as his nickname 'King Khan.' Valued at Rs 200 crore, the six-storey mansion is designed by his wife Gauri Khan, reflecting luxury and cinematic legacy. Jatia House- Kumar Mangalam Birla Jatia House is where Kumar Mangalam Birla, chairman of Kumar Mangalam Birla, resides. Purchased in Rs 425 crore, the 30,000-square-foot mansion includes spacious gardens, vast bedrooms and interiors that scream old-word charm. JK House- Gautam Singhania Located in Breach Candy, Mumbai, the JK house belongs to Raymond Group fame, Gautam Singhania. This 30-storey residence is worth jaw-dropping amount of Rs 6,000 crore, and includes gym, spa and multiple floors solely for car parking. Fairlawn- Ratan Tata Ratan Tata, the esteemed former chairman of Tata Sons, named his Rs 150 crore bungalow Fairlawn. Situated in Colaba, Mumbai, the house provides scenic views and reflects understated grace with its colonial architecture. Jalsa- Amitabh Bachchan Gifted to megastar Amitabh Bachchan by producer Ramesh Sippy, Jalsa is a symbol of Big B's cinematic success and legacy. Worth over Rs 120 crore, the Juhu residence is more like a public institution than a house, as every Sunday fans arrive outside Big B's house to have a glimpse of him. Gulita- Anand Piramal and Isha Ambani Gulita, the ultra-luxurious, diamond shaped-mansion was a gift by Industrialist Ajay Piramal to his son Anand Piramal, when he married Mukesh Ambani's daughter, Isha Ambani. Spread over five levels, it is worth Rs 500 crore, and includes temple, vast ballroom, spacious pool, and much more.
The Verge
30-05-2025
- Health
- The Verge
Young people sue Donald Trump over climate change
A group of young people — as young as 7 and as old as 25 — are suing the Trump administration to stop its assault on renewable energy and climate action. Executive orders President Donald Trump signed to promote fossil fuels amount to an 'unconstitutional' overreach of power, they allege in a complaint filed Thursday at a US District Court in Montana. The 22 plaintiffs also claim that by increasing pollution and denying climate science, the president's actions violate their Fifth Amendment rights to life and liberty. It's the latest high-profile case brought against governments by youth concerned about how fossil fuel pollution and climate change poses risks to their health and ability to thrive as they grow up. Two brothers, aged 11 and 7, 'were born into climate change-induced smoke seasons that did not exist for older generations' Two brothers, aged 11 and 7 and named 'J.K.' and 'N.K.' in the suit, 'were born into climate change-induced smoke seasons that did not exist for older generations and which compromise their health,' the complaint says. They grew up mostly in Montana but now live in Southern California, and the suit says wildfire smoke has encroached on their lives from state to state. J.K. was born with an abnormal mass of lung tissue and 'experienced nosebleeds, sore throats, headaches, tiredness, coughing, trouble breathing, and eye irritation from wildfire smoke,' according to the suit. N.K. has 'frequent' upper respiratory infections that have led to emergency room visits. They've both missed school days and camp because of feeling sick from smoke and soot in the air from wildfires, it says. Greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels trap heat, and rising temperatures have contributed to longer fire seasons in the western US. With hotter, drier conditions, the area burned by forest fires in the western US doubled between 1984 and 2015. 'Every additional ton of [greenhouse gas] pollution and increment of heat Defendants cause will cause J.K. and N.K. more days of poor air quality, more smoke, and thus, more harm to their lives, health, and safety,' the complaint adds. In recent years, scientists have been trying to better understand the long-term health impact of wildfire smoke, which previously hadn't been studied as thoroughly as pollution from other sources thought to be more consistent problems, like factories and highways. Now, chronic exposure to wildfire smoke is a growing concern. Wildfire smoke is considered a neurotoxin estimated to be more harmful than other common air pollutants, but its effects on the body can vary depending on what kinds of materials burn and how chemicals released by the fire interact with other substances in the atmosphere. After campaigning on a promise to ' drill, baby, drill ' and accepting more than $75 million in contributions from oil and gas interests, Trump signed executive orders on his first day in office declaring a purported 'national energy emergency,' directing federal agencies to 'unleash' domestic fossil fuel production and promote the use of gas-powered vehicles over EVs. He signed another executive order to 'reinvigorat[e]' the coal industry in April. Coal releases more planet-heating pollution when burned than other fossil fuels and has struggled to compete with cheaper sources of electricity. The plaintiffs are seeking injunctive relief to block implementation of those executive orders and to declare them unconstitutional. They also claim that Trump lacks the authority to erode environmental protections passed by Congress under the Clean Air Act. The administration's efforts to impede scientific research and remove climate information from federal websites amounts to 'censorship' and denies plaintiffs access to resources they might otherwise be able to use to minimize risks they face from climate change, the suit alleges. In response to the lawsuit, White House assistant press secretary Taylor Rogers said in an email to The Verge, 'The American people are more concerned with the future generations' economic and national security, which is why they elected President Trump in a landslide victory to restore America's energy dominance. Future generations should not have to foot the bill of the lefts' radical climate agenda.' The plaintiffs, who hail from Montana, Oregon, Hawai'i, California, and Florida, are represented by the nonprofit law firm Our Children's Trust, which has also represented young people in similar climate cases. A federal appellate court dismissed another case that youth filed against the Obama administration in 2015 over fossil fuel pollution causing climate change, and the US Supreme Court ended that legal battle this year when it declined to hear an appeal. But there have also been some wins. A group of youth reached a settlement last year with the state of Hawai'i and its Department of Transportation that commits them to a plan to reach zero greenhouse gas emissions from transportation by 2045. J.K. and N.K. were also plaintiffs in a climate suit filed against the state of Montana. Last year, Montana's Supreme Court upheld a district judge ruling affirming their right to a clean and healthy environment and rejecting policies that had barred officials from considering the consequences of climate change when permitting new energy projects.
