logo
#

Latest news with #KalanithiMaran

Delhi HC dismisses Kalanithi Maran's appeal seeking Rs 1,300 crore from SpiceJet
Delhi HC dismisses Kalanithi Maran's appeal seeking Rs 1,300 crore from SpiceJet

New Indian Express

time26-05-2025

  • Business
  • New Indian Express

Delhi HC dismisses Kalanithi Maran's appeal seeking Rs 1,300 crore from SpiceJet

MUMBAI: The Delhi High Court dismissed KAL Airways and businessman Kalanithi Maran's appeal seeking over Rs 1,300 crore in damages from SpiceJet. The appeal was previously rejected by an Arbitral Tribunal and later by a Single-Judge Bench of the High Court. 'These assertions were already previously rejected by the Arbitral Tribunal and then the Delhi High Court. It is important to clarify that KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran initially sought damages of more than Rs 1300 crore during the arbitration proceedings. These claims were thoroughly examined and subsequently rejected by a panel of three retired Supreme Court judges,' said SpiceJet on Monday. Following this, KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran appealed to the Single-Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court, seeking the same amount in damages, which was also rejected by the court, added SpiceJet. The ruling, dated May 23, 2025, was disclosed by the airline in a regulatory filing on Monday. The dispute between the two parties date back to February 2015 when Maran and KAL Airways had transferred their 58.46% stake in SpiceJet to Singh for Rs 2.

Delhi HC grounds Maran's ₹1,323-crore damages claim in SpiceJet dispute
Delhi HC grounds Maran's ₹1,323-crore damages claim in SpiceJet dispute

Time of India

time26-05-2025

  • Business
  • Time of India

Delhi HC grounds Maran's ₹1,323-crore damages claim in SpiceJet dispute

In a breather to cash-strapped SpiceJet , the Delhi High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by KAL Airways and its owner Kalanithi Maran seeking ₹1,323 crore damages from the budget airline in a long-standing share transfer dispute. The court said that the former promoter had engaged in a "calculated gamble" by delaying the filing and re-filing of their appeals. SpiceJet shares rose 1.96% to ₹44.69 per share on BSE at the close of the market following dismissal of the appeal. A division bench of justices C Hari Shankar and Ajay Digpaul came down heavily on KAL and Maran for the delay in filing their appeal, suppressing material facts related to their pending applications and for unjustifiably delaying the proceedings. "The delay in refiling is completely lacking in bona fides and represents a gamble by the unsuccessful litigant (KAL Airways) keeping all, including the successful litigant (SpiceJet), in the dark," the court said. The court also found KAL and Maran's conduct to be lacking in bona fides, amounting to "fence sitting" and deliberate concealment. The court said that while delay in refiling is generally treated more liberally than delay, this approach cannot be extended where the delay is not bona fide. "Limitation is a statute of equity and repose, and if the delay, whether in filing or refiling, is found to be lacking in bona fides, it has to be sternly dealt with", the bench said, noting a total absence of good faith. "The case presents a classic example of fence sitting, keeping, in the process, the respondents (Spicejet), the division bench of this court, as well as the Supreme Court, completely in the dark regarding the filing of the present FAOs, and of their languishing under objections," the court said. On July 20, 2018, the arbitral tribunal had rejected Maran's claim of damages of ₹1,323 crore for not issuing warrants to him and KAL Airways but awarded him a refund of ₹579 crore with interest. Both sides challenged the arbitral award and the petitions were dismissed by a single judge of the Delhi High Court in July 2023. SpiceJet and its chairman Ajay Singh promptly appealed against the dismissal within the statutory 60-day period. Their appeals were heard and in May last year, the division bench found merit in SpiceJet's contentions and remanded the matter back to the single judge for fresh consideration. Following this, KAL Airways and Maran appealed to the single-judge bench seeking the same amount in damages, which was also rejected by the court. Even the appeals were filed after 55 days of delay and also failed to cure procedural defects for another 226 days. The case relates to a share transfer dispute between SpiceJet chairman Ajay Singh and Maran and his KAL Airways. In February 2015, Maran and KAL Airways transferred their entire 58.46% stake in the airline to Singh. In 2017, Maran and KAL Airways moved the high court demanding that 180 million warrants redeemable as equity shares be transferred to them. The court, on July 29, 2016, asked both parties to settle the share transfer dispute under arbitration.

SpiceJet share price rises 4% as court rejects a damages claim
SpiceJet share price rises 4% as court rejects a damages claim

Mint

time26-05-2025

  • Business
  • Mint

SpiceJet share price rises 4% as court rejects a damages claim

Stock Market Today: SpiceJet share price gained more than 4% during the intraday trades on Monday as the the Delhi High Court Division Bench rejected a damages claim SpiceJet on Monday, 26 May 2025 informed the Bombay Stock Exchange or the BSE that the Delhi High Court Division Bench has rejected appeal of KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran for any Damages Claim. As per the SpiceJet release on the exchanges, the airlines operator SpiceJet said that the Division Bench of Delhi High Court in its order dated May 23, 2025 has dismissed the appeal filed by KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran seeking damages of more than Rs.1300 crore and other claims. These assertions were already previously rejected by the Arbitral Tribunal and then the Delhi High Court, as per SpiceJet. SpiceJet added that it is important to clarify that KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran initially sought damages of more than Rs.1300 crore during the arbitration proceedings. These claims were thoroughly examined and subsequently rejected by a panel of three retired Supreme Court judges, as per SpiceJet. Following this, KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran appealed to the Single-Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court, seeking the same amount in damages, which was also rejected by the court. SpiceJet share price opened at ₹ 44.10 on the BSE on Monday. The SpiceJet share price at the time of opening was up compared to previous days closing price of ₹ 43.83. The SpiceJet share price thereafter moved higher to ₹ 45.78 and this meant intraday gains of 4.45% for the SpiceJet share price. SpiceJet remains in news as in May itself it had announced about anUpdate on Fleet Reactivation with the Ungrounding of Boeing 737 NG Aircraft On May 07,2025 Spice Jet had said that as of 09 May 2025, one more Boeing 737 NG aircraft (Registration Number: VT-SGV) has been successfully ungrounded and reintroduced into our operating fleet. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.

Delhi HC dismisses KAL Airways, Maran's ₹1,300 crore claim against SpiceJet
Delhi HC dismisses KAL Airways, Maran's ₹1,300 crore claim against SpiceJet

Business Standard

time26-05-2025

  • Business
  • Business Standard

Delhi HC dismisses KAL Airways, Maran's ₹1,300 crore claim against SpiceJet

The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal seeking over ₹1,300 crore in damages from SpiceJet, filed by KAL Airways and businessman Kalanithi Maran. The ruling, dated May 23, 2025, was disclosed by the budget airline in a regulatory filing on Monday. The appeal, which had already been rejected by an Arbitral Tribunal and later by a Single-Judge Bench of the High Court, was the latest attempt by Maran and KAL Airways to claim compensation from the low-cost carrier. The arbitration proceedings, led by a panel of three retired Supreme Court judges, had thoroughly examined and rejected the damages claim. 'These claims were thoroughly examined and subsequently rejected by a panel of three retired Supreme Court judges. Following this, KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran appealed to the Single-Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court, seeking the same amount in damages, which was also rejected by the court,' the airline said. Kal Airways, Kalanithi Maran vs SpiceJet The dispute between Maran and SpiceJet dates back to more than a decade. In 2010, Kalanithi Maran and KAL Airways acquired a controlling stake in SpiceJet, increasing their shareholding to 58.46 per cent from 37.7 per cent. However, in February 2015, they transferred their entire stake back to SpiceJet's original founder, Ajay Singh, as part of a revival deal. Maran and KAL Airways claimed they paid ₹679 crore for warrants and preference shares that were never issued, sparking a legal battle. An arbitral tribunal initially ruled in their favour, ordering SpiceJet to refund ₹579 crore with interest. But in 2024, both the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court overturned the award and sent the case back for reconsideration. In response, Maran and KAL Airways have sought ₹1,323 crore in damages, while SpiceJet has rejected the claims as baseless and previously discredited. Following the fresh dismissal, SpiceJet shares rose 2.62 per cent to ₹44.98 apiece on BSE at 11.05 am.

Delhi HC dismisses Rs 1,300 cr damages appeal by Kalanithi Maran & KAL Airways against SpiceJet
Delhi HC dismisses Rs 1,300 cr damages appeal by Kalanithi Maran & KAL Airways against SpiceJet

Economic Times

time26-05-2025

  • Business
  • Economic Times

Delhi HC dismisses Rs 1,300 cr damages appeal by Kalanithi Maran & KAL Airways against SpiceJet

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel A Division Bench of Delhi High Court has dismissed the appeal filed by KAL Airways and businessman Kalanithi Maran seeking damages of more than Rs 1,300 crore from SpiceJet , said the low-cost airline in a statement. These assertions were already previously rejected by the Arbitral Tribunal and then the Delhi High Airways and Kalanithi Maran initially sought damages of more than Rs 1,300 crore during the arbitration proceedings. These claims were thoroughly examined and subsequently rejected by a panel of three retired Supreme Court judges. Following this, KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran appealed to the Single-Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court, seeking the same amount in damages, which was also rejected by the incident dates back to January 2015, when Singh, the previous owner of the airline, repurchased it from Maran following a prolonged grounding due to financial constraints. The tribunal ruled that Maran owed Singh and the airline Rs 29 crore in penal interest, while Singh was instructed to reimburse Maran Rs 579 crore along with in 2016 as per the Delhi High Court's directive to settle the share transfer dispute, the tribunal determined that there was no violation of the share sale and purchase agreement made between Maran and the current promoter Singh in late January tribunal rejected Maran's appeal for damages of Rs 1,323 crore from February 2015, Maran of the Sun Network and Kal Airways, his investment vehicle, had transferred their 58.46 per cent stake in SpiceJet to Singh for Rs 2 (Rs two only) along with Rs 1,500 crore debt liability, after the airline was grounded due to a severe cash was the first co-founder of the airline and is now its chairman and managing part of the agreement, Maran and Kal Airways had claimed to have paid Spicejet Rs 679 crore for issuing warrants and preference Maran approached the Delhi High Court in 2017, alleging SpiceJet had neither issued convertible warrants and preference shares nor returned the today's development, the shares of SpiceJet were trading at Rs 44.97 a piece on the BSE, up by 2.60 per cent as of 10:55 am on Monday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store