Latest news with #MayoClinicProceedings
Time of India
2 days ago
- Health
- Time of India
Japanese Walking vs Running: Which is better for burning calories and losing weight?
Japanese interval walking alternating slow and brisk paces — offers a low-impact, beginner-friendly fitness method. Compared to running, it supports heart health and weight loss with less joint strain, making it ideal for a wide range of users. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Understanding Japanese Interval Walking Cardiovascular Benefits: Similar Aims, Different Paths Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Calorie Burn: Which Is More Efficient? Choosing What Works for You FAQs What is Japanese interval walking? Who created this fitness method? As fitness trends evolve, a method gaining traction globally is the Japanese style of interval walking — a practice rooted in structured alternation between gentle and brisk walking. Often compared to running, this technique, developed through clinical research in Japan, has prompted many health enthusiasts to question: Which is more beneficial — Japanese walking or running?The Japanese Interval Walking Training (IWT) method, formulated by researchers including Dr Hiroshi Nose and documented in Mayo Clinic Proceedings, recommends a simple yet effective format: walk at a low intensity for three minutes, then switch to a faster pace for the next three, repeating this cycle five times. This 30-minute session alternates effort to build cardiovascular endurance without high-impact traditional walking, IWT introduces intervals that elevate heart rate, mimicking the exertion pattern of more intense workouts while maintaining accessibility for beginners, seniors, or individuals recovering from injury, as mentioned in a report by Tom's running and interval walking are recognised as strong cardio activities, known to improve heart health, boost metabolism, and strengthen muscles and joints. From mood enhancement to stress reduction, the psychological gains are substantial with both also contributes to weight management, though results will depend on the combination of physical activity and diet, particularly maintaining a caloric distinction lies in intensity and accessibility. Running demands greater cardiovascular and muscular engagement and may not suit everyone due to its higher impact on joints. Japanese interval walking, by contrast, offers a lower-impact, beginner-friendly option that still challenges the body through its built-in variation of those aiming to shed weight, calorie expenditure is often a key metric. According to available estimates, a 155-pound adult running a 5K at a slight incline can burn approximately 375 calories, as per a report by Tom's comparison, the same individual performing a 30-minute Japanese interval walk is expected to burn between 100 and 200 calories, depending on effort, speed, and running clearly provides a higher caloric output in a shorter span, interval walking offers a viable, sustainable path for those unable or unwilling to engage in high-impact exercises. Devices such as fitness trackers can aid individuals in monitoring their personal metrics, providing a clearer picture of what works best for question of which is 'better' — Japanese walking vs running — ultimately rests on personal needs and preferences. If injury risk or low stamina is a concern, interval walking may be a gentler entry point into regular exercise. Running, however, remains the go-to for those seeking faster results in terms of calorie burn and cardiovascular needs also vary. While running may require specialised footwear and activewear, walking can be done with minimal gear, although supportive shoes are still a walking method alternating 3 minutes of gentle walking with 3 minutes of brisk walking, repeated for 30 minutes. Developed in Japan, it builds endurance while being easy on the researchers, including Dr. Hiroshi Nose, developed the method, and it's been documented in medical journals like Mayo Clinic Proceedings.
Tom's Guide
3 days ago
- Health
- Tom's Guide
Japanese walking vs running — which is best for you?
So you're looking to increase your cardiovascular endurance, and you don't know whether to prioritize running or the Japanese Interval Walking Training (IWT) method that's growing in popularity right now. Below, we put the two head-to-head to help you decide which is best for your routine. In case you hadn't heard of it, the Japanese IWT method involves alternating your pace as you walk. You'll walk for three minutes at a low intensity, followed by three minutes at a higher intensity, repeated five times. It was developed in Japan by researchers, and is supported by the research of Dr Hiroshi Nose published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings. You can read what happened when our fitness editor tried Japanese walking for a week. Both interval walking and running are great forms of cardio. They'll both raise your heart rate and metabolism, and strengthen your muscles and joints over time. You can also expect both walking and running to help boost your mood and reduce your stress levels. They can also be used to lose weight, if paired with a good diet. If weight loss is your goal, you'll want to focus on being in a calorie deficit, which means burning more calories than you consume. If weight loss is your goal, you might be keen to know which form of cardio is likely to burn more calories. While the exact number of calories you burn depends on a number of factors, including intensity, workout length and biological factors like age, weight, sex, hormones and more. The best way to keep track of how many calories you're burning is to wear one of the best fitness trackers, which will do this for you. We have our concerns about Google's long-term plans for the brand, but right now, the Fitbit Charge 6 is the best fitness tracker on the market today thanks to its lightweight and diminutive size, support for an enormous range of workout types, and a smattering of useful smart features like Google Wallet and Google Maps. That said, as a rough guide, according to the Omni calculator, a 155-pound adult will burn around 375 calories running a 5K at a gradient of 1%. On the other hand, a 155-pound adult doing a 30-minute interval workout is more likely to burn between 100-200 calories, although this number will vary based on how hard you push yourself and any incline you cover. If you're looking to burn calories, you'll get there faster with running. Of course, burning calories isn't the only reason to work out. If you're a complete beginner or you're recovering from an injury, walking is much lower impact, so it might be a better place to start. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. What's more, if you're heading out for a run, you'll need a pair of supportive sneakers (check out the best running shoes to buy right now here), and probably a sports bra. As walking is lower impact, you won't need fancy equipment, although we'd recommend comfy shoes here too. The Saucony Ride 18 is our favorite running shoe for beginners. It's a no-fuss shoe that's comfortable, reliable, and responsive. And, you can get it for less than $100. The real answer to this question is which form of cardio to you enjoy the most. If you hate running, or running for 30 minutes is unachievable right now, it might be that interval walking is great way to burn more calories than you would if you walked at a steady pace. If you're a marathon runner, you might find walking intervals leave you wanting to move faster. There's no right or wrong, and both are fantastic ways to add more movement to your day and look after your physical and mental health.
Axios
10-04-2025
- Health
- Axios
Women find hope at New Albany menopause clinic
Mood swings, sleepless nights, uncontrollable crying — Nancy Thompson was in a dark place, until a local physician "turned the lights back on." Driving the news: OhioHealth's new Menopause and Midlife Clinic recently opened in New Albany, a first for Central Ohio. Why it matters: The specialized office is addressing a treatment gap preventing millions of women like Thompson from getting the care they need. The big picture: Menopause is something every woman goes through, but doctors aren't required to learn much about it and research is underfunded. Experiences can be so severe and varied that some women, including Oprah, feel like they're dying. But symptoms are often dismissed and misdiagnosed. Only about 7% of OB-GYN residents reported feeling adequately prepared to manage menopause, per a 2019 survey published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings. By the numbers: As of Jan. 30, just 106 health care providers in Ohio were credentialed as Menopause Society Certified Practitioners, per data provided to Axios. That's compared to well over 1,500 OB-GYN providers. Zoom in: One certified practitioner is Pragna Patel, the new OhioHealth clinic's first and only physician. There's such high demand that she's scheduling new patient consultations into September, though a cancellation list may get some women in sooner. OhioHealth is working to add more providers, and a second clinic is planned for the new Women's Center opening in 2027 on Riverside Hospital's campus, spokesperson Stephanie Stanavich tells Axios. What they're saying: "Women in midlife have really been overlooked, so a lot of women are coming in here very excited, very eager, very grateful," Patel says. Between the lines: Misinformation about the risks of hormone therapy, even among providers, has also kept the once-common treatment out of reach for many patients in recent years. Reality check: For Thompson, it's been life-changing after struggling for years with symptoms ranging from heart palpitations to hair loss and brain fog at work. After her primary doctor mentioned the clinic, she drove 90 minutes from her home in Northeast Ohio for her first appointment and received a prescription. The bottom line: "I have her number saved in my phone as 'Dr. Patel, lifesaver,'" Thompson tells Axios. "I have my life back."
Yahoo
25-03-2025
- Health
- Yahoo
2 drug combination lowers cholesterol better than just a statin, researchers say
Statins are very cheap and highly effective cholesterol-lowering drugs -- but high-risk heart patients may have an even better option, a new evidence review says. Combining statins with another drug, ezetimibe, significantly reduces the risk of death in patients with clogged arteries, according to findings published Sunday in Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Using a high-dose statin with ezetimibe significantly reduces levels of "bad" LDL cholesterol, increasing a person's chances of reaching healthy levels by 85%, researchers found. The combo also brought about a 19% reduction in risk of death from any cause; a 16% reduction in heart-related deaths; an 18% decrease in the risk of a major cardiovascular health problem; and a 17% decline in stroke risk. This combination therapy would prevent more than 330,000 deaths a year worldwide among patients who have already suffered a heart attack, including almost 50,000 deaths in the U.S. alone, researchers said. "This study confirms that combined cholesterol lowering therapy should be considered immediately and should be the gold standard for treatment of very high-risk patients after an acute cardiovascular event," senior researcher Dr. Peter Toth, a professor of clinical family and community medicine at the University of Illinois, said in a news release. Up to now, studies have been inconsistent regarding whether to provide combo cholesterol-lowering therapy immediately for high-risk patients, even before they suffer a heart attack or stroke. Typically, doctors wait at least two months before adding any medication to a statin, to see how well statins alone will lower cholesterol, Toth said. "This approach does not require additional funding or reimbursement of new expensive drugs," he said. "In fact, it may translate into lower rates of first and subsequent heart attacks and stroke, and their complications like heart failure, which are extremely costly for all healthcare systems." For the new evidence review, researchers pooled data from 14 studies involving more than 108,000 heart patients at very high risk for a heart attack, stroke or other heart-related health problem. Results were even more pronounced in an additional analysis that enabled a direct comparison of different therapies, researchers said. "This showed a 49% reduction in all-cause mortality and a 39% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events, when compared to high dose statin therapy alone," said lead researcher Dr. Maciej Banach, a professor of cardiology at the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin in Poland. Ezetimibe works by reducing the amount of cholesterol the intestines can absorb from food. Statins have a different mechanism - they work by interfering with the liver's ability to make cholesterol. Both drugs are available as inexpensive generics. "Our findings underline the importance of the adages 'the lower for better for longer' but also the equally important 'the earlier the better' for treating patients at high risk of cardiovascular conditions and to avoid further medical complications and deaths," Toth said. More information The Cleveland Clinic has more on cholesterol levels. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Axios
06-03-2025
- Health
- Axios
Why menopause care is still a challenge in California
Menopause is something every woman goes through, but doctors — even OB-GYNs — aren't required to learn much about it. Why it matters: Millions of women in California and around the world lack access to the care they need — and some are getting misinformation at the doctor's office. Catch up quick: In 2002, research from the Women's Health Initiative found that hormone therapy, which is used to alleviate menopause symptoms, increased a woman's risk of heart disease and breast cancer, upending conventional medical recommendations about the treatment. In recent years, the research was put into context: The risks weren't as great as originally thought, and the data was weighted toward women 60 and older. The average age of a menopausal woman is 51. Since then, researchers and health professionals have tried to correct the messaging, noting the benefits of hormone therapy for women younger than 60, including treating hot flashes and preventing bone loss. What they're saying: "It's such an uphill battle to not just teach people about it, but to undo all the damage of the last 20+ years," Deborah Gomez Kwolek of Mass General Women's Health and Sex and Gender Medicine Program tells Axios. Stunning stat: Only about 7% of OB-GYN residents reported feeling adequately prepared to manage menopause, according to a 2019 survey published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings. More than 20% of OB-GYN residents reported receiving no menopause lectures during residency. How it works: Perimenopause, the phase leading up to menopause, can begin six to 10 years earlier and trigger all sorts of hormonal chaos. Menopause is officially marked after a woman has gone one year without a menstrual cycle. "There are so many different symptoms and they manifest in different ways and at different times of life," said Nora Lansen, primary care physician and Elektra's chief medical officer. "So it could be, 'I can't remember my kid's teacher's name,' this year but then, two years from now, it's, 'My libido's tanking.'" Zoom in: One way health professionals can signal they've undergone additional training is by obtaining a certified credential through Menopause Society training. In California, fewer than 340 people have this credential (about 20 in San Francisco and around 30 in San Diego County) even though the state is home to 5 million women ages 40-64. Hospitals in San Francisco and San Diego also offer specific menopause health programs with specialists, hormone therapies and a clinical trial. What to watch: Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (D-San Ramon) introduced legislation last month that would require physicians to complete menopause-specific training if women compose more than 25% of their patient population. The bill would also mandate comprehensive insurance coverage for menopause and perimenopause treatments. She authored a similar bill during the 2024 legislative session, but Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed it in September, calling it "too far-reaching." Also moving through the Legislature is Assemblymember Diane Papan's (D-San Mateo) AB360, which would require state medical boards to develop and administer menopause training surveys as part of the license renewal process. The big picture: Businesses are stepping in where doctors aren't. Older millennials, the generation that currently includes the most women in America, are on the early cusp of menopause years. The Bay Area has seen a surge in femtech companies, which focus on technological products and services aimed at improving women's health. Many of these companies, from Midi Health to Evernow, have zeroed in on menopause care to meet increased need. But even that's not meeting demand. The bottom line: "Women don't have to suffer," Faubion said, but they have to find a physician who knows enough to help.
