logo
Japanese walking vs running — which is best for you?

Japanese walking vs running — which is best for you?

Tom's Guide01-06-2025
So you're looking to increase your cardiovascular endurance, and you don't know whether to prioritize running or the Japanese Interval Walking Training (IWT) method that's growing in popularity right now. Below, we put the two head-to-head to help you decide which is best for your routine.
In case you hadn't heard of it, the Japanese IWT method involves alternating your pace as you walk. You'll walk for three minutes at a low intensity, followed by three minutes at a higher intensity, repeated five times. It was developed in Japan by researchers, and is supported by the research of Dr Hiroshi Nose published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings. You can read what happened when our fitness editor tried Japanese walking for a week.
Both interval walking and running are great forms of cardio. They'll both raise your heart rate and metabolism, and strengthen your muscles and joints over time. You can also expect both walking and running to help boost your mood and reduce your stress levels. They can also be used to lose weight, if paired with a good diet. If weight loss is your goal, you'll want to focus on being in a calorie deficit, which means burning more calories than you consume.
If weight loss is your goal, you might be keen to know which form of cardio is likely to burn more calories. While the exact number of calories you burn depends on a number of factors, including intensity, workout length and biological factors like age, weight, sex, hormones and more. The best way to keep track of how many calories you're burning is to wear one of the best fitness trackers, which will do this for you.
We have our concerns about Google's long-term plans for the brand, but right now, the Fitbit Charge 6 is the best fitness tracker on the market today thanks to its lightweight and diminutive size, support for an enormous range of workout types, and a smattering of useful smart features like Google Wallet and Google Maps.
That said, as a rough guide, according to the Omni calculator, a 155-pound adult will burn around 375 calories running a 5K at a gradient of 1%. On the other hand, a 155-pound adult doing a 30-minute interval workout is more likely to burn between 100-200 calories, although this number will vary based on how hard you push yourself and any incline you cover.
If you're looking to burn calories, you'll get there faster with running.
Of course, burning calories isn't the only reason to work out. If you're a complete beginner or you're recovering from an injury, walking is much lower impact, so it might be a better place to start.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
What's more, if you're heading out for a run, you'll need a pair of supportive sneakers (check out the best running shoes to buy right now here), and probably a sports bra. As walking is lower impact, you won't need fancy equipment, although we'd recommend comfy shoes here too.
The Saucony Ride 18 is our favorite running shoe for beginners. It's a no-fuss shoe that's comfortable, reliable, and responsive. And, you can get it for less than $100.
The real answer to this question is which form of cardio to you enjoy the most. If you hate running, or running for 30 minutes is unachievable right now, it might be that interval walking is great way to burn more calories than you would if you walked at a steady pace. If you're a marathon runner, you might find walking intervals leave you wanting to move faster. There's no right or wrong, and both are fantastic ways to add more movement to your day and look after your physical and mental health.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple Watch Series 11 — 5 upgrades Apple needs to make to stay relevant with Samsung and Google
Apple Watch Series 11 — 5 upgrades Apple needs to make to stay relevant with Samsung and Google

Tom's Guide

time6 hours ago

  • Tom's Guide

Apple Watch Series 11 — 5 upgrades Apple needs to make to stay relevant with Samsung and Google

The Apple Watch Series 11 is likely right around the corner. Every year, Apple tends to close out smartwatch launch season with a September release that follows new watches from Samsung and Google in July and August, respectively. I already got my hands on the latest Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 and put it through thorough testing, with impressive results. The Google Pixel Watch 4, meanwhile, is slated for a likely August 20 debut at the Made by Google event taking place on that date. While nothing has been confirmed, rumors hint at a seriously upgraded next-gen Pixel Watch from Google. Assuming those rumors come to fruition and based on all we learned about the Galaxy Watch 8, Apple has its work cut out this time around. With that in mind, these are the five upgrades Apple needs to make to keep the Apple Watch Series 11 relevant against its core competition. Multi-band GPS isn't just for super-high-end smartwatches anymore. Both the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 and Galaxy Watch 8 offer multi-band GPS, while the Apple Watch Series 10 relies on a single-band GPS antenna. In short, more bands mean better connectivity in tricky locations where the sky might be obstructed. Think: city centers and heavily wooded areas. While the Google Pixel Watch 3 similarly sports single-band GPS, rumors suggest that the new Pixel Watch 4 could get an upgrade to match the latest Galaxy Watches. If that occurs, Apple will be the only major smartwatch manufacturer whose flagship device doesn't offer multi-band. And even though the Apple Watch Series 10 is a fairly reliable fitness tracker, there's certainly room for improvement. For example, when I recently biked 12 miles with the Apple Watch 10 vs the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8, the latter proved more accurate. That bike route, notably, included a lot of trees and tall buildings. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Unlike Samsung, Google and Garmin, Apple doesn't provide any sort of daily energy or sleep score to help users better understand their overall health. This is a shame. Of course, the best Apple Watch models already provide a decent level of sleep insights, even if it's not as detailed as what you get from Samsung or Garmin. However, the addition of a numeric sleep score out of 100 would bring Cupertino's sleep insights much more in line with industry leaders. Likewise, some sort of score that takes into account both sleep quality and recent physical fitness would also be a major upgrade for Apple Watch owners (and something I've been wanting for a long time, too). After all, Garmin's Body Battery metric has been around since 2018, and Fitbit's Readiness Score goes back to 2021. That said, Samsung's Energy Score only debuted last summer, so Apple isn't alone in joining the energy score party late. Let's just hope this is the year it happens. Ever since the very first Apple Watch model arrived more than a decade ago, the flagship Apple Watch series has been stubbornly stuck at just 18 hours per charge in standard mode. However, with the latest Galaxy Watch 8 models cruising for 30 hours per charge for the 40mm and 44mm models and 40-plus hours for the 46mm Galaxy Watch 8 Classic, Apple had better take battery life a bit more seriously this time around. Likewise, in our testing, the smaller Pixel Watch 3 model was good for about 24 hours per charge, while the larger Pixel Watch 3 battery is good for 48 hours per charge. Expect those numbers to increase slightly when the Pixel Watch 4 debuts. For the last handful of years, each new generation of the best smartwatch has debuted with a noticeably brighter screen, and 2025 sees the trend continuing. Samsung bumped up maximum brightness to 3,000 nits on the Galaxy Watch 8, an increase of 50% over the Galaxy Watch 7 (2,000 nits max brightness). With rumors suggesting that the Pixel Watch 4 will see a similar increase to 3,000 nits, here's hoping Apple follows suit. For reference, the Apple Watch Series 10 maxes at 2,000 nits while the Apple Watch Ultra 2 tops out at 3,000 nits. I've been pleasantly surprised by how actually useful Google's Gemini AI assistant is on the Galaxy Watch 8. Whether it's inquiring about my dog eating too many blueberries or asking for clothing recommendations for an upcoming trip, what I get from Gemini on the Galaxy Watch is a far cry from the Apple Watch's on-wrist Siri experience. The Google Pixel Watch 4 will almost certainly debut with Gemini AI as well, leaving Apple Watch owners to ask, 'What about us?' Unfortunately, as of right now, there's little to suggest that an Apple Intelligence-powered Siri will show up in the Apple Watch Series 11 this fall (an overhauled Siri in spring 2026 is much more likely), and that's a real bummer. While folks with the best smartwatch models for Android are having all their most burning questions answered with ease from the wrist, watchOS fans will likely have to wait at least another six months or more before an AI assistant as good as Gemini makes its way to the Apple Watch.

Claude can now reference past chats, if you want it to
Claude can now reference past chats, if you want it to

Engadget

time6 hours ago

  • Engadget

Claude can now reference past chats, if you want it to

Claude is getting a better, if selective, memory. Rather than acting as perfect catalog of everything you've talked about or shared, Anthropic says the AI chatbot now has the ability to reference past chats when asked, so you don't have to re-explain yourself. The feature seems like it could help you pick up a work project after time away, or query Claude for the details of a past research session that you don't quite remember. The key point is that Claude has to be prompted: It doesn't call on past chats unless you specifically ask it to. Anthropic also says that Claude's ability to reference chats is specific to the workspace and project you're working in. Anthropic's implementation is much more limited in scope compared to how ChatGPT's memory feature works. OpenAI updated ChatGPT in April to save all conversations you have with it, and rely on those records to personalize answers to any new question or prompt you send. The basic idea is that every conversation could improve the chatbot's responses. Google lets Gemini similarly recall past conversations and has also tested using Google Search history to further personalize AI responses. In contrast to both, Claude is really only performing a search of past conversations when asked, not referencing a profile of past chats. It's more privacy-minded by default and you can disable Claude's ability to do it at all via a settings toggle. If you're subscribed to the Max, Team or Enterprise plans, Claude's new ability should be rolling out now, according to Anthropic. The company says the feature will expand to other plans soon.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store