Latest news with #MichaelBowe
The Sun
03-08-2025
- General
- The Sun
I'm being forced to DEMOLISH my plush new summer house because it ‘looks like a private bar' – I've done nothing wrong
A FURIOUS resident is being forced to demolish his new summer house after neighbours complained that it looked more like a "private bar." Michael Bowe, 40, has left his neighbours outraged after erecting a summer house in his back garden, which he claimed was necessary for work and flexible living. 3 3 However, locals have been left unimpressed by the company director's new home addition, claiming the five-metre-long annex looks more like a private bar than an office space. Mr Bowe's fellow neighbours insist that the outbuilding is used as a drinking space that causes noise and disturbance, and claim this has a negative effect on their mental health. Residents of Marton-in-Cleveland, near Middlesbrough, have submitted objections to the council in a bid to have the summer house removed, the MailOnline reports. One neighbour, Debby Allan, wrote to officials: "We do not feel like the use of what this building is for is accurate. "It appears to be a bar and when used there have been unacceptable noise levels, as there is a lot of glass that echoes from the outside which causes disturbance to us." When approached at his home by the MailOnline, Mr Bowe refused to comment, describing himself as a private person. He said: "I don't feel as if I have done anything wrong." However, council planners have since ordered for the annex to be demolished after refusing a retrospective planning application. The garden building stands nearly three metres tall and was built just 20cm from the neighbouring home. Planning permission is typically required when a building is taller than 2.5m is located within two metres of a boundary. Ms Allan added went on to explain that it has caused great disruption, which has in turn has impacted both her's and other neighbours mental health. She also explained that many neighbours work shifts both through the day and night, and this disruption has forced them to stay with relatives to rest in between. Other locals share Ms Allan's frustration, with one submitting a complaint which claimed the annex is visible from her living room and dominates the garden. Louise Finn claims she has experienced a loss of privacy. She also explained that a confrontation between herself and Mr Bowe caused a huge amount of stress and anxiety. Her complaint to the council claims that the building was erected without planning permission or any consideration of the properties involved. She also shared Ms Allan's complaint that the whole affair is impacting her health and well being. The result of these complaints is that retrospective planning consent has been refused, ruling that the "significant overbearing" development affects the "quality of life and living conditions" of the neighbours. While town hall officials did also rule that the annex was "not unattractive or of low quality in design terms", enforcement action will now be taken. Mr Bowe is appealing this decision, describing the refusal as without merit. He is arguing that the summer house only marginally exceeds height limits due to its proximity to the boundary fence, but causes no harm to the neighbouring properties. Himself and his planning consultants claim that careful consideration was taken when building the outbuilding. They declare that the annex was designed in a low-profile and non-intrusive way"so as to not affect the neighbours. The planning inspectorate will make a decision later this year on whether to uphold or overturn the council's refusal. The top five reasons neighbours squabble One study by Compare the Market revealed the top reason British neighbour's argue Broken fences - top of the board was broken fences and whose responsibility it was to fix it Parking: one of the leading drivers of neighbour disputes, with 54.1 per cent of people having issues with people parking in front of their house, parking bay or driveway Trees - complaints about a neighbour's tree cracking your garden path was also common with nearly half of participants finding it frustrating Bin wars - outdoor bin etiquette continues to ignite the most furious debates between neighbours Nosy Neighbours - some people have their eyes and ears at the ready to have a peek causing problems for others 3
Daily Mail
02-08-2025
- Business
- Daily Mail
Man at war with neighbours over 'oppressive' private drinking den in his garden 'just 20cm from their fence'
Disgruntled neighbours are at war over claims that a resident has built a private drinking den in his garden without planning permission. Company director Michael Bowe, 40, erected a sprawling summer house in the back garden, claiming in council documents that it was needed for 'modern home working and flexible living'. But neighbours allege the plush five-metre-long annexe in Marton-in-Cleveland, near Middlesbrough, looks more like a private bar than a home office. In objections submitted to Middlesbrough Council, disgruntled neighbour Debby Allan wrote to officials: 'We do not feel like the use of what this building is for is accurate. 'It appears to be a bar and when used there have been unacceptable noise levels, as there is a lot of glass that echoes from the outside which causes disturbance to us.' Council planners have now ordered the 'overbearing' and 'oppressive' summer house to be demolished after refusing a retrospective planning application. The flat-roofed garden building, which measures 3.5m by 5m, was built just 20cm from a neighbour's fence and stands nearly three metres tall. Planning permission is typically required when a building taller than 2.5m is located within two metres of a boundary. In planning documents, Ms Allan accused Mr Bowe, a co-director of Middlesbrough childcare agency Invested Childcare, of causing 'great disruption' and said the annexe was 'not in character with existing properties'. She added: 'The work to this property has already been carried out in 2022 and 2024. It has caused great disruption, which has in turn caused us a lot of stress and impacted our mental health. 'We work shifts including night shifts, the noise and disruption had meant we had to stay with relatives to rest in between. 'We were unable to open our blinds in the living room due to the lack of privacy by the builders.' Another neighbour also submitted complaints which claimed the annexe looms into view from her living room and dominates the garden, with its rear wall pressed up against Mr Bowe's back fence. Louise Finn claimed she had endured a loss of privacy and that a confrontation between the pair had caused 'a huge amount of stress and anxiety'. The concern, raised in the documents, read: 'This property has been developed without planning permission and any consideration to properties involved. 'I respectfully request that you reconsider the approval for this retrospective planning of the development, as it would have a negative impact on my property and health and well-being.' Town hall officials refused retrospective planning consent, despite accepting that the annexe was 'not unattractive or of low quality in design terms'. But it ruled the 'significant overbearing' development affects the 'quality of life and living conditions' of neighbours, and launched enforcement action. Mr Bowe, who bought his four-bed detached home for £390,000 in 2020, is appealing the council's order to raze the summer house, describing the planning permission refusal as 'without merit'. His planning consultants argue the summer house only marginally exceeds height limits due to its proximity to the boundary fence, and causes no actual harm to neighbouring properties. They claim 'careful consideration' was given to its placement behind a neighbour's garage, which they say 'almost entirely screens it from view'. The consultants said: 'In the present case, the proposed summer house has been deliberately positioned behind the adjoining property's garage, ensuring it is substantially screened from view and has no adverse effect on outlook, daylight, or privacy.' It said the summer house 'remains well-screened by boundary fencing, free from overlooking openings, and is positioned to avoid shadowing or overbearing effects. 'The design, while utilising a flat roof, does so in a low-profile and non-intrusive way.' The planning inspectorate will make a decision on whether to uphold or overturn the council's refusal later this year. When approached at his home, Mr Bowe declined to comment, describing himself as a 'private person'. He said: 'I don't feel like I've done anything wrong.'
