I'm being forced to DEMOLISH my plush new summer house because it ‘looks like a private bar' – I've done nothing wrong
Michael Bowe, 40, has left his neighbours outraged after erecting a summer house in his back garden, which he claimed was necessary for work and flexible living.
3
3
However, locals have been left unimpressed by the company director's new home addition, claiming the five-metre-long annex looks more like a private bar than an office space.
Mr Bowe's fellow neighbours insist that the outbuilding is used as a drinking space that causes noise and disturbance, and claim this has a negative effect on their mental health.
Residents of Marton-in-Cleveland, near Middlesbrough, have submitted objections to the council in a bid to have the summer house removed, the MailOnline reports.
One neighbour, Debby Allan, wrote to officials: "We do not feel like the use of what this building is for is accurate.
"It appears to be a bar and when used there have been unacceptable noise levels, as there is a lot of glass that echoes from the outside which causes disturbance to us."
When approached at his home by the MailOnline, Mr Bowe refused to comment, describing himself as a private person.
He said: "I don't feel as if I have done anything wrong."
However, council planners have since ordered for the annex to be demolished after refusing a retrospective planning application.
The garden building stands nearly three metres tall and was built just 20cm from the neighbouring home.
Planning permission is typically required when a building is taller than 2.5m is located within two metres of a boundary.
Ms Allan added went on to explain that it has caused great disruption, which has in turn has impacted both her's and other neighbours mental health.
She also explained that many neighbours work shifts both through the day and night, and this disruption has forced them to stay with relatives to rest in between.
Other locals share Ms Allan's frustration, with one submitting a complaint which claimed the annex is visible from her living room and dominates the garden.
Louise Finn claims she has experienced a loss of privacy.
She also explained that a confrontation between herself and Mr Bowe caused a huge amount of stress and anxiety.
Her complaint to the council claims that the building was erected without planning permission or any consideration of the properties involved.
She also shared Ms Allan's complaint that the whole affair is impacting her health and well being.
The result of these complaints is that retrospective planning consent has been refused, ruling that the "significant overbearing" development affects the "quality of life and living conditions" of the neighbours.
While town hall officials did also rule that the annex was "not unattractive or of low quality in design terms", enforcement action will now be taken.
Mr Bowe is appealing this decision, describing the refusal as without merit.
He is arguing that the summer house only marginally exceeds height limits due to its proximity to the boundary fence, but causes no harm to the neighbouring properties.
Himself and his planning consultants claim that careful consideration was taken when building the outbuilding.
They declare that the annex was designed in a low-profile and non-intrusive way"so as to not affect the neighbours.
The planning inspectorate will make a decision later this year on whether to uphold or overturn the council's refusal.
The top five reasons neighbours squabble
One study by Compare the Market revealed the top reason British neighbour's argue
Broken fences - top of the board was broken fences and whose responsibility it was to fix it
Parking: one of the leading drivers of neighbour disputes, with 54.1 per cent of people having issues with people parking in front of their house, parking bay or driveway
Trees - complaints about a neighbour's tree cracking your garden path was also common with nearly half of participants finding it frustrating
Bin wars - outdoor bin etiquette continues to ignite the most furious debates between neighbours
Nosy Neighbours - some people have their eyes and ears at the ready to have a peek causing problems for others
3
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Increase in vapes found on Britain's coastline by beach clean volunteers
Volunteer beach cleaners are finding more vapes than ever before as plastic pollution chokes Britain's coastline. The Marine Conservation Society (MCS) on Wednesday launches its annual beach clean, which last year involved more than 15,000 volunteers who completed more than 1,200 litter surveys. The charity is calling for swift and strong action at the UN's global plastics conference in Geneva this week, where countries are deciding on their pollution policies. Some forms of plastic are on the rise, according to MCS litter volunteers. Of those surveyed, 41% mentioned finding more plastic items (including plastic cups, bottle caps/lids, microplastics), including 19% more vapes, 26% more fishing litter (including lines/nets), 11% more dog poo bags and 11% more wet wipes. But there were some positive findings that demonstrated how good policy can make a difference. Volunteers on the beach cleans log every piece of litter they find so that a comprehensive dataset of rubbish on beaches can be built up and trends observed. Their research found that the number plastic bags littered on beaches reduced by 80% between 2015 and 2024, after a charge on carrier bags was introduced. The MCS says this shows that policy changes can quickly make a positive difference to the amount of pollution in the environment. Summer is a bad time for litter on UK beaches. Seventy-four per cent of MCS volunteers said they found an increase in beach litter during the summer, compared with winter months, due to increased visitor numbers plus a gap in public awareness around environmental impacts. Volunteers who take part in the litter pick have asked local authorities and governments in the UK to build better infrastructure including more accessible bins on beaches. Litter pickers said the problem was widespread and harming wildlife. Violet Fraser, who has been cleaning beaches on the Western Isles in Scotland, said she had found birds' nests with plastic in, while Colette Edwards in Norfolk reported regularly finding seals caught in discarded nets on her local beach. Plastic is a particular scourge on beaches as it does not biodegrade, instead breaking down into microplastics that stay in the environment indefinitely, and these are easily ingested by marine animals and can cause illness and even death. A spokesperson for the MCS said: 'The amount of plastic found on beaches increased by 9.5% between 2023 and 2024. The continued presence of plastics on our coastline highlights the need for a circular economy in which consumers have more options and access to use refillable and reusable products. 'Beachwatch data has already been used by governments across the UK as evidence to introduce litter reducing policy – such as the carrier bag charges and bans on certain single-use plastics, such as straws, cutlery, plates and bowls, and the recent UK-wide commitment to ban plastic wet wipes.' Isaac Kenyon, a volunteer, said: 'There's something deeply grounding about standing on a shoreline and knowing that your small actions are part of something much bigger. Every piece of litter picked up is one less hazard for wildlife, one less piece of plastic in the ocean, and one small step toward a healthier planet.' The Great British Beach Clean runs from 19-28 September.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
My dad left £1,442 of old stamps when he died - but Royal Mail won't give me the cash: SALLY SORTS IT
I am executor for the estate of my father who died last year, aged 93. He left 1,661 unused non-barcoded postage stamps with a face value of £1,442.19. I contacted Royal Mail to ask if they could be cashed in as we are never going to use so many stamps. I was advised to post them with a Swap Out form because they were not bar-coded, include a Grant of Probate certificate, and request a cash value rather than replacement stamps. I added a note to the form indicating I did not wish to 'swap out' but wished the cash value instead. Royal Mail simply replaced them with newer bar-coded stamps and will not budge. K.W., Ross-on-Wye, Herefordshire. Sally Hamilton replies: You were furious when Royal Mail delivered the response that it would not let you cash in the stamps. You have no use for so many stamps and could do with the money to meet bills owed by your father's estate. As stamps are not legal tender, they cannot be used to pay official bills – though some individuals might accept them if you owe them money. In an age of email and WhatsApp, I can appreciate your frustration at sitting on a pile of postage stamps, ranging from 152 x 1p stamps and 114 x 2p stamps, to the handier 1st and 2nd class items. I suggested it might be easiest to share them between beneficiaries or relatives and friends. But you said the two beneficiaries of the estate are pensioners, including yourself, who send just a couple of Christmas cards a year. Although I use post quite often, when I purchased a pack each of first and second class stamps last week, the teller even exclaimed at the extortionate £13.46 price tag. Anyway, your complaint to Royal Mail customer services was essentially returned to sender with confirmation it could not exchange your stamps for cash. You felt particularly sore as the £19.55 you paid to send the stash of outdated postage by secure delivery to the swap out service was refunded in the form of stamps (aargh). When you escalated matters to the Postal Review Panel, which oversees gripes the Royal Mail doesn't resolve itself, it simply referred unhelpfully to the fact it could not 'make changes to the terms and conditions of any Royal Mail product or service'. Scam Watch TSB customers should beware a scam text from fraudsters purporting to be from the bank, consumer website Which? warns. The message appears on your phone as being from 'TSB', but scammers have spoofed its sender ID, meaning it appears to be a legitimate text from the bank. The text claims your 'internet banking phone numbers were changed' and to call the number in the message to cancel this change. Do not call this number, as it will put you through to a fraudster who will try to steal your personal and financial information. Instead, forward suspicious texts to 7726, so they can be reported. Since the message wasn't getting through to customer service, you came to me. You had read, in December 2023, about a reader who had purchased too many stamps in error from her local post office but on my intervention was permitted to return half of them to Royal Mail for cash. Although your position was not the same (in that case the customer had receipts to show for her barcoded stamps), I thought Royal Mail might show some leniency. But I'm afraid I could not persuade Royal Mail to budge. It said your position with the older stamps was different to the previous case and responded with a firm 'no', stating 'the swap out scheme is designed to offer replacements for invalid stamps, but it does not include a monetary refund option'. A Royal Mail spokesman said: 'We are very sorry to hear about the passing of her father. While we appreciate this has been a challenging period, we would like to clarify that our policy does not allow for cash refunds on unused, non-barcoded stamps. 'Based on this, she was directed to our swap out scheme, which enables customers to exchange old stamps for valid replacements.' Options for your stamps are to either sell or give them away. Selling is legal, though sellers should expect to offer a discount. There are also specialist traders. One I found online was offering 99p for a £1.70 first class stamp. Giving away unused stamps to charity is useful for estates wanting to reduce an inheritance tax liability, as charitable gifts of assets, including stamps, are tax-free. Specialist firm Xchange Master works with charities, including the RNIB, to convert stamps into funds for use by the charities, and says the organisations usually receive most of the stamps' face value. Holiday cottage plumbing fail Earlier this year I was diagnosed with prostate cancer and underwent surgery which was successful but left me with urinary problems. My wife and I decided to book a short break but because of my condition deliberately chose a place with separate bedrooms and two toilets. We booked one in Whitstable through Sykes Cottages that advertised two bedrooms and two bathrooms, and paid £439. The holiday was due to start on June 3 but a few days before Sykes told us one of the toilets was out of order. There was no indication when it would be repaired as the plumber was waiting for parts. I replied that because of my medical issue this was not acceptable and asked for a refund. This was refused. A.M., Bromley, Kent. Sally Hamilton replies: You were not pleased to receive an email from Sykes stating the company judged 'one toilet to be a reasonable solution for your party of two guests'. Quite the contrary. You had gone out of your way to find accommodation with two loos and repeatedly explained this when you complained. Sykes pointed to its cancellation policy which says late cancellation will result in forfeiture of the full amount. Normal rules should not apply, I believe, as the cancellation was prompted by the property not being as advertised. The Consumer Rights Act 2015 says holidaymakers are entitled to the accommodation promised and as described. On my intervention, Sykes immediately agreed to refund you. A spokesman for Sykes Holiday Cottages says: 'We understand A.M.'s reasons for wanting to cancel his booking and are sorry to hear of his experience. 'A payment to cover the cost of the holiday has now been paid and we have been in touch to confirm this with him.' Straight to the point My wife, daughter and I went to the AO Arena in Manchester in December to watch Les Miserables. We arrived early so had something to eat, but when we arrived at the venue later we were shocked to see the show had already started. In the interval we found out many other people were also late. The head of guest experience at the arena confirmed wrong information had been advertised. My ticket had the correct time but the website showed the wrong time. C.N., via email. You have now had a full refund. *** Three years ago I had solar panels installed for £14,500 but in April they stopped working after a power cut. I had a 12-year warranty with the company that made the panels so I contacted it. But three months later it still hasn't sent out the inverter part I need, which costs about £600. Nobody answers the phone when I call and I only get messages saying the part will arrive 'soon'. S.H., Yorkshire. The manufacturer apologises. The inverter has now arrived and you have been given a £300 Amazon voucher as a goodwill gesture. *** I tried to close my broadband account, but the provider said there was an 'issue' so couldn't close it. I cancelled my direct debit then got a letter which said my service would be cut off. I called to settle the remaining balance – £296 – but was told again my account couldn't be closed. Last month, I got a letter stating my account had been handed to a debt collector. The company backed down and said it would wipe off my debts, but I've now been rejected for a mortgage. B.S., via email. Your account is now closed, the debt has been waived and credit agencies have removed this incident from your record. Write to Sally Hamilton at Sally Sorts It, Money Mail, Northcliffe House, 2 Derry Street, London W8 5TT or email sally@ — include phone number, address and a note addressed to the offending organisation giving them permission to talk to Sally Hamilton. Please do not send original documents as we cannot take responsibility for them. No legal responsibility can be accepted by the Daily Mail for answers given.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Idaho bridge faces demolition after 92 years
Idaho's iconic Rainbow Bridge is facing demolition after 92 years. The crossing, which is also known as the North Fork Payette River Bridge, is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. It has allowed millions of travelers to pass over since it was built in 1933 but has been deemed unsafe by the Idaho Transportation Department. 'The current Rainbow Bridge no longer meets ITD [Idaho Transportation Department] standards for highway bridges,' the department wrote . 'Despite regular maintenance and major repairs, the structure is deteriorating to the point where ITD will no longer be able to maintain it for highway traffic.' The department also cited issues including narrow lane and shoulder widths, tight curves on both sides of the bridge, and limited sight distance for drivers. Costs to repair and maintain the long-standing bridge were said to range from $20 million to $50 million over the next 15 to 20 years, transportation officials told Idaho News 6 . 'Anything that we would put in place for an observation point or an overlook would have to be designed to current standards. And it would be quite large and technically challenging to find a place for that,' an official said. Current plans have asked for public input on the future of the bridge. There are hopes that construction on the bridge's replacement will begin by 2028, according to the ITD. Highway traffic will be redirected toward a newer bridge north of the current bridge, which will be both wider and have increased visibility for drivers. To honor the iconic bridge, designers are considering a 'rainbow-like' arch design in the new plans. While the bridge would not be safe for traffic or pedestrians again, the ITD has proposed scenarios in which the bridge could be preserved. In the first scenario, costing $20.3 million, all but the historic arches would be replaced with follow up repairs occurring in 2070. Scenario two involved retaining as much of the historic bridge as possible with repairs every 25 years, costing $50.4 million. The third scenario, costing $48.4 million, would require the repair of the elements in the worst condition and repairs occurring every 10 to 15 years. Perseveration Idaho, which has been working for 50 years to preserve the state's historic places, argued that the historic landmark's demolition would be costly and environmentally wasteful, the Idaho Statesman reported. 'Rainbow Bridge, the largest single-span concrete arch structure in Idaho, remains today as a major achievement. [It] not only reflects the leading edge of bridge engineering of its time, but also exemplifies a conscious effort to meld a modern structure with a picturesque natural setting,' the National Register of Historic Places said in 1999. Many locals are torn over whether to preserve the bridge when doing so comes with such a high price tag. 'Keeping the rainbow bridge as a pedestrian bridge would be ideal, similar to the 95 long bridge,' one commenter wrote. 'Unfortunately building a new bridge is a necessity ... I don't want to be stuck in an endless money pit with rainbow bridge.' Another simply said: 'Leave the old bridge in place.' The ITD has extended their reach for public comment on the new design and the future for Rainbow Bridge until August 10. The Daily Mail reached out to the ITD for comment.
