logo
#

Latest news with #MohamedZaini

Sept 10 set for decision on Rosmah's appeal over recusal of trial judge in solar case
Sept 10 set for decision on Rosmah's appeal over recusal of trial judge in solar case

Borneo Post

time17 hours ago

  • Politics
  • Borneo Post

Sept 10 set for decision on Rosmah's appeal over recusal of trial judge in solar case

Rosmah filed the recusal application at the eleventh hour before Judge Mohamed Zaini was slated to deliver his decision on Sept 1, 2022.- Bernama photo PUTRAJAYA (July 4): The Court of Appeal has fixed Sept 10 to deliver its decision on Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor's appeal to recuse a High Court judge who presided over her corruption trial involving the RM1.25 billion solar hybrid project in Sarawak. Court of Appeal deputy registrar Muhammad Noor Firdaus Rosli set the date during the case management today. On June 25, the Court of Appeal three-member bench comprising Justices Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim, Datuk Azman Abdullah and Datuk Noorin Badaruddin reserved their judgment after hearing submissions from both the prosecution and defence. Rosmah's lawyer, Datuk Akberdin Abdul Kader, confirmed the date when contacted by Bernama . The wife of former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak is appealing against the decision by the then High Court judge, Mohamed Zaini Mazlan — who has since been elevated to the Court of Appeal — dismissing her application for his recusal from presiding over her case. Rosmah filed the recusal application at the eleventh hour before Judge Mohamed Zaini was slated to deliver his decision on Sept 1, 2022. The application was based on allegations that a draft judgment in her case, purportedly prepared by a third party, had been leaked before its official delivery. On the same day, Judge Mohamed Zaini found Rosmah, 73, guilty of three corruption charges linked to the hybrid solar project, and sentenced her to 10 years in prison and a RM970 million fine, in default 30 years in prison. However, she was granted a stay of execution on both the custodial sentence and the fine, pending the disposal of her appeal before the Court of Appeal. Rosmah was charged with one count of soliciting RM187.5 million and two counts of receiving RM6.5 million in bribes from former Jepak Holdings Sdn Bhd managing director, Saidi Abang Samsudin. – Bernama Court of Appeal decision Mohamed Zaini Mazlan recusal Rosmah Mansor

Sept 10 set for decision on Rosmah's appeal over recusal of trial judge in solar case
Sept 10 set for decision on Rosmah's appeal over recusal of trial judge in solar case

New Straits Times

time20 hours ago

  • Politics
  • New Straits Times

Sept 10 set for decision on Rosmah's appeal over recusal of trial judge in solar case

PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has fixed Sept 10 to deliver its decision on Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor's appeal to recuse a High Court judge who presided over her corruption trial involving the RM1.25 billion solar hybrid project in Sarawak. Court of Appeal deputy registrar Muhammad Noor Firdaus Rosli set the date during the case management today. On June 25, the Court of Appeal three-member bench comprising Justices Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim, Datuk Azman Abdullah and Datuk Noorin Badaruddin reserved their judgment after hearing submissions from both the prosecution and defence. Rosmah's lawyer, Datuk Akberdin Abdul Kader, confirmed the date when contacted by Bernama. The wife of former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak is appealing against the decision by the then High Court judge, Mohamed Zaini Mazlan, who has since been elevated to the Court of Appeal, dismissing her application for his recusal from presiding over her case. Rosmah filed the recusal application at the eleventh hour before Judge Mohamed Zaini was slated to deliver his decision on Sept 1, 2022. The application was based on allegations that a draft judgment in her case, purportedly prepared by a third party, had been leaked before its official delivery. On the same day, Judge Mohamed Zaini found Rosmah, 73, guilty of three corruption charges linked to the hybrid solar project, and sentenced her to 10 years in prison and a RM970 million fine, in default 30 years in prison. However, she was granted a stay of execution on both the custodial sentence and the fine, pending the disposal of her appeal before the Court of Appeal. Rosmah was charged with one count of soliciting RM187.5 million and two counts of receiving RM6.5 million in bribes from former Jepak Holdings Sdn Bhd managing director, Saidi Abang Samsudin. — Bernama

Sept 10 decision on Rosmah's appeal in solar case judge recusal
Sept 10 decision on Rosmah's appeal in solar case judge recusal

The Sun

time21 hours ago

  • Politics
  • The Sun

Sept 10 decision on Rosmah's appeal in solar case judge recusal

PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has fixed Sept 10 to deliver its decision on Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor's appeal to recuse a High Court judge who presided over her corruption trial involving the RM1.25 billion solar hybrid project in Sarawak. Court of Appeal deputy registrar Muhammad Noor Firdaus Rosli set the date during the case management today. On June 25, the Court of Appeal three-member bench comprising Justices Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim, Datuk Azman Abdullah and Datuk Noorin Badaruddin reserved their judgment after hearing submissions from both the prosecution and defence. Rosmah's lawyer, Datuk Akberdin Abdul Kader, confirmed the date when contacted by Bernama. The wife of former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak is appealing against the decision by the then High Court judge, Mohamed Zaini Mazlan — who has since been elevated to the Court of Appeal — dismissing her application for his recusal from presiding over her case. Rosmah filed the recusal application at the eleventh hour before Judge Mohamed Zaini was slated to deliver his decision on Sept 1, 2022. The application was based on allegations that a draft judgment in her case, purportedly prepared by a third party, had been leaked before its official delivery. On the same day, Judge Mohamed Zaini found Rosmah, 73, guilty of three corruption charges linked to the hybrid solar project, and sentenced her to 10 years in prison and a RM970 million fine, in default 30 years in prison. However, she was granted a stay of execution on both the custodial sentence and the fine, pending the disposal of her appeal before the Court of Appeal. Rosmah was charged with one count of soliciting RM187.5 million and two counts of receiving RM6.5 million in bribes from former Jepak Holdings Sdn Bhd managing director, Saidi Abang Samsudin. -Bernama

Court of Appeal to decide on Rosmah Mansor's appeal for judge recusal in RM1.25 billion solar project case on Sept 10.
Court of Appeal to decide on Rosmah Mansor's appeal for judge recusal in RM1.25 billion solar project case on Sept 10.

The Sun

time21 hours ago

  • Politics
  • The Sun

Court of Appeal to decide on Rosmah Mansor's appeal for judge recusal in RM1.25 billion solar project case on Sept 10.

PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has fixed Sept 10 to deliver its decision on Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor's appeal to recuse a High Court judge who presided over her corruption trial involving the RM1.25 billion solar hybrid project in Sarawak. Court of Appeal deputy registrar Muhammad Noor Firdaus Rosli set the date during the case management today. On June 25, the Court of Appeal three-member bench comprising Justices Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim, Datuk Azman Abdullah and Datuk Noorin Badaruddin reserved their judgment after hearing submissions from both the prosecution and defence. Rosmah's lawyer, Datuk Akberdin Abdul Kader, confirmed the date when contacted by Bernama. The wife of former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak is appealing against the decision by the then High Court judge, Mohamed Zaini Mazlan — who has since been elevated to the Court of Appeal — dismissing her application for his recusal from presiding over her case. Rosmah filed the recusal application at the eleventh hour before Judge Mohamed Zaini was slated to deliver his decision on Sept 1, 2022. The application was based on allegations that a draft judgment in her case, purportedly prepared by a third party, had been leaked before its official delivery. On the same day, Judge Mohamed Zaini found Rosmah, 73, guilty of three corruption charges linked to the hybrid solar project, and sentenced her to 10 years in prison and a RM970 million fine, in default 30 years in prison. However, she was granted a stay of execution on both the custodial sentence and the fine, pending the disposal of her appeal before the Court of Appeal. Rosmah was charged with one count of soliciting RM187.5 million and two counts of receiving RM6.5 million in bribes from former Jepak Holdings Sdn Bhd managing director, Saidi Abang Samsudin. -Bernama

Rosmah's lawyer questions alleged judgment draft
Rosmah's lawyer questions alleged judgment draft

The Star

time16-05-2025

  • Politics
  • The Star

Rosmah's lawyer questions alleged judgment draft

PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal was informed that the research division of the Kuala Lumpur High Court must have received instructions to prepare a purported draft judgment in the case involving Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor and the solar hybrid project. Lawyer Datuk Jagjit Singh, who represents Rosmah, said that the research unit would not have prepared the draft opinions if instructions were not specifically given. 'The research unit would not venture on a frolic of its own without instructions and directions,' said her lawyer Datuk Jagjit Singh in his submissions here yesterday. In her appeal, Rosmah seeks to recuse Justice Mohamed Zaini Mazlan, now a Court of Appeal judge, from presiding over her corruption case concerning the RM1.25bil solar hybrid project. On Sept 1, 2022, Justice Mohamed Zaini found Rosmah guilty of three corruption charges linked to the hybrid solar project. She was sentenced to 10 years in prison and a RM970mil fine. Rosmah, 73, filed a last-minute application at the High Court to recuse Justice Mohamed Zaini. She argued that the draft judgment in her case, which had been prepared by an external party, was leaked and had gone viral just a few days prior to the delivery of the decision. The recusal application was dismissed by Justice Mohamed Zaini at the outset of the proceedings on Sept 1, 2022. In the appeal, Jagjit further submitted that the draft was clearly meant for the benefit of Justice Mohamed Zaini. He said Justice Mohamed Zaini's conduct, when taken as a whole, created 'a real danger of bias'. 'The act of requesting an officer in the research unit to prepare a draft judgment is highly improper, therefore unacceptable,' he said. The hearing continues before a three-judge panel on June 25. Court of Appeal judge Justice Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim chaired the panel. Two other judges on the bench were Justices Azman Abdullah and Noorin Badaruddin.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store