Latest news with #Name
Edinburgh Live
14 hours ago
- Business
- Edinburgh Live
Tiger Woods' son Charlie's 'broke' claim as real net worth emerges
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Emerging from the vast shadow of his father, golf prodigy Charlie Woods is carving his own path on the greens, stirring curiosity among fans about the budding teenager's net worth. Despite comparisons to his father, the 15-time major champion Tiger Woods, young Charlie has been making waves. He further cemented his growing reputation by clinching victory at his first major American Junior Golf Association tournament – the Team TaylorMade Invitational. Charlie marked another milestone in December 2024 with his first hole-in-one. It was his nonchalant remark afterwards that really captured attention. Interrupting his celebrations came a good-natured reminder from Tiger, who quipped about the age-old tradition in golf. "You're buying [a round of drinks] for everyone out here," nudged Woods Snr, eliciting the cheeky retort from Charlie: "I'm not buying. I'm broke," reports the Mirror US. Such jests raise eyebrows: could the scion of golfing royalty really be feeling the pinch? Sportskeeda estimates Charlie Woods' net worth at an impressive $25 million (£18.5M). Yet, the youngster's financial prospects might be even more robust, following whispers about a sizeable trust fund. Rumour has it, both Charlie and his sister Sam are the beneficiaries of significant trusts, apparently worth $20M (£14.8M) each, courtesy of their illustrious dad Tiger. Charlie has reportedly been gifted two lavish properties in Florida and California, which he will gain access to when he reaches 21. Speculation around endorsements also suggests that Charlie's net worth may be larger than initially estimated. Young Woods is eligible for a potentially profitable Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deal. These contracts are typically offered to standout student-athletes, but there's no confirmation yet that he has signed with any brand. Rumours previously swirled that Charlie had partnered with Greyson, a clothing brand valued at an estimated $39m (£28.9m), after he was seen sporting the company's logo at the 2023 PNC Championship. However, neither Woods nor the brand have confirmed a deal. Charlie has also been seen wearing his father's signature golf apparel line, Sun Day Red, throughout his junior career. Yet, it remains unclear if there is any official agreement with his dad's brand. The 16 year old triumphed over some of the world's top junior players at the Streamsong Golf Resort Black Course to win the TaylorMade Invitational. This significant victory came after he missed out on local qualifying for the U.S. Open for the second consecutive year, and it even catapulted his AJGA ranking from No. 606 to No. 14. However, he still has a long road ahead to emulate his father's success, with 49 year old Woods leading the PGA Tour's all-time prize money list. Despite the uncertainty surrounding Charlie's actual earnings, his father's impressive on-course earnings of $120m (£89.1m), coupled with a staggering overall net worth of $1.3bn (£965m) as reported by Forbes, suggest that both he and his sister are unlikely to face financial hardship anytime soon.
Tom's Guide
4 days ago
- Sport
- Tom's Guide
VPNs ordered to block illegal streaming sites in France – but how would this work?
French broadcaster Canal+, alongside the Ligue de Football Professionnel (LFP), recently dealt a blow to some of the best VPNs, with victory in its anti-piracy court case. The ruling ordered VPN providers to block access to over 200 "illegal sports streaming sites," with the case being described as a "legal first." NordVPN, Surfshark, ExpressVPN, Proton VPN, and CyberGhost are named in the case, and all are disappointed with the outcome. Being forced to restrict access to any sites – illegal or not – is a direct contradiction of the fundamental principles of most VPNs. It has been claimed that this sets a dangerous precedent for future legal cases and VPN targeting. Appeals are expected, and it isn't yet clear what actions the VPN providers will take. However, should site blocking commence, we wanted to investigate what this might look like and who would be affected. We can't predict if – or how – providers will comply with blocking orders, but domain-level blocking would appear to be the likeliest technical approach. Many of the leading VPN providers operate their own DNS (Domain Name System) servers. DNS servers have been described as "the phonebook of the internet." They translate domain names and what you type into your browser into the correct IP address for your desired site. DNS servers are often used by VPNs, adblockers, and malware protection software to block malicious sites. If you try to access a site that has identified as malicious, an IP address isn't returned and you won't be able to visit the site. Providers will have a "blocklist" of dangerous sites you're unable to access. In theory, illegal streaming sites could be added to this list. Affected users could use a custom DNS server, different from the one used by their VPN, to access the blocked sites. Not every VPN supports custom DNS, but NordVPN and Proton VPN do. Surfshark has also just launched a privacy-focused public DNS service. It appears as though the ruling will only impact those in France or French territories. Denis Vyazovoy, CPO of AdGuard VPN, commented on the ruling, describing it as "territorial." He said "this ruling does not directly affect users outside of France who connect to French VPN servers, unless their subscription was initiated while they were in France/French territories." "VPN users in France who use one of the named providers will likely find that certain pirate IPTV and sports streaming sites simply stop working – that is assuming that the VPNs comply with the ruling." Vyazovoy was skeptical that providers would fully go along with the blocking and suggested removing physical French servers as a workaround. They could be replaced with virtual servers elsewhere and lead to a maintained user level in France. The Internet Infrastructure (i2) Coalition said in a statement that "the integrity of the internet" is at risk. "The French ruling not only misplaces responsibility: it fundamentally threatens the privacy and security of millions of users in France and beyond," the coalition added. The i2 Coalition oversees a working group known as the VPN Trust Initiative (VTI), of which NordVPN, Surfshark, and ExpressVPN are members. The VTI recognized the need to safeguard rightsholders but urged "precision, restraint, and accountability" when it comes to technical enforcement of the internet. AdGuard VPN CPO, Denis Vyazovoy, had further thoughts on the potential repercussions of this ruling. "This ruling sets a worrying precedent: VPNs are being treated more like content platforms than neutral privacy tools," he said. "If more rulings like this follow, established VPN services that appear to be primary targets of such injunctions may consider exiting France altogether or at least reconsider the terms of their presence there. This will deprive French users of essential and trusted privacy tools." Vyazovoy expressed his worry that other VPN providers will be the next targets. "Everyone in the industry should be paying close attention and preparing for similar legal challenges. This ruling sends a signal to the whole VPN market in France and possibly beyond." A repeated message is that it's wrong to target VPNs. The VTI said "this selective approach is certain to fail, as it targets symptoms rather than addressing the root causes of piracy." Vyazovoy believed that "this court decision pushes VPNs into becoming content police, which risks turning them from privacy tools into enforcement tools." "If VPNs are forced to monitor traffic or block domains, users can't fully trust them anymore. That could drive people to sketchier, less transparent VPNs that don't follow any rules at all," he added. "This alone creates potential privacy risks for users. The precedent this sets could also lead to wider blocks, more legal actions, and less digital freedom in the long run." It isn't yet clear how providers will respond, and there are various obstacles that need to be carefully navigated. NordVPN acknowledged the ruling and believed it "will have a negative impact on France's digital security." It added that its team "is currently assessing all possible approaches that align with both legal compliance and our core commitment to our users' freedom and privacy." Surfshark said it was "reviewing the ruling and assessing all available options, including a potential appeal." While Surfshark said it has "respect for the French legal process," it believed the decision would be dangerous for global internet freedoms. The provider added that "mandating that intermediaries implement content restrictions brings up critical issues related to freedom of expression, proportionality, and the protection of user rights." ExpressVPN was also disappointed with the decision and said it was reviewing the judgement. "We assure you that our commitment to privacy and our no logs policy will never be compromised," the provider commented. This is certainly not the last we will hear of this case, and we will carefully monitor the providers' next steps. We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Legendary Coach Nick Saban to Shape Future of College Athletics in Presidential Commission
Former Alabama coach Nick Saban is expected to co-chair a new presidential commission on college sports reform, initiated by President Donald Trump. The commission aims to address significant issues in college athletics, including Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) payments, transfer rules, and conference alignments. Advertisement A source told The Athletic that Saban, a vocal critic of the current NIL system, will work alongside a prominent businessman with deep ties to college athletics. The initiative follows a meeting between Trump and Saban at the University of Alabama's spring graduation, where they reportedly discussed the state of college sports. The outlet also reports that the President will be 'very engaged' with the commission as they attempt to steer collegiate sports in a better direction. Saban responded to the news late last night on X, writing, 'It's Time to get College Football back on Track!!!' Nick Saban's Next Big Challenge – Fixing College Sports The commission, behind the leadership of 7-time National Champion coach Nick Saban, is expected to examine booster-funded payments, athlete employment debates, and Title IX applications, among other topics. Advertisement This move comes amid a transformative period in college sports, driven by relaxed transfer rules and NIL earnings, which have given athletes unprecedented power. Let's face it, the transfer portal process is absurd, sometimes leading athletes to jump around to multiple schools to fish for more playing time. And NIL is turning athletes from certain sports or with particular looks into multi-millionaires, regardless of talent level. Shedeur Sanders, a fifth-round draft pick of the Cleveland Browns, was a top NIL earner, as was LSU gymnast Livvy Dunne. They are nowhere near the top of their respective sports. A potential $2.78 billion NCAA settlement addressing antitrust lawsuits is also in progress, highlighting a perceived need for federal legislation. Advertisement Past presidential interventions, like the 1975 Olympic Sports Commission, suggest long-term impacts from such efforts. Critics, including athletes' attorneys, express concern that Saban's involvement may prioritize institutional interests over players' financial freedoms. It is a legitimate concern. RELATED: Alabama legend Nick Saban reportedly recruits President Trump into crusade against NIL money in college football This Doesn't Work Anymore Nick Saban shocked the college football world when he retired at the beginning of 2024, mentioning NIL money as a significant factor in his decision. Advertisement In an interview with ESPN, Saban would later explain that the behavior of some of his players following Alabama's 27-20 overtime loss to Michigan that year in the CFP semifinal was disheartening. 'I want to be clear that wasn't the reason, but some of those events certainly contributed,' Saban said of his decision to retire. 'I was really disappointed in the way that the players acted after the game. You gotta win with class. You gotta lose with class.' 'We had our opportunities to win the game and we didn't do it, and then showing your ass and being frustrated and throwing helmets and doing that stuff … that's not who we are and what we've promoted in our program.' He went on to discuss with his players the potential to field a great team the next season, but found they were solely interested in two things: 'What assurances do I have that I'm going to play because they're thinking about transferring, and how much are you going to pay me?' Advertisement 'So I'm saying to myself, 'Maybe this doesn't work anymore, that the goals and aspirations are just different, and that it's all about how much money can I make as a college player?'' Saban continued. 'I'm not saying that's bad. I'm not saying it's wrong, I'm just saying that's never been what we were all about, and it's not why we had success through the years.' College players shouldn't be faulted for wanting to find ways to make money from their athletic careers, especially when 90% of them will not go on to big paydays in professional sports. But something has to be done to fix the issues. We haven't even touched on the fact that it's nearly impossible for these student-athletes to focus on or want to focus on their education when there is social media money to be made and they're transferring to different schools three times in two years. Advertisement Can Saban help make college sports great again? It might be his biggest challenge yet. Also Read:: Tom Brady Shares Words of Wisdom for Shedeur Sanders' After Draft Slide
Yahoo
21-05-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Nick Saban: 'I don't think we need a commission' on college sports. Here's why
VESTAVIA HILLS, Ala. — Nick Saban continues to be at the center of conversation about a recently announced federal commission on the future of college athletics, one that will tackle NCAA sports in the age of Name, Image and Likeness. But the former Alabama football coach reiterated a message that he's continued to push since he was announced a co-chairman of the commission along with Cody Campbell, a former Texas Tech football player and chairman of the university's Board of Regents. Advertisement "I know there has been a lot of stuff out there about some commission or whatever. I don't think we need a commission. I've said that before," Saban said before the Nick's Kids Golf Tournament at the Old Overton Club in Vestavia Hills. "I think we need to know what the issues are. I think we just need to have people who are willing to move those and solve those and create some solutions for some of those issues. I'm all for being a consultant to anybody who would think that my experience would be beneficial to helping create some of those solutions." To Saban, that doesn't mean that all the issues regarding the NCAA and NIL are solved. "I'm not anti-NIL. I'm all for the players for making money," Saban said. "I don't think we have a sustainable system right now. I think a lot of people agree with that in terms of the future of college athletics period, not just football. How do we sustain 20 other non-revenue sports that create lots of opportunities for people and the future?" Saban said he knows President Donald Trump is "very interested in athletics" and the changing college football landscape that includes NIL and "having a balanced competitive playing field." Advertisement "If I could be a consultant to anyone who might be able to help the future of college athletics, I would be more than willing to do that," Saban said. Ahead of the Regions Tradition Golf Tournament in Hoover May 14, Saban said he didn't "really know much about this commission." "I think we know what needs to be done, I just think we've got to figure out who's got the will to do it," Saban said. "I learned one thing about coaching for all these years that when you get into a subject like this that's very complex, it's probably good not to talk about it off the cuff." Colin Gay covers Alabama football for The Tuscaloosa News, part of the USA TODAY Network. Reach him at cgay@ or follow him @_ColinGay on X, formerly known as Twitter. This article originally appeared on The Tuscaloosa News: Nick Saban reiterates lack of need for federal commission on college sports
Yahoo
16-05-2025
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
Goo Goo Dolls Fans Lose Their Minds Over 'Incredible' New Release
Fans of the Goo Goo Dolls just got the surprise of their lives when the beloved band released never-before-seen footage from the 1998 music video of one of their biggest hits, and they can't believe the performers have been "hiding" it from them all this time. Alongside a preview posted to X of "a brand new lyric video" posted to YouTube for their fan-favorite track "Iris," the band revealed they dug "deep into the archives" for video that was shot for the original production but never used. Listeners were completely gagged by the 26-year-old glimpse at the musicians, who hit it big in 1995 after their breakthrough single "Name." There was enough footage in their archives to make a full-length video of lead vocalist and guitarist John Rzeznik, bassist and vocalist Robby Takac, and former drummer Mike Malinin, with one fan calling out how much they loved that it was done to "the full version and not the radio edit." "Why have you been hiding this?!" one demanded before adding, "I absolutely 💯 love the behind the scenes footage ❤️😊🔥." "Babe John 🥹," another fawned over the then-33-year-old. "Yes! Yes! Yes! 😍," others celebrated. "25 years later and we are still getting fed with UNRELEASED FOOTAGE!" someone on YouTube wrote excitedly, adding, "What a time to be alive." "Incredible quality," someone else praised. "It is really cool to see additional footage. Love it.""Interesting visual changes," another observed, noting the contrast between the original version. "Love this.""Crying over a song from the '90s like it just broke my heart today," someone else admitted, adequately describing the state of mind for Dolls fans everywhere.
