US pro athletes reject antitrust exemptions for college sports
While compensation for professional players seemingly knows no limit, college athletes in the US have only been allowed to begin profiting from their performance and reputation in recent years.
Now, professional players are weighing in as Congress works to develop a national framework for student athlete profit-sharing, with pros saying they felt a duty to protect future union members while they played in college.
"Granting an antitrust exemption to the NCAA and its members gives the green light for the organisation and schools to collude and work against student athletes," the unions' statement said.
"Historically, antitrust exemptions have been used to set prices, limit wages, and restrict access to opportunities provided by open markets, all while shielding abuse from legal recourse."
The joint statement was sent by the Major League Baseball Players Association (MLBPA), Major League Soccer Players Association (MLSPA), National Basketball Players Association (NBPA), National Football League Players Association (NFLPA) and National Hockey League Players Association (NHLPA).
The US House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce is considering the Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements (SCORE) Act after a House settlement last month ensured National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletes will receive revenue sharing from their schools for Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) profits.
In a statement last week Congressman Gus Bilirakis, a Florida Republican, said a national framework governing such profit-sharing was long overdue, and praised the SCORE Act saying it "delivers the stability, clarity and transparency" student athletes and colleges need.
A 2021 Supreme Court decision held that the NCAA is subject to antitrust laws.
In their joint statement, the players' unions called for transparency and fair dealing.
"It is not hard to imagine a situation where NCAA and its members collude to restrict revenue sharing and deny student athletes fair compensation with the confidence of immunity against legal action. Indeed, they have been doing exactly that for decades.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Serious Accusations Against South Africa: Alleged Collaboration with Hamas Sparks Diplomatic Storm
US-based lawsuit worth $400 million is being prepared against President Cyril Ramaphosa and other officials. Image: Supplied/Presidency A lawsuit alleges that South Africa, alongside Iran, engaged in active coordination with Hamas that ultimately led to the October violence, which claimed the lives of hostages of at least forty‑seven American citizens. Image: Supplied/Presidency South Africa is facing serious accusations of collaborating with Hamas in the lead-up to the October 7 attacks on Israel. These grave claims have ignited controversy both at home and abroad. Journalist Paula Slier, in a blog post published in the Times of Israel on July 11, 2025, reported that a US-based lawsuit worth $400 million is being prepared against President Cyril Ramaphosa and other officials. The suit alleges that South Africa, alongside Iran, engaged in active coordination with Hamas that ultimately led to the October violence, which claimed the lives of hostages of at least forty‑seven American citizens. The allegations are primarily based on the work of UK consultant Justin Lewis, who claims to have uncovered evidence of diplomatic collusion. Lewis argues that South African officials not only provided rhetorical support but also facilitated Hamas's access to international legal platforms, specifically the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice — access that Hamas would not have otherwise enjoyed. Dirco Rejects Allegations as Baseless In an open letter responding to Slier and the Times of Israel, Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) spokesperson Chrispin Phiri expressed 'bemusement' at the publication's decision to elevate what he described as 'extreme, dangerous and unverified assertions.' Phiri criticised the amplification of Lewis's claims, noting that they are unsupported by any credible evidence. He emphasised that South Africa's diplomatic efforts in support of Palestinian rights are rooted in international law, not political alignment with Hamas. According to Phiri, raising such serious allegations without verifying facts not only undermines public trust but also jeopardises the reputation of both South Africa and the global media. Legal Framework: South Africa's Case Against Israel The South African government's approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict has always been anchored in legal rather than ideological grounds. Cape Town lodged a case at the International Court of Justice, alleging that Israel has violated the Genocide Convention and breached multiple UN resolutions and human rights treaties. South Africa contends that Israeli settlement expansion, forced displacements, and disproportionate use of force in Gaza constitute a clear pattern of settler colonialism and ethnic persecution. These claims are framed entirely within the ambit of international humanitarian law. Phiri stressed that South Africa's legal case against Israel is not directed at Judaism or the Jewish people. Nor is it politically motivated. Instead, it relies on documented evidence of rights violations with a historical basis extending back decades. The government's stance is one of accountability under international legal norms. ANC's Longstanding Relationship with the Jewish Community Historically, the ANC has had close ties to South Africa's Jewish community. Many Jewish anti-apartheid activists stood side-by-side with ANC leaders during the liberation struggle. Notable figures such as Helen Suzman and others actively supported the fight against apartheid. In recognition of this shared history, the ANC has consistently acknowledged the contributions of Jewish individuals in advancing democracy in South Africa. The ANC leadership often highlights this legacy to counter claims that South Africa's foreign policy is motivated by anti-Jewish sentiment. On the contrary, the party asserts that its support for Palestine is informed by a deep commitment to human rights and justice — not ethnicity or religion. Ongoing Media Scrutiny and Commitment to Investigative Due Diligence Despite the weight of Dirco's denial, Slier has made clear that she intends to continue her investigative work. She acknowledged that Lewis is not personally filing the lawsuit but serves as an adviser to third parties contemplating legal action. Slier stressed that the situation remains fluid, and she is committed to pursuing credible sources, legal experts, and scholars to determine whether there is any basis to the allegations of prior knowledge or collusion. "I will report on any credible evidence of collaboration, foreknowledge, or financial transactions linked to South African officials," Slier said, "but only after rigorous verification." She also noted that some colleagues questioned the credibility of Lewis, pointing to a lack of legal credentials and an absence of evidence supporting his claims. ANC Denounces Allegations as Meritless Amid the ongoing uproar, the ANC has issued a firm statement dismissing the allegations as meritless and politically motivated. The party said the claims are part of a broader campaign to discredit its principled stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The ANC urged the media and legal representatives to investigate carefully and vet sources before making sensational claims. "The ANC strongly rejects these allegations," the party noted. "They are baseless, reckless and run counter to our long-standing commitment to justice, human rights and international law." Wider Implications for South Africa's Global Role The controversy is raising broader questions about South Africa's role in global diplomacy. Critics argue that if the allegations were true, they would signal a troubling trend: the use of state influence to support militant organisations. Allies warn that such perceptions could hamper South Africa's ability to work with Western partners and international organisations. Supporters counter that South Africa has a right to pursue legal remedies through international justice mechanisms and to speak out against what it considers violations of international law, regardless of political or strategic fallout. They argue that South Africa has always used its UN membership and moral authority to promote peace and human dignity. Looking Ahead At present, there is no legal proceeding underway in any court against South African officials. The alleged lawsuit remains an exploratory effort by unnamed US citizens, reportedly based on unverified evidence. Dirco insists that no formal case has been initiated or filed. Meanwhile, the ANC and Dirco maintain a united front: they reject the allegations and reaffirm South Africa's unwavering commitment to the rule of law. Journalist Slier remains vigilant, promising to continue her investigation. As the country navigates this diplomatic minefield, the integrity of its legal processes, journalistic scrutiny, and media standards will come under intense focus.
The South African
11 hours ago
- The South African
Cyril Ramaphosa comes out swinging, suspends Andrew Chauke
President Cyril Ramaphosa has suspended the South Gauteng Director of Public Prosecutions, Advocate Andrew Chauke, with immediate effect. Image: Wikimedia Commons Home » Cyril Ramaphosa comes out swinging, suspends Andrew Chauke President Cyril Ramaphosa has suspended the South Gauteng Director of Public Prosecutions, Advocate Andrew Chauke, with immediate effect. Image: Wikimedia Commons President Cyril Ramaphosa has suspended the South Gauteng Director of Public Prosecutions, Advocate Andrew Chauke, with immediate effect, pending an inquiry into his fitness to hold office. In a statement on Monday evening, The Presidency said the suspension was effected in terms of Section 14(3) read with Section 12(6)(a) of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) Act. 'Having asked Adv Chauke to provide reasons why he should not be suspended, President Ramaphosa has decided suspension is the correct course of action pending an inquiry,' the Presidency said. The President has since informed Advocate Chauke of his decision in writing. Additionally, President Ramaphosa indicated that both the Presidency and the public would benefit from an independent assessment of the issues at hand, particularly where there are disputes of fact. He further expressed concern that Advocate Chauke's continued presence at the helm of prosecutions in South Gauteng, while serious accusations are levelled against him, could negatively affect the reputation of the NPA as a whole. 'President Ramaphosa is also concerned that Adv Chauke will not be able to fulfil his functions optimally while facing an inquiry,' the Presidency said. This decision follows prolonged concerns regarding Advocate Chauke's conduct in critical cases and represented a significant step toward restoring public trust in the NPA. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The South African
13 hours ago
- The South African
Top Gauteng prosecutor suspended: Ramaphosa moves to fix NPA
President Cyril Ramaphosa's suspension of the South Gauteng Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), Advocate Andrew Chauke, has garnered praise online. The suspension comes after years of mounting calls for Chauke's removal. It will take effect immediately pending an inquiry into his fitness to hold office. The decision is in terms of section 14(3) read with 12(6)(a) of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) Act. In a statement, Ramaphosa said he informed Chauke of his decision and shared that the public would benefit from an independent assessment of the issues. He believes that if Chauke continues his duties while facing an inquiry, it would negatively affect the NPA's reputation. The president also expressed concern that Chauke would not be able to fulfil his functions optimally while facing an inquiry. ActionSA, which had previously called for Chauke's removal after the NPA withdrew charges against former Minister Zizi Kodwa, welcomed the move. The party labelled Chauke 'Joburg's king of public prosecutions,' criticising what it sees as a failure to pursue high-profile corruption cases. ActionSA Parliamentary Leader Athol Trollip described the suspension as long overdue but cautioned that it was just one step toward broader reform. Chauke, appointed by former President Jacob Zuma in 2011, has been a controversial figure. In 2023, National Director of Public Prosecutions Shamila Batohi recommended his precautionary suspension following the withdrawal of charges against former Crime Intelligence boss Richard Mdluli. Chauke dismissed the recommendation, accusing Batohi of bowing to pressure from certain factions. 'It is quite clear that she acts to appease and satisfy particular groupings within society,' he said at the time. His suspension comes just a month after Batohi faced criticism from several political parties for comments made before Parliament's Standing Committee on Public Accounts (SCOPA). During the session, she stated that the NPA had been infiltrated by bad elements. However, she later retracted her remark. 'I said that perhaps there are people within the NPA who are not aligned with the leadership's vision of upholding the rule of law,' Batohi clarified. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news
