logo
#

Latest news with #NorthWestShelfProject

Woodside CEO cops vicious spray for exposing the ‘Temu' Gen Zers who export their carbon guilt abroad while preaching about the climate crisis
Woodside CEO cops vicious spray for exposing the ‘Temu' Gen Zers who export their carbon guilt abroad while preaching about the climate crisis

Sky News AU

time3 days ago

  • Business
  • Sky News AU

Woodside CEO cops vicious spray for exposing the ‘Temu' Gen Zers who export their carbon guilt abroad while preaching about the climate crisis

Woodside CEO Meg O'Neill sure raised some hackles this week when she took aim at the double standards of climate crusaders. In her sights were those who bash fossil fuels while rushing to charge their smartphones so they can splurge on cheap goods from online Chinese retailers. But the boss of Australia's biggest oil and gas producer wasn't sticking a Boomer-style boot into young Australians, despite the inevitable howls of protest. This business leader simply had the audacity to voice an uncomfortable truth - it is time to face the energy hypocrisy woven into the fabric of our everyday lives. Ms O'Neill was on a panel at the industry's annual conference in Brisbane on Tuesday when the moderator, Sky News Political contributor Chris Uhlmann, asked if people genuinely knew the source of their electricity. Echoing the sentiment that 'most people hit a switch and expect the lights to come on', she then referenced the false fossil fuel virtue which exists, according to reports. Ms Neill said: 'It's been a fascinating journey to watch the discussion, particularly among young people who have this very ideological, almost zealous view of, you know, 'fossil fuel bad, renewables good', that are happily plugging in their devices, ordering things from Shein and Temu, having, you know, one little thing shipped to their house without any sort of recognition of the energy and carbon impact of their actions. 'So that human impact and the consumer's role in driving energy demand and emissions absolutely is a missing space in the conversation.' Or in other words, exposing those who quietly export their carbon guilt abroad while proudly claiming to protect the planet. Woodside and by association Ms O'Neill are the enemy to green evangelists because of the company's North West Shelf Project on the Burrup Peninsula in the remote Pilbara region. It is the biggest gas plant on the mainland and the extension - now approved by newly appointed Environment Minister Murray Watt - will allow Woodside to keep operating and supplying gas to the Australian market until 2070. Opponents claim the project will emit billions of tonnes of CO2 as we keep the lights on. Consequently, the net zero brigade do not like Ms O'Neill's position on double standards one bit. Grace Vegesana from the Australian Youth Climate Coalition didn't hold back, accusing Ms O'Neill of trying to dodge responsibility for climate change by pointing the finger at everyday Australians. 'Climate change is happening right in front of our eyes yet Meg O'Neill is trying to cast the blame back onto individuals. In case you've forgotten basic climate science Meg, yes, fossil fuels = bad,' Ms Vegesana said, going after what she called yet another attempt by big oil and gas to deflect blame. Greenpeace's Joe Rafalowicz went even further, calling it 'laughable' that a fossil fuel executive would try to shift blame onto kids. His view was that Ms O'Neill should start listening to students in flooded mid north New South Wales who just saw their schools shut down 'thanks to another climate-driven disaster'. But this is not the essence of her view. The issue Ms O'Neill is highlighting, I believe, is that any and every call for moderation or pragmatic transition in energy is framed as heresy. We are now saddled with energy insecurity and skyrocketing costs, not in the least because of the news this week that from July 1 households in NSW, SA, and SE QLD face up to a $228 spike in their electricity bills. This might be something to think about at the next climate rally when these critics are live-streaming their outrage on devices charged with fossil fuel-powered electricity. But I don't blame Gen Z - they are encouraged to criticise the very industry that keeps this country running. Meanwhile, the Coalition has rediscovered its spine by stepping back from its net zero by 2050 goal following the second honeymoon of the Liberal and National parties. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said Australia needs to do its part on climate change but not 'at any cost.' Significantly, the former shadow finance minister Jane Hume who pushed to keep the net zero target didn't make it into the new shadow cabinet. But if Gen Zs and the like desire a carbon-free future, are they honestly prepared to unplug their lives and work with major industry or is the goal simple - to yell at the companies that keep them connected? The transition needs to be handled efficiently and until then so-called 'climate justice' means blackouts to the rest of us. Louise Roberts is a journalist and editor who has worked as a TV and radio commentator in Australia, the UK and the US. Louise is a winner of the Peter Ruehl Award for Outstanding Columnist in the NRMA Kennedy Awards for Excellence in Journalism and has been shortlisted in other awards for her opinion work.

Gas decision has ruined Labor's environmental credibility
Gas decision has ruined Labor's environmental credibility

Sydney Morning Herald

time5 days ago

  • Business
  • Sydney Morning Herald

Gas decision has ruined Labor's environmental credibility

Are we hell-bent on pumping even more emissions into our atmosphere for short-term gain (' Albanese just extended a major fossil fuel project for 45 years. Here's what it means ', May 29)? The North West Shelf expansion, now set to go ahead, will have gas producers salivating and fossil fuel lobbyists feeling encouraged. Donald Trump's denialism and full-blown environmental vandalism has emboldened naysayers and anti-science conspiracists around the globe. But why would the Labor government, having built on its policies to cut emissions from electricity generation, transport and industry, approve other projects which, in the case of the NW Shelf, would add on-site emissions of 7.7 million tonnes a year? Why would the government not feel emboldened, since the election, to say no to the gas companies who want to keep us addicted? Why would the government not demand that the gas we already have be provided to Australian consumers, not sold to the highest bidder overseas to fill the overseas gas companies' coffers? Fiona Colin, Malvern East Environment Minister Murray Watt, in announcing preliminary approval to Woodside for its North West Shelf Project's 45-year extension plan, stated that the decision was made after 'consideration of rigorous scientific and other advice … from a wide cross-section of the community' and 'subject to strict conditions'. Given that the wide-ranging negative environmental impact of ocean drilling for gas is well documented, and in this case there is also the high risk of damage to the culturally significant 50,000-year-old Aboriginal rock art in the region to the extent that it would lose World Heritage status, we need to know – what is the scientific evidence for the government's case and what are the strict conditions that would be consistent with Labor's pre-election promises to promote the development of renewable energy. It seems to me that the government is risking a Faustian bargain. Paul Casey, Callala Bay I'm bitterly disappointed that the Albanese government has extended the life of Woodside's North West Shelf gas industry. Wishfully, I thought Labor would be the better environmental manager of our two major parties, and I am horrified that they have failed the first test in their second term of government – protecting Australia's magnificent natural and cultural heritage. The WA Tourism website says 120,000 people are employed in the state's industry, at least 50 times the number employed by Woodside gas. Thousands of tour operators would lose their jobs due to the degradation of WA's natural wonders such as Scott Reef. Losing a few thousand Woodside jobs is hardly a tragedy compared to the desecration of our country caused by this extension. Margot Vaccari, Berowra Still reeling from the graphic scenes of carnage on the sea floor shown in the must-see film Ocean, I'm wondering what role our government will take in the UN Ocean Conference being held in France next month. Come on, Albo – we voted for you and environmental protection. The Woodside decision and the destructive message it sends doesn't sit well with your pre-election policies. Neither does it augur well for your legacy. It seems as if you are choosing to channel bottom-feeder Trump rather than the extraordinary David Attenborough. Rosemary Russell, Neutral Bay What a disgrace. Giving Woodside an extension for 40 years, no less. They've already made their money out of NWS and now an extension. Thanks for the $40 billion over 40 years, Woodside, and how much did you get back from the $40 billion a year the Government subsidises fossil fuel industry in Australia? North West Shelf employment of about 2200 is 0.03% of employment in Western Australia. Big deal – not. And what do you do about all the emissions you produce getting the gas to sell overseas for Japan to sell on at great profit? I'm appalled by this government's decisions on gas and coal approvals. Totally disgusted. Jon Percival, Taringa (Qld) With news of the Woodside approval, every young Australian should now understand that we have a government that puts the economic interests of the fossil fuel industry ahead of their futures. The fast-emerging climate crisis will present young people with a very challenging future. Surely they have a right to expect our current political leaders to be taking every possible step not to make the situation worse. Catherine Rossiter, Fadden (Qld) Fossil fuel fantasies Having first-hand experience after visiting in 2018, I can assure Santos MD Kevin Gallagher that it is not Victoria which has the North Korea mindset, but the gas industry (' Santos says investment conditions in Victoria are like North Korea ', May 29). Much like the recent North Korean warship launch, the argument that Australia needs more gas development falls over as soon as it is exposed to the real world – where outside the fossil fuel industry and its media enabler's rigid and predictable groupthink, renewable energy sources remain cheaper, cleaner, more timely and do not irreversibly destroy a liveable planet for future generations. That these shysters have been able to pay virtually no tax while exporting most of Australia's gas offshore is a national shame and tragedy, so let's not add to the debacle by swallowing fossil fuel fairytales. As Australian patriots might say: no representation without taxation. Chris Roylance Paddington (Qld) It is intriguing how much Kevin Gallagher knows about investment conditions in North Korea given the international sanctions against the country. Perhaps he is paid so much as CEO to compensate for swallowing his moral compass to do his work. His whinge about a democratic society making the destruction of their environment more onerous sounds like a win to me. I suspect the same kind of complaints were made in the 19th century by those investing in the slave trade. Giles Parker, Riverview Use Royal Randwick for housing Peter McGauran, chairman of the Australian Turf Club, claims that a great opportunity to financially secure the future of thoroughbred racing has been lost with the vote not to support the sale of Rosehill racecourse (' Rosehill won't become a mini-city, but there's a Plan B just down the metro line ', May 29). Your correspondent Mike Keneally has proposed, as an alternative, the disposal of Canterbury track (Letters, May 29), while acknowledging it is a smaller area than Rosehill. Another option would be for racing to focus on Warwick Farm and Rosehill tracks and dispose of Royal Randwick racecourse, which is not only a larger land area than Rosehill but of far greater value for housing development as it is already well served by the light rail system and is close to important health services and the University of NSW. As well, the new suburb of Royal Randwick, being adjacent to Centennial Park, would have ready access to recreational facilities. Thus, it would be ideally suited to high-rise residential development similar to that at nearby Queen's Park. McGauran claims that selling Rosehill would have financially helped the racing industry. This seems to suggest that the industry is suffering difficulties, at a time when the number of NSW races with prize money above $1 million continues to increase and would-be owners are struggling to buy a yearling for less than a few hundred thousand dollars. Bruce Coomber, Sawtell Should Premier Chris Minns compulsorily acquire Rosehill racecourse for housing despite opposition from 'high-profile' wealthy trainers (' Timid city needs V'landys 'can-do', May 29)? The arguments in favour are very strong, though of course it's not only the wealthy, well-connected and powerful people who run racing we should be concerned about as we wrestle with the crisis of housing affordability. We need a laser focus on vastly increasing not just the amount of housing, but well-designed housing with good urban amenity such as parks, sports fields, public transport and schools all based on suburbs that are designed to be walked around, not car-based. To get good suburbs, we need more than government making land available; we need the firm hand of government mandating good urban design and the direct provision of public housing in spades. Of course NSW being what it is, the conflict of interests between wealthy and powerful developer interests are likely to be even more problematic to the delivery of good housing than the horse and gambling crowd, influential as they are. Colin Hesse, Nowra Rosehill had a train station. It now has a light rail stop at Rosehill Gardens – some 600 metres from the main entrance to the course. Grand Avenue is congested with heavy vehicle traffic from industries that feeds into James Ruse Drive, which is a carpark most weekday mornings and afternoons. The whole notion of placing a mini-city in this location was fraught with many more issues than the value of the land or turf club members' votes. George Zivkovic, Northmead For the record, those who advocate development of Canterbury racecourse for housing need to understand that the racecourse, built beside the banks of the Cooks River, lies on reclaimed swamp; every time it rains, it returns to its mangrove origins. Recent housing developments nearby are pumping water out of their basements constantly and have rapidly dropped in value. John Bailey, Canterbury Unions: It's complex It's great to see the lid lifted on corruption in the CFMEU but unfortunate that it fires up those who demonise the trade union movement (' CFMEU confessions ', May 29). Unions have played a huge role in improving the lives of millions of Australians. Sadly, many younger people who have benefited from battles fought by previous generations are reluctant to belong to a union. I can't help feeling collective bargaining is becoming more important than ever as work is casualised or outsourced and AI threatens countless other jobs. Rob Mills, Riverview Regulators dozed off Caitlin Fitzsimmons' article exposes the deplorable service provided by Sydney Water and the EPA (' Forever chemicals in Sydney water ', May 28). Both agencies have been asleep at the wheel as these chemicals pollute our water and bodies. Remember how the EPA failed to act on radioactive materials at Hunters Hill many years ago, and we are still waiting for the same agency to identify the source of the asbestos spread in public parks and playgrounds. Maybe a royal commission into Sydney Water and the EPA would force management of both 'regulatory bodies' to do their jobs. Lin Sinton, Killarney Heights Taxing the wealthy Ross Gittins nails it once again (' Ignore rich men's super tax whine ', May 28) but omitted one important point regarding the alleged evil of taxing unrealised capital gains. Despite the fears that the sky might fall in if these gains were to be taxed, it should be remembered that a similar tax already exists – state Land Tax. It is levied annually on the unimproved value of property held (excluding the family home) above a specified threshold, even though the property has not been sold. It may not be a popular tax, but it forms an important part of the state's finances. Vince Taranto, Roselands Style over substance House sellers are not only ones being ripped off by the price of online advertising (' House sellers are being ripped off – and the ACCC is onto it ', May 29). There is also the expensive practice of 'styling' – in other words, convincing the vendor that the property will sell more easily or for a better price if there are 10 cushions on the bed. Add in the state government rip-off called stamp duty on a new purchase and it is no surprise a considerable proportion of the older generation do not consider downsizing. Stephanie Edwards, Leichhardt Lesson lost If Giselle Kapterian survives the recount, she will be immediately given a shadow ministry position. This will take her focus away from her electorate, which she barely knows, to her shadow position. And the Liberals wonder why Bradfield has become the ultimate marginal electorate? Years of neglect landed them in this position. They've learned nothing. Megan Pursche, Gordon Let the sun set Your editorial on the demise of the British Empire sets an odd jarring note of remorse that this has come about, when it should be a cause for rejoicing (' London lets the sun go down on the British Empire ', May 29). Professor Geoffrey Sachs of Colombia University says 'no country has done greater harm to the world than the British'. The results of British interference and British theft are still having repercussions today; our own ABC ran a show called Stuff the British Stole. A fitting farewell for the British Empire would be the nickname given to the Union Jack by Irish republicans – the butcher's apron. Denis Doherty, Glebe Sorry to rain on the glorious parade of the empire, but the afterglow you are witnessing is from the unresolved embers of the many fires created by Britain in its colonies. The natives may have received incidental benefits, but undoubtedly the biggest winner from colonialism was the British Treasury. Let's stop reading the history as written by the victors. Good riddance. Manbir Singh Kohli, Pemulwuy Problems loom for Ley Liberal leader Sussan Ley has already proven a more savvy politician than predecessor Peter Dutton (' Team sorted, now the hard graft must start ', May 29). I suspect the collective IQ of the opposition frontbench is at least double what it was. However, perhaps her smartest move was to appoint Jacinta Price to the outer ministry, where she will be forced to hold her divisive tongue. Ley owes voters a huge debt of gratitude for dispensing with Dutton, who would have been an albatross around the Liberals' neck. She might even have a reasonably credible opposition if she can keep the wolves in her party at bay and persuade David Littleproud to keep his ego in check. Perhaps the biggest challenges facing this fragile alliance are the twin issues of net zero and nuclear power, which appears to be an impossible task. This could result in the downfall of both leaders and the demise of the Coalition's hopes of a speedy recovery. Graham Lum, North Rocks Musk epiphany As an astute businessman (he is the world's richest man, after all), Musk should have known about Trump's preferences well before now ('' Disappointed' Musk splits with Trump, says key tax bill undermines DOGE ', 29 May). Tax cuts for the rich were already enacted in Trump's first term. This is just a continuation of that. His tariff policies were part of his election platform and have been telegraphed for many years. And making someone a 'whipping boy' implies that they are innocent. By contrast, DOGE seems to have merited all the opprobrium it has been getting. It would seem that Musk has been blindly following the cult leader rather than sticking to common business sense. Maybe the scales have belatedly been lifted from his eyes? Still, at least he should benefit from the tax cuts. David Rush, Lawson Silent not forgotten I know Coral Button's generation as the Silent Gen, of which my parents were members (Letters, May 29). 'Silent' characterised this generation. They experienced many hardships, especially deprivations linked to the Great Depression and World War II without complaint. The Australia we have today is built on their toil. We should all be grateful for the foundation their efforts laid for the generations that followed. Meg Pickup, Ballina Higher cause When I got an A in English throughout my non-selective high school exams sometime last century, it prepared me for getting my letters published in the Herald. No selective high school could have done better. Dorothy Gliksman, Cedar Brush Open for business I was never a big fan of US President Ronald Reagan's conservative brand of politics, but I do like this quote of his: 'Politics I supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to realise that it bears a very close resemblance to the first.' Eric Palm, Gympie

More gas projects, less green tape call at energy event
More gas projects, less green tape call at energy event

West Australian

time27-05-2025

  • Business
  • West Australian

More gas projects, less green tape call at energy event

Australia must cut the "red and green tape" around gas projects and allow more exploratory drilling to secure the nation's energy and exports, a conference has been told, despite an election result endorsing a move to renewable energy. Former ambassador to the United States Joe Hockey and Woodside chief executive Meg O'Neill were among presenters calling for policy changes at the Australian Energy Producers conference in Brisbane on Tuesday, which attracted more than 2000 attendees. Queensland Treasurer David Janetzki also used the event to declare the state's energy future would remain based on coal, and pledged to extend the life of the state's coal-fired power stations. The event comes as the gas industry awaits a verdict on whether Woodside will be allowed to extend its North West Shelf Project in Western Australia that is one of the world's largest liquefied natural gas sources. Approving the project and other developments including Santos' Narrabri Gas Project in NSW would be vital to addressing the nation's energy needs and preventing gas shortfalls, Ms O'Neill said. "With the new federal parliament elected, it is an opportunity to finally cut red and green tape to simplify and streamline Australia's approval system," she said. Mining exploration should also be allowed to "resume in earnest in Australia," she said, to allow companies to find opportunities for energy supply and export. Identifying additional gas and oil projects would be important for Australia's international standing, Mr Hockey told the event from Singapore, and should be allowed with limited government intervention. "We have a duty to grow the oil and gas industry in Australia, to grow it for global consumption," he said. "We need to get back to some basic principles that if you have less regulation, if you have less onerous taxes and less tax then you are more likely to grow your economy." The calls for more gas projects come weeks after the re-election of the federal Labor government, which has a target of 82 per cent renewable energy in the national grid by 2030. Federal Resources Minister Madeleine King told the conference the administration had heard the gas industry's desire for faster approvals but would adopt a careful approach. "The entire Australian government has heard your message that environment approvals that are complex and lengthy. Addressing this issue is a priority for this government," she said. "Commercial decisions and joint venture negotiations are also complex and lengthy and subject to change. Not all delays can be attributed to government regulation." While Ms King dismissed the coalition's gas reservation policy during the election campaign as a "thought bubble," she said the government would consider regulations to prevent gas shortages in the domestic market. But Queensland's LNP government would take a more aggressive approach to using fossil fuels, Mr Janetzki told attendees, and would extend the use of gas and coal. "(Coal-fired power stations) will remain open as long as it is economically sensible and systematically needed, not (closed on) an arbitrary date to fill a headline for a day," he said. On Monday, the Queensland government cancelled the Moonlight Range Wind Farm proposed near Rockhampton that would have installed 88 wind turbines and generated enough energy to power 260,000 homes per year.

More gas projects, less green tape call at energy event
More gas projects, less green tape call at energy event

Perth Now

time27-05-2025

  • Business
  • Perth Now

More gas projects, less green tape call at energy event

Australia must cut the "red and green tape" around gas projects and allow more exploratory drilling to secure the nation's energy and exports, a conference has been told, despite an election result endorsing a move to renewable energy. Former ambassador to the United States Joe Hockey and Woodside chief executive Meg O'Neill were among presenters calling for policy changes at the Australian Energy Producers conference in Brisbane on Tuesday, which attracted more than 2000 attendees. Queensland Treasurer David Janetzki also used the event to declare the state's energy future would remain based on coal, and pledged to extend the life of the state's coal-fired power stations. The event comes as the gas industry awaits a verdict on whether Woodside will be allowed to extend its North West Shelf Project in Western Australia that is one of the world's largest liquefied natural gas sources. Approving the project and other developments including Santos' Narrabri Gas Project in NSW would be vital to addressing the nation's energy needs and preventing gas shortfalls, Ms O'Neill said. "With the new federal parliament elected, it is an opportunity to finally cut red and green tape to simplify and streamline Australia's approval system," she said. Mining exploration should also be allowed to "resume in earnest in Australia," she said, to allow companies to find opportunities for energy supply and export. Identifying additional gas and oil projects would be important for Australia's international standing, Mr Hockey told the event from Singapore, and should be allowed with limited government intervention. "We have a duty to grow the oil and gas industry in Australia, to grow it for global consumption," he said. "We need to get back to some basic principles that if you have less regulation, if you have less onerous taxes and less tax then you are more likely to grow your economy." The calls for more gas projects come weeks after the re-election of the federal Labor government, which has a target of 82 per cent renewable energy in the national grid by 2030. Federal Resources Minister Madeleine King told the conference the administration had heard the gas industry's desire for faster approvals but would adopt a careful approach. "The entire Australian government has heard your message that environment approvals that are complex and lengthy. Addressing this issue is a priority for this government," she said. "Commercial decisions and joint venture negotiations are also complex and lengthy and subject to change. Not all delays can be attributed to government regulation." While Ms King dismissed the coalition's gas reservation policy during the election campaign as a "thought bubble," she said the government would consider regulations to prevent gas shortages in the domestic market. But Queensland's LNP government would take a more aggressive approach to using fossil fuels, Mr Janetzki told attendees, and would extend the use of gas and coal. "(Coal-fired power stations) will remain open as long as it is economically sensible and systematically needed, not (closed on) an arbitrary date to fill a headline for a day," he said. On Monday, the Queensland government cancelled the Moonlight Range Wind Farm proposed near Rockhampton that would have installed 88 wind turbines and generated enough energy to power 260,000 homes per year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store