More gas projects, less green tape call at energy event
Former ambassador to the United States Joe Hockey and Woodside chief executive Meg O'Neill were among presenters calling for policy changes at the Australian Energy Producers conference in Brisbane on Tuesday, which attracted more than 2000 attendees.
Queensland Treasurer David Janetzki also used the event to declare the state's energy future would remain based on coal, and pledged to extend the life of the state's coal-fired power stations.
The event comes as the gas industry awaits a verdict on whether Woodside will be allowed to extend its North West Shelf Project in Western Australia that is one of the world's largest liquefied natural gas sources.
Approving the project and other developments including Santos' Narrabri Gas Project in NSW would be vital to addressing the nation's energy needs and preventing gas shortfalls, Ms O'Neill said.
"With the new federal parliament elected, it is an opportunity to finally cut red and green tape to simplify and streamline Australia's approval system," she said.
Mining exploration should also be allowed to "resume in earnest in Australia," she said, to allow companies to find opportunities for energy supply and export.
Identifying additional gas and oil projects would be important for Australia's international standing, Mr Hockey told the event from Singapore, and should be allowed with limited government intervention.
"We have a duty to grow the oil and gas industry in Australia, to grow it for global consumption," he said.
"We need to get back to some basic principles that if you have less regulation, if you have less onerous taxes and less tax then you are more likely to grow your economy."
The calls for more gas projects come weeks after the re-election of the federal Labor government, which has a target of 82 per cent renewable energy in the national grid by 2030.
Federal Resources Minister Madeleine King told the conference the administration had heard the gas industry's desire for faster approvals but would adopt a careful approach.
"The entire Australian government has heard your message that environment approvals that are complex and lengthy. Addressing this issue is a priority for this government," she said.
"Commercial decisions and joint venture negotiations are also complex and lengthy and subject to change. Not all delays can be attributed to government regulation."
While Ms King dismissed the coalition's gas reservation policy during the election campaign as a "thought bubble," she said the government would consider regulations to prevent gas shortages in the domestic market.
But Queensland's LNP government would take a more aggressive approach to using fossil fuels, Mr Janetzki told attendees, and would extend the use of gas and coal.
"(Coal-fired power stations) will remain open as long as it is economically sensible and systematically needed, not (closed on) an arbitrary date to fill a headline for a day," he said.
On Monday, the Queensland government cancelled the Moonlight Range Wind Farm proposed near Rockhampton that would have installed 88 wind turbines and generated enough energy to power 260,000 homes per year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Man of Many
an hour ago
- Man of Many
Meet the Australian Fragrance Brands Shaping a New Olfactory Landscape
Australia's love affair with fragrance is only just beginning. Over the past decade, the beguiling sector has undergone a quiet transformation, sweeping from a hive of mass-market imports and celebrity-endorsed perfumes to a true boutique industry. And at its heart lies a desire for originality in storytelling. If you ask the perfumers and fragrance experts leading the future of scent, a change is in the air. A shifting fashion climate and the rise of home-grown individualism have given way to a new form of contemporary luxury, one that isn't as concerned with pomp as it is with provenance. As Craig Andrade, founder of craft label The Raconteur, explains, fragrance, as a category, is fast-moving from status symbol to personal expression. 'When you have a great sense of scent in your wardrobe, it becomes this beautiful, invisible communication that says so much and yet, only those who are close to you can understand what it is you're trying to say,' Andrade says. 'It is the most subtle form of self-expression; the most exquisite form of communication a man can use to say who he is.' Adrade is one of the many boutique Australian producers helping to chart a new frontier in fragrance. The former law firm partner turned perfumer launched his business in 2019 after identifying a gap in the market for premium, artisanal scents that offered something different from the industry norm. When COVID hit just one year later, his gamble paid off. 'That moment accelerated and accentuated this heightened awareness around scent,' he tells me. 'It also brought this sort of category of wellbeing, where scent could play a role in small touches to elevate your space, to the forefront. When you're working from home, simply applying a room scent was a small ritual of self-care and something you could do at home.' 'There was a huge surge in demand; you started to see this audience that had a greater awareness and a greater level of sophistication when purchasing online. For men and for women, there was just a bigger appetite for getting into this space, and that was the tectonic shift in our industry globally, and certainly in Australia.'
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
State celebrates major milestone for women in politics
August marks 100 years since NSW elected its first woman to parliament, feminist and temperance campaigner Millicent Preston-Stanley. While Australian women were given the right to vote and stand in federal elections in 1902, it took the states longer to catch up. Opponents to females in the state's legislature argued that they couldn't match it with men for knowledge of mining, land laws and other matters dealt with by elected MPs, according to former High Court justice Virginia Bell. Nevertheless, NSW parliament passed a law in 1918 - the Women's Legal Status Act - which allowed the then so-called fairer sex to be elected as members of parliament, appointed judges or magistrates and admitted as solicitors or barristers. "An undercurrent in the Hansard debates on the bill was the view that its enactment wasn't going to disrupt the (status quo)," Ms Bell this week said at a NSW parliament event celebrating the centenary of Ms Preston-Stanley's election. "The electorate, it was felt, was not going to return women as members and the legal profession wasn't going to be overwhelmed by them, either." In 1925, Ms Preston-Stanley became the first woman elected to the NSW Legislative Assembly as a Nationalist Party representative for the eastern suburbs, nearly 25 years after women gained the right to vote. On August 25 that year she became the first woman to speak on the floor of the house as an elected member, delivering her maiden speech. A staunch feminist and trailblazer, Ms Preston-Stanley was a fierce advocate for women and children, laying the foundations for reforms in maternal health, child welfare and housing for women. During her time in parliament, she advocated for fairer divorce laws, better healthcare for mothers and improved protection for children. In 1927, Ms Preston-Stanley's seat was abolished and she failed to be re-elected in another electorate. However under her leadership, a private professional women's lobby known as the Feminist Club stood apart from many other women's organisations during the period which primarily concerned themselves with home keeping, family and religion. She also kept working to encourage other women into politics. Progress was slow, with only three females elected to the Legislative Assembly in the 50 years after her election. Now, more than 150 women have served as members of the NSW parliament. Women make up about 42 per cent of the NSW Legislative Assembly today, a remarkable progression from Ms Preston-Stanley's time as the sole female voice in the chamber. "She was a truly remarkable, staunch trailblazer and it's very fitting that her pioneering advocacy for women should be acknowledged," Ms Bell said. Ms Preston-Stanley married former South Australian premier Crawford Vaughan in 1934. She died in June 1955, aged 71. August marks 100 years since NSW elected its first woman to parliament, feminist and temperance campaigner Millicent Preston-Stanley. While Australian women were given the right to vote and stand in federal elections in 1902, it took the states longer to catch up. Opponents to females in the state's legislature argued that they couldn't match it with men for knowledge of mining, land laws and other matters dealt with by elected MPs, according to former High Court justice Virginia Bell. Nevertheless, NSW parliament passed a law in 1918 - the Women's Legal Status Act - which allowed the then so-called fairer sex to be elected as members of parliament, appointed judges or magistrates and admitted as solicitors or barristers. "An undercurrent in the Hansard debates on the bill was the view that its enactment wasn't going to disrupt the (status quo)," Ms Bell this week said at a NSW parliament event celebrating the centenary of Ms Preston-Stanley's election. "The electorate, it was felt, was not going to return women as members and the legal profession wasn't going to be overwhelmed by them, either." In 1925, Ms Preston-Stanley became the first woman elected to the NSW Legislative Assembly as a Nationalist Party representative for the eastern suburbs, nearly 25 years after women gained the right to vote. On August 25 that year she became the first woman to speak on the floor of the house as an elected member, delivering her maiden speech. A staunch feminist and trailblazer, Ms Preston-Stanley was a fierce advocate for women and children, laying the foundations for reforms in maternal health, child welfare and housing for women. During her time in parliament, she advocated for fairer divorce laws, better healthcare for mothers and improved protection for children. In 1927, Ms Preston-Stanley's seat was abolished and she failed to be re-elected in another electorate. However under her leadership, a private professional women's lobby known as the Feminist Club stood apart from many other women's organisations during the period which primarily concerned themselves with home keeping, family and religion. She also kept working to encourage other women into politics. Progress was slow, with only three females elected to the Legislative Assembly in the 50 years after her election. Now, more than 150 women have served as members of the NSW parliament. Women make up about 42 per cent of the NSW Legislative Assembly today, a remarkable progression from Ms Preston-Stanley's time as the sole female voice in the chamber. "She was a truly remarkable, staunch trailblazer and it's very fitting that her pioneering advocacy for women should be acknowledged," Ms Bell said. Ms Preston-Stanley married former South Australian premier Crawford Vaughan in 1934. She died in June 1955, aged 71. August marks 100 years since NSW elected its first woman to parliament, feminist and temperance campaigner Millicent Preston-Stanley. While Australian women were given the right to vote and stand in federal elections in 1902, it took the states longer to catch up. Opponents to females in the state's legislature argued that they couldn't match it with men for knowledge of mining, land laws and other matters dealt with by elected MPs, according to former High Court justice Virginia Bell. Nevertheless, NSW parliament passed a law in 1918 - the Women's Legal Status Act - which allowed the then so-called fairer sex to be elected as members of parliament, appointed judges or magistrates and admitted as solicitors or barristers. "An undercurrent in the Hansard debates on the bill was the view that its enactment wasn't going to disrupt the (status quo)," Ms Bell this week said at a NSW parliament event celebrating the centenary of Ms Preston-Stanley's election. "The electorate, it was felt, was not going to return women as members and the legal profession wasn't going to be overwhelmed by them, either." In 1925, Ms Preston-Stanley became the first woman elected to the NSW Legislative Assembly as a Nationalist Party representative for the eastern suburbs, nearly 25 years after women gained the right to vote. On August 25 that year she became the first woman to speak on the floor of the house as an elected member, delivering her maiden speech. A staunch feminist and trailblazer, Ms Preston-Stanley was a fierce advocate for women and children, laying the foundations for reforms in maternal health, child welfare and housing for women. During her time in parliament, she advocated for fairer divorce laws, better healthcare for mothers and improved protection for children. In 1927, Ms Preston-Stanley's seat was abolished and she failed to be re-elected in another electorate. However under her leadership, a private professional women's lobby known as the Feminist Club stood apart from many other women's organisations during the period which primarily concerned themselves with home keeping, family and religion. She also kept working to encourage other women into politics. Progress was slow, with only three females elected to the Legislative Assembly in the 50 years after her election. Now, more than 150 women have served as members of the NSW parliament. Women make up about 42 per cent of the NSW Legislative Assembly today, a remarkable progression from Ms Preston-Stanley's time as the sole female voice in the chamber. "She was a truly remarkable, staunch trailblazer and it's very fitting that her pioneering advocacy for women should be acknowledged," Ms Bell said. Ms Preston-Stanley married former South Australian premier Crawford Vaughan in 1934. She died in June 1955, aged 71. August marks 100 years since NSW elected its first woman to parliament, feminist and temperance campaigner Millicent Preston-Stanley. While Australian women were given the right to vote and stand in federal elections in 1902, it took the states longer to catch up. Opponents to females in the state's legislature argued that they couldn't match it with men for knowledge of mining, land laws and other matters dealt with by elected MPs, according to former High Court justice Virginia Bell. Nevertheless, NSW parliament passed a law in 1918 - the Women's Legal Status Act - which allowed the then so-called fairer sex to be elected as members of parliament, appointed judges or magistrates and admitted as solicitors or barristers. "An undercurrent in the Hansard debates on the bill was the view that its enactment wasn't going to disrupt the (status quo)," Ms Bell this week said at a NSW parliament event celebrating the centenary of Ms Preston-Stanley's election. "The electorate, it was felt, was not going to return women as members and the legal profession wasn't going to be overwhelmed by them, either." In 1925, Ms Preston-Stanley became the first woman elected to the NSW Legislative Assembly as a Nationalist Party representative for the eastern suburbs, nearly 25 years after women gained the right to vote. On August 25 that year she became the first woman to speak on the floor of the house as an elected member, delivering her maiden speech. A staunch feminist and trailblazer, Ms Preston-Stanley was a fierce advocate for women and children, laying the foundations for reforms in maternal health, child welfare and housing for women. During her time in parliament, she advocated for fairer divorce laws, better healthcare for mothers and improved protection for children. In 1927, Ms Preston-Stanley's seat was abolished and she failed to be re-elected in another electorate. However under her leadership, a private professional women's lobby known as the Feminist Club stood apart from many other women's organisations during the period which primarily concerned themselves with home keeping, family and religion. She also kept working to encourage other women into politics. Progress was slow, with only three females elected to the Legislative Assembly in the 50 years after her election. Now, more than 150 women have served as members of the NSW parliament. Women make up about 42 per cent of the NSW Legislative Assembly today, a remarkable progression from Ms Preston-Stanley's time as the sole female voice in the chamber. "She was a truly remarkable, staunch trailblazer and it's very fitting that her pioneering advocacy for women should be acknowledged," Ms Bell said. Ms Preston-Stanley married former South Australian premier Crawford Vaughan in 1934. She died in June 1955, aged 71.
West Australian
5 hours ago
- West Australian
MICHELLE GRATTAN: Consensus goal may elude
One observer describes next week's economic roundtable this way: 'Chalmers has opened a can of worms — and everybody has got a worm'. Even those close to the roundtable are feeling overwhelmed by the extent of the worm farm. There are many hundreds of submissions, five Productivity Commission reports, Treasury background papers, and stakeholders in the media spruiking their opinions ahead of the event. Business, unions and the welfare sector have largely settled into their predictable wish lists. In areas such as the housing crisis, it's actually not difficult to say what should be done — you hardly need this meeting to tell you. It just seems near impossible to get the relevant players (whether they be States, local councils, the construction industry) to do it, or be able to do it. On issues of deregulation generally, when it comes to specifics, a lot is contested. As the ACTU's Sally McManus says, 'one person's regulations are another person's rights'. As much as Treasurer Jim Chalmers might like to project the sunny side of Australia's situation, independent economist Chris Richardson (who will be at the summit's day three tax session) puts it more bluntly. 'We have a problem: the average Australian saw their living standards rise by just 1.5 per cent over the past decade,' he posted on X. 'That's embarrassingly shy of the 22 per cent lift in living standards enjoyed across the rich world as a whole, and way below what Australians achieved in times past. 'You'd have hoped that both sides would have talked about tackling that challenge at the last election, but they didn't.' Richardson is hoping the roundtable can achieve 'enough consensus to change some things', which the Government can use as a springboard. But he's worried the meeting could underperform, given its 'lead-up hasn't seen much consensus', Economist Richard Holden from UNSW says to be successful, the roundtable needs to get 'broad agreement on some version of the ' Abundance agenda' (a reference to a currently fashionable book focusing on loosening regulatory blocks) – especially as it applies to housing. 'In addition, to be successful would require that big issues like federation and tax reform are referred to Treasury for serious consideration and to present the Government with options by year's end.' There are two approaches for a government that wants to promote economic reform. It can, as then treasurer Paul Keating did at the 1985 tax summit, put up a model and see how much it can make fly. Or it can, as Chalmers is doing, ask a wide range of participants for their ideas, and then decide how much of what emerges to pursue — in terms of what has wide support and what fits the Government's agenda. The closer we get to the meeting, the harder it becomes to anticipate its likely import (or lack of). Signposts are there, but they could be false signals, or ignored later. Despite all the talk about tax, the Government — specifically the Prime Minister — has flagged it doesn't have the stomach for radical reform. Certainly not this term. Anthony Albanese said last week, 'The only tax policy that we're implementing is the one that we took to the election'. This doesn't rule out new initiatives this term — the phrasing is carefully in the present tense — but from what we know of the PM's approach they would likely be limited rather than sweeping. Independent economist Saul Eslake said that a few weeks ago he was optimistic the summit would give Chalmers the licence to spend some of the vast political capital the election yielded. 'But the Prime Minister has made it clear he is not getting that licence. The Government is not prepared to venture much beyond its limited mandate from the election. 'The best that can be hoped for is a willingness to have an adult conversation with the electorate between now and the next election with a view to seeking a bold mandate in 2028,' Eslake says. Predictably, the roundtable is putting the spotlight on the Albanese-Chalmers relationship. This can be summed up in a couple of ways. The PM is more cautious when it comes to economic reform, the Treasurer is more ambitious. In political terms, it's that 'old bull, young bull' syndrome. The different styles are clear. The 'old bull' is blunt, sounding a touch impatient, for example, when he's asked about tax. The 'young bull' is publicly deferential to his leader. One of the most potentially significant discussions at the roundtable will be around AI. Unlike many well-worn issues, this is a relatively new, and quickly changing, area of policy debate. There are varying views within Government about whether firm or light guardrails are needed and whether they should be in a separate new act or just via changes to existing laws. Chalmers is in favour of light-touch regulation. The unions are not on the same page as Chalmers' regulatory preference, and they want a say for workers. The unions were the winners from the 2022 jobs and skills summit — the Government delivered to them in spades at the meeting, and later. It's not clear they are in as strong a position this time. Their big claim for the roundtable — a four-day working week — has already been dismissed by the Government. Regardless of the diversity of views among those rubbing shoulders in the cabinet room next week, one man will stand out as something of an oddity. Ted O'Brien, shadow treasurer, invited as a participant, will be as much an observer. O'Brien might say he wants to be constructive, but his role means he will want to be critical. But he has to tread carefully. Others in the room, and outside observers, will be making judgments about him. For O'Brien, the gathering should be a networking opportunity more than an occasion for performative display.
