Latest news with #OxfordAcademic
National Observer
04-07-2025
- Business
- National Observer
Losing confidence in Carney's willingness to prioritize action on the climate crisis
Prime Minister Mark Carney has described the Trump administration's economic and political disruption of the international order as game-changing. His efforts to manage this transition internationally and domestically are occurring in the context of the existential threat to the planet. A 2024 UN Environment Program (UNEP) report concluded that, under a status quo scenario, the Earth is on track to reach an approximate 2.7°C increase in planetary warming by 2100. A study by leading climate scientists in the journal Oxford Academic warned: 'We are on the brink of an irreversible climate disaster… Much of the very fabric of life on Earth is imperiled… We have now brought the planet into climatic conditions never witnessed by us or our prehistoric relatives…' Canadians are witnessing it firsthand as devastating wildfires rage across Western Canada. Carney has long been an authority on the risks posed by climate change. In 2015, as Bank of England Governor, he gave the 'tragedy of the horizon' speech, which introduced climate change to bankers as a threat to international financial stability. In his 2021 book Value(s), Carney critiques free market fundamentalism for its disregard of the human condition. The existential threat of climate change, state of inequality etc., all stem from a common crisis in values. A practicing Catholic, Carney sat on the Vatican's Council for Inclusive Capitalism. In an interview shortly after he was appointed UN Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance in December 2019, Carney described climate change as the world's greatest existential threat. He urged people everywhere to keep up the pressure in calling for climate action. How will the Carney government navigate 'fighting climate change' and bending to the priorities of corporations and their political enablers? writes Bruce Campbell Canada's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction record Canada's Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC), represent its commitment under the Paris Agreement to reduce emissions by 45 to 50 per cent below 2005 levels by 2035, building on its emissions' reduction plan of 40 to 45 per cent by 2030. Canada's commitment to reach net-zero by 2050 is codified in law through the Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act. Canada has been a laggard in meeting its emissions reduction targets. In his 2024 report, Canada's commissioner of the environment and sustainable development warned that since 2005, Canada's emissions have declined by 7.1 per cent, still a long way from reaching the reduction of at least 40 per cent required by 2030. Canadian banks and other financial institutions continue to invest heavily in fossil fuel projects. The Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), a global, member-led initiative supporting banks to lead on climate mitigation in line with the Paris Agreement goals, has seen more than 140 banks, including Canada's big banks, leave the alliance since the election of the Trump administration. The Canada Pension Plan recently dropped its commitment to align its investments with the country's net-zero action targets. Carney Government climate-related actions In his election victory speech, Carney said, 'It's time to build an industrial strategy that makes Canada more competitive while fighting climate change.' Carney also promised action to increase clean energy infrastructure, particularly interprovincial transmission ties to help electrify the economy. Carney appointed Tim Hodgson — former chairperson at Ontario Hydro One and formerly on the board of fossil fuel company MEG Energy — to serve as energy and natural resources minister; Hodgson is a former Goldman Sachs banker and worked alongside Carney at the Bank of Canada. Hodgson's speech at a Calgary gathering pressed for the Pathways Alliance project to proceed with a proposed carbon-capture facility in the oilsands region of northern Alberta. Negotiations are currently underway which suggest that the carbon emissions cap could be changed if there are meaningful advances toward the realization of its carbon capture and storage project (CCS). Many questions remain about carbon capture and storage feasibility. An Oxford University study concluded that regarding CCS 'as a way to compensate for ongoing fossil fuel burning is economically illiterate.' While Hodgson has been at the forefront of Carney government pronouncements, Julie Dabrusin, the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, has been missing in action. Michael Sabia, recently appointed by Carney as the Clerk of the Privy Council, the head of the public service, is woven from the same cloth as both Carney and Hodgson. Carney's mandate letter to cabinet stated the government's intention for Canada to become an energy superpower in both clean and conventional energy. The letter outlined seven priorities, none of which explicitly mentioned climate. It simply stated: 'We will fight climate change.' The Speech from the Throne delivered by King Charles III mentioned the creation of a federal project office committed to building an industrial strategy to make Canada more globally competitive, 'while fighting climate change.' At the meeting between the federal government and premiers, a joint statement was issued reading, in part, 'First Ministers agreed that Canada must work urgently to get Canadian natural resources and commodities to domestic and international markets, such as critical minerals and decarbonized Canadian oil and gas by pipelines…' The very term 'decarbonized oil and gas' has been denounced by the co-chair of the federal Net-Zero Advisory Body (NZAB), climate scientist Simon Donner, as Orwellian. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith was 'encouraged' by the federal government's change of tone on pipelines. On June 6, Carney introduced Bill C-5. The bill includes the Building Canada Act, which gives the government the power to circumvent environmental laws to get major resource projects built. The Canadian Environmental Law Association warned that Bill C-5 could fast-track environmentally risky mega-projects across the country while undermining federal laws designed to safeguard the environment, human health, and Indigenous rights. Navigating between corporate interests and the health of the planet For someone very knowledgeable about the climate threat to the planet, Carney's actions thus far are not encouraging. Going forward, will he implement measures necessary to ensure the government meets its Paris Agreement commitments? What changes will his cabinet make to its emissions cap on fossil fuel company emissions? Will he finalize methane regulations for oil and gas, finalize the clean electricity investment tax credit, establish a made-in-Canada climate taxonomy, mandate the Canadian Sustainability Standards Board to provide binding obligations for public companies, adopt Senator Rosa Galvez' (CAFA) — a bill to ensure financial institutions align their activities with Canada's climate commitments under the Paris Agreement? Carney's actions thus far leave my optimism hanging by a thread.
Android Authority
15-05-2025
- Health
- Android Authority
Take off your tinfoil hat: Exposure to 5G doesn't alter your genes, new study finds
TL;DR A new study found no genetic changes in human cells exposed to 5G radiation, even at high intensities. Researchers ruled out heating effects, confirming previous claims of harm were likely due to temperature, not EMF. 5G waves can't penetrate deep into the skin, and aren't scrambling your DNA. The 5G conspiracy crowd has been banging their drum for years, but scientists have now directly tested their central claims. In a useful but unsurprising result, a new 5G study found that blasting human skin cells with the radiation doesn't do anything to your genes. The peer-reviewed study, published in PNAS Nexus via Oxford Academic, exposed cultured human skin cells to 5G electromagnetic fields at two common frequencies: 27 GHz and 40.5 GHz. The cells were subjected to this radiation at intensities up to 10 times the current safety limits for both two-hour and 48-hour periods. The result was no changes in gene expression or alterations in DNA methylation — in other words, nothing. 5G frequencies are too low to damage DNA. This isn't just a case of not finding much or narrowing the possible harm. The researchers took great care to rule out heat as a confounding factor, which has skewed the few isolated studies that reported apparent effects and fueled the conspiracy. By carefully managing temperature and isolating the electromagnetic exposure, they confirmed that any changes seen in past studies were likely caused by warming and not the EMF itself. In summary, the energy of 5G frequencies is too low to ionize atoms or break molecular bonds, which means it can't damage DNA. Not even a little. The study also found these signals don't even make it past the surface — 5G waves can only penetrate a matter of millimeters into your skin. So even if they were dangerous, which the study found they're not, they're not getting deep enough to start altering your brain or internal organs. Of course, conspiracy theorists are rarely shaken from their beliefs by a forensic and peer-reviewed 5G study such as this one. It'll no doubt be branded as some fake news government propaganda. People are welcome to wear a tinfoil hat if it makes them feel safer, but they can't say the science is on their side. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Time of India
27-04-2025
- Health
- Time of India
‘Extended resection lowers Lynch-related cancer risk'
Ahmedabad: A global research comprising of 8,438 patients suffering from colorectal cancer caused by Lynch Syndrome has indicated pathways for ensuring less chances recurrence. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A cohort from Ahmedabad represented India in the study. Lynch Syndrome, also known as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), is the most common hereditary cancer condition that significantly increases the risk of developing colorectal cancer and other cancers. The condition often affects multiple generations, and in the Indian context, some studies estimate the prevalence to be one in 300 persons. More importantly, about 10-15% of colorectal cancers in India are caused by the condition compared to 2-10% in Western countries. The cancer has a high relapse rate of 17-50% in later stages. The study, ' Metachronous Colorectal Cancer Risks After Extended or Segmental Resection in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 Lynch Syndrome: Multicentre Study from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database,' was recently published in the British Journal of Surgery (BJS) by Oxford Academic. One of the authors of the study is Dr Harsh Sheth from FRIGE Institute of Human Genetics, Ahmedabad. "It is one of the biggest studies in connection with Lynch Syndrome, comprising over 65,000 person-year follow-ups and surgical data of 908 patients. The study started with the question of what is the best surgical approach after the first tumour – should the onco surgeons go for segmental resection or extended colectomy to reduce chances of relapse," said Dr Sheth. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He added that the study's findings indicate an equal or higher risk of developing metachronous colorectal cancer for those who already have a history. It challenges the earlier notion that screening and resection are enough. " Extended resection significantly reduces the risk of metachronous cancer (across all Lynch Syndrome genes) compared to segmental resection. There is no survival benefit in either surgery group, but there are benefits in fewer operative procedures, reduced surveillance burden, and better quality of life," said Dr Sheth. The take-home message, said experts, for the surgical guidelines is to ensure that if Lynch Syndrome is detected pre-operatively, the chances of metachronous cancer should be discussed.
