Latest news with #ProcurementCode
Yahoo
29-04-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Complaint alleges Gallup-McKinley Schools superintendent violated state ethics laws
(Image via New Mexico In Depth) Gallup-McKinley County Schools Superintendent Mike Hyatt is under scrutiny for alleged violations of state procurement and government ethics laws, following a complaint filed Monday with the New Mexico State Ethics Commission. Submitted on behalf of Stride, Inc. and its online education subsidiary, K12 Virtual Schools, the complaint alleges Hyatt sought a $235,000-per-year salary as Stride's Vice President for Academic Innovation, while the company had an active contract with the school district—and when he was not hired for the position, Hyatt sought to terminate that contract. K12 provides online education for the district's Destinations Career Academy of New Mexico. This story was originally published by New Mexico In Depth. 'Superintendent Hyatt is apparently knowingly and willfully abusing his public position, at the expense of ~4,200 New Mexico students' who are enrolled in online schooling, the complaint alleged. In an email to New Mexico In Depth, Monday, Hyatt refuted the allegations, saying the company, not he, behaved in 'illegal' and 'unethical' ways, because of inadequate student-teacher ratios for their online courses. 'We have recently found out the illegal [and] unethical practices of Stride and how they are profiting and increasing revenue by breaking the law in our online program,' Hyatt wrote. 'We notified them of their wrongdoing and had previously notified them to not break the law when it comes to students teacher ratios.' The ethics complaint letter alleges that Hyatt potentially violated the New Mexico Government Conduct Act (GCA) and state procurement code. 'The GCA has specific prohibitions against a public officer or employee seeking employment with a contractor who has a contract with the public officer or employee's employer,' according to the complaint. 'The Procurement Code similarly prohibits an employee who is participating directly or indirectly in the procurement process to become, or to be, while such an employee, the employee of any person or business contracting with the governmental body by whom the employee is employed.' The complaint was filed by attorney Laura E. Sanchez of the law firm Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A., in Albuquerque. The New Mexico State Ethics Commission declined to comment on the complaint or its investigation plans. On Monday, Deputy Director Amelia Bierle told New Mexico In Depth in an email that the Commission does not comment on alleged ethics violations before investigations are concluded. Gallup-McKinley signed an Educational Products & Services Contract with K12 in June 2020. Hyatt was district superintendent. According to the company's complaint letter, Hyatt applied for the company's VP position on December 11, 2024 and was initially interviewed on Jan. 21, 2025. On Feb. 21, the company's senior vice president of schools, Adam Hawf, spoke with Hyatt by phone to let him know he had not been hired. 'Mr. Hawf called Superintendent Hyatt, as opposed to issuing him a formal letter, due to the sensitivity of the relationship and fear that Superintendent Hyatt would adversely affect the District's relationship with the Contractor,' the complaint letter states. In his email to New Mexico In Depth, Monday, Hyatt confirmed, 'I applied for a job there in 2024.' Less than a month after the call with Hawf, at a routine monthly meeting with the company on March 10, Hyatt's demeanor had become 'completely different than it had been in past meetings,' according to the complaint letter. '[T]he meeting was hostile […] instead of amicable and collaborative.' On April 1, Hyatt sent a breach of contract and termination letter to the company, citing several alleged contract breaches, including inadequate student-teacher ratios, teacher licensure, and problems with student achievement in Destinations Career Academy students. Three days later, Gallup-McKinley issued a request for proposals to find a new contractor. The termination letter violated a 45-day 'cure' period for contractual disputes, the company contends. The complaint further alleges that Hyatt directed the district to issue the new request for proposals for virtual education services while Stride's contract was still in effect, potentially violating its exclusivity provision. Hyatt knew previously about student-teacher ratio concerns, according to the complaint letter. 'Superintendent Hyatt's conduct after he was denied employment … shows that he is potentially abusing his authority, and not acting in the public interest,' the ethics complaint states. 'He was aware of the alleged student-teacher ratios and the licensure issues prior to submitting his application for employment with the Contractor. He also served as a positive reference for the Contractor with the New Mexico PED [Public Education Department] on February 6, 2025 and for Ohio as recently as February 25, 2025, despite knowledge of the concerns he later raised in the letter to the Contractor on April 1, 2025.' The firm submitted 18 supporting documents with the ethics complaint, including emails and correspondence, the termination letter, and the request for proposals. The company has tried to address Hyatt's concerns within the 45-day 'cure period' set out in the contract but has been hindered by Gallup-McKinley since receiving the termination letter, according to the complaint. Examples include the district delaying teacher criminal history fingerprint clearances and refusing to sign off on teachers' license extensions. 'Out of desperation they are attempting to deflect the harm they have done […] and are trying to create a narrative that I by myself am trying to break a contract for personal reasons,' Hyatt wrote in his email to the news organization. 'Nothing could be further from the truth.'
Yahoo
17-02-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Mayor: Post editorial misses the mark on West Palm Beach park contract decision
This letter is being written in response to a recent Palm Beach Post editorial ('Should West Palm approve contract with CEO indicted for fraud? City says yes!') criticizing me and the City Commission for the decision at the January 21 City Commission meeting authorizing execution of the contract for the Currie Park Redevelopment Park Project, after West Construction was selected as the contractor through a competitive process. Frankly, I was appalled by the lack of research done prior to the criticism of the decision. It is as if the editorial was simply responding to the question contained in the headline for the news story ('Why did West Palm pick a firm whose CEO is under fraud indictment to rebuild Currie Park?') as opposed to doing a thorough job of understanding the basis for the decision. Questions that should have been considered and researched before jumping to conclusion that the decision has a 'stench' related to it, include the following: Whether or not the city could reject the decision without risking a bid protest and lawsuit? The impact on the project that would result from a reversal of the decision? Whether or not the federal grants committed to the project obligate the city to select the lowest responsible bidder? Whether or not a performance bond would be posted by West? Whether or not a performance bond would protect the city against any losses if West failed to perform its contractual obligations? Does the writer even know what a performance bond is? By the way, if one watched the tape, all of these issues (except for the last question) were discussed at the aforementioned commission meeting. Now, let me share some actual facts related to the project and the decision: The project is a signature project of the city and has been discussed by the commission since 2018. The project is a priority project of my administration and is anxiously anticipated by the surrounding community, as at least 12 community meetings have been held since December 2020. On June 3, 2022, the city received a federally funded grant through the U.S. Department of Commerce in the amount of $16.7 million. The deadline for the work to be performed with the proceeds of the federal grant is June 2, 2026. The failure to complete construction work by the federal grant deadlines may result in the withholding of federal grant funds and/or termination of the federal grants. The project has received 3 state grants for the project, in the aggregate amount of $2.1 million. The failure to complete construction work by the state grant deadlines may result in the withholding of state grant funds and/or termination of the State Grants. The parks bond which was approved by Palm Beach County voters in March 2020, allocated $8.4 million to the project. If that amount is not used for the project, the city could incur significant adverse financial consequences. Under the city's Procurement Code, the indictment of officers of a respondent is not the basis for disqualification of the respondent from the bid process. There were no other reasons under the code for which West should be deemed disqualified. If the city rejected West at the expense of the stated risks and selected the second low bidder, it would be obligated to pay an additional $5 million for the project, which monies are not currently available. Selecting the second low bidder when West met the requirement of the Invitation to bid and the code, would subject the city to a bid protest by West and likely litigation related thereto. Such action would significantly delay the project, to the extent that the city would be unable to satisfy the conditions of the federal and state grants. If the city lost the revenues from the federal and state grants, it would be unable to pay for the project. In other words, the Project would die. A performance bond in the amount of roughly $35.4 million has already been posted by West in connection with the Project. In the event that West failed to perform its contractual obligations in connection with the project, the surety would be obligated to find a contractor to complete the project using the bond funds. Since West itself was not indicted, even if the indicted officer of West were ultimately convicted of certain crimes, West would still be able to perform its contractual obligations related to the project. In fact, a Succession Plan for West was presented to the commissioners at the commission meeting. West has previously performed 11 significant projects in the city during the past 20 years, for a total amount of $29.5 million. This includes the recent award of the $15 million Gaines Park Redevelopment Project which was underway prior to the aforementioned indictment and on which the work is being performed at a high level. In fact, there have been no defaults or substandard performance on any of those contracts. More: Should West Palm approve contract with CEO indicted for fraud? City says yes! | Editorial In conclusion, while one can sit in an ivory tower and criticize the fact that West does not pass some so-called 'purity test' because of the indictment of a certain officer of West, that failure does not, in and of itself, justify risk losing the Project in totality. If West were disqualified because of the indictments of one of its officers, that certainly would have led to the demise of the project. It would be folly to jeopardize the project because of so-called 'bad optics.' The benefits of the project to this city far outweigh any negative perception created by the alleged misdeeds of a single West company officer in Tampa. As former President Teddy Roosevelt once said, 'It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actuallyin the arena, . . .' It is easy to sit on the sidelines and 'Monday Morning quarterback', but true leadership requires tough, difficult decisions, often in the heat of battle. Keith A. James is mayor of West Palm Beach. This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: WPB Mayor: Post editorial board didn't do homework on contract decision
