Latest news with #RoadlessAreaConservationRule
IOL News
9 hours ago
- Politics
- IOL News
Trump administration plans to rescind roadless protections for national forests
The Tongass National Forest on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. Image: Salwan Georges/The Washington Post The Trump administration has announced plans to rescind a decades-old rule that protects nearly 59 million acres of pristine national forest land, including 9 million acres in Alaska's Tongass National Forest. This controversial move, revealed during a meeting of Western governors in New Mexico, has ignited a fierce debate over environmental conservation and the future of logging in the United States. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins stated that the administration would begin the process of rolling back protections for these roadless areas, which have been safeguarded since the late 1990s. If the rollback survives potential court challenges, it could open vast swaths of untouched land to logging and road construction. According to the Agriculture Department, this would affect approximately 30 percent of the land in the National Forest System, including 92 percent of Tongass, one of the last remaining intact temperate rainforests in the world. Critics of the rollback have expressed deep concern over the environmental implications of such a decision. Environmental groups have condemned the administration's plans and vowed to challenge the decision in court. Drew Caputo, vice president of litigation for lands, wildlife, and oceans at Earthjustice, stated, 'The roadless rule has protected 58 million acres of our wildest national forest lands from clear-cutting for more than a generation. The Trump administration now wants to throw these forest protections overboard so the timber industry can make huge profits from unrestrained logging.' The Roadless Area Conservation Rule, established during President Bill Clinton's administration, aimed to preserve increasingly scarce roadless areas in national forests. Conservationists argue that these lands are vital for protecting wildlife habitats that are threatened by development and large-scale timber harvests. Since the rule's implementation in 2001, it has been the subject of numerous court battles and political disputes. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ In contrast, the logging industry has welcomed the administration's decision. Scott Dane, executive director of the American Loggers Council, argued that federal forests are overgrown and unhealthy. He stated, 'Our forests are extremely overgrown, overly dense, unhealthy, dead, dying, and burning. To allow access into these forests, like we used to do prior to 2001, will enable forest managers to practice sustainable forest management.' Monday's announcement follows Trump's March 1 executive order instructing the Agriculture and Interior Departments to boost timber production, aiming to reduce wildfire risks and reliance on foreign imports. The administration frames the decision as a necessary step to enhance local management of forests and mitigate wildfire threats. Rollins claimed, 'This misguided rule prohibits the Forest Service from thinning and cutting trees to prevent wildfires. And when fires start, the rule limits our firefighters' access to quickly put them out.' However, critics argue that the administration's approach could exacerbate wildfire risks. They point out that the roadless rule already contains provisions for removing dangerous fuels, which the Forest Service has effectively utilised for years. Chris Wood, chief executive of the conservation group Trout Unlimited, remarked that the administration's decision 'feels a little bit like a solution in search of a problem.' As the debate continues, the fate of the roadless rule remains uncertain. The implications of this decision extend beyond logging and timber production; they touch upon the broader issues of environmental conservation and climate change. The outcome of this policy shift could have lasting effects on the nation's forests and the ecosystems they support.
Yomiuri Shimbun
9 hours ago
- Politics
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump to Strip Protections from Millions of Acres of National Forests
A decades-old rule protecting tens of millions of acres of pristine national forest land, including 9 million acres in Alaska's Tongass National Forest, would be rescinded under plans announced Monday by the Trump administration. Speaking at a meeting of Western governors in New Mexico, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said the administration would begin the process of rolling back protections for nearly 59 million roadless acres of the National Forest System. If the rollback survives court challenges, it will open up vast swaths of largely untouched land to logging and roadbuilding. By the Agriculture Department's estimate, this would include about 30 percent of the land in the National Forest System, encompassing 92 percent of Tongass, one of the last remaining intact temperate rainforests in the world. In a news release, the department, which houses the U.S. Forest Service, criticized the roadless rule as 'outdated,' saying it 'goes against the mandate of the USDA Forest Service to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the nation's forests and grasslands.' Environmental groups condemned the decision and vowed to take the administration to court. 'The roadless rule has protected 58 million acres of our wildest national forest lands from clear-cutting for more than a generation,' said Drew Caputo, vice president of litigation for lands, wildlife and oceans for the environmental firm Earthjustice. 'The Trump administration now wants to throw these forest protections overboard so the timber industry can make huge money from unrestrained logging.' The Roadless Area Conservation Rule dates to the late 1990s, when President Bill Clinton instructed the Forest Service to come up with ways to preserve increasingly scarce roadless areas in the national forests. Conservationists considered these lands essential for species whose habitats were being lost to encroaching development and large-scale timber harvests. The protections, which took effect in 2001, have been the subject of court battles and sparring between Democrats and Republicans ever since. The logging industry welcomed the decision. 'Our forests are extremely overgrown, overly dense, unhealthy, dead, dying and burning,' said Scott Dane, executive director for the American Loggers Council, a timber industry group with members in 46 states. He said federal forests on average have about 300 trunks per acre, while the optimal density should be about 75 trunks. Dane said President Donald Trump's policies have been misconstrued as opening up national forests to unrestricted logging, while in fact the industry practices sustainable forestry management subject to extensive requirements. 'To allow access into these forests, like we used to do prior to 2001 and for 100 years prior to that, will enable the forest managers to practice sustainable forest management,' he said. Monday's announcement follows Trump's March 1 executive order instructing the Agriculture Department and the Interior Department to boost timber production, with an aim of reducing wildfire risk and reliance on foreign imports. Because of its vast wilderness, environmental fragility and ancient trees, Alaska's Tongass National Forest became the face of the issue. Democrats and environmentalists argued for keeping the roadless rule in place, saying it would protect critical habitat and prevent the carbon dioxide trapped in the forest's trees from escaping into the atmosphere. Alaska's governor and congressional delegation have countered that the rule hurts the timber industry and the state's economy. After court battles kept the rules in place, Trump stripped it out in 2020, during his first term, making it legal for logging companies to build roads and cut down trees in the Tongass. President Joe Biden restored the protections, restricting development on roughly 9.3 million acres throughout the forest. Trump officials have gone further this time, targeting not just the rule's application in Alaska but its protections nationwide. In her comments Monday, Rollins framed the decision as an effort to reduce the threat of wildfires by encouraging more local management of the nation's forests. 'This misguided rule prohibits the Forest Service from thinning and cutting trees to prevent wildfires,' Rollins said. 'And when fires start, the rule limits our firefighters' access to quickly put them out.' The Forest Service manages nearly 200 million acres of land, and its emphasis on preventing wildfires from growing out of control has become more central to its mission as the blazes have become more frequent and intense because of climate change. Yet critics of the administration's approach have said Trump officials have worsened the danger by firing several thousand Forest Service employees this year. Advocates for the roadless rule said ending it would do little to reduce the threat of wildfires, noting that the regulation already contains an exception for removing dangerous fuels that the Forest Service has used for years. Chris Wood, chief executive of the conservation group Trout Unlimited, said the administration's decision 'feels a little bit like a solution in search of a problem.' 'There are provisions within the roadless rule that allow for wildfire fighting,' Wood said. 'My hope is once they go through a rulemaking process, and they see how wildly unpopular and unnecessary this is, common sense will prevail.'
