Trump administration plans to rescind roadless protections for national forests

IOL News

4 hours ago

The Tongass National Forest on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska.
Image: Salwan Georges/The Washington Post
The Trump administration has announced plans to rescind a decades-old rule that protects nearly 59 million acres of pristine national forest land, including 9 million acres in Alaska's Tongass National Forest. This controversial move, revealed during a meeting of Western governors in New Mexico, has ignited a fierce debate over environmental conservation and the future of logging in the United States.
Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins stated that the administration would begin the process of rolling back protections for these roadless areas, which have been safeguarded since the late 1990s. If the rollback survives potential court challenges, it could open vast swaths of untouched land to logging and road construction. According to the Agriculture Department, this would affect approximately 30 percent of the land in the National Forest System, including 92 percent of Tongass, one of the last remaining intact temperate rainforests in the world.
Critics of the rollback have expressed deep concern over the environmental implications of such a decision. Environmental groups have condemned the administration's plans and vowed to challenge the decision in court. Drew Caputo, vice president of litigation for lands, wildlife, and oceans at Earthjustice, stated, 'The roadless rule has protected 58 million acres of our wildest national forest lands from clear-cutting for more than a generation. The Trump administration now wants to throw these forest protections overboard so the timber industry can make huge profits from unrestrained logging.'
The Roadless Area Conservation Rule, established during President Bill Clinton's administration, aimed to preserve increasingly scarce roadless areas in national forests. Conservationists argue that these lands are vital for protecting wildlife habitats that are threatened by development and large-scale timber harvests. Since the rule's implementation in 2001, it has been the subject of numerous court battles and political disputes.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
In contrast, the logging industry has welcomed the administration's decision. Scott Dane, executive director of the American Loggers Council, argued that federal forests are overgrown and unhealthy. He stated, 'Our forests are extremely overgrown, overly dense, unhealthy, dead, dying, and burning. To allow access into these forests, like we used to do prior to 2001, will enable forest managers to practice sustainable forest management.'
Monday's announcement follows Trump's March 1 executive order instructing the Agriculture and Interior Departments to boost timber production, aiming to reduce wildfire risks and reliance on foreign imports. The administration frames the decision as a necessary step to enhance local management of forests and mitigate wildfire threats. Rollins claimed, 'This misguided rule prohibits the Forest Service from thinning and cutting trees to prevent wildfires. And when fires start, the rule limits our firefighters' access to quickly put them out.'
However, critics argue that the administration's approach could exacerbate wildfire risks. They point out that the roadless rule already contains provisions for removing dangerous fuels, which the Forest Service has effectively utilised for years. Chris Wood, chief executive of the conservation group Trout Unlimited, remarked that the administration's decision 'feels a little bit like a solution in search of a problem.'
As the debate continues, the fate of the roadless rule remains uncertain. The implications of this decision extend beyond logging and timber production; they touch upon the broader issues of environmental conservation and climate change. The outcome of this policy shift could have lasting effects on the nation's forests and the ecosystems they support.