logo
#

Latest news with #SalahuddinPanhwar

Feudalism, bandits, drugs have gripped Sindh: Justice Panhwar
Feudalism, bandits, drugs have gripped Sindh: Justice Panhwar

Express Tribune

time2 days ago

  • Politics
  • Express Tribune

Feudalism, bandits, drugs have gripped Sindh: Justice Panhwar

Supreme Court Justice Salahuddin Panhwar has lamented that the feudal system, bandits and drugs have badly gripped and crippled the people in Sindh. Addressing the legal fraternity at district bar association Umerkot, the judge said Larkana and Sukkur divisions have become ensnared by the tentacles of feudal lords and bandits while the drug culture has swept across the districts of Hyderabad and Mirpurkhas divisions. "Generations are being destroyed," he bemoaned. "The lives of ordinary people and of the families are being destroyed." He maintained that if the stories of survival of such people are shared with the people in the civilized and developed world, the latter will become astonished to see how their fellow humans can stay alive in such situations. The judge also deplored that the cases of illegally occupying lands also frequently occur in Sindh even though this problem has ceased to exist in other parts of the world. He said the Cooperative Societies Act was legislated to favour the poor people, labourers and peasants but its advantage presently is being taken by the rich people. He also commented on the quality of education in Sindh, pointing out that in the digital era the students in Umerkot do not have access to computers for studying. "Two classes have been created in Sindh. The poor send their children to the government schools and the other classes educate their children in the private sector." Justice Panhwar bewailed that the society has become compromising instead of pursuing and securing their rights. He urged the judges, lawyers, journalists and other important segments of the society to try to realize the problems affecting the people and to base their decisions on truth. "Our decisions ought to be public centric, taking care of the fundamental rights of the people." On the occasion, the district bar's president advocate Shareef Bheel presented a charter of demands, calling for action against narcotics, providing health and education facilities, establishing sports grounds and controlling the deteriorating law and order. The apex court's judge also visited some schools and colleges.

Reserved seats case: SIC for uploading of short order signed by all judges
Reserved seats case: SIC for uploading of short order signed by all judges

Business Recorder

time01-07-2025

  • Politics
  • Business Recorder

Reserved seats case: SIC for uploading of short order signed by all judges

ISLAMABAD: The constitutional bench has been asked to upload short order of reserved seats on Supreme Court's website, signed by all the judges, who heard review petitions against the majority judgment. The Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC)'s lawyer on Monday filed an application under Order XXXIII Rule 6 read with Rule 1 of Order V of The Supreme Court Rules, 1980. Initially, a 13-member Constitutional Bench, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan, and comprising Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Ayesha A Malik, Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Musarrat Hilali, Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Justice Shahid Bilal Hasan, Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Justice Aamer Farooq, and Justice Ali Baqar Najafi, was constituted for the hearing of review petitions. On the first hearing, held on May 6, 2025, Justice Ayesha and Justice Aqeel recused from the bench, while Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, at the verge of conclusion, recused. The Constitutional Bench on June 27 with the majority of seven set aside the impugned judgment dated 12th July 2024, on the reserved seats of women and non-Muslims. The SIC in the petition mentioned that the Court in its order dated 6th May 2025 recorded in Para 4 that 'at the time of final determination by the remaining members of the bench the dismissal of review petitions by the two members will also be counted.' The petitioner said although an order dated 27.6.2025 has been uploaded on the website but that has not been signed by Justice Ayesha and Justice Aqeel, which was required to be done in view of the practice and procedure of this Court. The matter is of utmost public importance and fair administration of justice, particularly in view of Articles 17(2) and 19 A of the Constitution and the rights arising there from. Therefore, issuance and release of order signed by all 12 judges of the Court would have great impact. The petition said that in view of the foregoing submissions it is imperative that the order of the Court may be issued in the interest of justice. It prayed that the instant application may kindly be accepted and the order of the Court signed by all 12 judges may kindly be release/ issued. It is further prayed that the same be uploaded on the website of the Supreme Court, in the interest of justice. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store