Reserved seats case: SIC for uploading of short order signed by all judges
The Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC)'s lawyer on Monday filed an application under Order XXXIII Rule 6 read with Rule 1 of Order V of The Supreme Court Rules, 1980.
Initially, a 13-member Constitutional Bench, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan, and comprising Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Ayesha A Malik, Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Musarrat Hilali, Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Justice Shahid Bilal Hasan, Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Justice Aamer Farooq, and Justice Ali Baqar Najafi, was constituted for the hearing of review petitions.
On the first hearing, held on May 6, 2025, Justice Ayesha and Justice Aqeel recused from the bench, while Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, at the verge of conclusion, recused.
The Constitutional Bench on June 27 with the majority of seven set aside the impugned judgment dated 12th July 2024, on the reserved seats of women and non-Muslims.
The SIC in the petition mentioned that the Court in its order dated 6th May 2025 recorded in Para 4 that 'at the time of final determination by the remaining members of the bench the dismissal of review petitions by the two members will also be counted.'
The petitioner said although an order dated 27.6.2025 has been uploaded on the website but that has not been signed by Justice Ayesha and Justice Aqeel, which was required to be done in view of the practice and procedure of this Court.
The matter is of utmost public importance and fair administration of justice, particularly in view of Articles 17(2) and 19 A of the Constitution and the rights arising there from. Therefore, issuance and release of order signed by all 12 judges of the Court would have great impact.
The petition said that in view of the foregoing submissions it is imperative that the order of the Court may be issued in the interest of justice.
It prayed that the instant application may kindly be accepted and the order of the Court signed by all 12 judges may kindly be release/ issued.
It is further prayed that the same be uploaded on the website of the Supreme Court, in the interest of justice.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
16 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Marketing strategy of extremists
In the rugged terrains of Pakistan's tribal belt, and increasingly in the digital corridors of our cities, extremist groups like the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) are running what is arguably one of the most sophisticated marketing campaigns of our time. They are not just peddling guns and violence - they are selling an idea, a myth, a cause. Their methods are psychological, symbolic and deeply emotive. And disturbingly effective. Let us not fool ourselves. Extremist groups do not rise in a vacuum. They carefully curate a narrative that speaks to alienation, pain, and a deep sense of historical grievance. And in doing so, they market four powerful myths to disillusioned youth. They glorify the past. The lost grandeur of the Islamic world - its empires, caliphates and conquests - is repackaged as a paradise lost, stolen by colonialism and corruption. This myth creates a romanticised sense of victimhood, where Muslims are always righteous but perpetually wronged. History becomes a blunt instrument to stoke resentment, not a mirror for introspection. What is conveniently ignored is that the decline of the Muslim world was not solely due to external conquest, but internal stagnation - moral, intellectual and political. There is no room in their narrative for self-critique, only blame. They exploit unresolved political traumas. Palestine, Kashmir, Iraq, Syria - these wounds are not merely referenced, they are weaponised. Young people are told that the world is silent to Muslim suffering, that dialogue has failed, and that only violence can bring justice. Groups like TTP use these crises to create a transnational victimhood complex, even when they have neither the intent nor capacity to help these causes. Their interest is symbolic, not substantive. They sell utopia. In a world riddled with corruption, poverty and moral ambiguity, extremists offer a seductive promise: a pure Islamic state, governed by Sharia, where everything will magically fall into place. The message is deceptively simple - impose divine law, and paradise will descend. But their version of Sharia is often a narrow, tribal interpretation far removed from Islamic legal pluralism or ethical dynamism. When tested in practice - as seen in Taliban-ruled Afghanistan - it results in authoritarianism cloaked in religiosity, not justice or prosperity. They amplify local deprivations. In places like KP and Balochistan, the state's neglect has bred real anger. Political exclusion, economic marginalisation and lack of basic services have left generations feeling abandoned. Extremists step into this vacuum, not as ideologues, but as pseudo-liberators. They present themselves as defenders of the poor and the wronged, even as they destroy schools, murder dissenters and enforce brutal rule. They are arsonists posing as firefighters. What makes all this particularly insidious is that their campaign is wrapped not just in ideology, but in emotion - nostalgia, grievance, identity and rage. And it is made even more effective by the vacuum left by the state: a failure to respond with a counter-narrative rooted in dignity, justice and opportunity. While extremist groups offer a sense of belonging, mission and moral clarity, the state continues to offer bureaucracy, neglect and silence. The state's over-reliance on brute force - military operations, mass arrests, short-term deals - will not kill the idea that fuels extremism. You cannot drone away a narrative. You cannot shoot an ideology. What is needed is a deep, multi-layered response: equitable development in neglected regions; authentic political inclusion; an education system that prioritises ethics and inquiry over rote learning and blind obedience; and above all, reclaiming Islamic thought from the ideological warlords who have hijacked it. The crisis we face is not merely one of security; it is epistemological. It is about who gets to define Islam, what justice looks like, and how tradition can be honoured without being weaponised. The only way forward is to engage with these questions honestly, to foster critical discourse within our religious institutions, and to reimagine the role of faith in public life - not as a tool of coercion, but as a framework for compassion, balance and justice.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan welcomes Court of Arbitration Award affirming IWT rights
A view of the Uri-II hydroelectric project dam on Jhelum River, which flows from Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir into Azad Kashmir, near Uri in Baramulla district. PHOTO: REUTERS Listen to article Pakistan has welcomed an Award issued by the Court of Arbitration on August 8, interpreting key aspects of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), calling the decision a significant affirmation of its rights over the Western Rivers. The ruling, made public on the Court's website Monday, clarifies the criteria for new run-of-river hydropower projects India plans to construct on the Chenab, Jhelum, and Indus rivers. In a major finding, the Court declared that India must 'let flow' the waters of the western rivers for Pakistan's unrestricted use. It emphasised that any exceptions for hydro-electric generation must adhere strictly to the treaty's provisions rather than India's preferred 'ideal' or 'best practices' standards. 🔸 #PCA Press Release | The Indus Waters Western Rivers Arbitration (Islamic Republic of Pakistan v. Republic of India) 🔸 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝗿𝗯𝗶𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗥𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝗜𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲… — Permanent Court of Arbitration (@PCA_CPA) August 11, 2025 India has repeatedly refused to participate in the arbitration, challenging the Court's jurisdiction. However, the Court unanimously rejected India's objections in a prior July 6, 2023 ruling and confirmed that it was properly constituted and competent to hear the dispute. A Supplemental Award issued on June 27, 2025, further clarified that India's April 2025 announcement placing the Treaty 'in abeyance' did not limit the Court's competence. Throughout the proceedings, the Court ensured India remained informed and invited to participate, while thoroughly assessing Pakistan's claims through hearings, written submissions, and examination of historical and publicly available evidence. It also addresses the legal effect of decisions by dispute resolution bodies under the Treaty, such as courts of arbitration and neutral experts. The Foreign Office, in a statement on Monday, said, 'The Court's findings on low-level outlets, gated spillways, intakes for the turbines, and freeboard are in line with Pakistan's interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Treaty.' The Award also limits India's ability to maximise pondage volume, curbing potential overuse of water resources. Importantly, the Court noted that its Awards are final and binding on both India and Pakistan, with a controlling legal effect on future arbitration and neutral expert rulings, read the statement. It further added that recognising Pakistan's position as the downstream riparian state, the Court reaffirmed that the Treaty's objective is to define the rights and obligations of both parties with an emphasis on mutual cooperation and effective dispute resolution. The Award holds special significance amid India's recent announcement to place the Treaty in abeyance and its earlier boycott of the arbitration proceedings. 🔊PR NO.2️⃣3️⃣7️⃣/2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣5️⃣ Pakistan Welcomes the Award Rendered by the Court of Arbitration on the Issues of General Interpretation of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT). 🔗⬇️ — Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Pakistan (@ForeignOfficePk) August 11, 2025 Pakistan described the ruling as 'an endorsement of Pakistan's historical stance' on the water-sharing issues. Pakistan reiterated its commitment to the full implementation of the Indus Waters Treaty and urged India to immediately resume normal Treaty functioning and to 'faithfully implement the Award announced by the Court of Arbitration.' Pak IWT stance vindicated by arbitration court Earlier in June, the Court of Arbitration constituted in accordance with the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) of 1960, ruled that India's decision of holding the treaty in abeyance did not deprive it of its competence to adjudicate Pakistan's complaints against its neighbour. The court issued the 'Supplemental Award' on the proceedings instituted by Pakistan against India. 'Consistent with this interpretation of the Treaty, the Court has previously found that once a proceeding before a court of arbitration is properly initiated, as in the present case, there must be a strong presumption against the incidental loss of jurisdiction over the matters placed before it by subsequent acts, such as the appointment of a neutral expert. Read: Arbitration court vindicates Pakistan's IWT stance Accordingly, the text of the Treaty, read in light of its object and purpose, does not to allow either party, acting unilaterally, to hold in abeyance or suspend an ongoing dispute settlement process,' the order read. India suspends Indus Waters Treaty In April, India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan in the aftermath of a deadly attack in Pahalgam, Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), that killed 26 tourists. The attack led to a dramatic escalation between the two nuclear-armed neighbours. India accused Pakistan of supporting the terrorists behind the assault, a claim Islamabad strongly denied. India launched airstrikes against what it described as terrorists training camps across the border. Pakistan said the strikes hit civilian areas, causing dozens of casualties. Pakistan conducted Operation Bunyanum Marsoos in response to Indian military's dastardly attacks that began on the night of May 6 and 7, resulting in the loss of innocent civilian lives, including women, children, and the elderly. On May 10, Pakistan deployed its Al-Fatah missile and targeted multiple Indian military installations. However, after the intervention of US President Donald Trump, a full and immediate ceasefire was reached.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Sindh Assembly unites for minorities' rights ahead of Independence Day
Listen to article The Sindh Assembly on Monday unanimously passed a resolution to mark National Minorities Day, with both treasury and opposition leaders affirming that the Constitution guarantees complete protection to minorities in Sindh and across Pakistan. The move, taken three days before Independence Day, was described as a reaffirmation that every citizen is assured freedom of religion and security of life and property. The session, held in the old Assembly building under the chair of Speaker Owais Qadir Shah, saw the resolution moved by Deputy Speaker Naveed Anthony. Earlier, Minister for Law and Parliamentary Affairs Ziaul Hassan Lanjar had successfully sought suspension of other proceedings to allow debate on the motion. Speaking in favour, Chief Minister Syed Murad Ali Shah recalled the Assembly's historic role in passing the 1943 resolution in favour of Pakistan and hosting Quaid-e-Azam's 1947 address. He said observing Minorities Day before Independence Day underscored the guarantee of religious freedom and protection for all citizens. He noted Sindh's leading role in joining Pakistan, adding that its representatives would continue contributing to the country's unity and survival. Referring to Quaid-e-Azam's commitment to safeguarding minorities, Shah cited contributions by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and Benazir Bhutto. The CM also hoisted the national flag in the Assembly Hall. Opposition Leader Ali Khursheedi supported the resolution, urging all parties to respect its spirit. He cautioned against sectarian and ethnic bias, and highlighted the need for serious attention to public safety issues. Lanjar announced plans to establish minority desks headed by SSP-level officers at the Sindh Police headquarters and the IG's office. Local Government Minister Saeed Ghani said protection of non-Muslims dated back to the time of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and the Rashidun Caliphate. He emphasised that Islam prohibits harm to non-Muslims, adding that minorities in his constituency are treated with respect. Deputy Speaker Anthony noted that former president Asif Ali Zardari had initiated National Minorities Day in 2009, recalling Quaid-e-Azam's 11 August 1947 speech in which he symbolically represented minorities in the national flag through the white stripe. He proposed that the constitutional term 'minority' be removed to reflect equality. Former Speaker Agha Siraj Durrani stressed that the term is a constitutional provision that could only be changed in the National Assembly, and highlighted the PPP's record in granting minorities more than five per cent of government jobs. Speaker Shah announced that a symbolic session will be held on August 14, inviting special children as guests. MQM's Taha Ahmed Khan, PTI's Shabbir Qureshi, and MQM's Anil Kumar and Fauzia Hameed also backed the resolution. MQM members called for constitutional removal of the term 'minority' and reiterated the need for religious harmony. Anil Kumar said minorities enjoy all facilities in Pakistan, unlike in India. The House unanimously approved the resolution before adjourning the session.
