Latest news with #Taliban-appointed
Memri
6 days ago
- Politics
- Memri
Hezb-e-Islami Leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar Discusses Russia's Recognition Of Afghan Taliban, Advocates 'National And Religious Unity Within The Framework Of A Just And Lawful System' In Afghanistan
On July 9, 2025, Daily Shahadat published a Dari-language article by former mujahideen commander and the leader of Hezb-e-Islami Afghanistan Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, who is also the publisher of the daily, addressing Russia's recognition of the Afghan Taliban government and its acceptance of the Taliban-appointed ambassador to Moscow. Hekmatyar also publishes Daily Shahadat. In the article – titled "Acceptance Of The Islamic Emirate's Ambassador In Moscow – Political Maneuver Or Political Gamble?" – Gulbuddin Hekmatyar describes Russia's move to recognize the Taliban government variously as a political and diplomatic maneuver, a gamble, and a reaction to developments in Syria and Iran, suggesting it may also be part of a broader deal between Russia and the United States. The article is informative and offers insight into the past half-century of Afghanistan's history and its unique geographical location, which draws global powers to seek to control it in a strategic game. However, the Hezb-e-Islami leader thinks that foreign powers' meddling in Afghanistan can be ended. "If Afghanistan succeeds in realizing its national and religious unity within the framework of a just and lawful system, it will overcome the most dangerous conspiracies and pressure circles of foreign actors," he says. Following are excerpts from the article: "The Coup Against Najib [Dr. Mohammad Najibullah Ahmadzai, President Of Afghanistan Executed By The Taliban In 1996] Was A Joint Plan Of Russian And American Intelligence, And Iranian And Saudi Intelligence Were Also Involved In It" "Acceptance Of The Islamic Emirate's Ambassador In Moscow – Political Maneuver Or Political Gamble? "A Reaction To The Events In Syria And Iran Or A Give-And-Take Deal With America? "In The Light Of Moscow's Policies On Afghanistan From The Founding Of The Soviet Union To Today "Moscow, since the time of Peter the Great – when it emerged as a regional power – has always pursued the expansion of Russian influence toward the south and access to warm waters. "In this regard, Afghanistan, due to its sensitive geopolitical position, was considered one of the areas of interest to Russia. The expansionist policies of Peter the Great laid the groundwork for the (rivalry between Russia and Britain) in Afghanistan. This rivalry later turned into the Great Game in the 19th century, and Afghanistan was accepted as a (buffer) between Russia and Britain. "After the establishment of the Soviet Union and when it occupied the regions of Central Asia and the Caucasus and reached the borders of Afghanistan, this country gained greater importance. Until today, throughout all this time, it has had an active presence in the affairs of our country. As the Soviet Union, at one time, it competed with Great Britain over the occupation of Afghanistan, and at another time with the United States of America. "At one point, against the first Taliban government, it, together with India, Iran, Israel, France, Britain, and America – supported the [anti-Taliban] Northern Alliance, which included the Parcham Party, militias from the Soviet occupation era, Shura-e-Nazar, Jamiat, and Shia parties under Iran's influence. It provided them with weapons and printed Afghani [currency] for them. "There was also a time when Russia and Iran helped America in the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq. From 2001 to 2014, a major part of the logistics for NATO and American forces in Afghanistan was carried out through Russian land and airspace, and another part of America's logistics was delivered through Pakistan's land and airspace. Groups affiliated with Moscow and under Tehran's influence, during the 20 years of occupation, were at the service of America. "This coalition was formed when Moscow, due to continuous failures and the financial and human losses in the war in Afghanistan, and the problems that this situation created for it within the Soviet Union, had no choice but to withdraw its forces from our country. It considered the establishment of an Islamic government in Afghanistan a serious threat to its dominance over Central Asia. America and Iran had similar concerns. They jointly decided to unify their positions regarding Afghanistan and to prevent the establishment of a Mujahideen government... "The coup against Najib [Dr. Mohammad Najibullah Ahmadzai, former president of Afghanistan executed by the Taliban in 1996] was a joint plan of Russian and American intelligence, and Iranian and Saudi intelligence were also involved in it..." "Saudi Support Was Cut Off When The Taliban Refused To Hand Over [Saudi National] Osama Bin Laden To Them"; "Saudi Intelligence Chief Turki Al-Faisal Traveled On His Private Jet... To Kabul [But Osama Was Too Powerful For The Taliban To Hand Him Over]" "[During 1996-2001] The first era of the [Islamic] Emirate, from beginning to end, was spent in war against the Northern Alliance. The Hezb-e-Islami did not want to fight the Taliban; it considered such a war neither useful nor in accordance with its military policies. The Alliance benefited from financial, military, and political support from Russia, the United States, India, Iran, France, Britain, and Israel, while the Taliban were supported by Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, who also recognized their government. "Saudi support was cut off when the Taliban refused to hand over [Saudi national] Osama bin Laden to them. This was despite the fact that a gathering of the Emirate's religious scholars in Kabul asked Osama to leave Afghanistan. The Emirate's foreign minister traveled to Saudi Arabia with the message that they were willing to hand over Osama to the Saudis. "Saudi intelligence chief Turki al-Faisal traveled on his private jet, together with the Taliban foreign minister [Wakil Ahmad] Muttawakil, to Kabul and then Kandahar to take Osama and bring him to Saudi Arabia. But the Taliban were not able to do so, because Osama was so powerful that the Taliban simply were unable to arrest and hand him over to Turki al-Faisal. In fact, in the war against the Alliance, the Taliban were largely indebted to the active role of Osama's loyal fighters, who fought on the front lines in all Taliban battles. "The 9/11 attacks and the refusal to hand over Osama to Saudi Arabia and the United States led America to strike Afghanistan from land and sky – first targeting it with cruise missiles and then bombarding the Taliban centers and strongholds with terrifying B-52 bombers. The Taliban offered no resistance whatsoever; from the day the first American missile was launched toward Afghanistan to the day the Taliban evacuated Kandahar and, through a press conference, surrendered to America and Karzai, a total of five weeks (35 days) passed!" After 9/11 "The U.S. Decision Changed – A Large-Scale Aerial And Ground Assault, With The Participation Of Hired Afghan Fighters Belonging To The Northern Front And Groups Under Iranian Influence, Replaced The Limited And Covert Operation Planned With Russia And Iran [To Replace The Taliban Government]" "Before the United States began its operation to occupy Afghanistan, it had a plan for a joint operation with Russia, in such a way that 17,000 Russian soldiers would participate in the operation, capture Mazar and Takhar, and hand them over to the Northern Alliance. The expenses of this operation were to be paid by the United States. "Akhdar Ibrahimi [aka Lakhdar Brahimi], the special representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for Afghanistan, told a group of Afghans in a meeting in Switzerland: Moscow and Washington have a plan for a joint operation; it is better that you get on this train! "Before September 11, 2001, the United States and some Western countries including Russia, Iran, and India were providing intelligence, weapons, and financial support to the United Northern Front [aka Northern Alliance] against the Taliban. In the years 2000–2001, secret meetings were held in Moscow, Dushanbe (Tajikistan), Tehran, and Delhi to coordinate this support. "After the Al-Qaeda attack on America, the U.S. decision changed. A large-scale aerial and ground assault, with the participation of hired Afghan fighters belonging to the Northern Front and groups under Iranian influence, replaced the limited and covert operation planned with Russia and Iran. And the United States was able to launch its operations under the flag of 'the international counter-terrorism coalition' (ISAF)." "Although Pakistan's Role... In Assisting The U.S. In The Occupation Of Afghanistan Was No Less Than That Of Russia And Iran, Due To Its Support For The Taliban, It Was Deprived Of An Active And Significant Presence In The Bonn Negotiations [That Led To Formation Of Post-Taliban Government Headed By Hamid Karzai]" "The United States first overthrew the Taliban government and captured major cities, including Kabul and Kandahar. Then, it convened a meeting in Bonn with the participation of representatives from the United States, Britain, Germany, Iran, and Russia, so that with their consultation and agreement, the future government during the occupation period could be formed. "The share of Russia and Iran in the governments during the occupation period was greater than other countries due to their extensive cooperation in the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan. Although Pakistan's role and contribution in assisting the United States in the occupation of Afghanistan was no less than that of Russia and Iran, due to its support for the Taliban, it was deprived of an active and significant presence in the Bonn negotiations. Former mujahideen commander Gulbuddin Hekmatyar "Britain insisted on the restoration of [former king of Afghanistan Mohammad] Zahir Shah as king, but Iran was sensitive to this, because the restoration of monarchy in Afghanistan would pave the way for the return of Reza Shah Pahlavi in Iran. The replacement of [Burhanuddin] Rabbani, a Tajik, with [Hamid] Karzai, a Pashtun, was also not pleasing to Iran; they preferred Satar Sirat, who was the representative of the deposed king, but did not succeed. The United States considered Karzai suitable to its own liking, and in the Bonn meeting, the final word had to be spoken by the actual victor of Afghanistan – the United States. "Karzai used to refer to Zahir Shah as 'Baba' [father or grandfather] and would bow to kiss his hand. However, in his first presidential term, in the face of the Northern Alliance – and especially [Mohammad Qasim] Fahim, who was his defense minister and later his deputy – he resembled a sparrow in a cage beside a hawk. Even his protection in Arg [the Presidential Palace] was provided by the gunmen of Shura-e Nazar [created by Ahmad Shah Massoud]. "Russia and Iran formed the Jabal Al-Siraj Alliance led by Rabbani against Hezb-e-Islami [led by Gulbuddin Hekmatyar] and supported it for four years with financial, military, intelligence, and propaganda assistance, and supported the fight against the Taliban for five years. Both of them helped the United States in the occupation of Afghanistan and the overthrow of the Taliban government with all their capabilities..." "Russia Abandoned Its Important And Strategic Friend In The Region (Iran) During The Hardest Days And The Dangerous U.S.-Israel Attack, And Aside From Empty Rhetoric, Gave Iran No Help – Neither Did It Provide The S-400 Air Defense System, Nor The SU-35 And SU-57 Fighter Jets – Iran Was Forced To Purchase 40 Chinese J-10 Aircraft" "However, the United States, in its negotiations with the Taliban [in Doha, 2020] and in handing over Kabul to them, did not inform Moscow and Tehran and made a unilateral decision. The reason was its differences with its two former partners on one hand, and their efforts to establish an anti-American front – BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization [SCO] and its expansion – on the other. The founders of this organization are Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, and these five countries constitute more than 40 percent of the world's population and about 25 percent of the global gross domestic product. "Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iran, Ethiopia, and the United Arab Emirates have also joined [BRICS subsequently]. So far, more than 30 countries have expressed their desire to join or cooperate with BRICS. All of these countries want to reduce their dependence on the dollar and the Western financial system. The United States considers any effort to strengthen this organization or join it as hostility toward itself and finds it intolerable. "However, regarding the lack of official recognition of the Taliban government [since it assumed power in August 2021] and how to engage with it, they had a joint position. The events in Syria and later the massive and joint attack by the United States and Israel on Iran [in June 2025] deepened the rift in their relations, and Moscow decided to be the first country to accept the Taliban's ambassador in Moscow and allow the white Taliban flag to replace the previous tricolor flag [of Afghanistan] – perhaps in this way they could lessen the pain that had reached Russia. "It is clear that this is a political game and nothing else – Russia has not changed, nor has its policies and positions regarding Afghanistan. Official recognition or non-recognition of any government has had no effect on its policies in the past, nor will it in the future. "Russia abandoned its important and strategic friend in the region (Iran) during the hardest days and the dangerous U.S.-Israel attack, and aside from empty rhetoric, gave Iran no help – neither did it provide the S-400 air defense system, nor the SU-35 and SU-57 fighter jets. Iran was forced to purchase 40 Chinese J-10 aircraft. Russia's position regarding the U.S. attack on Iran was so passive and vague that some observers and analysts thought perhaps a deal had been made between Moscow and Washington over Iran." "Basically, Russia Has Always Pursued Policies Regarding Afghanistan That Are Based On Its Strategic Goals"; "This Was Part Of An Agreement Between Moscow And Washington During The Dissolution Of The Soviet Union: That Russia Would Withdraw From Eastern Europe But Would Continue Its Active Presence In Central Asia" "Moscow's move [to recognize the Taliban government] led to the issuance of a warrant by the Hague International Court [ICC] for the arrest of the Taliban leader [Mullah Hibbatullah Akhundzada] and Chief Justice [Abdul Hakim Haqqani]. "The United Nations also called it a unilateral decision [by Russia]. The White House, the U.S. State Department, and Congress also reacted, emphasizing their firm rejection of recognizing the Taliban, maintaining sanctions, imposing additional sanctions, and continuing the freeze on Afghanistan's assets in American banks. And [U.S. President Donald] Trump once again said: We handed over the world's most powerful base (Bagram) to China! "Basically, Russia has always pursued policies regarding Afghanistan that are based on its strategic goals. Central Asia was under the complete control of the Soviet Union, and after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the region remained under Moscow's influence. In some countries, such as Tajikistan, power remains to this day in the hands of former KGB members, and in others, they hold the largest share and role in governments. "This was part of an agreement between Moscow and Washington during the dissolution of the Soviet Union: that Russia would withdraw from Eastern Europe but would continue its active presence in Central Asia. At that time, we repeatedly heard from Washington statements such as: Central Asia is the soft underbelly of the Soviet Union; it is facing threats from radical Islamic groups in Afghanistan; the mujahideen government destabilizes the region's stability and security; the withdrawal of Soviet forces from this region is harmful and will have dire consequences! Meaning, America agreed to the continued dominance of Moscow over this region, despite the complete collapse of the Soviet Union! "Likewise, Moscow does not allow Central Asia to connect to the South through Afghanistan, nor for its gas and oil to be transported via this route to the South – thus freeing itself from dependence and reliance on Moscow and its transit path. At any cost, this must be prevented. It would be the height of folly for anyone to think that Russia would easily abandon its strategic objectives merely by accepting the ambassador of the Kabul government in Moscow." "When Hezb-e-Islami Forces Entered Kabul, [Hashemi] Rafsanjani, The Former President Of Iran, Said In His Friday Prayer Sermon: We Will Never Allow Hezb-E-Islami To Rule Over Kabul"; "Pakistan Also Does Not Favor The Establishment Of An Islamic Government Led By A Pashtun And Considers It A Cause For Provoking And Encouraging The Pashtuns Of Pakistan To Separate From Pakistan" "In this regard, Iran also holds a position identical to that of Russia: the transfer of Central Asian gas and oil through Afghanistan to Pakistan and India – two important markets for Iran – is in no way acceptable to it. Iran's opposition to the project for transporting Turkmenistan's gas to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India (TAPI), and the creation of obstacles against it, stems from this very point. Iran has spared no effort to prevent the implementation of this project, and one of the main reasons behind its massive investments in the continuation of insecurity and war in Afghanistan has been exactly this. "Furthermore, a majority Pashtun and Sunni government in Afghanistan is intolerable for Iran. When Hezb-e-Islami forces entered Kabul, [Hashemi] Rafsanjani, the former president of Iran, said in his Friday prayer sermon: We will never allow Hezb-e-Islami to rule over Kabul. Iran opposes U.S.-backed TAPI gas pipeline, while U.S. opposes Iran-Pakistan-India pipeline "Pakistan also does not favor the establishment of an Islamic government led by a Pashtun and considers it a cause for provoking and encouraging the Pashtuns of Pakistan to separate from Pakistan and join Afghanistan. For this very reason, it preferred non-Pashtuns belonging to ethnic minorities, such as Mojaddedi [Sibghatullah Mojaddedi, former President of Afghanistan] and [Burhanuddin] Rabbani, for the presidency. "One of the heads of Pakistan's ISI [Inter-Services Intelligence of Pakistani military], who was known for being propagandistic, wrote in his analytical report to Pakistan's decision-making authorities: A government led by a Pashtun in Kabul is not in Pakistan's interest. When the forces of Hezb-e-Islami entered Kabul, this same general, in a meeting with the leaders of the Peshawar-based factions [of the Taliban], said: Pakistan will never allow Hekmatyar to rule Kabul. One of them said to him: Please, General Sahib, do it." "As Long As Afghanistan Lacks A Government Based On The Will Of The Majority Of The People And A Strong Consultative System, It Will Remain A Toy For External Competition – Neither Accepting Political Representatives From This Side Nor From That Side, Nor Financial Aid, Nor Diplomatic Maneuvers, Will Replace True Legitimacy" "The truth is this: As long as Afghanistan lacks a government based on the will of the majority of the people and a strong consultative system, it will remain a toy for external competition – neither accepting political representatives from this side nor from that side, nor financial aid, nor diplomatic maneuvers, will replace true legitimacy. If Afghanistan succeeds in realizing its national and religious unity within the framework of a just and lawful system, it will overcome the most dangerous conspiracies and pressure circles of foreign actors. "We also believe that as long as diplomatic and political relations among the countries of the world are not based on sound principles and genuine justice, and as long as unhealthy rivalries, reprehensible hypocrisy, and malicious intent are not set aside, the existing problems between countries will not be resolved, and trust and confidence will not be established. "Some of these sound and justice-based principles are as follows: "i) Non-interference by large and powerful countries in the internal affairs of small and underdeveloped countries. "ii) Non-support for imposed, non-national, non-popular, coup-installed, puppet, autocratic governments that lack internal legitimacy. "iii) Severing relations with ethnocentric and racist regimes. "These fundamental conditions must be strictly observed in dealing with any government and system: "1) The country's political and social system must be lawful and supported by the majority of the nation. "2) It must have a shura [council] that genuinely represents the will of the people, as the highest and most authoritative body for all major national decisions. "3) It must possess a constitution accepted by the nation, as a national covenant and guarantor of the individual human rights of every member of society. "However, diplomatic relations and political engagements between countries are currently, in general, based on reprehensible motives and unhealthy political, economic, and military rivalries. No attention is paid to who the counterpart is and what background and characteristics they have – whether they represent their nation and people or a forcibly imposed minority, whether they respect and submit to the will of their people or not. "If it were not so, and if these standards were observed in political relations, we would not witness authoritarian, coup-installed, and individual-centered governments in any country in the world. Such regimes would face severe global isolation, and the space for their survival and continuation would be significantly restricted. "Hekmatyar" Source: (Afghanistan), July 9, 2025.
Deccan Herald
09-07-2025
- Politics
- Deccan Herald
India's UNGA vote is a pragmatic embrace of the Taliban reality
On July 7, India abstained from voting on a draft resolution at the UN General Assembly regarding Afghanistan. 'The Situation in Afghanistan' resolution, introduced by Germany, called for 'greater international support for the Afghan people' and put the spotlight on the 'grave, worsening, widespread and systematic oppression' of all women and girls in rationale was that 'an approach focused only on punitive action' was unlikely to succeed, and a 'business as usual' approach was unlikely to deliver desired results first, India's abstention might appear puzzling — after all, New Delhi has been vocal about its opposition to the Taliban's violent and medieval ways. Also, almost three years ago, on November 10, 2022, India voted in favour of a similar UNGA resolution. What has changed since then? To understand this, it is important to recap the background that prompted New Delhi to recalibrate its view of the dispensation in tiesIndia shares strong ties with Afghanistan, and various governments in New Delhi and Kabul have nurtured close diplomatic and people-to-people relations. Between 1996 and 2001, when the Taliban captured power in Kabul, India chose to back the Northern Alliance. In 2001, the United States overthrew the Taliban, and India doubled down on its aid and outreach. In the two decades till 2021, India contributed about $3 billion through various aid projects in Afghanistan. However, following the humiliating withdrawal of the US on August 15, 2021, and the Taliban takeover, India's development efforts came to a screeching halt. A year later, in 2022, India restarted its mission operations in Kabul and still maintains a technical team to oversee its developmental outreach in Afghanistan. Since then, several meetings have been held, and though India is yet to officially recognise the Taliban government, quasi-diplomatic ties have been restored — there have been meetings at the foreign office level, ministers have held discussions, and the Afghanistan embassy in New Delhi could soon have a Taliban-appointed enemy's enemy is a friendThe growing New Delhi-Kabul ties are a testament to India realising that the strategic distancing from a Taliban-led government is a tactical mistake in a geopolitically sensitive region. In reaching out to the Taliban, India is not an outlier — on the contrary, it is late to the party. Between August 2021 and February 2024, the Taliban regime held close to 1,500 diplomatic meetings with about 80 countries. With 215 meetings, China topped the list, closely followed by Turkey (194). Pakistan held 118 was among the first to reach out to the Taliban (even before August 2021) and has built deep economic ties. The Taliban, which was patronised by Pakistan, has not had the best of ties with Islamabad after assuming power in Kabul. This widening chasm between Islamabad and Kabul provides New Delhi an opportunity to fill the void created by Pakistan's diminished influence if India might not be able to match China in tapping Afghanistan's natural resources, New Delhi will be hoping to maintain (and improve) its goodwill with the people of Afghanistan through its humanitarian efforts. By maintaining good ties, India will also expect the Taliban regime to keep a check on Pakistan-sponsored anti-India forces, like the JeM and the LeT, operating from its soil. Thus, improving ties with Taliban-ruled Kabul could limit Islamabad's sphere of Delhi's ties with the regime in Kabul, coupled with growing engagement with Tehran, poses a strategic challenge to Islamabad's influence in the region. India's investment in the Chabahar port offers Afghanistan an alternative to Pakistan's said, for New Delhi, building ties with the Taliban comes with its own challenges and contradictions. While India has built strong people-to-people connect, in the Taliban's worldview, it hardly matters. India has a democracy-based governance system with human rights and secular values enshrined in its guiding principles; the Taliban is a hardline, ultra-conservative movement which follows a Deobandi interpretation of Sunni Islam — the two are as different as chalk and realpolitik guides the two regimes. For the Taliban, ties with India could be an extension of its quest for international legitimacy. For New Delhi, building ties with the Taliban could further improve its people-to-people ties. These improved ties could also lead to better lives for Afghanistan's religious minorities, especially the Hindus and Sikhs. But, herein lies the catch — the more importance and recognition the Taliban regime gains, the more it is likely to pursue its anti-women, anti-minority could have continued with its anti-Taliban stance and focused on people-centric developmental projects if the US had a better plan and more patience to see democracy take deeper roots in Afghanistan. Post-2021, none of the global powers were ready to fill the vacuum the US left behind in Afghanistan. Russia, China, and Iran have been quick to swoop in to build ties with the Taliban would have been a foreign policy felo-de-se for India not to adjust its sails to this changing wind. This shift in policy, though subtle and nuanced, has earned the displeasure of those who reposed faith in the 'friendship with India'.India's evolving ties with the Taliban and its 'enduring commitment to meeting [the] humanitarian and developmental needs' of the people of Afghanistan are a delicate balancing act. It is better to protect and further one's interests rather than grandstand. Disclaimer: The views expressed above are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the views of DH.
Time of India
08-07-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
India Abstains UN Vote on Afghanistan, Slams ‘Business as Usual' Approach to Terrorism, Taliban
India abstained from a United Nations General Assembly resolution on the situation in Afghanistan, warning that a 'business as usual' approach will not work in the current humanitarian and security crisis. India's Permanent Representative to the UN, Parvathaneni Harish, urged the global community to focus on dismantling terrorist safe havens, naming Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed. While reaffirming its historic ties and development commitments to Afghanistan, including more than 500 projects and 50,000 metric tons of wheat aid since 2021, India emphasized that punitive-only measures won't succeed. The move comes after External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar's talks with the Taliban-appointed Foreign Minister, showing India's quiet but active diplomacy.#india #afghanistan #unitednations #unga #indiaafghanistan #indiaafghnaistanrelations #afghanistancrisis #indiaunvote #modigovt #talibanterror #unga2025 #indiadevelopmentaid #afghanistanun #terrorism #indiadiplomacy #parvathaneniharish #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews
India Gazette
08-07-2025
- Politics
- India Gazette
India abstains from UN resolution on Afghanistan, calls for efforts to end exploitation of Afghan soil for terrorism
New York [US], July 8 (ANI): India abstained from voting on the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) resolution on the situation in Afghanistan on Monday and noted that a 'business as usual' approach without new and targeted initiatives is unlikely to deliver the outcomes the international community envisions for the Afghan people. The text titled 'The situation in Afghanistan' was adopted by a vote of 116 in favour to 2 against (Israel, United States), with 12 abstentions. While delivering the explanation of the vote on the UNGA resolution on the situation in Afghanistan, India's Permanent Representative to the UN, Parvathaneni Harish, said that India is closely monitoring the security situation in Afghanistan and called on the international community to direct its coordinated efforts towards ensuring that entities and individuals designated by the UN no longer exploit Afghan soil for terrorist activities. He said, 'India is closely monitoring the security situation in Afghanistan. The international community must direct its coordinated efforts towards ensuring that entities and individuals designated by the UN Security Council - - the Al Qaeda and their affiliates, ISIL and their affiliates, including Lashkar-e-Tayyiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, along with their regional sponsors who facilitate their operations, no longer exploit the Afghan territory for terrorist activities.' The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution calling on Afghanistan to uphold human rights, adhere to international law and take decisive action against terrorism amid a worsening humanitarian crisis, rising numbers of returnees and the enduring impact of decades of conflict. Recalling recent talks between External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and Taliban-appointed Foreign Minister, Harish said, 'On the political front, India's External Affairs Minister recently spoke with the Acting Foreign Minister of Afghanistan. We welcome the strong condemnation of the Pahalgam terrorist attack of April 22, 2025, by the Afghan side. This conversation followed a meeting between India's Foreign Secretary and the Acting Foreign Minister, where both sides discussed various bilateral issues and regional developments.' He stated that India's approach to Afghanistan has always been guided by 'long-standing friendship and special friendship' with the Afghans. 'India's approach to Afghanistan - as its contiguous neighbour with deep historical and cultural ties - has always been guided by our longstanding friendship and special relationship with the Afghan people. As a long-standing partner, India has direct stakes in ensuring peace and stability in Afghanistan,' he stated. Harish said that India has been actively engaging with regional and international stakeholders to promote peace, stability and development in Afghanistan since the UNGA last considered the issue in 2022. He further said, 'We believe that international and regional consensus and cooperation on key issues concerning Afghanistan are essential. Our participation in UN meetings in Doha and other regional forums reflects our ongoing efforts, including our recent participation in the meetings held in Doha last week.' He also spoke about the humanitarian assistance provided by India to Afghanistan. 'India's immediate priorities in Afghanistan include the provision of humanitarian assistance and the implementation of capacity-building initiatives for the Afghan people. We have been working closely with UN agencies to support the Afghan people in critical areas such as health, food security, education and sports. India's commitment to Afghanistan's reconstruction is demonstrated through more than 500 development partnership projects across all provinces.' He stated that India, since August 2021, supplied around 50,000 metric tons of wheat, over 330 metric tons of medicines and vaccines, 40,000 litres of the pesticide Malathion, and 58.6 metric tons of other essential items, supporting millions of Afghans in dire need of humanitarian assistance. He also mentioned India's efforts to provide help to Afghanistan in partnership with the UN Office on Drugs and Crime. 'In partnership with the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), we have provided 84 MTs of assistance and medicines and 32 MTs of social support items for drug rehabilitation programmes in Afghanistan, particularly those focused on women. India also continues to offer scholarships and fellowships to Afghan students. Since 2023, we have provided scholarships for undergraduate and postgraduate courses to 2,000 Afghan students, including nearly 600 girls and women,' he said. He emphasised that any policy to address a post-conflict situation must combine a mix of policy instruments - incentivising positive behaviour and disincentivising harmful actions and an approach focused on punitive measures is unlikely to succeed. He said, 'Any coherent policy to address a post-conflict situation must combine a mix of policy instruments - incentivizing positive behaviour and disincentivizing harmful actions. An approach focused only on punitive measures, in our view, is unlikely to succeed.' 'The United Nations and the broader international community have adopted more balanced and nuanced approaches in other post-conflict contexts. However, no new policy instruments have been introduced to address the worsening humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan since August 2021. A 'business as usual' approach, without new and targeted initiatives, is unlikely to deliver the outcomes the international community envisions for the Afghan people,' he added. He emphasised India's historic ties with the people of Afghanistan and expressed commitment to meeting their humanitarian and developmental needs. He said, 'I would like to reiterate India's historic ties with the people of Afghanistan and our enduring commitment to meeting their humanitarian and developmental needs. While we remain committed to continued engagement with all relevant stakeholders and broadly support the international community's efforts towards a stable, peaceful and prosperous Afghanistan, India has decided to abstain on this resolution.' (ANI)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
08-07-2025
- Politics
- Business Standard
India abstains from UN resolution on Afghanistan, calls for end of terror
India abstained from voting on the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) resolution on the situation in Afghanistan on Monday and noted that a "business as usual" approach without new and targeted initiatives is unlikely to deliver the outcomes the international community envisions for the Afghan people. The text titled "The situation in Afghanistan" was adopted by a vote of 116 in favour to 2 against (Israel, United States), with 12 abstentions. While delivering the explanation of the vote on the UNGA resolution on the situation in Afghanistan, India's Permanent Representative to the UN, Parvathaneni Harish, said that India is closely monitoring the security situation in Afghanistan and called on the international community to direct its coordinated efforts towards ensuring that entities and individuals designated by the UN no longer exploit Afghan soil for terrorist activities. He said, "India is closely monitoring the security situation in Afghanistan. The international community must direct its coordinated efforts towards ensuring that entities and individuals designated by the UN Security Council - - the Al Qaeda and their affiliates, ISIL and their affiliates, including Lashkar-e-Tayyiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, along with their regional sponsors who facilitate their operations, no longer exploit the Afghan territory for terrorist activities." The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution calling on Afghanistan to uphold human rights, adhere to international law and take decisive action against terrorism amid a worsening humanitarian crisis, rising numbers of returnees and the enduring impact of decades of conflict. Recalling recent talks between External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and Taliban-appointed Foreign Minister, Harish said, "On the political front, India's External Affairs Minister recently spoke with the Acting Foreign Minister of Afghanistan. We welcome the strong condemnation of the Pahalgam terrorist attack of April 22, 2025, by the Afghan side. This conversation followed a meeting between India's Foreign Secretary and the Acting Foreign Minister, where both sides discussed various bilateral issues and regional developments." He stated that India's approach to Afghanistan has always been guided by "long-standing friendship and special friendship" with the Afghans. "India's approach to Afghanistan - as its contiguous neighbour with deep historical and cultural ties - has always been guided by our longstanding friendship and special relationship with the Afghan people. As a long-standing partner, India has direct stakes in ensuring peace and stability in Afghanistan," he stated. Harish said that India has been actively engaging with regional and international stakeholders to promote peace, stability and development in Afghanistan since the UNGA last considered the issue in 2022. He further said, "We believe that international and regional consensus and cooperation on key issues concerning Afghanistan are essential. Our participation in UN meetings in Doha and other regional forums reflects our ongoing efforts, including our recent participation in the meetings held in Doha last week." He also spoke about the humanitarian assistance provided by India to Afghanistan. "India's immediate priorities in Afghanistan include the provision of humanitarian assistance and the implementation of capacity-building initiatives for the Afghan people. We have been working closely with UN agencies to support the Afghan people in critical areas such as health, food security, education and sports. India's commitment to Afghanistan's reconstruction is demonstrated through more than 500 development partnership projects across all provinces." He stated that India, since August 2021, supplied around 50,000 metric tons of wheat, over 330 metric tons of medicines and vaccines, 40,000 litres of the pesticide Malathion, and 58.6 metric tons of other essential items, supporting millions of Afghans in dire need of humanitarian assistance. He also mentioned India's efforts to provide help to Afghanistan in partnership with the UN Office on Drugs and Crime. "In partnership with the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), we have provided 84 MTs of assistance and medicines and 32 MTs of social support items for drug rehabilitation programmes in Afghanistan, particularly those focused on women. India also continues to offer scholarships and fellowships to Afghan students. Since 2023, we have provided scholarships for undergraduate and postgraduate courses to 2,000 Afghan students, including nearly 600 girls and women," he said. He emphasised that any policy to address a post-conflict situation must combine a mix of policy instruments - incentivising positive behaviour and disincentivising harmful actions and an approach focused on punitive measures is unlikely to succeed. He said, "Any coherent policy to address a post-conflict situation must combine a mix of policy instruments - incentivizing positive behaviour and disincentivizing harmful actions. An approach focused only on punitive measures, in our view, is unlikely to succeed." "The United Nations and the broader international community have adopted more balanced and nuanced approaches in other post-conflict contexts. However, no new policy instruments have been introduced to address the worsening humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan since August 2021. A 'business as usual' approach, without new and targeted initiatives, is unlikely to deliver the outcomes the international community envisions for the Afghan people," he added. He emphasised India's historic ties with the people of Afghanistan and expressed commitment to meeting their humanitarian and developmental needs. He said, "I would like to reiterate India's historic ties with the people of Afghanistan and our enduring commitment to meeting their humanitarian and developmental needs. While we remain committed to continued engagement with all relevant stakeholders and broadly support the international community's efforts towards a stable, peaceful and prosperous Afghanistan, India has decided to abstain on this resolution. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
