Latest news with #Termsof


News18
3 days ago
- Entertainment
- News18
Hina Khan's Video With Her ‘Sweetest' Mother-In-Law Will Leave You In Splits
Last Updated: Hina Khan and Rocky Jaiswal tied the knot on June 4, 2025. Hina shares hilarious videos with her in-laws, giving fans a peek into her married life. After dating for over a decade, Hina Khan and Rocky Jaiswal tied the knot on June 4, 2025, in an intimate wedding surrounded by close family and friends. After her wedding, the Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai actress is enjoying her life in her in-laws' house. Hina is often seen sharing hilarious videos with her in-laws, giving a sneak peek into her married life. On Sunday, July 27, the actress shared another playful meme video on Instagram with her mother-in-law. In the video, Hina was seen wearing a pink and blue striped night suit as she wiped utensils in the kitchen. As soon as she turned her eyes while working, she spotted her mother-in-law staring at her over her newspaper as if she was keeping an eye on the actress so that she did not slack off and worked properly. A troubled Hina started to work quickly and more efficiently. Hina's expressions and her bond with her mother-in-law are bound to leave her fans rolling over with laughter. Sharing the funny video, Hina Khan wrote in the caption, 'Shaadi ke side effects. Waise, my MIL (mother-in-law) is the sweetest, I swear," followed by a red heart and laughing emojis. View this post on Instagram A post shared by ???????????????? ???????????????? (@realhinakhan) Hina Khan And Rocky Jaiswal's Relationship Hina Khan started dating Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai's supervising producer, Rocky Jaiswal, in 2014. Rocky Jaiswal has been a pillar of support and strength for Hina, especially during her battle with cancer. In June 2024, the actress revealed she was suffering from Stage 3 breast cancer and confirmed undergoing chemotherapy for the treatment. After going through numerous ups and downs, the couple finally exchanged vows on June 4, 2025, in a private ceremony in Mumbai. Hina Khan Will Be Appearing On Pati Patni Aur Panga Hina Khan will next appear on the reality show Pati Patni Aur Panga alongside Rocky Jaiswal. The show will reportedly challenge couples with tasks that test both compatibility and chemistry. Besides them, the show will also feature Gurmeet Choudhary-Debina Bonnerjee, Avika Gor and her fiance Milind Chandwani, wrestlers Geeta Phogat and Pawan Kumar, Swara Bhasker and Fawad Ahmed, and Sudesh Lehri and Mamta Lehri. Hosted by Munawar Faruqui and Sonali Bendre, the show will premiere on August 2. First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Business Insider
3 days ago
- Business
- Business Insider
Here's how Astronomer used Hollywood to turn a viral disaster into a marketing win
Astronomer, a once little-known tech company, looked to the stars to turn a viral disaster into a marketing opportunity. The company was introduced to the world after a "kiss cam" at a Coldplay show caught its now-former CEO, Andy Byron, embracing its now-former head of human resources, Kristin Cabot, before the pair ducked for cover. The video ricocheted around the world, and the executives resigned days later. Astronomer then moved to shift the narrative, and it did so by working with two A-list Hollywood stars: Gwyneth Paltrow and Ryan Reynolds. Reynolds started the viral ad agency Maximum Effort in 2018. It has promoted the "Deadpool" movies, in which Reynolds also starred, and has made humorous ads for Mint Mobile, the NAACP, and others. Reynolds is the chief creative officer. It's not clear who reached out to whom first. Maximum Effort and Astronomer did not immediately respond to messages from Business Insider. The ad agency, however, confirmed on LinkedIn on Sunday that it was behind Astronomer's new ad, which featured Paltrow, poked fun at the controversy without ever mentioning it, and highlighted the company's work. Thank you for your interest in Astronomer. — Astronomer (@astronomerio) July 25, 2025 Public relations experts told BI after the Coldplay incident that Astronomer could probably capitalize on what was otherwise a bad situation. The company's collaboration with Maximum Effort appears to have done just that. The commercial has been well-received, and some PR professionals told BI the company has fully succeeded in leveraging its accidental fame. "Creating a video clever enough, yet with just enough controversy, to spread online and capture mainstream media attention is generating millions of dollars of free, positive publicity for Astronomer," Kristi Piehl, founder and CEO of Media Minefield, told BI. She said Paltrow's script was "on message" and, importantly, focused on what Astronomer does, not what its former executives did. Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. What is your job title? (1 of 2) Entry level position Project manager Management Senior management Executive management Student Self-employed Retired Other Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . "The video shifts the narrative, allowing Astronomer to have the last word," Piehl said. In the video, Paltrow is presented as a "temporary spokesperson" for the firm. She says the company has "gotten a lot of questions over the last few days" and wanted her to answer the "most common ones." But rather than share any new details about the now-infamous "kiss cam" moment, Paltrow promoted Astronomer's products. "If you want to talk crisis communications, this is a 2025 era playbook on how to do this the right way from a corporate standpoint," Sam Amsterdam, founder and managing partner at Amsterdam Group Public Relations, told BI. "They chose not to make this a crisis. This was a deliberate attempt at being pragmatic, at brand building, at brand defining," he said. Ryan McCormick, cofounder of Goldman McCormick PR, said the public is used to seeing corporate responses to crises that "miss their mark," but that wasn't the case this time. "Astronomer nailed it here, and I think public interest in them will only increase for the foreseeable future," he said. Having made it through to the other side of a viral controversy, the company appears ready to move on. In a LinkedIn post on Sunday, Astronomer's cofounder and new CEO, Pete DeJoy, thanked Maximum Effort for its "remarkable work." "As Gwyneth Paltrow said, now it's time for us to return to what we do best: delivering game-changing results for our customers. We look forward to what this next chapter holds for Astronomer."

Business Insider
4 days ago
- General
- Business Insider
My grandparents raised me and parented with fear. I tried to do things differently, but the result was the same.
My grandparents raised me, and they weren't around much. I was often without adult supervision, and in an effort to protect me, they injected a healthy dose of fear into their parenting. And though it did instill both discernment and resilience, it also created anxiety. While the origins of many of the stories that scared me didn't come directly from them, they perpetuated the myth and often added to it. I remember, at the age of 8, watching a movie as a family about the slow fallout of a nuclear war. No discussions followed the movie, no attempts to assuage my fears, even when I told them about the nightmares that came in the weeks after. The things my grandparents warned me about often became a recurring theme of my childhood nightmares. Though their intentions were good, telling them about my fear just seemed to solidify their commitment to parenting me this way. I wanted to parent differently Before I became a parent myself, I talked with my grandparents about my upbringing. They told me they had figured I was better off scared than dead. I reminded them of all the ways my anxiety manifested with the chronic nightmares and fears around everything from death to nuclear war, but they offered no apologies. I knew I wanted to parent differently. At 30, I had a son. Over the next eight years, I had three more kids. Rather than pull scary tales from the daily news or the town rumor mill, I kept them sheltered. When they asked about issues I thought could be frightening, I tried to explain in a way that was both direct and sensitive. Sometimes, the overwhelming anxiety I struggled with made it difficult, though I don't think I knew it at the time. I learned that my son dealt with similar anxieties Retrospection can be difficult as a parent. It often provides an overarching, distanced perspective we don't have when our children are little. Maybe this was why I was caught off guard when my 20-year-old son came over to have dinner one night and announced, "I'm afraid of everything." When I asked what "everything" included, he delivered a list as long as my own. It included driving, fire, water, and a million other things. Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. What is your job title? (1 of 2) Entry level position Project manager Management Senior management Executive management Student Self-employed Retired Other Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . "You passed all the fear from when you grew up to me," he said. Though I had aimed to raise my children differently from how my grandparents parented me, we had seemingly achieved a similar result. I, too, had created fear, which morphed into anxiety. My son carried it into adulthood just as I had. As we said our goodbyes, I thought back to my early years as a parent. I told my kids to be careful with electricity. "Don't plug that in," I heard myself saying from almost two decades prior, "you might get shocked or start a fire." At the beach, warnings were issued about swimming too far out without adult supervision. "You told us never to swim alone," my son said, "and I remember swimming with friends and searching for an adult. At 13, it became embarrassing." The truth hurt, but it wasn't all bad Looking back at how I'd parented in contrast to my intention was eye-opening. I didn't even realize I had anxiety until my 40s. I assumed everyone lived the way that I did — in a perpetual state of fear. "I didn't know," I told my son. Then, I did what I've always done when I make a mistake: I told him I was sorry. He told me it was OK, before adding, "It is probably part of the reason I made it to adulthood." While I was truly grateful for his forgiveness and understanding, I knew I needed to start doing things differently with my youngest two children, now 14 and 12. I've gone to therapy and also realized the value of taking medication to control my anxiety. What I am trying to do now is instill confidence in my kids. My fears oozed onto everything I did and affected the way I parented. I suppose, like my grandparents, I was just doing my best to make sure my kids were safe.

Business Insider
4 days ago
- Business
- Business Insider
I felt attacked by Trump's tariffs so I made an AI-powered app to help Canadians fight back
This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Sasha Ivanov, founder of Maple Scan. Ivanov, based in Alberta, Canada, has a master's degree in computer science and is an app developer who studies human-technology interactions. It all came from a really personal moment. Back in February, I was at home watching the news when I saw Trump's announcement about tariffs being imposed on Canadian goods — and I felt attacked. I remember thinking, "I'm going to try to start buying Canadian, to support the economy here and the country," but I quickly realized how hard it is to really know what you're buying. I was going through my pantry, grabbing my ketchup, and trying to look up if it was Canadian or not. I had to look through all its ingredients, then I had to search online for a substitute. It was slow, annoying, and just not scalable. With my background in app development and human-computer interaction research, I quickly decided to build an app that could help solve this conundrum. That weekend, I spent a few days building the first prototype. And a week later, I launched Maple Scan. Maple Scan focuses on informed decisions When people first hear about the app, they think it will just tell them whether something is Canadian or not and recommend an alternative. But our approach is different because that question is nuanced. Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . Once you download the free app, you can take a photo of any product with the in-app camera. The AI-powered image recognition in the app will then read the label and search for information online and in our database, but it won't make a final judgment on whether a product is Canadian. Instead, it will tell you about the ingredients, ownership, where it's manufactured, and how many people are employed there. The app surfaces all those different pieces of information so you can make a decision on your own. We don't want to make that judgment for you — we just want people to be informed. For example, the app can distinguish between " Made in Canada" and "Product of Canada," which are two different things based on how many of the ingredients come from here. It also includes ownership information, like whether it's a Canadian-owned brand or a subsidiary of a foreign company. It's about giving context, not just a label. Honestly, one of my favorite parts of this whole journey has been the community that's grown around it. Maple Scan started as a solo project, but the support that came in almost immediately was beautiful. University colleagues, people across Canada, and even total strangers reached out and said they wanted to help with this project. Now, we have a group of volunteers with expertise in everything from social media marketing to food industry regulations, as well as mentorship, engineering support, and networking help. All the support has been absolutely crucial to the app's growth. For example, people in the food industry have helped explain how long it takes for packaging to reflect a product's sourcing, sometimes months. So, when a company might not have a "Made in Canada" label yet but actually does source from Canada, Maple Scan can help bridge that gap and surface that information sooner. We've had over 110,000 downloads in just a few months, and there've been over 550,000 individual scans to date. When it first launched, it made it to number 6 on the Canadian App Store. And with the recent announcements of more tariffs potentially coming, it's trending again. Maple Scan is constantly adding new features When we launched, we also saw Maple Scan downloads in Mexico in parts of Europe. It turns out that people around the world want to understand who owns the products they buy and where they're made. Though our focus remains on Canada for now, we're working on new features. One of our goals is to help people buy things in line with their values and save money while doing it. We know it's a privilege to shop based on principle, and local products can cost more. So we want to help people make those choices without it costing them extra. We are constantly evolving. One of the coolest things we added later on was hyper-local recommendations. So if there's a soda company in your own city, it might say, "Hey, look, there's this soda company here. Just get that." Another feature we added is fun messages that pop up while the app scans products, like "Checking if it can survive a Canadian winter" or "Scanning for hidden maple syrup." Many people have told me that's their favorite part of the app. The tariffs are definitely a wake-up call for Canada that we can't be overly dependent on one trading partner. But it sends a powerful message when we see people try new products and form new economic relationships. People tell me they have found such great Canadian alternatives that they're happy to stick with them. Once those habits shift, they can be hard to undo even if tariffs go away.

Business Insider
6 days ago
- Business
- Business Insider
Trump made Paramount pay. Is this the new normal?
Want to do business in the United States? Pay up. More specifically: Pay Donald Trump. That's a reasonable lesson to draw from the Paramount-Skydance deal, which received formal government approval Thursday and should finally close in the coming weeks — about 1.5 years after it first kicked off. We don't know how Skydance's David Ellison, who is buying Paramount with the backing of his father, Larry Ellison, will run the company. Maybe he'll be able to turn the company around, and years from now we'll note how he made a savvy purchase of a distressed asset at a fire-sale price. Maybe it continues to decline. Maybe he ends up flipping it to someone bigger in short order. But the most important thing is the thing that was clear back in January, when Donald Trump started his second term as president: If current owner Shari Redstone wanted to sell the company to Ellison, she would need to cut Trump a check. That happened on Tuesday, when Paramount's current management formally settled a lawsuit Trump filed against the company last year. They paid $16 million, most of which is ostensibly earmarked for Trump's future presidential library. And on Thursday, the deal got formal approval from the Federal Communications Commission, run by Brendan Carr, a Trump loyalist who sometimes wears a pin in the shape of Trump's head on his suit. In theory, the Trump lawsuit and Carr's approval were separate events. In reality, it would be very hard to find anyone who believes that. (I've asked Carr for comment.) This is a story that has kicked up a lot of attention in the home stretch. Some of the angles are most definitely real, and concerning. Like the fact that Carr's blessing comes with pledges from Ellison to do things like " root out bias" in CBS's news coverage, which sounds very much like a company promising to cover news in a way that pleases Carr and his boss. Some of the angles are much muddier: While we've yet to see any actual evidence that Paramount canceled Stephen Colbert's late-night show to get the deal done, it's reasonable for people to jump to that conclusion. (Over at The Ankler, veteran TV reporter Lesley Goldberg makes a compelling argument that the cancellation had everything to do with business, and nothing to do with Trump.) Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. What is your job title? (1 of 2) Entry level position Project manager Management Senior management Executive management Student Self-employed Retired Other Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . We also don't know whether the Ellisons have also agreed to give Trump $16 million or $20 million in other goodies as part of the deal, as Trump has claimed at various times. (Paramount has said it has no knowledge of extra payments; team Ellison hasn't commented.) But the main point is the main point, which we've known for many months: Last fall, Trump filed a suit against Paramount over the editing of a "60 Minutes" interview with Kamala Harris. In any other world, that suit would go nowhere. But then Trump was elected, and started getting Very Big Companies like Disney and Meta to pay him to settle other suits he would normally have little chance of winning. (Like Paramount, those settlements were made directly to him, via his future library — as opposed to other settlements he is extracting from institutions like colleges and law firms, which are paying the federal government.) So it was clear that Paramount would have to do the same thing, or it couldn't do the Skydance deal. Again: In theory, the "60 Minutes" suit had nothing to do with Trump's role as president of the United States — he filed it as a private citizen, prior to his inauguration. In reality, the only reason Paramount settled it was because he's president of the United States — and one that's willing to use that power to insert himself into day-to-day business deals. Hard to believe this will be the last one where that happens.