Latest news with #What'sWrongwithSecretaryKim
Time of India
22-07-2025
- Climate
- Time of India
Actress Seo Hyo Rim gets stuck due to flash flood; shares ordeal online with public
Actress Seo Hyo Rim , who has been living a quiet life in the rural regions of South Korea, was recently involved in a heartbreaking incident. While residing in the Gyeonggi Province with her family, she shared that she had been hit by the flash floods, and narrated her first-hand account about the experience. Seo Hyo Rim talks about her ordeal On July 20, Hyo Rim took to her social media account in order to spread awareness about the matter. She shared a photo of blocked roads amid extreme rainfall and shared that she had been stuck at her home ever since. The actress's post started with the caption, "I just got my phone signal, but the roads have collapsed and we're stranded'. The photos shared by the star also showed the tragic state of the roads that were completely blocked off due to the rains and flooding. The actress also delved into how the flooding caused all of the roads to and from the region to be blocked. Her statement read, "The power is out, and there's no running water. Many people are worried about us. Fortunately, there were no casualties in our village, but other villages suffered severe damage. I never knew landslides could be this terrifying. I sincerely hope there won't be any more damage'. Hyo Rim has been living in the rural area of North Gyeonggi Province since she got married in 2019 to Jung Myung Ho. The area that she currently lives in with her family is still at risk, as further rainfall was predicted earlier for the area, raising concerns about safety measures. About Seo Hyo Rim Seo Hyo Rim is a seasoned actress who has been active in the industry for quite some time and has managed to make a mark as well. Some of her most popular projects include 'Behind Every Star', 'The Red Sleeve', 'What's Wrong with Secretary Kim', 'Beautiful Gong Shim', and 'That Winter, the Wind Blows'. She will next be seen on the screen with the upcoming drama ' Boyfriend on Demand ' alongside names like Jisoo from BLACKPINK, Seo In Guk, Ryu Abel , and more.
Indian Express
17-07-2025
- Entertainment
- Indian Express
Lee Min Ho says he's considering marriage at 40 after personal loss: ‘Having a child feels like the most valuable thing
Lee Min Ho might just be ready to say 'I do' as he approaches 40. For years, the K-drama star has reigned as the heartthrob who kept his personal life under wraps. But after the recent loss of his beloved pet, Min Ho opened up about his feelings during the press conference for his upcoming movie Omniscient Reader. He spoke about wanting to get married, though he still sees it as a distant, vague concept. That said, at this point in life, he finds himself thinking about what really matters. In that same breath, he even said he's open to fatherhood, calling it one of the most valuable things. But for him, marriage has to start with falling in love, who it's with doesn't matter. Also read: S Line review: K-Drama that's freaking viewers out with its dark take on shame and surveillance The actor recently shared with fans that he is reeling from the loss of his beloved dog, 'I spent a few days crying for it. I realised how much I relied on him. I have never felt like that before.' During his Seoul conference, Lee said he is at an age where he's thinking, 'I should do it, (marriage)' and admitted, 'As I go through life, I find myself thinking more about what's important.' He said that when he really stops to think about it, building a family and having a kid feels like the most valuable thing to him, according to Chosun Biz. The Heirs star added, 'But it doesn't go as intended. It feels like a miracle needs to happen for that. Marriage still feels vague, but if a moment comes where I instinctively think, 'this is a miracle,' I think I could get married.' Also read: Lee Min Ho admits he 'could fall any moment,' says problems arise from personal desires, pins all hope on Omniscient Reader Lee has previously dated and was in publicly confirmed relationships with his K-drama co-stars, including Park Min Young (What's Wrong with Secretary Kim) and Bae Suzy (While You Were Sleeping). When asked whether he has a high standard which makes it harder to actually take a relationship to the wedding phase, the actor said, 'Personally, my standards for interacting with people and potential partners seem to differ.' Lee explained that he's lived a life where he never really learned how to cherish the little things, moments of quiet joy or simple happiness, probably because he's always been in the spotlight. But that's something he now looks for in a partner. 'I think about sharing life with someone who knows what that kind of happiness feels like, and I wonder what we'd be chasing together, someone who has qualities completely absent from me.' Further, the actor was questioned whether he would consider marrying a celebrity and Lee said, 'Of course, if I love someone, that doesn't matter.' During the same press briefing, Lee Min Ho also spoke about the burden of being a Hallyu star and the pressure that comes with it. Despite having a hard time cracking the OTT space with his recent K-dramas, Lee has continued to be labeled the top Hallyu star for 12 years straight, one of the most popular actors globally. The actor said he never chased stardom and doesn't take anything for granted, knowing well that he 'could fall anytime.' 'It all takes one simple misstep to end everything,' he said. Meanwhile, Omniscient Reader hits screens on July 23. The movie also stars BLACKPINK's Jisoo and Business Proposal lead Ahn Hyo Seop.
Time of India
08-07-2025
- Entertainment
- Time of India
Park Seo-joon wins 60 million won portrait rights lawsuit - "Excessive Response" vs "Legitimate Rights" sparks heated debate
When Your Favorite K-Drama Star Takes Legal Action Remember that feeling when you see your favorite celebrity's face plastered on random restaurant banners? Well, Park Seo-joon just proved that even stars have limits. The heartthrob actor recently won a partial victory in his lawsuit against a restaurant that used his drama scenes for advertising without permission - and the internet is absolutely divided. The whole drama started when a soy sauce marinated crab restaurant continued using Park Seo-joon's photos from the hit tvN series "What's Wrong with Secretary Kim" for their promotional materials. Despite multiple requests to stop since 2019, the restaurant kept using banners with phrases like "The crab restaurant that even Park Seo-joon fell for" and "Park Seo-joon's storm eating show of soy sauce crab". The Numbers Game That Got Everyone Talking Here's where it gets interesting - initially, media reports claimed Park Seo-joon was seeking a whopping 6 billion won (approximately ₹37 crores) in damages. But his agency quickly clarified that the actual amount was 60 million won (around ₹37 lakhs). The court sided with Park Seo-joon, acknowledging the portrait rights violation but awarded only 5 million won (about ₹3 lakhs) considering the restaurant's scale and the nature of the infringement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Empieza a ganar un segundo sueldo con Cervecería Nacional CFD Empieza a invertir hoy Empieza ahora Undo To put this in perspective, ₹37 lakhs might seem like pocket change for a top-tier actor, but it's about making a statement. It's like when your local chai wallah uses Shah Rukh Khan 's photo without permission - the principle matters more than the money. The Great Divide - Netizens Battle It Out The lawsuit result has split Korean netizens faster than you can say "Gangnam Style." One camp argues that Park Seo-joon went too far, especially since the restaurant had cooperated during the drama's filming. "Taking legal action against a place that helped with drama shooting is too much," some commented. But the other side isn't backing down. They're pointing out that using someone's photo for commercial purposes for years without permission is clearly wrong. "There should be consequences for commercial activities that exploit celebrity fame," supporters argue. Why This Case Matters Beyond the Headlines This isn't just about one actor and one restaurant - it's about an entire industry practice that's been flying under the radar. Walk through any commercial district in Seoul (or Mumbai, for that matter), and you'll spot countless restaurants, cafes, and shops using celebrity photos from TV shows and movies in their advertising. The case highlights the clash between celebrity portrait rights that need protection and industry practices that have been tacitly accepted for years. It's similar to how Bollywood filming locations often use actors' photos for promotion - the line between legitimate marketing and unauthorized exploitation can get pretty blurry. This legal precedent could force both the broadcasting and restaurant industries to establish clearer guidelines within legal boundaries. For young entrepreneurs and content creators, it's a wake-up call about respecting intellectual property rights, even when "everyone else is doing it." The Park Seo-joon case serves as a fascinating mirror to our own entertainment industry dynamics. Just like how restaurants near film shooting locations often capitalize on celebrity visits, the temptation to leverage star power for business growth is universal. However, this lawsuit reminds us that fame comes with legal protections, and businesses need to navigate these waters more carefully. Whether you're team Park Seo-joon or team restaurant, one thing's clear - the days of casually using celebrity images without permission might be numbered.
Time of India
03-07-2025
- Entertainment
- Time of India
Actor Park Seo Joon sues restaurant; claims unauthorised use of photo
Popular actor Par Seo Jun, who is known for roles in projects like 'Itaewon Class', 'Concrete Utopia', and 'Fight for My Way', has recently sued a restaurant for using his image for promotions without getting legal permission. The restaurant, which was previously the location for shooting the actor's series 'What's Wrong with Secretary Kim', has been unlawfully using his photos for promotional purposes. Park Seo Jun sues the restaurant where a famous K-drama was shot Seo Jun's drama 'What's Wrong With Secretary Kim' was shot at the same soy sauce marinated crab restaurant that the actor has recently sued. As per Sports Chosun, the star sued the restaurant for continuous use of his photos after being requested not to. The legal team stated that, 'The lawsuit began by continuing malicious acts that did not respond to requests to remove the portal site search advertisements and banners afterwards. The estimated damage amount is 6 billion won, considering the advertising model fee, but the actual lawsuit amount is 60 million won, considering the defendant's business scale and various circumstances." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Scientists: Tinnitus? When tinnitus won't go away, do this (Watch) Hearing Magazine Undo The Actors company also added to the statements, saying that they will also be taking strict and legal action against those who spread criticism and hate towards the ' Dream High ' star. Soon after the news of his lawsuit began spreading online, many netizens criticised the actor for targeting small businesses and suing the restaurant. They extended on the statement, saying that the lawsuit was valid as per court orders. Park Seo Jun's side also explained that another complaint is being filed against the restaurant under malicious ridicule and slander. Why exactly is the lawsuit happening? Previously, the actor was shot while eating a crab from the restaurant in one of his popular K-drama episodes. Ever since then, the restaurant has been using the specific clip as well as photos of the popular actor in order to promote their food to the public without getting legal permission. Even after continuously being requested to stop the use of his face for promotional matters, the restaurant did not respond and continued on with its actions, resulting in the lawsuit.
Pink Villa
03-07-2025
- Entertainment
- Pink Villa
Park Seo Joon partially wins 6 billion KRW lawsuit against restaurant owner, know how What's Wrong with Secretary Kim is linked t
Park Seo Joon was embroiled in a lawsuit with a restaurant owner over the unauthorized use of his photos for promotional purposes. On July 3, the K-media outlet Herald Economy reported on the latest update of the case – the actor partially won the case. Read to know all about the origin of the legal dispute and how one of his most popular dramas is related to it. Park Seo Joon to be paid 5 million KRW in damages from restaurant owner The court ordered a restaurant owner to pay Park Seo Joon 5 million won (approximately 3,700 USD) in damages for using the actor to increase sales without a formal agreement. Due to the actor's popularity, he charges high fees for advertisements. According to Park Seo Joon's agency, Awesome ENT, the unauthorized use of his photos resulted in a significant financial impact on him. They calculated that the actor lost roughly 1 billion KRW (approximately 736,000 USD) annually in advertising fees over six years, as the restaurant did not pay him a dime for using his photos for promotion. How is What's Wrong with Secretary Kim linked with the case? The issue began after a scene from Park Seo Joon's 2018 hit drama, What's Wrong With Secretary Kim, was shot at the concerned restaurant. The scene included the actor enjoying ganjang gejang (soy sauce-marinated crab) there. Following that, from August 2019 to September 2023, the diner owner displayed banners featuring Park Seo Joon inside and outside the establishment. He even ran search ads on Naver for about six years. Upon discovering this, he took legal action, claiming that the use of his image "without consent" violated his "portrait rights." His agency stated that they had requested the promotional materials be taken down several times since 2019, but the restaurant continued to use them, prompting a lawsuit of 6 billion KRW. The agency added, "We have confirmed that secondary harm is ongoing through malicious mockery and slander regarding the contents of a just verdict." Although they won the case, they will receive only 5 million KRW, as per the court's ruling.
