Latest news with #YIMBYism
Time of India
15-07-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
Explained: YIMBY vs NIMBY - Why Barack Obama is calling out liberals on housing hypocrisy
AI generated image TL;DR Obama goes YIMBY: The former US president has embraced the 'Yes In My Backyard' movement, urging more housing construction and zoning reform. Liberal hypocrisy under fire: He's criticising wealthy, progressive communities that oppose new housing—especially affordable and mixed-income units. DNC 2024 spotlight: Obama's push for YIMBYism is now central to the Democratic Party's housing agenda heading into 2025. What's this all about? The US is in the midst of a housing crisis. Sky-high rents, unaffordable homes, and crippling shortages have become daily realities for millions of Americans. Enter: the YIMBY vs NIMBY debate. YIMBY stands for 'Yes In My Backyard'—a movement that wants to relax zoning laws, allow more housing (especially in urban areas), and build up supply. NIMBY, or 'Not In My Backyard,' represents resistance to new development, often from affluent or suburban homeowners who fear property devaluation, increased density, or social change. What makes this a big deal now? Barack Obama—once the patron saint of the liberal elite—has come out swinging against the NIMBY mindset. And he's not pulling punches. Obama's YIMBY Turn: A Long Time Coming Obama's alignment with the YIMBY movement didn't come out of nowhere. In fact, it began during his second term. In 2016, the Obama White House released a little-noticed but now prophetic document: the Housing Development Toolkit. It recommended local governments roll back exclusionary zoning, eliminate parking minimums, and legalise denser housing types like duplexes and apartments. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 發現這個之後我就不再玩其他遊戲了！ ——大多數遊戲玩家都不知道… 突襲暗影傳奇 立即安裝 Undo At the time, few noticed. But with today's crisis-level housing prices, that document reads like a warning unheeded. What did Obama say? At a closed-door Democratic fundraiser and later during a major speech at the 2024 Democratic National Convention, Obama made his most direct case yet: 'We have to get serious about housing. That means more construction. And yes, that means zoning reform—even when it's politically hard.' He called out 'progressive neighbourhoods' that support liberal causes in theory but block low-income housing projects in practice. In other words: they're pro-diversity, until it moves in next door. Why is this a shot at fellow Democrats? Because many of the most restrictive housing regulations in the US are in deep blue cities—places like San Francisco, New York, and parts of Los Angeles. Obama is essentially saying: you can't claim to care about inequality, climate change, and racial justice while blocking housing near public transit or good schools. YIMBY advocates have long pointed out that opposition to dense, affordable housing often comes cloaked in environmental or aesthetic language—but in practice reinforces segregation and skyrocketing rents. This puts him at odds with parts of the Democratic base: wealthy suburban liberals who vote blue but don't want their single-family neighbourhoods to change. Why now? A few reasons: The youth crisis: Young Americans can't afford to buy homes. Many are drowning in rent or forced to move far from job centres. Housing affordability is a top issue for voters under 40—a key Democratic constituency. Climate and equity : Denser housing near jobs and transit cuts emissions. It also integrates neighbourhoods. Political urgency: With Trump back in power, Democrats are trying to show they offer practical solutions. Housing is now seen as a tangible, winnable fight. How is YIMBYism changing Democratic politics? The Democratic Party is undergoing a housing policy transformation, and Obama's backing gives YIMBYism establishment credibility. Key moments: Kamala Harris' 2024 campaign made YIMBYism a core part of her agenda, pledging federal incentives for cities that reform zoning. Mayors like Karen Bass (LA) and Brandon Johnson (Chicago) are testing pro-housing reforms at the local level. Younger lawmakers, including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ro Khanna , have expressed cautious support for YIMBY goals—if paired with tenant protections. There's even talk of conditioning federal infrastructure and transit funds on whether cities allow more housing—a stick-and-carrot approach Obama helped pioneer. So who's still saying 'Not In My Backyard'? NIMBYism isn't gone. In fact, it's alive and well in blue and red states alike. Common arguments include: 'Character of the neighbourhood': A vague but often racially coded argument against multifamily housing. 'Traffic and parking': A perennial excuse to halt development. 'Environmental concerns': Sometimes legitimate—but often used to delay or kill projects. Ironically, some NIMBYs are now rebranding as 'PHIMBYs' (Public Housing In My Backyard), arguing for 100% government-built units only. Critics say this is a clever way to block private development without looking regressive. Bottom line Barack Obama siding with YIMBYs marks a turning point in America's housing debate. It pits him—and now much of the Democratic establishment—against wealthy liberals who've long avoided scrutiny for their role in fuelling inequality. He's not just talking policy. He's talking values. And asking a tough question: Are we serious about justice? Or only when it doesn't mess with our property values? FAQ Q: What's YIMBYism in simple terms? A: It's the belief that we need to build more housing—everywhere—to tackle affordability, segregation, and climate change. Q: What's Obama's stance? A: Strongly pro-YIMBY. He's called for zoning reform, denser housing, and ending liberal double standards on development. Q: Is this a partisan issue? A: Not entirely. There are YIMBYs and NIMBYs in both parties, though Democratic cities tend to face sharper contradictions between rhetoric and reality. Q: Will this fix the housing crisis? A: Not alone. But most economists agree more supply is essential—especially near jobs, transit, and good schools.
Sydney Morning Herald
15-05-2025
- Politics
- Sydney Morning Herald
Labor played the Medicare card in its victory. Now it wants to own housing
NSW Labor heavyweights have established a new campaigning arm of the party to elevate housing to an ALP 'cause not just policy' akin to its long-held support for workers' rights and Medicare. On the back of the party's federal success in using Medicare as the centrepiece of its election campaign, Labor for Housing has been established to campaign for YIMBYism and ensure the party becomes defined by its commitment to solving the housing crisis, according to one of its founders. Senior member of Labor left and Inner West Mayor Darcy Byrne said housing had to be a 'moral and political cause' for the party if it is to have any chance of solving the crisis gripping the nation. 'We have the union movement to campaign on Labor's agenda for workers' rights. We also need a grassroots movement to build popular support for Labor's solutions to the housing crisis,' he said. 'Just as Medicare is both a government policy and a Labor cause, our policies to fix the housing crisis must be supported by a concerted, grassroots, political campaign. If we want Labor's housing policies to succeed, then we need to go out into the community and advocate for them.' Senior Labor sources, not authorised to comment on the federal campaign, were concerned the Greens managed to define themselves as the party of housing, even if the party's policies were going to do little to increase the lack of supply. The federal government has an ambitious goal to build 1.2 million homes over the next five years to meet the chronic shortfall in supply, however, it is lagging well behind that target. NSW must build 75,000 a year over the same period to meet its target under the National Housing Accord but Premier Chris Minns has conceded his government will not achieve that. David Borger, chair of Housing Now, an alliance of 'unlikely bedfellows' advocating for more housing, said political parties have for too long courted the anti-development vote.
The Age
15-05-2025
- Politics
- The Age
Labor played the Medicare card in its victory. Now it wants to own housing
NSW Labor heavyweights have established a new campaigning arm of the party to elevate housing to an ALP 'cause not just policy' akin to its long-held support for workers' rights and Medicare. On the back of the party's federal success in using Medicare as the centrepiece of its election campaign, Labor for Housing has been established to campaign for YIMBYism and ensure the party becomes defined by its commitment to solving the housing crisis, according to one of its founders. Senior member of Labor left and Inner West Mayor Darcy Byrne said housing had to be a 'moral and political cause' for the party if it is to have any chance of solving the crisis gripping the nation. 'We have the union movement to campaign on Labor's agenda for workers' rights. We also need a grassroots movement to build popular support for Labor's solutions to the housing crisis,' he said. 'Just as Medicare is both a government policy and a Labor cause, our policies to fix the housing crisis must be supported by a concerted, grassroots, political campaign. If we want Labor's housing policies to succeed, then we need to go out into the community and advocate for them.' Senior Labor sources, not authorised to comment on the federal campaign, were concerned the Greens managed to define themselves as the party of housing, even if the party's policies were going to do little to increase the lack of supply. The federal government has an ambitious goal to build 1.2 million homes over the next five years to meet the chronic shortfall in supply, however, it is lagging well behind that target. NSW must build 75,000 a year over the same period to meet its target under the National Housing Accord but Premier Chris Minns has conceded his government will not achieve that. David Borger, chair of Housing Now, an alliance of 'unlikely bedfellows' advocating for more housing, said political parties have for too long courted the anti-development vote.
