logo
Explained: YIMBY vs NIMBY - Why Barack Obama is calling out liberals on housing hypocrisy

Explained: YIMBY vs NIMBY - Why Barack Obama is calling out liberals on housing hypocrisy

Time of India15-07-2025
AI generated image
TL;DR
Obama goes YIMBY: The former US president has embraced the 'Yes In My Backyard' movement, urging more housing construction and zoning reform.
Liberal hypocrisy under fire: He's criticising wealthy, progressive communities that oppose new housing—especially affordable and mixed-income units.
DNC 2024 spotlight: Obama's push for YIMBYism is now central to the Democratic Party's housing agenda heading into 2025.
What's this all about?
The US is in the midst of a housing crisis. Sky-high rents, unaffordable homes, and crippling shortages have become daily realities for millions of Americans. Enter: the YIMBY vs NIMBY debate.
YIMBY stands for 'Yes In My Backyard'—a movement that wants to relax zoning laws, allow more housing (especially in urban areas), and build up supply. NIMBY, or 'Not In My Backyard,' represents resistance to new development, often from affluent or suburban homeowners who fear property devaluation, increased density, or social change.
What makes this a big deal now? Barack Obama—once the patron saint of the liberal elite—has come out swinging against the NIMBY mindset.
And he's not pulling punches.
Obama's YIMBY Turn: A Long Time Coming
Obama's alignment with the YIMBY movement didn't come out of nowhere. In fact, it began during his second term. In 2016, the Obama White House released a little-noticed but now prophetic document: the Housing Development Toolkit. It recommended local governments roll back exclusionary zoning, eliminate parking minimums, and legalise denser housing types like duplexes and apartments.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
發現這個之後我就不再玩其他遊戲了! ——大多數遊戲玩家都不知道…
突襲暗影傳奇
立即安裝
Undo
At the time, few noticed.
But with today's crisis-level housing prices, that document reads like a warning unheeded.
What did Obama say?
At a closed-door Democratic fundraiser and later during a major speech at the 2024 Democratic National Convention, Obama made his most direct case yet: 'We have to get serious about housing. That means more construction. And yes, that means zoning reform—even when it's politically hard.'
He called out 'progressive neighbourhoods' that support liberal causes in theory but block low-income housing projects in practice.
In other words: they're pro-diversity, until it moves in next door.
Why is this a shot at fellow Democrats?
Because many of the most restrictive housing regulations in the US are in deep blue cities—places like San Francisco, New York, and parts of Los Angeles.
Obama is essentially saying: you can't claim to care about inequality, climate change, and racial justice while blocking housing near public transit or good schools. YIMBY advocates have long pointed out that opposition to dense, affordable housing often comes cloaked in environmental or aesthetic language—but in practice reinforces segregation and skyrocketing rents.
This puts him at odds with parts of the Democratic base: wealthy suburban liberals who vote blue but don't want their single-family neighbourhoods to change.
Why now?
A few reasons:
The youth crisis:
Young Americans can't afford to buy homes. Many are drowning in rent or forced to move far from job centres. Housing affordability is a top issue for voters under 40—a key Democratic constituency.
Climate and equity
: Denser housing near jobs and transit cuts emissions.
It also integrates neighbourhoods.
Political urgency:
With Trump back in power, Democrats are trying to show they offer practical solutions. Housing is now seen as a tangible, winnable fight.
How is YIMBYism changing Democratic politics?
The Democratic Party is undergoing a housing policy transformation, and Obama's backing gives YIMBYism establishment credibility. Key moments:
Kamala Harris' 2024 campaign made YIMBYism a core part of her agenda, pledging federal incentives for cities that reform zoning.
Mayors like Karen Bass (LA) and Brandon Johnson (Chicago) are testing pro-housing reforms at the local level.
Younger lawmakers, including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and
Ro Khanna
, have expressed cautious support for YIMBY goals—if paired with tenant protections.
There's even talk of conditioning federal infrastructure and transit funds on whether cities allow more housing—a stick-and-carrot approach Obama helped pioneer.
So who's still saying 'Not In My Backyard'?
NIMBYism isn't gone. In fact, it's alive and well in blue and red states alike. Common arguments include:
'Character of the neighbourhood': A vague but often racially coded argument against multifamily housing.
'Traffic and parking': A perennial excuse to halt development.
'Environmental concerns': Sometimes legitimate—but often used to delay or kill projects.
Ironically, some NIMBYs are now rebranding as 'PHIMBYs' (Public Housing In My Backyard), arguing for 100% government-built units only. Critics say this is a clever way to block private development without looking regressive.
Bottom line
Barack Obama siding with YIMBYs marks a turning point in America's housing debate. It pits him—and now much of the Democratic establishment—against wealthy liberals who've long avoided scrutiny for their role in fuelling inequality.
He's not just talking policy. He's talking values. And asking a tough question:
Are we serious about justice? Or only when it doesn't mess with our property values?
FAQ
Q: What's YIMBYism in simple terms?
A: It's the belief that we need to build more housing—everywhere—to tackle affordability, segregation, and climate change.
Q: What's Obama's stance?
A: Strongly pro-YIMBY. He's called for zoning reform, denser housing, and ending liberal double standards on development.
Q: Is this a partisan issue?
A: Not entirely. There are YIMBYs and NIMBYs in both parties, though Democratic cities tend to face sharper contradictions between rhetoric and reality.
Q: Will this fix the housing crisis?
A: Not alone. But most economists agree more supply is essential—especially near jobs, transit, and good schools.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'It's Un-American': John Kennedy BURSTS At Harvard's DEI Agenda With Harmeet Dhillon
'It's Un-American': John Kennedy BURSTS At Harvard's DEI Agenda With Harmeet Dhillon

Time of India

time19 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'It's Un-American': John Kennedy BURSTS At Harvard's DEI Agenda With Harmeet Dhillon

Senator John Kennedy strongly criticized Harvard University's DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) policies during a conversation with attorney Harmeet Dhillon, calling them 'un-American.' Kennedy argued that DEI initiatives promote quotas and racial obsession, which he claims do not reflect the views of most Americans. He emphasized that while diversity is a positive concept, the current DEI agenda distorts its meaning and alienates people. Kennedy likened being against true diversity to being against golden retrievers—suggesting the issue lies in how the concept is being applied, not in diversity itself.#JohnKennedy #HarmeetDhillon #DEIDebate #HarvardDEI #DEIControversy #AmericanValues#AntiQuota #DiversityDebate #DEICriticism #PoliticalCommentary #SenateVoices #EducationPolicy

Kiren Rijiju reiterates discussion on Op Sindoor in Parliament monsoon session on Monday
Kiren Rijiju reiterates discussion on Op Sindoor in Parliament monsoon session on Monday

Time of India

time35 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Kiren Rijiju reiterates discussion on Op Sindoor in Parliament monsoon session on Monday

Kiren Rijiju on Friday reiterated that the government will answer questions related to Operation Sindoor and Trump's ceasefire claims in the Parliament. After an all-party meeting , Union Minister of Parliamentary Affairs of India, Kiren Rijiju said that government will answer all questions related to Op Sindoor and Trump's claims on India-Pakistan ceasefire during the monsoon session of Parliament. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Artificial Intelligence Degree CXO PGDM MCA Cybersecurity Technology Finance MBA Data Analytics healthcare Project Management Product Management Data Science Public Policy Management Data Science Operations Management Others others Design Thinking Leadership Healthcare Digital Marketing Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Exec Cert Prog in AI for Biz India Starts on undefined Get Details A 16-hour long discussion about Operation Sindoor is scheduled to take place in Lok Sabha on Monday, followed by a discussion in Rajya Sabha on Tuesday. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now "...Before the monsoon session began, several opposition parties, including the Congress, had requested that Operation Sindoor and the Pahalgam terror attack should be discussed in Parliament. The government said we are ready to discuss it...," the union minister said. He also pointed out the ruckus created by opposition MPs, leading to adjournment of Parliament from the last five days. Live Events "The opposition has been creating a ruckus in Parliament from day one and protesting inside and outside Parliament and not allowing the House to function. In the first week of the monsoon session of Parliament, we have been able to pass only one bill... I urge all opposition parties not to disrupt the proceedings of Parliament," Rijiju said. On Justice Varma's impeachment case, Rijiju said that the decision is not under government control, it will be decided by the judiciary and all members of parliament have taken the motion from their end.

'My regret is ... ': Rahul Gandhi admits failure in understanding OBC plight; reflects on past 'mistakes'
'My regret is ... ': Rahul Gandhi admits failure in understanding OBC plight; reflects on past 'mistakes'

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

'My regret is ... ': Rahul Gandhi admits failure in understanding OBC plight; reflects on past 'mistakes'

NEW DELHI: Leader of opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi on Friday expressed regret over his inability to understand the plight of oppressed classes, saying that he "made a mistake" and "didn't protect the OBCs" like he "should have". Speaking at Congress' 'Bhagidari Nyay Sammelan' in the national capital, he said, "I have been in politics since I look back, I can see that I made a mistake. I didn't protect the OBCs like I should was because I could not understand your issues in depth at that time." "My regret is that if I had known about your (OBC) history, about your issues, even a little more, I would have conducted a Caste Census right at that time. It is a mistake I made. It is not Congress party's mistake, it is my mistake. I am going to rectify that mistake," he added. Gandhi's politics has centered around raising voice for the oppressed classes, especially SCs, STs and the OBCs, including a call for caste-based census. Earlier in the day, he targeted the PM Modi government of "deliberately" marginalizing Bahujans (SC, ST, and OBC communities) in higher education by keeping a large percentage of reserved faculty positions vacant in central universities. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search ads Search Now Undo by Taboola by Taboola "The figures presented by the Modi government in Parliament are clear evidence of the marginalisation of Bahujans and institutional Manuvad. In central universities, professor posts for - ST: 83% - OBC: 80% - SC: 64% have been deliberately kept vacant. Similarly, associate professor posts for - ST: 65% - OBC: 69% - SC: 51% have also been left unfilled," he said in a post on X. "This is not mere negligence but a calculated conspiracy to exclude Bahujans from education, research, and lack of adequate participation of Bahujans in universities ensures that the issues faced by marginalised communities are deliberately excluded from research and the guise of NFS (Not Found Suitable), thousands of qualified SC, ST, and OBC candidates are being declared unfit due to Manuvadi ideology, and the government refuses to take any is utterly unacceptable. All vacant posts must be filled immediately—Bahujans deserve their rights, not Manuvadi exclusion," he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store