Latest news with #breakups
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
‘Sullivan's Crossing' Questions We Need Answered in Season 4: Will Couples Break Up? Who Is Leaving?
Sullivan's Crossing left fans with more questions than answers about possible breakups, more secrets and even possible cast exits ahead of season 4. Based on Robyn Carr's novel series, the CW show — which is now streaming on Netflix — follows neurosurgeon Maggie (Morgan Kohan) as she finds herself in legal trouble and returns to her hometown in rural Nova Scotia to reconnect with her estranged father, Sully (Scott Patterson). It took three seasons, but Maggie finally found her footing — and fell in love with Cal (Chad Michael Murray). Their happiness didn't last long, though, because just as Maggie and Cal were planning their future together, her secret husband, Liam (Marcus Rosner), showed up. The drama didn't stop there, though, with Sully leaving Sullivan's Crossing, Frank (Tom Jackson) and Edna (Andrea Menard) thinking about stepping away from the town and several couples considering whether to stay together at all. 'Sullivan's Crossing' Season 3 Ending Explained: Who Is Lucy Secretly Married To? Who Broke Up? 'There's never a dull moment at Sullivan's Crossing,' showrunner Roma Roth told Collider in July 2025. 'A romance drama series needs to have push and pull between your characters ... we're going to have a pretty big shoe drop at the end of the season that we'll get to see play out in season 4.' Keep scrolling for every question viewers want answered in season 4 of Sullivan's Crossing: Can Maggie and Cal Survive Her Secret Marriage? Maggie and Cal's biggest problem in season 3 revolved around their plans to move in together. Cal was ready to take that next step, while Maggie was more hesitant. It seemed like they were back on track in the finale — until Maggie's "summer fling," a.k.a husband Liam, arrived in Sullivan's Crossing. Season 4 has a lot of who, what, where, how and whys to answer for Us. While the most obvious questions revolve around Maggie and Cal's relationship, we also want to know what motivated Liam to show up — and whether he is sticking around. Where Do Sydney and Rafe Stand? Sydney (Lindura) and Rafe (Dakota Taylor) were at a crossroads at the end of season 3 on whether their different views on marriage could mean their relationship was over. Viewers rooting for Sydney and Rafe need to know whether they can work through this or if this obstacle will be what causes them to break up. What About Lola and Jacob? Speaking of Sullivan's Crossing couples, Lola (Amalia Williamson) was preparing for her romance with Jacob (Joel Oulette) to turn long-distance. Jacob initially considered putting his master's degree on hold to stay with Lola but she seemed certain they could make it work. Can Lola and Jacob actually make it work? Sounds like a question for next season. Which 'Sullivan's Crossing' Stars Are — And Aren't — Returning for Season 4 After Onscreen Complications Are Frank and Edna Leaving for Good? Frank (Tom Jackson) and Edna (Andrea Menard) were put through the wringer in season 3 after she was diagnosed with a brain tumor. Edna then started to lose her vision, and Maggie ultimately performed a high-stakes surgery that saved her life — but what does that mean for the fan-favorite couple now? Frank and his wife discussed traveling more so they can enjoy the next stage of their lives, but that means they would be leaving Sullivan's Crossing. The show would need to answer to viewers about how to keep Frank and Edna happy while not disappointing those of Us who watch the show for their story. Who Is Taking Over at Sullivan's Crossing? Sullivan's Crossing could no longer have Frank and Edna around and Maggie's medical practice has also kept her from the business. Then there is Sully, who chose to go to Ireland with Helen (Kate Vernon), which didn't leave a lot of options in terms of who is running the campground now. Some fans think signs are pointing at a time jump in season 4, but we have to wait until 2026 to find out. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Lifestyle
- Yahoo
This Is How You 'Win' A Breakup, According To Relationship Experts
Breakups hit everyone differently. Some people do best diving into other aspects of their lives (like their career), while others want to do everything in their power to make their ex regret their mistake. While it's so tempting to opt for the latter, consider an alternative approach, one that focuses more on personal growth and less on seeking revenge. 'Breakups are an emotional thing,' dating expert Emma Hathorn of told HuffPost. 'They pick at our insecurities, make us worry that we were the problem, cause us to overthink, to comb through the arguments and the days that led up to that concrete ending.' We all want to bounce back stronger. But instead of going after a revenge body or finding a rebound to hook up with (no judgment, been there) or any of the other breakup clichés, consider taking this opportunity to reclaim yourself. After all, you are your best company. Here, relationship experts share a new take on what it means to really 'win a breakup.' You make your home entirely yours. Nothing says independence like being able to live on your own. 'It offers an opportunity for a fresh start,' Mindy DeSeta, Ph.D., relationship and sex expert for the Hily dating app, told HuffPost. 'Having your own space provides a sense of freedom, the ability to establish your own routine and the power to make decisions without needing anyone's approval.' Meaning, you can decorate your space any way you want it without someone ruining your aesthetic with sports memorabilia. Or you can display your memorabilia and treasures without judgment. Plus, 'there's always opportunities to create new connections,' DeSeta adds. You can make your space a place to host dinner parties, book clubs and other events. This can remind you that you have a solid group of people who have your back or open the opportunity for new friends and more community-building. You don't feel the urge to check their social media. It's so tempting to keep online tabs on your ex, but stalking their every move, whether through their social media or friends, is only going to prolong the healing process. 'Letting go of the constant monitoring means you've detached from the need for comparison or validation,' Hathorn said. 'You've stopped measuring your healing against their performance of happiness or whoever they're currently hanging out with.' So hit that mute button (or, better yet, hit unfollow) for the sake of your peace of mind. You focus on your work and career. A lot of people dive deep into their career post-breakup, and for good reason. 'Growing a business or earning a job promotion is a major breakup win,' DeSeta said. 'Not only will you be bringing in more income, but focusing on your career success also redirects your attention away from heartbreak while providing a genuine sense of accomplishment and validation.' The best part is that you can use that extra money to do whatever pleases you, whether it's booking a luxury trip or saving up for a big-ticket item from your wishlist. You can see your relationship for what it was: the good, bad and in-between. It's hard to notice any flaws in your relationship when you're in it, making you wonder what actually went wrong that led to a breakup. But with distance comes reflection. 'Maybe you're able to see now that you both had flaws, or that it just wasn't meant to work,' Hathorn suggested. For example, maybe you realize your partner wasn't as supportive with your career as you'd like them to be or you both clashed on certain political beliefs. 'We often ignore what's right in front of us,' Rene Mondy, therapist and post-marriage expert, told HuffPost.'Sit with a journal and ask: What did I overlook, justify or downplay in this connection?' Fully processing the breakup allows you to figure out what matters most to you in a relationship, so you can seek out someone who is a better match. You're investing time in things you love. Raise your hand if you ever stopped doing something you enjoyed because you were too busy in your relationship. (*Raises hand*) It's happened to the best of us. Relationships, especially bad ones, can turn your focus away from the things that excite and inspire you. 'Sometimes we sideline our own hobbies for a relationship,' Hathorn said. She and DeSeta suggest redirecting your attention and energy back to yourself by investing in what matters most to you. Maybe it's seeing a therapist weekly to help you process your emotions or devoting more time to the gym. Maybe it's finally booking that solo trip to Portugal you've been wanting to do or just spending more time with friends and family. Getting back to your favorite hobbies will remind you of what you value most in life — something you can always take with you into your next phase in life, whatever that may be. You look at the future with a sense of possibility. After taking time to reconnect with yourself and having distance from your previous relationship, you'll have a better sense of what comes next, Hathorn adds. Whether you want to stay single for a while or you decide to dive into dating, you'll approach your next chapter with a stronger sense of self, higher standards and a life that's authentically yours. And, according to Hathorn, 'This is the real victory.' Related... This Is The Exact Moment You 'Lose' A Fight With Your Partner, According To Couples Counselors Straight Women Share The Exhausting Reason They Are Stepping Away From Dating Men 4 Signs You Have A 'Minimal Effort Partner.' And What To Do If This Kind Of Love Finds You. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
07-08-2025
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
Taylor Swift and Selena Gomez Became 'Best Friends' 'Bonding' Over Jonas Brothers Breakup: 'Best Thing We Got Was Each Other'
The pair first crossed paths in 2008 while Gomez was dating Nick Jonas and Swift was dating his older brother Joe JonasNEED TO KNOW Selena Gomez is reflecting on her friendship with Taylor Swift and how they have "stuck around for all the ups and downs" The duo first crossed paths in 2008 when they were each dating a Jonas Brother (Gomez dated Nick Jonas, while Swift dated Joe Jonas) Gomez said the pair "bonded" over their breakups with the brothers and shared, "She and I like to say the best thing we got out of those relationships was each other because it was really sweet"Selena Gomez is looking back on her enduring friendship with Taylor Swift. During an appearance on the Therapuss with Jake Shane podcast on Aug. 7, the singer and actress, 33, opened up about how she met Swift, 35, and how they subsequently 'bonded' over their respective breakups with Jonas Brothers stars Nick Jonas and Joe Jonas. 'Taylor [Swift] and I dated the Jonas Brothers,' Gomez told host Shane, 25, of how she and Swift first met. 'I dated Nick and she dated Joe. And everything was, it was cute, we were young. We all know and love each other now and it's so cute. We don't know what we were doing — She and I like to say the best thing we got out of those relationships was each other because it was really sweet.' The Only Murders in the Building star went on to share that she was around 15 and Swift was around 18 when they dated Nick, now 32, and Joe, now 35, and reflected on how it was a time ' when it was the crazy curly Taylor and she had all these bracelets that went all the way up.' Gomez said the pair went on to become 'best friends' as they 'bonded over the breakup, as girls do.' 'And then we just stuck around for all the ups and downs that came after and here we are now 16 years later,' Gomez added. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The Emilia Pérez star, who first crossed paths with Swift in 2008, also went on to detail how the pop superstar played her 2008 hit 'Love Story' for her before it was released. 'I believe 'Love Story' was the first song she had ever played me and it wasn't released yet,' Gomez explained. 'Yeah, I was in a hotel room and I remember it vividly, it was just one of those songs I instantly heard and thought this is one of the most beautiful songs ever.' Shane then commented, "Wow, 'I can't believe you heard Love Story before it was released,' to which Gomez responded, 'I know, it was so sweet. She was like, 'Okay I just want to play you this song but just like you know, I don't know it's going to be the first single, I think, I think.' And just hearing her say those little thoughts and just listening to it. Yeah, she is a chameleon, she's incredible.' Gomez's comments come after she shared a new snap of the BFFs together as she declared the past year of her life the 'most beautiful.' The photo was shared in a July 20 Instagram post that featured a carousel of images of Gomez and her loved ones, including her fiancé, Benny Blanco. In the new picture of the friendship duo, Gomez posed alongside Swift as they sat surrounded by a pile of metallic balloons. While Gomez stretched her hand toward the camera, Swift lay her head to the side as she leaned toward her bestie and stared up into the lens. Over the years, the two have shown their support for one another on various occasions, from cheering each other on at award shows to Swift celebrating Gomez's engagement to Blanco, 37, and declaring that she'll 'be the flower girl' at their upcoming nuptials. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
Khaleej Times
04-08-2025
- Khaleej Times
UAE: Venting online about your ex? Experts warn of up to Dh500,000 defamation fine
As more people turn to social media to share personal details about their breakups or divorces, legal experts are warning that such posts could cross into criminal territory, while also discouraging the younger generation from commitment and marriage. Byron James, a partner at Expatriate Law and an international family law expert, explained that under UAE law, particularly Federal Decree-Law No. 34 of 2021 on Combatting Rumours and Cybercrimes, both defamation and privacy violations are criminal offences, with strict penalties attached to online conduct. 'The UAE's legal approach reflects a broader commitment to protecting individual dignity, reputation and family privacy,' he said. 'These are matters of public order.' Defamation in the UAE includes any statement, written or implied, that harms someone's honour, reputation or social standing. Unlike in some jurisdictions, truth is not a defence; even accurate information can be considered defamatory if shared without justification and causes reputational damage. What makes this more severe is the method of publication. 'The offence is aggravated if defamatory content is posted online,' Byron said. 'Social media, WhatsApp, email or even blogs, all of these fall under electronic means. Once something is shared, it becomes a cybercrime. Penalties can go up to Dh500,000, jail time, and in some cases, deportation for non-citizens.' Privacy violations are also addressed under the same law. Sharing personal data, images, voice notes, private messages, or screenshots without consent may result in criminal charges. Even if the other party isn't directly named, if their identity can be inferred from context or known associations, a violation may have occurred. Byron adds: 'There's no need for malicious intent. Simply posting harmful or private information during or after a divorce could be enough to trigger liability, especially if it affects public perception or ongoing legal proceedings.' The emotional cost Shamsa (name changed), a 33-year-old Dubai resident, says she used to admire couples who shared their relationships online, until she saw how many ended up airing their separation just as publicly. 'Seeing a full relationship unfold online is nice, until it gets ugly,' she said. 'Even when people say they don't want to share the details, their followers pressure them. They say, 'We were part of your journey, we deserve to know what happened.' That kind of demand is unhealthy.' Shamsa believed that these public breakups have quietly shifted how people view marriage. 'It's changing the image of commitment. When people who once seemed so in love turn on each other online, it makes the idea of long-term relationships feel less stable.' Why do people post? Psychologist Rehab Al Hammadi, a UAE-based mental health professional, said that emotional regulation often breaks down during periods of grief or loss. 'People may feel the urge to defend themselves, tell their side, or seek validation. But social media isn't a safe outlet, especially when legal lines are involved.' She explained that the short-term relief of sharing often gives way to long-term consequences. 'Public judgment, potential legal action, or impact on custody battles can make things worse. Venting publicly doesn't resolve pain; it often adds new layers to it.' Even vague posts may count Indirect references or vague posts, sometimes called 'subtweeting' or 'soft launching' grievances, may still meet the legal threshold. 'If mutual followers can reasonably identify the person being referenced, and reputational harm occurs, that's enough,' Byron explained. 'Courts don't only look at content, they assess the overall context and impact.' He gives an example: a post like 'Some people pretend to be the victim while lying in court' may appear general, but if shared during a public or known divorce dispute, it can be interpreted as targeting a specific person. 'The legal system gives weight to emotional and moral harm as well, not just reputation.'
Yahoo
01-08-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Breakups Beat the Market—Here's Where The Next 400% Trade Starts
The most misunderstood structural trade in markets keeps delivering, if you know where to look next. GE didn't quadruple by accident. It broke up and the market finally paid attention. That 400% return wasn't about earnings or timing. It was structure. When bloated companies separate, capital flows differently. Management sharpens, incentives realign, and the market wakes up. We've seen this before. Again, breakups unlock value that's been sitting dormant for years. It's not an exception. It's a cycle: the market keeps mispricing, and yet most investors still miss it. Everyone talks valuation. Few realize structure is what moves capital. More News from Barchart Morgan Stanley Says Nvidia Has 'Exceptional' Strength. Should You Buy NVDA Stock Here? This Dividend Stock Yields 4.5% But Is Down 21% in 2025: Time to Buy? Dear MicroStrategy Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for July 31 Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. Structural Alpha Is Mispriced Wall Street still clings to its comfort zones, valuation screens, earnings revisions, and backward-looking ratios. But the market rarely rewards what's already obvious. Structural alpha, the kind created when a company breaks itself apart, is still widely mispriced. Why? Because most funds aren't built to handle it. When a spinoff hits the market, it triggers mechanical selling. Index funds can't hold it. Mandated strategies dump it. Institutions often don't know what it is or simply don't care. There's no analyst coverage, no liquidity, and no story. That's the inefficiency. Not because the business is flawed, but because ownership is forced out before the price can reflect reality. In that vacuum, spinoffs often trade well below intrinsic value. It's temporary but recurring. Complexity scares investors off. Behavioral bias does the rest. No one wants to explain complexity on a slide. So, they ignore it and miss the upside. That's where the opportunity is. We see it repeatedly: good businesses tossed aside, mispriced on arrival, and quietly revalued once the dust settles. Structure, not valuation, is the unlock. And very few are looking there. The Setup: What We Look For Not every breakup creates value. But the best ones follow a pattern. We've studied hundreds of these setups globally, and the traits repeat. The newly spun business is usually leaner, simpler, and finally free from a parent that never gave it full attention. That alone can unlock margin. You often see high insider ownership or direct management alignment. They've waited years to run the business on their terms and now they have the incentive to get it right. That strategic clarity is powerful. A focused mission, a clean balance sheet, and the ability to reinvest in one vertical change how capital is deployed. Many of these companies have hidden return-on-capital potential that was buried inside a bloated conglomerate. The key is spotting that shift before the market does. But here's where most investors get it wrong: they chase the parents. Spin is where the value disconnect usually lives. It's underfollowed, often underloved, and structurally mispriced out of the gate. We look for setups with clear catalysts, a cleanup of costs, a better capital allocation plan, or even the path to a sale. That's where the re-rate happens. The story isn't complex. The market's just slow to read the first chapter. The Data Behind It Corporate breakups don't just look good in theory; they deliver in practice. Historically, spinoffs have outperformed their benchmarks, not just on a one-year view, but over multi-year horizons. That's not anecdotal. It's consistent across sectors and cycles. At The Edge, we've tracked hundreds of these events over the last decade. Our proprietary post-breakup takeover study shows that 57% of all takeouts occur in the spun entity, not the parent. Why? Because that's where acquirers find focus, simplicity, and often a discount to fair value. The average return to takeover? 33%. And in many cases, it happens within 12 to 18 months of the separation. This is real alpha, not driven by multiple expansion or economic recovery, but by time compression. Breakups shortcut the usual waiting game of a turnaround. They create clarity instantly, and that speed is what the market rewards. This isn't a turnaround slog; it re-rates before most investors even react. In many cases, the re-rating starts as soon as the spinoff hits the tape. We track these setups globally. And when you know where to look, the pattern is hard to ignore. Investors searching for performance would do well to start here. Recent Trades That Worked The best breakup trades don't need hype; they show up in the numbers. Back in March, we highlighted a group of spinoff-related names with strong fundamentals and clear re-rating potential. When the market wobbled in April, we doubled down. That call's now paying off. (ECG) led the charge, up 71.3% since April 7. (WDC) followed with a 57.9% gain after years of underappreciated value finally caught a bid. (AMTM) jumped 23.7% on increased visibility and structural upside. What worked? The setups were clean, mispriced spin or breakup exposure, low institutional ownership, optionality, and in some cases, activist pressure. These weren't trades on momentum. They were dislocations we identified early and rode as the market caught on. We're now exiting WDC, ECG, and Boeing after strong runs, locking in gains but keeping names like (BA) on our breakup watchlist. The story isn't over; it's just moving to the next phase. The takeaway? When structure shifts, capital moves. If you know where to look, the alpha isn't just possible, it's measurable. What To Watch Next The next wave of structural alpha is already forming, and it's hiding in plain sight. (WBD) is preparing to split into two distinct public companies: one focused on streaming and studios (including DC), and the other housing legacy cable networks. It's a classic complexity unwind. These businesses shouldn't live under the same roof, and now they won't. Expect narrative clarity, strategic realignment, and re-rating potential on both sides. (CMCSA) is spinning out a $7 billion bundle of legacy media and digital assets into a newly formed Versant Media Group. It's leaner, more focused, and finally free to be priced on its own terms. The market has ignored the value buried in these properties for years—this spinoff forces a reappraisal. (HON) is next. Its advanced materials unit is set to separate by year-end, with strong margins, distinct capital needs, and none of the overlap that justified a combined structure. Once spun, it's likely to be a takeover candidate. This isn't a one-time theme. It's what we track every day globally. We scan filings, monitor board moves, and identify which post-breakup setups have the structural DNA for outperformance: low float, insider alignment, under coverage, and optionality. We're not looking for hype. We're looking for asymmetric setups the market hasn't priced yet. And breakups, when done right, continue to be the most overlooked place to find them. Something To Consider Breakups still baffle the market. And that confusion is exactly what drives their outperformance. This isn't a trade based on hope or a bet on sentiment; it's a pattern rooted in dislocation, behavior, and capital misalignment. Most investors still miss it. They chase valuation and overlook structure. They wait for clarity and by then, the move has already happened. But the edge lies in seeing the setup before the market prices it in. It's not about guessing. It's about recognizing when the parts are worth more than the whole and having the conviction to act before the re-rate. GE's 400% return was dramatic, but not unusual. It's what happens when complexity is removed, incentives are realigned, and investors are finally given something they can price. Alpha doesn't need forecasting. It needs a map, and breakups draw the clearest one in today's market. On the date of publication, Jim Osman did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
