logo
#

Latest news with #dieselgate

Four Volkswagen executives sentenced in latest Dieselgate ruling – Can you still claim compensation?
Four Volkswagen executives sentenced in latest Dieselgate ruling – Can you still claim compensation?

The Sun

time12-08-2025

  • Automotive
  • The Sun

Four Volkswagen executives sentenced in latest Dieselgate ruling – Can you still claim compensation?

A four year trial concluded when a German court sentenced four former Volkswagen directors for their part in the diesel cheating emission scandal uncovered in 2015. Two defendants received prison sentences, with the former head of diesel motor development receiving the heaviest term of four years and six months. 1 While the trial might have been brought to a close, prosecutors are still uncovering how widely the scandal was known around the company. According to the Financial Times, criminal proceedings against a total of 31 defendants are still pending. Volkswagen is also facing a separate civil case, where it may have to pay damages for the effects dieslgate had on the markets. Currently, the emission cheating scandal has cost Volkswagen billions, with some of this money owed to UK drivers as compensation. Check Diesel emissions claims eligibility CHECK HERE What was Dieselgate? In September 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), an American environmental regulatory body, found a 'defeat device' in many US Volkswagens. This was a piece of software which would make the vehicle look less polluting than it was during emissions testing. Volkswagen later admitted that this software could be found in millions of vehicles worldwide - including models across the UK and Europe. In the UK, over 1.2 million diesels were recalled once the EPA found these devices. This included thousands of Volkswagens, Audis, and Skodas. However, Diesel Claim, a law firm, believes many other vehicle manufacturers are guilty of fitting these devices too. That includes Ford, BMW, Land Rover, Jaguar, Mercedes, Renault, and Nissan. Can I still claim compensation? Diesel Claim said UK drivers are due compensation for this scandal, and it is fighting the case for claimants in court. It believes it has affected the resale value of affected vehicles, led to higher fuel costs for consumers, and increased your carbon footprint - meaning drivers should receive a pay out. To be eligible to claim compensation through Diesel Claim, you need to have bought a diesel vehicle between 2009 and 2019. The vehicle must also have been manufactured between these dates. Claimants could receive up to £10,000 in compensation. Diesel Claim works on a no win no fee basis, meaning you won't need to pay any fees for joining. It's only if you're successfully awarded compensation that Diesel Claim will take a cut of your compensation.

Four former Volkswagen managers convicted of fraud in ‘dieselgate' trial
Four former Volkswagen managers convicted of fraud in ‘dieselgate' trial

The Guardian

time26-05-2025

  • Automotive
  • The Guardian

Four former Volkswagen managers convicted of fraud in ‘dieselgate' trial

A German court has convicted four former Volkswagen managers of fraud and given two of them prison sentences for their part in the 'dieselgate' emissions test-cheating scandal which erupted almost a decade ago. The former head of development Heinz-Jakob Neusser received a suspended jail term of one year and three months from the court in the city of Braunschweig, according to the news agency Bloomberg. A former head of drive electronics, named only as Hanno J, was given a sentence of two years and seven months, German media reported. The heaviest sentence, of four years and six months, was given to the former head of diesel motor development Jens H, while the fourth defendant was given a suspended sentence of one year and 10 months. The defendants can appeal against the rulings. The scandal began in September 2015 when the US Environmental Protection Agency issued a notice of violation saying Volkswagen had rigged engine control software that enabled diesel cars to pass emissions tests while emitting far more pollution in actual driving. The company has paid more than $33bn (£24bn) in fines and compensation to vehicle owners. Two VW managers received prison sentences in the US. The former head of the company's Audi division Rupert Stadler was given a suspended sentence of 21 months and a fine of €1.1m (£0.92m); his sentence is still subject to appeal. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion The four found guilty on Monday, who have been on trial since 2021, were initially to have their cases heard alongside that of the former VW CEO Martin Winterkorn. Proceedings against him have been suspended because of his health issues, and it is not clear when he might go on trial. Winterkorn has denied wrongdoing. Further proceedings are open against 31 other suspects in Germany. Volkswagen said in a statement that the 'proceedings in the court in Braunschweig are against individuals' and had 'no significant consequences for the cases before the civil courts that Volkswagen is involved in' related to the scandal. Agence France-Presse and Associated Press contributed to this report

Four ex-Volkswagen managers found guilty over ‘dieselgate'
Four ex-Volkswagen managers found guilty over ‘dieselgate'

Free Malaysia Today

time26-05-2025

  • Automotive
  • Free Malaysia Today

Four ex-Volkswagen managers found guilty over ‘dieselgate'

Volkswagen said that the proceedings in the Braunschweig court are against individuals. (EPA Images pic) BERLIN : A German court today convicted and handed prison sentences, some suspended, to four former Volkswagen (VW) managers over their part in the 'dieselgate' emissions-cheating scandal, Bloomberg reported. The scandal has caused waves in the global car industry since September 2015, when Volkswagen admitted tampering with millions of diesel vehicles to dupe pollution tests. Former VW executive Heinz-Jakob Neusser received a suspended jail term of one year and three months from the court in the city of Braunschweig, according to news agency Bloomberg. The former head of drive electronics, named only as Hanno J, was given a sentence of two years and seven months, German media reported. The heaviest sentence of four years and six months was given to the former head of diesel motor development, Jens Hwhile the fourth defendant was given a suspended sentence of one year and 10 months. The defendants can appeal against the rulings. The separate trial of former Volkswagen CEO Martin Winterkorn remains suspended because of his ill health. Auto sector analyst Ferdinand Dudenhoeffer, head of the Center Automotive Research, judged that the case had for now ended 'with scapegoats and, in some cases, suspended sentences'. Volkswagen said in a statement that the 'proceedings in the court in Braunschweig are against individuals' and that they had 'no significant consequences for the cases before the civil courts that Volkswagen is involved in' related to the scandal. The four found guilty today, who have been on trial since 2021, were initially set to have their cases heard alongside that of Winterkorn. However, the court decided to split off proceedings against Winterkorn, who was unable to appear because of ill health. The former auto executive finally went on trial in September before the court again suspended proceedings in October, when he was not fit to take the stand. The highest-ranking former executive to have been convicted in the scandal so far is former Audi CEO Rupert Stadler. He was was fined and given a suspended sentence in 2023 after admitting to fraud by negligence. In February, prosecutors in France called for Volkswagen to face charges of aggravated fraud there too. They said nearly one million French customers had to pay for servicing and repairs after the emissions breach was revealed.

Judges rule ‘dieselgate' group action can proceed in Scotland
Judges rule ‘dieselgate' group action can proceed in Scotland

The Independent

time20-05-2025

  • Automotive
  • The Independent

Judges rule ‘dieselgate' group action can proceed in Scotland

Judges have ruled that a group action against car manufacturers in the so-called 'dieselgate' case can proceed in Scotland's highest civil court. The case concerns legal action over allegations that Nissan and Renault fitted prohibited 'defeat devices' to diesel vehicles to get round emissions tests. Joseph Mackay applied for permission to bring group proceedings on behalf of about 8,500 people who claim to have suffered loss as a result of the manufacturers' alleged behaviour. The Lord Ordinary sitting in the Outer House of the Court of Session in Edinburgh previously granted permission for the group action to go ahead. However, the various Nissan companies, described as the defenders, appealed to the Inner House of the Court of Session to challenge that decision. The Lord President Lord Pentland, sitting with Lady Wise and Lord Clark, has now refused the appeal, allowing the group action to proceed. In order to begin group proceedings in Scotland, two initial applications must be made to the court, one to appoint a representative party and other for permission to bring the proposed group proceedings. Nissan contended that Mr Mackay failed to demonstrate that he was an appropriate person to be appointed as the representative party. They also argued that it was not shown that it would be more efficient for the claims to be brought as a group action rather than individually, nor that the proceedings had any real prospect of success. In an opinion delivered by Lord Pentland on Tuesday, the judges said the Lord Ordinary was 'fully entitled' to conclude that the applicant was a 'suitable person to be authorised to act as the representative party in the proposed group proceedings'. He wrote: 'In summary, the applicant had no interest in the proceedings other than his own claim; he was wholly independent of the defenders; there was nothing to suggest that he would act otherwise than fairly and adequately in the group's interests.' The ruling notes that the Lord Ordinary's decision to authorise the bringing of group proceedings was a discretionary decision and that there is 'no justification' for the Inner House to interfere with it. It also states that the Lord Ordinary was justified in concluding that there were 'real prospects of success' and that it would be more efficient for the claims to be brought collectively rather than individually. Renault did not contest the Lord Ordinary's original decision.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store