Latest news with #humanbehavior
Daily Mail
12-05-2025
- Health
- Daily Mail
Florida scientists work out what causes the majority of alligators to attack humans
In groundbreaking new research, scientists in Florida determined that almost all alligator attacks were actually due to risky behavior from humans. Researchers at both the University of Florida and Centre College in Kentucky published the first-ever study into what humans were doing immediately before an encounter with an alligator. The experts found that 96 per cent of recorded reptile 'attacks' occurred immediately after a human had engaged in 'risky' behavior, and published the findings in the Human-Wildlife Interactions journal where, in April, they announced beast bites were preventable. The study's lead and professor at Centre College Mark Teshera said the findings show that alligator 'attacks' aren't actually attacks at all. He said: 'It was important to create a ranking system for risky human behaviors because it showed that the overwhelming majority of bites stemmed from some level of humans engaging in risky behavior in places where alligators live. 'Therefore, we should not call these encounters "attacks". The professor added that the motivation for the study was to determine if the beasts were misrepresented. Scientists concluded that humans shoulder a majority of the blame for alligator bites, and the predators don't typically go looking to attack people. Professor Frank Mazzotti said: 'The takeaway lesson from this study is that many bites can be prevented if humans are aware of their surroundings and minimize risky behaviors, such as walking small pets near bodies of water or swimming where alligators are known to be present.' Scientists believe that alligators won't go looking for conflict but will respond if presented with an 'attractive stimulus', which could be something that would spook them like splashing, swimming, or just as a presence in their natural habitat. When researchers specifically looked at fatal bites, they found humans were often engaging in high-risk behavior beforehand. This can be defined as deliberately entering the alligator's habitat. Humans who simply walked near the water or the alligator's habitat on land were rarely bitten. Mazzotti said the findings could help protect the reptiles from being euthanized by authorities if they were to bite a human. Typically, when an attack occurs, authorities will attempt to identify the alligator, capture it, and euthanize them. If humans are conscious of not disturbing the creatures, they're less likely to get attacked, and the alligators won't be senselessly killed.
Daily Mail
09-05-2025
- Health
- Daily Mail
Florida scientists work out what's behind 96% of alligator attacks on humans
In groundbreaking new research, Florida scientists determined that almost all alligator attacks were caused by risky behavior from humans. Researchers at the University of Florida and Centre College in Kentucky published the first-ever research studying what humans were doing immediately before an alligator encounter. They found that a whopping 96 percent of recorded 'alligator attacks' occurred right after humans were engaging in 'risky' behavior. Researchers published the study in the Human-Wildlife Interactions journal and announced in April that alligator bites are preventable. Mark Teshera, the study's lead and a biology professor at Centre College, said the findings show that alligator 'attacks' aren't actually attacks at all. 'It was important to create a ranking system for risky human behaviors because it showed that the overwhelming majority of bites stemmed from some level of humans engaging in risky behavior in places where alligators live,' Teshera said. 'Therefore, we should not call these encounters 'attacks.'' Teshera added that the motivation for the study was to determine if alligators were misrepresented. Scientists concluded that humans shoulder a majority of the blame for alligator bites, and the predators don't typically go looking to attack people. 'The takeaway lesson from this study is that many bites can be prevented if humans are aware of their surroundings and minimize risky behaviors such as walking small pets near bodies of water or swimming where alligators are known to be present,' Professor of Wildlife Ecology Frank Mazzotti said. Scientists believe that alligators won't go looking for conflict but will respond if presented with an 'attractive stimulus.' The stimulus can be something that would spook the alligator, including splashing, swimming, or a presence in their natural habitat. When researchers specifically looked at fatal bites, they found humans were often engaging in high-risk behavior beforehand. This can be defined as deliberately entering the alligator's habitat. Humans who simply walked near the water or the alligator's habitat on land were rarely bitten. Mazzotti said the findings could help protect alligators from being euthanized by authorities for biting a human. Typically, when an attack occurs, authorities will attempt to identify the alligator, capture it, and euthanize them. Although alligator attacks are rare, a Florida woman named Rachel Thompson was bitten last July while swimming in Hillsborough River If humans are conscious of not disturbing the creatures, they're less likely to get attacked, and the alligators won't be senselessly killed. The information is particularly useful as Floridians prepare for alligator season, which runs from April to June. The spring is when alligators mate, and they're more active, which can lead to an increase in human interactions. Researchers advise Floridians to be aware of alligator habitats and avoid swimming in the area. Last July, a woman named Rachel Thompson was swimming in Hillsborough River when she was bitten by an alligator. The alligator bit her leg as she attempted to escape by throwing a rock and punching it. Thompson miraculously pried the alligator's mouth open, and her son helped her escape. Another woman was recently attacked while she paddled in a canoe near the mouth of Tiger Creek.
Forbes
08-05-2025
- Science
- Forbes
A Symbiotic Dance: Navigating Loops Of Artificial And Natural Perception
Everything is connected. The interplay of AI and NI is influencing what we aspire to, how we feel, ... More what we think and how we perceive our environment - which in turn influences how we interact with it, and ourselves. The relationship between Artificial Intelligence and Natural Intelligence is rapidly evolving, moving beyond simple tool-use to a complex interplay that shapes the very fabric of human experience. This interaction operates across the four fundamental dimensions of human life – our aspirations, emotions, thoughts, and sensations/behavior – creating either a virtuous cycle of mutual enhancement or a vicious descent into cognitive and experiential distortion. Understanding this dynamic is crucial as AI becomes increasingly integrated into our daily lives, influencing everything from how we process information to how we perceive reality itself. At the heart of this relationship lies a feedback loop. AI is developed by human intelligence, trained on data generated by human activity, and designed to augment or replicate human capabilities. In turn, this AI influences human behavior, cognition, and even our internal states, which then generates new data and new possibilities for AI development. This continuous cycle can either elevate human potential and well-being (virtuous) or degrade them (vicious). Let's explore this feedback loop, which is the cause and consequence of a multitude of separate but interconnected cycles. Our relationship with AI has different implications depending on the aspect of our being that we focus on. In the following, we look at each of the four dimensions that shape our experiences and expressions as humans: aspirations, emotions, thoughts and sensations. AI can be a powerful engine for realizing human aspirations. It can automate tedious tasks, provide insights from vast datasets, unlock new avenues for creativity, and even help personalize learning and development, enabling individuals to pursue their goals more effectively. Consider how AI tools are used in scientific research to accelerate discoveries or in creative industries to generate novel ideas and content. This forms a virtuous cycle where AI empowers humans to achieve more, leading to higher aspirations and further innovation in AI. However, a vicious cycle can emerge if AI narrows our aspirations by making us overly reliant on automated solutions, discouraging effortful pursuits, or if AI systems are designed to manipulate our desires for commercial or other interests. If the ease of AI-driven task completion leads to a decline in the pursuit of challenging goals requiring deep human engagement, as discussed in the context of AI's impact on cognition and the workplace and potential cognitive atrophy, our collective aspirations may inadvertently shrink. AI's potential to stifle creativity by recycling existing knowledge also poses a risk to the pursuit of novel aspirations AI's impact on human emotions is multifaceted. AI-powered systems can analyze emotional states through facial recognition, voice analysis, and text sentiment, potentially offering personalized support or tailoring interactions. AI companions and chatbots are being developed that aim to provide emotional support, and research suggests that while AI can generate responses that make people feel heard, the perception of whether the response comes from a human or AI significantly impacts the emotional resonance. This could lead to a virtuous cycle where AI provides timely support and understanding, enhancing emotional well-being. Conversely, a vicious cycle can arise if over-reliance on AI for emotional connection diminishes genuine human interaction, leading to feelings of isolation, or if AI is used to manipulate emotions for persuasive purposes, eroding trust and authenticity in communication. The accelerating development of "emotion AI" highlights both the potential for therapeutic applications and the risks of misuse. The idea that perceiving AI as conscious can have carry-over effects on human-human interaction also touches upon the emotional dimension of this relationship. The realm of human thought is perhaps where the AI/NI cycle is most immediately apparent. AI, particularly generative AI, is fundamentally reshaping how we interact with information, learn, reason, and make decisions. AI can serve as a powerful tool for critical thinking, providing access to diverse perspectives and analyzing complex data. Collaborative problem-solving between humans and AI can outperform either alone, especially in tasks requiring both data analysis and human judgment. This can foster a virtuous cycle where AI augments human cognitive abilities, leading to deeper understanding and more effective problem-solving. However, a significant risk lies in the potential for cognitive offloading, where individuals delegate complex thinking tasks to AI, potentially leading to a decline in critical thinking skills and an over-reliance on AI outputs, even when they are flawed or biased. The ease of generating content with AI may also stifle creativity if it leads to the recycling of existing patterns rather than the generation of truly novel ideas. A particularly concerning aspect of AI's influence on thought is its capacity to distort memory and perception. Recent studies have demonstrated that exposure to AI-edited images and videos can implant false memories, leading individuals to confidently recall events or details that never actually occurred. The effect is particularly strong with AI-generated videos of AI-edited images, significantly increasing both the number and confidence level of false recollections compared to viewing unedited images. This highlights another vicious cycle where AI-altered realities can directly corrupt our personal histories and understanding of events, making it difficult to distinguish between authentic experiences and synthetic ones. While creating fully false memories might be harder than some earlier studies suggested, the ability of AI to introduce specific false details into existing memories remains a significant concern. This has dramatic implications for legal proceedings, the spread of misinformation, and our ability to trust our own recollections AI influences our sensations and behavior through interfaces, recommendations, and automation. From personalized content feeds that cater to our preferences to autonomous systems that perform physical tasks, AI is increasingly mediating our interaction with the world. AI-powered systems can analyze behavioral patterns to predict actions or tailor experiences, potentially leading to more efficient or engaging interactions. This can contribute to a virtuous cycle where AI enhances our capabilities and experiences, leading to more effective and fulfilling behaviors. However, a vicious cycle can develop if AI-driven systems are designed to exploit our sensory and behavioral vulnerabilities, leading to addictive interfaces, filter bubbles that limit exposure to diverse perspectives, or the erosion of privacy through constant surveillance and data collection. The convenience offered by AI can also lead to a decline in physical activity or the development of new forms of dependency, as discussed in the context of AI's impact on our brains and behaviors. The potential for AI to influence our moment-to-moment sensations and subsequent actions, often without conscious awareness of the AI's role, presents a subtle but powerful vector for shaping human behavior. The interplay across these dimensions forms interconnected cycles. For example, AI-driven manipulation of emotions (vicious emotional cycle) can influence our thoughts and lead to the formation of false beliefs or memories (vicious cognitive cycle), which in turn can alter our aspirations and behaviors. Conversely, using AI tools to enhance critical thinking and creativity (virtuous cognitive cycle) can lead to the pursuit of more ambitious goals (virtuous aspirational cycle), fostering positive emotions and more engaged behaviors. Navigating this complex landscape requires intentionality. To protect our "real" perspective and perception in the age of ubiquitous AI, consider these four practical takeaways: Be acutely aware that digital content, especially images and videos, can be easily and convincingly altered by AI. Develop healthy skepticism towards sensational or emotionally charged visuals encountered online. Learn to recognize potential signs of AI manipulation, cross-reference information from multiple trusted sources, and be wary of content that seems too perfect or aligns too neatly with existing biases. Understand that even seemingly minor AI edits can influence memory and perception over time. While AI can offer forms of interaction and support, it lacks genuine consciousness and emotional depth. Actively invest time and energy in face-to-face interactions, build strong relationships, and seek emotional support from other humans. Recognize that the nuances of human empathy and understanding are irreplaceable for true emotional well-being and a grounded sense of reality Resist the urge to delegate all challenging mental tasks to AI. Actively practice critical thinking, problem-solving, and creative generation without AI assistance. Engage in activities that require focused attention and deep processing to maintain cognitive fitness and avoid the pitfalls of cognitive offloading. Use AI as a tool to augment, not replace, your own intellectual efforts. Be conscious of how AI-driven platforms and content feeds are designed to capture your attention and influence your behavior. Regularly evaluate the time spent on digital media and its impact on your emotions, thoughts, and overall well-being. Actively seek out diverse perspectives and content that challenge your existing views. Configure privacy settings and be mindful of the data you share, understanding that this data fuels the AI systems that shape your digital experience. The interplay between our artificial and natural intelligences presents both opportunities and significant challenges. By understanding the potential for both virtuous and vicious cycles across the dimensions of our aspirations, emotions, thoughts, and sensations/behavior, and by adopting proactive strategies to safeguard our perception and cognitive autonomy, we can strive to ensure that AI serves as a tool to enhance, rather than erode, the richness of the human experience.
