Latest news with #supertax
The Australian
11-08-2025
- Business
- The Australian
Super rule changes to help younger savers, wealthy Australians hit with the new super tax
The government's new super tax has triggered a much wider push to review superannuation rules, with the looming economic summit set to become a forum for change. With the controversial new 15 per cent tax on amounts above $3m yet to be set in stone, the economic summit, which kicks of on August 19, will hear calls to cut benefits for the very wealthy but also to improve super benefits for younger savers. The Commonwealth Bank and the Grattan Institute have already supported wealth taxes for older and richer investors. But those calls are now being balanced with a push to let younger, less wealthy investors gain more access to super through increased contribution caps. Top advisory firm BDO Australia has sent a shot across the bows with a provocative call to open up the amount investors are allowed to contribute into super each year. At present, the pre-tax contribution limit is $30,000 per annum – an amount unchanged from a decade ago. In contrast, the amount older and wealthier Australians can have tax-free in super is $2m – up from an initial level of $1.6m when it was first legislated in 2017. Similarly, the post-tax contribution limit is $110,00 amount compared to levels of $180,000 in the past. Lance Cunningham, BDO national tax technical leader, said the current settings are inappropriate. 'They offer limited opportunity for people to contribute at the time they most want to do so,' Mr Cunningham said. Super policy is becoming more central to the agenda as the government publicly eliminates other items from the debate, including negative gearing. At the same time, items related to super such as capital gains tax, pension access and family trust rules remain very much in focus. The summit is due to commence before the government nails down the final terms of the new super tax, tagged as Division 296. The prospects of the introduction of the tax being delayed are rising since the government is supposed to begin collecting tax revenue from the measure from July 1 next year with guidance on the treatment of unrealised gains still to be clarified. Two other key issues in super will also be difficult to avoid at the summit, despite a formal focus on productivity: • The regulation of super is back in the spotlight. The lack of a single regulator for super has emerged as a problem for the government in the wake of the First Guardian scandal, now shaping up as the biggest regulatory failure for many years. Supervision of super is split between three regulators: ASIC, APRA and the ATO. Following the First Guardian collapse, The Australian reported last week that ASIC has raised the prospect of limiting superannuation investment options and restricting retail access to high-risk funds, as it warned a root-and-branch response is needed to counter financial services industry misconduct. • Separately, lobbyists from big super funds are pushing the government to review the terms of the performance test in MySuper. Last year, all of the MySuper superannuation funds passed the APRA Your Future, Your Super performance test for the first time, but industry leaders believe conformity in the tests is leading to a lack of innovation in super products. There are now calls for the APRA to broaden the scope of the performance tests to ensure it captures more products and allows for diverse strategies across the sector. Read related topics: Need to know
Daily Mail
24-07-2025
- Business
- Daily Mail
The looming threat hanging over thousands of Aussie super accounts
Australians are bracing for a radical new super tax that could prove even more damaging for households if Labor bows to pressure from the Greens. Anthony Albanese was re-elected with a plan to impose a new 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains on super balances above $3million. The resumption of Parliament means the government will attempt to pass the law - backdated to July 1 - but it needs the support of the Greens in the Senate. The policy is radical because it proposes to tax the notional capital growth of assets during a financial year before they are sold, which could force self-managed super funds to sell the likes of farms and commercial real estate to avoid the tax. The new tax is different to an existing 15 per cent tax on earnings during the accumulation phase, which is paid to the fund without most workers noticing. The 80,000 Australians with more than $3million in super would have to pay an annual tax bill, which an individual would have to pay from their bank savings. The SMSF Association estimates 50,000 of these people are in a self-managed super fund and will therefore be affected by Labor's proposed new tax. The group's chief executive Peter Burgess said those with more than $3million in super would be forced to sell assets like commercial business premises to avoid this tax - creating severe cashflow issues for businesses with a self-managed super fund. 'They will need to find that money somewhere else because you're talking about a paper gain,' he told Daily Mail Australia. 'They haven't actually received that gain - the tax is based on that; it means they're going to have to dip into their savings or their reserves elsewhere in order to be able to pay this tax.' It comes as Greens leader Larissa Waters has hinted her hard-left party will be demanding an even tougher new tax on super. The party want the threshold lowered to $2million but indexed for inflation. It's expected to affect 104,141 super accounts or 0.6 per cent of retirement savers. 'We'll be having some good discussions with the government on that matter and I'm optimistic of a good outcome there, but I'll have those discussions in private,' she told the ABC's 7.30 program on Tuesday night. Host Sarah Ferguson didn't press Senator Waters on whether the Greens would insist on a lower $2million threshold. But Mr Burgess said it would be political suicide for Labor to agree to the demands of the Greens, at least on the point of the threshold. '[Labor] is holding their ground and they're not making changes - I would be very surprised to see the government reduce the threshold,' he said. 'That would be suicidal for the government to do that with all the controversy, exposing more people to the unintended consequences.' The Coalition and left-leaning crossbench senators David Pocock and Jacqui Lambie are opposed to taxing unrealised gains, which means Labor needs the support of the Greens in the Senate to get its tax division 296 legislation passed into law. The new super tax bill isn't expected to be introduced during this fortnight of Parliament, but the government is proposing to backdate it to July 1. Mr Burgess argued is was impossible for people to plan their financial affairs without knowing the final outcome of the bill. 'The government can argue, "Well, we've been talking about this tax for a few years now" but it's unreasonable to expect people to act on legislation,' he said. 'To backdate it to the first of July we think is completely unreasonable - if it isn't passed in this fortnight, then the earliest it will be passed is late August. 'We may see some panic selling - but certainly what we're saying to people is "let's wait until the legislation is passed".' Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino told the House of Representatives during Question Time on Wednesday this was a 'very modest measure'. 'If an SMSF has a farm or a business within the fund, that it should be receiving commercial, arms length payments from that business or that farm,' he said. Labor's Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions and Other Measures bill was first introduced in 2023, with Treasury calculating it will affect 80,000 people or just 0.5 per cent of super savers. Wilson Asset Management modelling predicted a failure to index the new tax would affect 5.4million Australians, aged 18 to 34, by the time they turned 67 and were able to qualify for the age pension. AMP warned Labor's plan to tax unrealised gains above the $3million threshold would affect the average 22-year-old worker in four decades' time.
