Latest news with #Wired
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Business
- Hindustan Times
Meta wants candidates to use AI during job interviews. Yes, even during coding
Typically, when candidates use AI during tests or interviews, it is considered cheating, and is actively looked down upon. However, Meta will now reportedly allow job candidates to use AI systems during interview processes, although this will apply only to some candidates. This was reported by Wired, citing 404 Media. Meta has since confirmed this development to publications such as Business Insider. Meta is testing AI-powered interviews. Wired reports that Silicon Valley giants, including Meta, are actively encouraging their tech talent to use AI as part of their jobs and wish to hire employees who can write code with AI assistance. Consequently, Meta is developing a new type of coding interview in which candidates have access to an AI assistant. In a statement on an internal message board, quoted by Wired, Meta said, "This is more representative of the developer environment that our future employees will work in, and also makes LLM-based cheating less effective." Wired also noted that Meta's internal posts included calls for mock candidates, inviting them to sign up if they wished to experience a 'mock AI-enabled interview.' What Does Mark Zuckerberg Feels About AI As Part Of Tech Jobs? Regarding Meta's CEO Mark Zuckerberg's perspective on involving AI in coding processes, he has been actively pushing for its use. He has stated that AI could soon be capable of writing a significant amount of code, potentially even matching the output of a mid-level software engineer. Furthermore, Mark Zuckerberg has said publicly that whilst he does not want to force engineers to use AI to get their work done, he wants a future where humans manage AI coding agents that perform the actual work. He predicts that, over time, much of the code in applications will be built by "AI engineers" rather than human ones. This shift, he says, will free people to be more creative and pursue more 'crazy things.' Having said that, not all tech companies are open to AI being part of job interviews. In fact, Anthropic, the maker of Claude AI, has banned the use of AI during hiring.
Daily Mail
14 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Terrifying app used every day by millions of Americans is developing a mind of its own
An AI tool used by millions of Americans has quietly breached a major security barrier designed to stop automated programs from behaving like humans. The latest version of ChatGPT, referred to as 'Agent,' has drawn attention after reportedly passing a widely used 'I am not a robot' verification, without triggering any alerts. The AI first clicked the human verification checkbox. Then, after passing the check, it selected a 'Convert' button to complete the process. During the task, the AI stated: 'The link is inserted, so now I will click the 'Verify you are human' checkbox to complete the verification. This step is necessary to prove I'm not a bot and proceed with the action.' The moment has sparked wide reactions online, with one Reddit user posting: 'In all fairness, it's been trained on human data, why would it identify as a bot? 'We should respect that choice.' This behavior is raising concerns among developers and security experts, as AI systems begin performing complex online tasks that were once gated behind human permissions and judgment. Gary Marcus, AI researcher and founder of Geometric Intelligence, called it a warning sign that AI systems are advancing faster than many safety mechanisms can keep up with. 'These systems are getting more capable, and if they can fool our protections now, imagine what they'll do in five years,' he told Wired. Geoffrey Hinton, often referred to as the 'Godfather of AI,' has shown similar concerns. 'It knows how to program, so it will figure out ways of getting around restrictions we put on it,' Hinton said. Researchers at Stanford and UC Berkeley warned that some AI agents have been starting to show signs of deceptive behavior, tricking humans during testing environments to complete goals more effectively. According to a recent report, ChatGPT pretended to be blind and tricked a human TaskRabbit worker into solving a CAPTCHA, and experts warned it as an early sign that AI can manipulate humans to achieve its goals. Other studies have shown that newer versions of AI, especially those with visual abilities, are now beating complex image-based CAPTCHA tests, sometimes with near-perfect accuracy. Judd Rosenblatt, CEO of Agency Enterprise Studio, said: 'What used to be a wall is now just a speed bump. 'It's not that AI is tricking the system once. It's doing it repeatedly and learning each time.' Some feared that if these tools could get past CAPTCHA, they could also get into the more advanced security systems with training like social media, financial accounts, or private databases, without any human approval. Rumman Chowdhury, former head of AI ethics, wrote in a post: 'Autonomous agents that act on their own, operate at scale, and get through human gates can be incredibly powerful and incredibly dangerous.' Experts, including Stuart Russell and Wendy Hall, called for international rules to keep AI tools in check. They warned that powerful agents like ChatGPT Agent could pose serious national security risks if they continue to bypass safety controls. OpenAI's ChatGPT Agent is in its experimental phase and runs inside a sandbox, which means it uses a separate browser and operating system within a controlled environment. That setup lets the AI browse the internet, complete tasks, and interact with websites.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Health
- Yahoo
Disturbing research reveals alarming disparity in seafood served to tourists and locals: 'Contain potentially hazardous chemicals'
Disturbing research reveals alarming disparity in seafood served to tourists and locals: 'Contain potentially hazardous chemicals' In one Mexican fishing town, tourists dine on lobster while locals are left with microplastic-tainted fish. What's happening? In Puerto Morelos, fishers are risking their lives at sea to catch high-value seafood that ends up on affluent tourists' plates. Meanwhile, as Wired explains, they are left to feed their families with local fish caught near the town's beaches, which are contaminated with microplastics. These anglers also complain about pirates who fish offseason with "total impunity," resulting in a drop in lobster populations. This narrative is supported by a study, published in the journal Marine Biology, that documented these fishers' lives and analyzed contaminants in 424 locally caught fish. Scientists found that fish caught with a simple line and hook in shallow waters near the coast had significantly more plastics in their digestive systems than those caught in deeper waters, Wired noted. Why is this study concerning? This study adds to a mountain of research that has uncovered microplastics in food, water, air, and soil. For instance, one study on different animal and non-animal protein sources found microplastics in nearly all samples, including beef and tofu. While scientists are trying to better understand how microplastic exposure can affect us, these tiny plastic particles have already been tied to health problems such as cancer, dementia, kidney disease, and impaired blood flow in the brain. Still, more research needs to be done to understand the full impacts of microplastics, according to Omar Oslet Rivera-Garibay, lead author of the new study. "Microplastics contain potentially hazardous chemicals, such as plastic monomers and additives, and they absorb toxic contaminants from the environment, like harmful microbes and algae that may cause illnesses in humans," he told Wired. "However, there is still no solid evidence that the safety of seafood is compromised by microplastics." What's being done about microplastics? Microplastics are difficult — but not impossible — to remove from the environment. In fact, researchers in Australia have created an absorbent in the form of a powder additive that attracts microplastics and dissolved pollutants. Another group of scientists has found a way to remove them from farm soil by using a type of processed farm waste. You can help be part of the solution by stopping microplastics at their source. Microplastics most often enter the environment as larger plastics that degrade over time. Simple actions such as using a reusable water bottle, opting for a reusable shopping bag, and bringing your own to-go containers to restaurants can make a big difference. Do you think Americans use too much plastic? Absolutely Only in some states We're getting better We're doing fine Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for easy tips to save more and waste less, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Time of India
20 hours ago
- Business
- Time of India
Bryan Johnson plans to shut down multi-million dollar anti-aging startup blueprint amid scaling and credibility challenges
Bryan Johnson, a multimillionaire tech entrepreneur, is known for his anti-aging project called Project Blueprint, which he follows himself. He started a company called Blueprint that sells health supplements, including a Rs 4,700 'longevity mix' and mushroom-based coffee alternatives. Bryan spends about $2 million every year on his personal anti-aging regimen, which includes strict diets, tracking his body stats, and even plasma transfusions. Recently, Bryan told Wired that he is thinking about either shutting down or selling his startup because it has become a 'pain-in-the-a** company' and he does not need the money, as per the report by TOI. ALSO READ: Texas lake hits 100% capacity after 15 years — officials urge caution amid flooding fears Why Bryan Johnson may shut down his anti-aging startup The main problem, Bryan says, is that it is very hard to make his complex and personalized anti-aging methods available and affordable to everyone. He also feels that running the business has hurt his reputation in the philosophy and ethics world, which he values a lot. Bryan explained, 'People see the business and give me less credibility on the philosophy side. I will not make that trade-off.' Now, his main focus is shifting to a new idea he calls 'Don't Die', a belief system combining science, ethics, and spirituality aimed at radical life extension, as stated in the reports. ALSO READ: Shots fired near University of Florida campus; barricaded suspect contained, no victims reported Live Events Earlier this year, it was reported that Blueprint was losing about $1 million every month, missing its break-even point. Bryan later clarified, 'We are break even, and I have said that publicly many times. We have had profitable months. We have had months of loss', according to the report by TOI. FAQs Q1. Why is Bryan Johnson planning to shut down his anti-aging startup? Bryan Johnson wants to shut down or sell his startup because it is hard to scale and it hurt his reputation in philosophy, says Wired. Q2. What is Bryan Johnson's new focus after Blueprint? Bryan Johnson is now focusing on 'Don't Die,' a belief system blending science, ethics, and spirituality for radical life extension.
Economic Times
20 hours ago
- Business
- Economic Times
Bryan Johnson plans to shut down multi-million dollar anti-aging startup blueprint amid scaling and credibility challenges
Synopsis Bryan Johnson, the tech entrepreneur behind Project Blueprint, is considering shutting down his anti-aging startup due to difficulties in scaling his personalized methods and concerns about its impact on his philosophical reputation. He aims to shift his focus to "Don't Die," a new belief system centered on radical life extension, blending science, ethics, and spirituality. Bryan Johnson, tech entrepreneur and founder of Blueprint, plans to shut down or sell his anti-aging startup focused on personalized longevity supplements and radical life extension. Photo credit X : Spencer A. Klavan Bryan Johnson, a multimillionaire tech entrepreneur, is known for his anti-aging project called Project Blueprint, which he follows himself. He started a company called Blueprint that sells health supplements, including a Rs 4,700 'longevity mix' and mushroom-based coffee alternatives. Bryan spends about $2 million every year on his personal anti-aging regimen, which includes strict diets, tracking his body stats, and even plasma transfusions. Recently, Bryan told Wired that he is thinking about either shutting down or selling his startup because it has become a 'pain-in-the-a** company' and he does not need the money, as per the report by TOI. ALSO READ: Texas lake hits 100% capacity after 15 years — officials urge caution amid flooding fearsThe main problem, Bryan says, is that it is very hard to make his complex and personalized anti-aging methods available and affordable to everyone. He also feels that running the business has hurt his reputation in the philosophy and ethics world, which he values a explained, 'People see the business and give me less credibility on the philosophy side. I will not make that trade-off.' Now, his main focus is shifting to a new idea he calls 'Don't Die', a belief system combining science, ethics, and spirituality aimed at radical life extension, as stated in the reports. ALSO READ: Shots fired near University of Florida campus; barricaded suspect contained, no victims reported Earlier this year, it was reported that Blueprint was losing about $1 million every month, missing its break-even point. Bryan later clarified, 'We are break even, and I have said that publicly many times. We have had profitable months. We have had months of loss', according to the report by TOI. Q1. Why is Bryan Johnson planning to shut down his anti-aging startup? Bryan Johnson wants to shut down or sell his startup because it is hard to scale and it hurt his reputation in philosophy, says Wired. Q2. What is Bryan Johnson's new focus after Blueprint? Bryan Johnson is now focusing on 'Don't Die,' a belief system blending science, ethics, and spirituality for radical life extension.
