Are Investors Undervaluing Galliford Try Holdings plc (LON:GFRD) By 40%?
Galliford Try Holdings' estimated fair value is UK£6.96 based on 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity
Current share price of UK£4.16 suggests Galliford Try Holdings is potentially 40% undervalued
Our fair value estimate is 46% higher than Galliford Try Holdings' analyst price target of UK£4.76
Does the May share price for Galliford Try Holdings plc (LON:GFRD) reflect what it's really worth? Today, we will estimate the stock's intrinsic value by taking the expected future cash flows and discounting them to their present value. The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model is the tool we will apply to do this. There's really not all that much to it, even though it might appear quite complex.
Remember though, that there are many ways to estimate a company's value, and a DCF is just one method. Anyone interested in learning a bit more about intrinsic value should have a read of the Simply Wall St analysis model.
Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit.
We use what is known as a 2-stage model, which simply means we have two different periods of growth rates for the company's cash flows. Generally the first stage is higher growth, and the second stage is a lower growth phase. To begin with, we have to get estimates of the next ten years of cash flows. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren't available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years.
Generally we assume that a dollar today is more valuable than a dollar in the future, so we need to discount the sum of these future cash flows to arrive at a present value estimate:
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
Levered FCF (£, Millions)
UK£33.4m
UK£38.1m
UK£40.2m
UK£41.3m
UK£42.4m
UK£43.4m
UK£44.5m
UK£45.7m
UK£46.8m
UK£48.0m
Growth Rate Estimate Source
Analyst x5
Analyst x5
Analyst x5
Est @ 2.59%
Est @ 2.57%
Est @ 2.56%
Est @ 2.56%
Est @ 2.55%
Est @ 2.55%
Est @ 2.55%
Present Value (£, Millions) Discounted @ 8.1%
UK£30.9
UK£32.6
UK£31.8
UK£30.2
UK£28.6
UK£27.2
UK£25.8
UK£24.4
UK£23.2
UK£22.0
("Est" = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St)Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = UK£277m
We now need to calculate the Terminal Value, which accounts for all the future cash flows after this ten year period. For a number of reasons a very conservative growth rate is used that cannot exceed that of a country's GDP growth. In this case we have used the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield (2.5%) to estimate future growth. In the same way as with the 10-year 'growth' period, we discount future cash flows to today's value, using a cost of equity of 8.1%.
Terminal Value (TV)= FCF2034 × (1 + g) ÷ (r – g) = UK£48m× (1 + 2.5%) ÷ (8.1%– 2.5%) = UK£881m
Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= UK£881m÷ ( 1 + 8.1%)10= UK£403m
The total value is the sum of cash flows for the next ten years plus the discounted terminal value, which results in the Total Equity Value, which in this case is UK£680m. The last step is to then divide the equity value by the number of shares outstanding. Relative to the current share price of UK£4.2, the company appears quite undervalued at a 40% discount to where the stock price trades currently. Remember though, that this is just an approximate valuation, and like any complex formula - garbage in, garbage out.
We would point out that the most important inputs to a discounted cash flow are the discount rate and of course the actual cash flows. You don't have to agree with these inputs, I recommend redoing the calculations yourself and playing with them. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company's future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company's potential performance. Given that we are looking at Galliford Try Holdings as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we've used 8.1%, which is based on a levered beta of 1.090. Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business.
Check out our latest analysis for Galliford Try Holdings
Strength
Earnings growth over the past year exceeded the industry.
Currently debt free.
Dividends are covered by earnings and cash flows.
Weakness
Dividend is low compared to the top 25% of dividend payers in the Construction market.
Opportunity
Trading below our estimate of fair value by more than 20%.
Threat
Annual earnings are forecast to decline for the next 3 years.
Whilst important, the DCF calculation ideally won't be the sole piece of analysis you scrutinize for a company. DCF models are not the be-all and end-all of investment valuation. Preferably you'd apply different cases and assumptions and see how they would impact the company's valuation. For example, changes in the company's cost of equity or the risk free rate can significantly impact the valuation. What is the reason for the share price sitting below the intrinsic value? For Galliford Try Holdings, we've put together three relevant items you should further examine:
Risks: You should be aware of the 2 warning signs for Galliford Try Holdings (1 is a bit unpleasant!) we've uncovered before considering an investment in the company.
Future Earnings: How does GFRD's growth rate compare to its peers and the wider market? Dig deeper into the analyst consensus number for the upcoming years by interacting with our free analyst growth expectation chart.
Other Solid Businesses: Low debt, high returns on equity and good past performance are fundamental to a strong business. Why not explore our interactive list of stocks with solid business fundamentals to see if there are other companies you may not have considered!
PS. The Simply Wall St app conducts a discounted cash flow valuation for every stock on the LSE every day. If you want to find the calculation for other stocks just search here.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Airbus CEO on Demand, Tariffs Impact, European Defense
Airbus Chief Executive Officer Guillaume Faury discusses the impact of geopolitical and trade uncertainties on the aviation industry. He also talks about deliveries, supply chain and demand for air travel, as well as Europe's increased push for spending in the defense sector. He speaks to Bloomberg's Guy Johnson from the Paris Air Show. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Barcelona open to selling defensive stalwart if strong bid arrives
According to journalist Achraf Ben Ayad, Ronald Araujo's future at Barcelona is far from guaranteed. He mentions that the Uruguayan centre-back, considered one of the club's most valuable assets, may be sacrificed this summer if the right offer arrives. Advertisement Barcelona's financial difficulties are well documented, and with the club needing to generate around €50 million before making new signings, Araujo represents a tempting option for an essential cash injection. Although the club and player publicly continue to show mutual commitment, the details behind the scenes paint a different picture. A clause in Araujo's contract, coming into effect on July 1, will lower his €1 billion release clause to just €65 million for a ten-day period. That limited-time opportunity creates a potential storm of interest from top European clubs looking to pounce on a defender of his calibre at what would be considered a bargain in today's market. It is no accident Ronald Araujo could leave Barcelona. (Photo by) Advertisement The drop in the buyout clause was likely not inserted by accident. It reflects a clear strategy by either the player's camp, the club, or both to leave the door open for a possible departure without causing public tension. If Barcelona were fully determined to keep Araujo, such a clause simply would not exist in the first place. And from Araujo's side, if he were 100% committed to continuing, he could have negotiated differently. Defense will be trimmed With Barcelona already overloaded at centre-back, the club may see this as the right moment to part with one of its stars for the greater financial good. Advertisement Hansi Flick already has options like Pau Cubarsi, Eric Garcia, Andreas Christensen, and Inigo Martinez in the squad. That makes Araujo a luxury Barcelona might not be able to afford, especially given his strong market value. The next few weeks, especially between July 1–10, will be decisive. Multiple clubs are expected to circle, and while Araujo will have no shortage of suitors, Barcelona's willingness to listen suggests that everything is on the table.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Trump administration is offering 3 different scenarios for how 'Liberation Day 2.0' may play out
A key deadline in President Trump's trade war is getting closer, with a 90-day pause on his "Liberation Day" tariffs set to expire on July 9. But what will actually happen when the clock strikes midnight on what some are calling "Liberation Day 2.0" is anyone's guess. A series of comments from Trump and his officials this week — even within a 12-hour span on Wednesday — were notable for the variety of scenarios they have on the table. It could be a nonevent with additional deadline extensions in the offing. It might be a day of celebration of long-promised trade deals that have yet to materialize. And it could also be a day when the hammer comes down and tariffs are simply dictated. Trump himself has indicated he is open to all three, telling reporters Wednesday evening that he will be sending letters to tell nations, "This is the deal, you can take it or leave it," but also acknowledging that some deadlines could be extended, and on other fronts, "We're rocking in terms of deals." The scenarios laid out this week by the president, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick aren't necessarily mutually exclusive, but which countries get which outcome will be closely watched by investors, as some outcomes are decidedly more market-friendly than others. As for what will actually happen, Henrietta Treyz of Veda Partners offered a prediction in a Thursday morning note to Yahoo Finance suggesting a combination of all three. "I think this is going to be like a potluck: There's going to be a little bit of everything," she said. On the menu for about 130 nations will be letters, she suggested, "and I'm optimistic their rate will be in the 10-25% range." Other nations may be able to secure limited deals — such as a recent pact with the UK — but with plenty of tariffs staying on or being added. Others may get an extension for now. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet The uncertainty facing markets revolves around which scenario takes center stage in the coming weeks. The divergences were in stark relief Wednesday as the day unfolded. In the morning, during a CNBC appearance, Lutnick suggested the centerpiece would be a flood of new deals. He said that with China tensions on the back burner for the moment, negotiators will able to find areas of agreement on other fronts. "You're going to see deal after deal," he said. "This is going to start coming next week and the week after and the week after." But observers have grown increasingly unmoved by these promises after the administration has been suggesting imminent deals for months now, with only a limited pact with the UK materializing so far. By midday, Bessent was testifying before Congress and offered a somewhat different portrait of the weeks ahead. He indirectly acknowledged the slower pace of deals and said Trump is "highly likely" to push back his deadline for at least some top trading partners. He said the administration is prepared to "roll the date forward" for the 18 major partners that are negotiating in what the administration views as good faith. "If someone is not negotiating, then we will not," Bessent added. During his testimony, the Treasury secretary also floated the notion of regional trade deals, where a group of countries may get similar terms. By the evening, Trump offered a third focus, announcing that he is going to send letters to trading partners in the next one to two weeks to simply set new unilateral tariff rates. The letters are "telling them what the deal is," Trump told reporters Wednesday during a stop at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C. But the president's comments also offered a mix of his aides' other messages from the day. The president said he would be willing to extend the deadline for certain nations, "but I don't think we're going to have that necessity." He also suggested that deals could be imminent on at least a few fronts, noting that "we're dealing with Japan, we're dealing with South Korea. We're dealing with a lot of them." Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio