US to ease human rights criticism of El Salvador, Israel and Russia, Washington Post says
Kanishka Singh
and
Costas Pitas
, Reuters
Under Trump, the administration has increasingly moved away from the traditional promotion of democracy and human rights, largely seeing it as interference in another country's affairs.
Photo:
AFP / Pool / Christopher Furlong
The Trump administration plans to scale back criticism of El Salvador, Israel and Russia over human rights, the Washington Post reports, citing drafts of the State Department's annual human rights report.
The draft reports related to those countries were significantly shorter than the ones prepared by the administration of Democratic former President Joe Biden, who left office in January, following Republican Donald Trump's November 2024 election win.
The State Department, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment, has not yet officially released this year's report, which covers last year's incidents.
A senior State Department official in a briefing with reporters declined to provide specific details about the contents of the report but said it had been restructured in a way that "removes redundancies, increases report readability".
The United States has traditionally viewed the promotion of human rights and democracy as well as press freedom as core foreign policy objectives, although critics have repeatedly pointed out the double standard Washington has had towards its allies.
Under Trump, the administration has increasingly moved away from the traditional promotion of democracy and human rights, largely seeing it as interference in another country's affairs.
Instead, Trump officials have interfered in other ways, repeatedly weighing in on European politics to denounce what they see as suppression of right-wing leaders, including in Romania, Germany and France, and accusing European authorities of censoring views such as criticism of immigration.
On El Salvador, the draft State Department report states that it had "no credible reports of significant human rights abuses" in 2024, the Post said.
The previous report published under the Biden administration said there were "significant human rights issues" there including credible reports of "degrading treatment or punishment by security forces" and "harsh and life-threatening prison conditions."
The Trump administration has deported people to El Salvador with help from the government of President Nayib Bukele, whose country is receiving US$6 million from the US to house the migrants in a high-security mega-prison.
The draft report makes no mention of corruption or threats to the independence of Israel's judiciary, the Post reported. The previous report mentioned isolated reports of government corruption and cited the criminal case of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been indicted on charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust - all of which he denies.
Previous references to Israeli surveillance of Palestinians and restrictions of their movements were also not addressed in the draft report, the newspaper said.
The final report on Russia issued under the Biden State Department made several references to violence and harassment faced by LGBTQI+ people in Russia.
The Washington Post said the draft report removed all references to LGBTQ+ individuals or crimes against them, and descriptions of government abuses that remained had been softened.
The embassies of El Salvador, Israel and Russia in Washington did not immediately respond to separate emailed requests for comment.
The Trump administration has moved to reshape the State Department's human rights bureau, which it said had become a platform for "left-wing activists to wage vendettas against 'anti-woke' leaders".
Usually, the annual report is released around March or April each year but has been delayed this year. The State Department official said the report would be released "in the very near future."
"The report is not meant to be every single human rights abuse that's happened in every single country. It's meant to be illustrative and a broad picture of what the conditions of human rights are on the ground in each country," the official said.
-
AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
31 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Diplomats who have been in the room give their insight on who might prevail in Alaska
The Telegraph has spoken to a host of former officials and diplomats who have first-hand experience dealing with both the Russian and American presidents. Trump characterised his goals for the high-stakes meeting as an opportunity to stare into his Russian counterpart's eyes to judge his plan to end the war in Ukraine. 'I'm going to see what he has in mind,' the US President told reporters. 'I may leave and say good luck, and that'll be the end,' he added. 'Probably in the first two minutes I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can get done.' If he is prepared to walk away at the slightest demonstration that Putin isn't ready to end the war – Zelenskyy says Russia is gearing up for more conflict – then what does Trump want? It has long been thought that he is desperate for a Nobel Peace Prize and has a particular grudge against President Barack Obama for being decorated only eight months into his first term. The Norwegian Nobel Committee cited Obama's 'extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples', which seemed to be more about Obama's promise as an international leader than his actual accomplishments. Trump is the self-styled 'president of peace'. 'As president, he has brokered peace between Azerbaijan and Armenia, Cambodia and Thailand, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Egypt and Ethiopia, Serbia and Kosovo, and with the Abraham Accords,' the White House said. 'Trump and certainly [JD] Vance, they don't care about the future of Ukraine particularly,' Anthony Gardener, who served as Obama's US Ambassador to the EU, said. 'I'm convinced Trump does want to position himself as the person who, quote, unquote, brought a sort of form of peace to get a Nobel Peace Prize,' Gardener added. Ending the bloodshed in Ukraine could do that. Others say he's looking for yet another deal to sell as a demonstration of business acumen. There are significant rare earth mineral deposits in eastern Ukraine. That territory is on the table, and Trump has already made a play for it by signing an agreement with Zelenskyy to be able to mine it. 'Trump wants to bag a win … period,' Gardener said. In his office in the Kremlin, where Putin will be preparing for his meeting with Trump, sits a bust of Catherine the Great. The significance of the monument should not be lost. As Russia's longest-serving female monarch, Catherine dragged the country into the 18th century and during her reign, doubled the size of its empire. David Liddington, a former deputy prime minister, said Putin also compares himself to Peter the Great, 'somebody who is going to restore Russia's greatness and grow Russia's territory, at least its effective empire'. And Putin is likely to double down on his positions, in an attempt to at least cement his control over the Ukrainian territory already seized by his invasion forces. He will leave little of the planning up to his aides, who are mostly believed to be yes men there for affirmation rather than assistance. 'President Putin is secretive, well-scripted and always eager to press an argument that reaffirms his positions rather than his willingness to settle. He reflects the attitudes of someone who's familiar with power play, intelligence and security considerations, not the transactional, commercial kind of negotiation playbook,' Margaritis Schinas, a former European Commission vice-president, said. According to Bobby McDonagh, a former Irish ambassador to the UK, Italy and EU, Putin is 'utterly predictable'. 'He will relentlessly and ruthlessly pursue his very narrowly defined idea of Russian interests,' McDonagh added. Those who have been in the room before say the Russian President will likely try to corner his American counterpart by demanding that the structure of their meeting plays out in a specific fashion. 'He prefers meetings structured in two parts: first, with delegations and interpreters that mainly serve as an audience to listen to his position on a particular subject, usually peppered with aggressive comments on those who think otherwise; then, a more closed – usually tete a tete – discussion of principals where he may show some margin of openness,' Schinas said. It is in the latter section of the meeting in which Putin will try to hammer home any wriggle room he has made for himself. 'Putin will keep his eye on the strategic prize. He will look for opportunities to lessen the economic pressure on Russia and the Russian economy,' Liddington said. The UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office estimates that sanctions on Russia have deprived the Russian state of at least £333 billion ($755b) in war funds between February 2022 and June 2025. Any easing would give Putin a significant win. John Bolton, Trump's former national security adviser, told the Telegraph that Putin will use his KGB skills to manipulate the US President. 'That's one reason why Putin really did not want Zelenskyy or the Europeans there. He doesn't want Trump to be distracted with all these other players,' Bolton said. 'Putin will try to get Trump back into feeling that they're friends again. I think Trump has been disappointed that his friend, over the first six months of the Administration, has not helped him reach this deal.' According to Bolton, Putin has 'manipulated Trump on Ukraine really right from the beginning of the Administration, but back before the disaster with Zelenskyy in the Oval Office'. The Russian President is 'going to try and get Trump back on side', Bolton said, adding: 'He's got to work fast'. 'The outcome will depend entirely on whether Trump resists Putin's known and entirely unacceptable demands,' McDonagh added. He was referring to a stripped-back Ukrainian Army, no prospect of them joining Nato, and the recognition of Russian sovereignty over the Ukrainian regions of Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson. The US President is much happier to consult with advisers on his positions in the meeting, but those don't bode well for Ukraine. Tulsi Gabbard, his intelligence chief, is known to not care much for Kyiv. Vance and Pete Hegseth, the Defence Secretary, have vocalised the need for Ukraine to surrender territory. 'He likes to be surrounded by his team and advisers, allowing them space for contributions, but under no circumstances margin for decision,' Schinas said. This means the US President is unlikely to listen to the European leaders, including Keir Starmer, who were to hold talks with him overnight. There is one hope among the European and Ukrainian onlookers ahead of the summit. Is Trump prepared to let himself be embarrassed at the hands of Putin? Will he attempt to emulate Ronald Reagan, the former US president credited for the invention of 'Make America Great Again'? Sir Julian King, Britain's last-ever European Commissioner, said: 'You can get unexpected outcomes'. 'Reagan at Reykjavik blindsided his allies,' he said, referring to the 1986 summit between the US president and Mikhail Gorbachev which ushered in the end of the Cold War. 'But as they meet for the first time in years, with Putin's maximalist negotiating and Trump's unpredictability, anything could happen. 'The one potential saving grace, Trump won't want to come out looking like a chump,' he concluded.
NZ Herald
31 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Swing voters want more focus on the economy, less on identity issues
Five years ago, Raymond Teachey voted, as usual, for the Democratic presidential nominee. But by last fall, Teachey, an aircraft mechanic from Bucks County, Pennsylvania, was rethinking his political allegiances. To him, the Democratic Party seemed increasingly focused on issues of identity at the expense of more tangible day-to-day concerns, such as public safety or the economy. 'Some of them turned their back on their base,' Teachey, 54, said. Raymond Teachey, an aircraft mechanic who said that he skipped the 2024 presidential election after supporting Joe Biden in 2020, at a park in Bristol, Pennsylvania. Photo / Hannah Yoon, The New York Times Working-class voters like Teachey, who supported Biden in 2020 but either backed Trump last year or, as Teachey did, skipped the 2024 presidential election, help explain why Democrats lost pivotal swing counties like Bucks and vividly illustrate how the traditional Democratic coalition has eroded in the Trump era. Now, Democrats hope to bring these voters back into the fold for the midterm elections in 2026, betting on a backlash to Trump and his party's far-reaching moves to slash the social safety net. But in interviews with nearly 30 predominantly working-class voters who supported Biden in 2020 before defecting or struggling deeply with their choices last year, many had a stinging message for the Democratic Party. Just because we have misgivings about Trump, they say, it doesn't mean we like you. 'I think I'm done with the Democrats,' said Desmond Smith, 24, a deli worker from Smithdale, Mississippi, and a black man who said he backed Biden in 2020 at the height of the racial justice protests. Last year, disillusioned by what he saw as the party's over-emphasis on identity politics and concerned about illegal immigration, he voted for Trump. Asked how Democrats could win him back, he said: 'Fight for Americans instead of fighting for everybody else'. An in-depth post-election study from the Pew Research Centre suggests that about 5% of Biden's voters in 2020 switched to Trump in 2024, while roughly 15% of those voters stayed home last year. Trump retained more of his 2020 voters than Democrats did, a crucial factor in winning the election. Polling on the current attitudes of those Biden defectors is limited, but it is clear the Democratic brand, broadly, continues to struggle. A Wall Street Journal poll released in late July found that the party's image was at its lowest point in more than three decades, with just 33% of voters saying they held a favourable view of Democrats. 'They're doing nothing to move their own numbers because they don't have an economic message,' said John Anzalone, a veteran Democratic pollster who worked on that survey. 'They think that this is about Trump's numbers getting worse,' he added. 'They need to worry about their numbers.' Certainly, anger with Trump, an energised Democratic base and the headwinds a president's party typically confronts in Midterm elections could help propel Democrats to victory next year. Democrats have had some recruitment success (and luck), and they see growing openings to argue that Trump's domestic agenda helps the wealthy at the expense of the working class, a message they are already beginning to push in advertising. There is no top-of-the-ticket national Democrat to defend or avoid, while Republicans have virtually no room to distance themselves from Trump's least popular ideas. But interviews with the voters whom Democrats are most desperate to reclaim also suggest that the party's challenges could extend well beyond next year's races. Here are five takeaways from those conversations. Biden's disastrous re-election bid fuelled a trust issue. It hasn't gone away. Bielski, 35, an executive chef at a private club, said he had typically voted for Democrats until last year's presidential election, when he backed Trump. Democratic leaders had insisted that the plainly frail Biden was vigorous enough to run, and they had encouraged sceptical voters to fall in line. Instantly after he dropped out, they urged Democrats to unite behind the candidacy of Kamala Harris, who was then the vice-president. That did not sit right with Bielski, who said he was already distrustful of Democrats who had pushed pandemic-era lockdowns. Harris, he said, 'wasn't someone that I got to vote for in a primary'. 'It almost seemed wrong,' continued Bielski, who lives in Phoenix. 'It was kind of like, okay, the same people that were just running the country are now telling us that this is the person that we should vote for.' After Harris became the Democratic nominee, some voters interpreted her meandering answers in televised interviews as an unwillingness to be straight with them. By contrast, while Trump gave outlandish and rambling public remarks riddled with conspiracy theories and lies, some said they had got the general sense that he wanted to tackle the cost of living and curb illegal immigration. 'It was difficult to understand what her point of view was,' said Bruce Gamble, 67, a retired substation maintainer for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. Gamble said he voted for Biden in 2020 and Trump last year. Trump 'was able to communicate better to me', he added, while Harris 'felt like she was talking over my head, so I didn't quite trust her'. Worried about paying the bills, they saw Democrats as too focused on cultural issues. Many in this multiracial group of voters said they thought Democrats had gone too far in promoting transgender rights or in emphasising matters of racial identity. But often, they were more bothered by their perception that those discussions had come at the expense of addressing economic anxieties. 'It seemed like they were more concerned with DEI and LGBTQ issues and really just things that didn't pertain to me or concern me at all,' said Kendall Wood, 32, a truck driver from Henrico County, Virginia. He said he voted for Trump last year after backing Biden in 2020. 'They weren't concerned with, really, kitchen-table issues.' A poll from the New York Times and Ipsos conducted this year found that many Americans did not believe that the Democratic Party was focused on the economic issues that mattered most to them. 'Maybe talk about real-world problems,' said Maya Garcia, 23, a restaurant server from the San Fernando Valley in California. She said she voted for Biden in 2020 and did not vote for president last year. Democrats talk 'a lot about us emotionally, but what are we going to do financially?' She added, 'I understand that you want, you know, equal rights and things like that. But I feel like we need to talk more about the economics.' But in a warning sign for Republicans, a recent CNN poll found that a growing share of Americans — 63% — felt as if Trump had not paid enough attention to the country's most important problems. Sarah Smarty, a home health aide and an author who voted for Joe Biden in 2020 but flipped to President Donald Trump last year, drives through Mifflin County, near McClure, Pennsylvania. Photo / Hannah Yoon, The New York Times 'America First' gained new resonance amid wars abroad. As wars raged in the Middle East and Ukraine, some working-class voters thought the Biden Administration cared more about events abroad than about the problems in their communities. 'They were funding in other countries, while we do not have the money to fund ourselves,' said Smarty, 33, a home health aide and an author. She said she voted for Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2024, adding that she viewed Trump as a man of action. 'I would really like to see more jobs,' she said. 'I would like to see them take good care of people who are homeless in our area.' Bielski said that against the backdrop of overseas turmoil, Trump's 'America First' message resonated. But these days, he does not think Trump is living up to that mantra. 'We're getting into more stuff abroad and not really focusing on economics here,' he said. 'It doesn't seem like he's holding true to anything that he's promised.' Flores, 22, a technician at a car dealership, said the foreign policy emphasis — and a sense that life was tough regardless of the party in power — helped explain why he skipped last year's election as well as the 2020 presidential race. 'No matter how many times have we gone red, or even blue, the blue-collar workers' have seen little progress, Flores said. Marlon Flores, a technician at a car dealership who said that regardless of the party in power, blue-collar workers have seen little progress, at his apartment complex in Houston. Photo / Desiree Rios, The New York Times They worry about illegal immigration. But some think Trump's crackdowns are going too far. These voters often said they agreed with Trump on the need to stem the flow of illegal immigration and strengthen border security. But some worried about the Administration's crackdown, which has resulted in sweeping raids, children being separated from their parents, the deportation of American citizens and a growing sense of fear in immigrant communities. Several people interviewed said they knew people who had been personally affected. Smarty, for instance, said her friend's husband, who had lived in the US for 25 years, had suddenly been deported to Mexico. Her friend is 'going through some health problems, and they have kids, and that's really hard on their family', Smarty said. 'I don't really feel that's exactly right.' They're not done with every Democrat. But they're tired of the old guard. Many of the voters interviewed said they remained open to supporting Democrats — or at least the younger ones. 'Stop being friggin' old,' said Cinnamon Boffa, 57, from Langhorne, Pennsylvania. As she recalled, she supported Biden in 2020 but voted only down-ballot last year, lamenting that 'our choices suck'. Teachey thought there was still room for seasoned politicians, but in many cases, it was time to get 'the boomers out of there'. He is increasingly inclined to support Democrats next year to check unfettered Republican power. 'They're totally far-right,' he said of the GOP. 'Honestly, I don't identify with any party.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Katie Glueck Photographs by: Adriana Zehbrauskas, Hannah Yoon, Desiree Rios ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
'Very severe consequences' for Russia if no end to Ukraine war at Alaska summit
Donald Trump, left, and Vladimir Putin are set for a summit in Alaska. Photo: AFP US President Donald Trump promised "very severe consequences" on Russia if its President Vladimir Putin doesn't agree to end his war in Ukraine during the two leaders' meeting on Friday. "There will be consequences," Trump just said during an event at the Kennedy Centre in Washington. Asked if that meant new sanctions or tariffs, Trump demurred. "I don't have to say," he said, adding only: "There will be very severe consequences." Some background : Trump had previously threatened new sanctions on Moscow as punishment for the Ukraine war, setting last Friday as a deadline to impose them unless Putin came to the negotiating table. That deadline came and went without new sanctions, which could have limited effect given low levels of trade between the US and Russia. Trump has also threatened secondary sanctions on countries that purchase Russian energy. While he imposed new levies on India , the number-two purchaser of Russian oil, he stopped short of slapping the new duties on India's largest customer, China. Meanwhile, Trump told European leaders at a virtual meeting on Thursday that territorial issues related to Ukraine cannot and will not be negotiated by anyone but Ukraine's president, according to French President Emmanuel Macron. Speaking to journalists after the meeting with Trump, Macron said that "several messages came out of the exchange." French President Emmanuel Macron Photo: Pool / Ludovic Marin / AFP The first message was that Trump was "very clear" about the fact that Washington wanted to obtain a ceasefire during the US leader's upcoming meeting with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, in Alaska. "It's very important that a ceasefire is obtained during this meeting in America and we support this initiative alongside a new prisoner exchange and the liberation of (Ukrainian) children," Macron said. The second element - which was "very clearly expressed" by Trump - was "that the territorial issue relating to Ukraine cannot and will not be negotiated by anyone but the Ukrainian president", he continued. The French leader's comments came after Trump indicated last week that a ceasefire deal could include "some swapping of territories," an idea rejected by both Russia and Ukraine. According to US officials, Putin has offered to halt the war in Ukraine in exchange for significant territorial concessions by Kyiv, including the entire eastern Donbas region. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has vowed not to give Donbas to Russia, saying that doing so would open the door for Putin to "start a third war" in Ukraine. -CNN
