Idaho now has a powerful mini-legislature within its official Legislature
Idahoans can breathe a sigh of relief now that the Legislature has folded its tent and gone home.
The bright side of this year's session is that it could have been worse. The session lasted two weeks longer than expected, costing taxpayers about $20,000-$30,000 per day.
The main reason for the delay was the inability of the Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee (JFAC) to finalize budgets for state programs. JFAC set many budgets even before it knew how much revenue would be available, and it then squandered time figuring out how to operate without defined procedural rules.
Without a guiding script, Idaho Legislature's budget committee strays from voting procedures
Adding to the delay was JFAC's decision to ignore the constitutional order of setting budgets. Since statehood, general legislation, which establishes state laws, was the job of the entire Legislature. Committees hold hearings, take testimony and produce bills for debate in both houses before sending them to the governor.
JFAC's job has been confined to providing the funding to finance the programs established through that policy-making process. However, in recent years JFAC has had the nerve to set itself up as a mini-legislature within the official Legislature. That is, to fund legislative policies with appropriation bills but also to set its own policies with 'intent language' in the bills.
JFAC co-chair, Rep. Wendy Horman, justified the committee's use of policy-making intent language, claiming it is the committee's job to set 'conditions, limitations and restrictions' on spending. She said, 'it is the job of JFAC to set fiscal policy.'
The Idaho Constitution would disagree. Appropriation bills are to fund the government, not to set state policy.
Several JFAC members have raised legitimate concerns. Sen. Julie VanOrden said the use of intent language to set policy skirts the public vetting process and is 'a real abuse of power.' Sen. Janie Ward-Engelking correctly observed that JFAC is 'a budgeting committee, it's not a policy committee.'
JFAC's constitutionally improper policy-making has created memorable problems in the past.
In the 2022 session, JFAC put intent language in House Bill 764, saying that federal money designed to make up for pandemic-related learning loss was to serve 'school-aged participants ages 5 through 13 years.' When about 80 legitimate schools and child care centers received grants, the extreme-right outrage machine swung into action, claiming fraud and abuse because some kids under 5 might have benefited from the federal money, which federal guidelines allowed. That resulted in a flurry of pointless legal actions and investigations, which ended up costing the state way more than the miniscule amount that may have been incidentally spent on kids under 5.
In 2024, JFAC put intent language in House Bill 770, the funding bill for the Department of Transportation, that killed a favorable sale of the bedraggled transportation department building on State Street in Boise. The restriction resulted in litigation and will end up costing the state millions trying to renovate an outdated building that will be an unusable money pit.
This year, JFAC has picked up the pace of its unlawful policy-making. In House Bill 459, the Department of Labor appropriation bill, the mini-legislature required the preparation of several reports, including one requiring 'an analysis of the impact of illegal immigration on the state's labor market and the potential costs and benefits of using E-Verify.'
This should be done through legislative action, not in the funding process.
Senate Bill 1209 calls for several legislative items. Among other things, Section 4 requires Idaho State University to lead any negotiations toward acquisition of the Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine. Section 6 requires the State Board of Education to develop a new outcomes-based funding model for Idaho's colleges and universities. Section 7 requires audits of state institutions of higher learning for compliance with Idaho's ill-defined diversity, equity and inclusion laws. In essence, the DEI laws prohibit many of the virtues that Jesus taught in the New Testament.
Senate Bill 1196, requires the Idaho Commission for Libraries to report on compliance by state and school libraries with Idaho book ban laws. There are a number of other similar policy-making bills the JFAC mini-legislature churned out this session, but the list is too lengthy to lay out here.
It is high time for JFAC leadership to establish procedural rules to expedite the funding of programs enacted through the established legislative process. More important, however, is that the committee get back into its proper lane of setting budgets, rather than establishing state policy.
If not, it may be necessary for those affected by its improper policy-making to institute court proceedings to get JFAC to comply with its limited duty of funding programs enacted by the official Legislature.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
9 hours ago
- Politico
Redistricting experts to Sacramento: You can go it alone
DRIVING THE DAY: Former Vice President Kamala Harris announced today she won't run to succeed Gov. Gavin Newsom, ending months of speculation about her 2026 plans, our Melanie Mason reports. Harris' decision leaves her open to pursue the presidency again in 2028. It also galvanizes the long-frozen campaigns of California gubernatorial candidates, whose race is now wide open. 'For now, my leadership — and public service — will not be in elected office,' Harris said in a statement. 'I look forward to getting back out and listening to the American people, helping elect Democrats across the nation who will fight fearlessly, and sharing more details in the months ahead about my own plans.' Newsom, another possible 2028 presidential contender, shared an X post saying Harris has 'courageously served our state and country for her entire career.' 'Grateful for her service and friendship — and looking forward to continuing the fight in whatever the future might hold for her,' the governor said. GERRYMANDERING 101: Call it the Fleetwood Mac option: California lawmakers could go their own way on a Democratic gerrymandering bid. Redistricting experts have been briefing elections committee staff in the Legislature on a redraw strategy that would enlarge Democrats' House margin without voter approval, Playbook has learned. That would avert an expensive and uncertain special election — saving Newsom and allies money for other ballot battles — but it would push Democratic lawmakers into uncharted legal terrain. Voters bequeathed California its independent House redistricting commission in 2010, and because only voters can substantially amend ballot initiatives once they've passed, they may need to sign off on Newsom's plan to redraw a few California House Republicans into oblivion. Or they may not. Newsom has argued there's another option: simply having the Legislature craft new maps. He's noted that California's constitution is silent on mid-decade redistricting (as opposed to the once-a-decade commission process linked to the Census). Now UCLA Voting Rights Project experts are bolstering that argument to the Legislature. Their legal analysis, shared exclusively with POLITICO after it was presented to legislative staffers this week, argues the Legislature 'has the legal constitutional authority to draw new districts today' if it deems it 'appropriate' — as Newsom and other Democrats have argued. None of this means the Legislature will decide to circumvent voters. Attorney General Rob Bonta suggested yesterday that the cleanest route would be lawmakers putting a new map on the ballot. That would give Democrats political cover and help inoculate them from the legal challenge that would inevitably follow if the Legislature simply goes it alone — a path that could end in an embarrassing court rebuke. On the other hand, going to voters could end in an embarrassing (and costly) political rejection. Assuming Texas presses ahead with its gerrymander and California responds in kind, would Democrats roll their dice on a legal theory or take their chances with voters? Stay tuned. IT'S WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON. This is California Playbook PM, a POLITICO newsletter that serves as an afternoon temperature check on California politics and a look at what our policy reporters are watching. Got tips or suggestions? Shoot an email to lholden@ WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY HOUSING HICCUP: Newsom's office confirmed today that he's expecting to roll back a state housing law for areas damaged by the January wildfires that tore through Los Angeles County, potentially blocking developers from using the law to increase density in single-family neighborhoods. The move comes after Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and other city leaders have implored Newsom to block denser development, warning it could complicate fire evacuations and strain local infrastructure in the ravaged Pacific Palisades neighborhood. Conservative media influencers have seized on residents' fears that more duplexes could add to traffic snarls. 'I can confirm the governor will issue an executive order today providing local governments in high severity burn areas with discretion to limit SB 9 development,' said Tara Gallegos, a spokesperson for Newsom, in a statement. 'Stay tuned.' The law in question, SB 9, was passed in 2021 as part of an effort to ease the state's housing shortage by requiring cities to allow duplexes or lot splits on land zoned for single-family homes. Under Newsom's order, those projects could be temporarily halted in parts of LA, Altadena and Malibu, where thousands of homes were destroyed. — Dustin Gardiner IN OTHER NEWS JUSTICE POLITICS: California Sens. Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff condemned the Trump administration's back-door move to give Bill Essayli 210 more days as acting U.S. attorney for the Central District of California just as his interim appointment was set to expire. The administration has used the same maneuver — prolonging the tenure of his picks through acting U.S. attorney appointments — in New York, New Jersey and Nevada. 'The Trump Administration is again hijacking the U.S. Attorney appointment process in order to keep Bill Essayli in power without Senate confirmation votes,' Padilla and Schiff said in a joint statement today. 'One look at Essayli's record shows you why President Trump is worried about formally nominating him and instead, is choosing to circumvent the law and the Senate's power of advice and consent.' The Los Angeles Times reported last week that Essayli has struggled to secure indictments against people who were arrested during demonstrations prompted by ICE raids across Los Angeles County. Though Essayli has not been formally nominated by the president, it's not a stretch to say that Padilla and Schiff would likely oppose the firebrand Republican's nomination through a 'blue slip.' The Senate Judiciary Committee tradition dating back to 1917, which defers to home-state senators on such matters, would likely prevent Essayli's nomination from even being considered. On Tuesday, however, Trump pushed the committee's chair — Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) — to essentially ignore any such objections and allow his nominations to be considered. 'He should do this, IMMEDIATELY, and not let the Democrats laugh at him and the Republican Party for being weak and ineffective,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'The Democrats have broken this ridiculous custom on us, it's time that we break it on them.' Grassley later said he was 'offended' by the president's comments. — Nicole Norman WAVE WATCH: Coastal California escaped mostly unscathed from tsunami threats after a large earthquake off the Russian coast on Tuesday night spurred warnings and advisories. The National Weather Service this morning lifted its advisory for the Los Angeles coast, although Bass said city departments will be monitoring the situation throughout the day as dangerous currents persist. The San Francisco Chronicle reported Crescent City on the state's far North Coast was hit the hardest, with waves hitting eight feet early this morning. The tsunami also created an opportunity for the Trump administration to take another dig at Newsom over a natural disaster. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told the Associated Press she had been unable to reach him during the response. A Newsom spokesperson refuted this to the Chronicle, saying the governor had no record of a call or text from the secretary. WHAT WE'RE READING TODAY — Prominent UCSF oncologist and Trump critic Dr. Vinay Prasad resigned from his senior post at the FDA. (San Francisco Chronicle) — A tally of the plans by the more commonly known Silicon Valley startups shows they're spending $4 billion collectively over the next few years as dozens of industrial companies in the region are betting on the advancement of defense manufacturing. (Bloomberg) — Court records show that federal authorities are using information the Los Angeles Police Department sends to national databases to find new targets. (Los Angeles Times) AROUND THE STATE — The San Diego City Council voted to turn an unusable office tower into rent-restricted apartments for low-income families. (San Diego Union-Tribune) — The Sacramento City Council approved a change that will take effect next month banning people from sitting or laying down on the ground outside City Hall. (Sacramento Bee) — compiled by Juliann Ventura
The Hill
9 hours ago
- The Hill
Here are the states to watch in the redistricting arms race
Texas Republicans introduced a proposed set of new House lines on Wednesday, putting the party one step closer to gaining five seats in 2026. The new proposed map is likely to most directly impact lawmakers situated near or in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, Austin, Houston and the southern border, as Republicans look to net five seats in next year's midterms. Texas's decision to redistrict its lines has also started a domino effect, prompting other red and blue states to consider redrawing their own lines in the middle of the decade. The redistricting war will have implications for which party holds the House majority next year. Here are the states to watch in the redistricting battle heading into 2026: Texas President Trump is vying to have Republicans pick up a number of seats in the Lone Star State as Republicans brace for an unfavorable midterm environment. Texas lawmakers are convening for a special session over 18 agenda items, including redistricting. GOP lawmakers introduced a new map on Wednesday that would potentially help give their party more of a cushion next year. The new map would create five new House seats that would have voted for Trump by double digits in last November's election, giving Texas Republicans the opportunity to grow their majority from 25 House members to 30. The new proposed map most immediately impacts Democratic Reps. Marc Veasey in the Dallas-Forth Worth area, Julie Johnson in the Dallas area, Greg Casar and Lloyd Doggett in the Austin area, Al Green near Houston, and Vicente Gonzalez and Henry Cuellar near the southern border. Ohio Ohio lawmakers are required to redraw their House map this year after the 2022 maps failed to receive bipartisan support. The Buckeye State has a congressional delegation of 10 House Republicans and five House Democrats. Two of the most vulnerable Democrats who could see their House districts get even tougher are Reps. Marcy Kaptur and Emilia Sykes in Ohio's 9th and 13th Congressional Districts, respectively. Rep. Greg Landsman (Ohio) is another Democrat who could see his district redrawn more competitively in Ohio's 1st Congressional District. Republicans face a tougher road to making his district more difficult to hold since the state constitution prohibits lawmakers from breaking up Cincinnati. California California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) is weighing several options for how the Golden State might do its own midcycle redistricting in response to Texas's move to redraw its maps. California Democrats could put the issue before voters through a ballot measure. An alternative path would be to work through the state Legislature. Newsom has noted in the past that the state constitution is silent on potential midcycle redistricting, which could offer lawmakers a potential loophole to redraw their maps. Newsom, who met with Texas Democrats on Friday, said any move would be 'predicated on Texas moving forward.' New York New York lawmakers are taking steps toward allowing the state to redistrict midcycle if need be. New York State Assembly member Micah Lasher (D) and state Sen. Mike Gianaris (D) are proposing legislation that would allow the Empire State to redraw House lines in response to another state undergoing midcycle redistricting. New York also uses a redistricting commission to craft its maps, but it's subject to the Legislature's approval. Democrats are contending with a major hurdle. In order for the state constitution to be amended, the effort would need to be passed in two consecutive sessions, after which voters would then weigh in on the ballot measure. That would mean Democrats wouldn't be able to redraw their House maps ahead of 2026. Florida The Florida Supreme Court recently upheld a challenge to the state's current map, which broke up former Rep. Al Lawson's (D-Fla.) district into three that are represented by Republicans. But Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) suggested, despite that win, the state should consider drawing new House maps. 'I think if you look at that Florida Supreme Court analysis, there may be more defects that need to be remedied apart from what we've already done,' DeSantis said last week. 'I also think the way the population has shifted around Florida just since the census was done in 2020, I think the state was malapportioned,' he continued. 'So I do think it would be appropriate to do a redistricting here in the middecade.' Missouri Missouri Republican leaders say they're getting pressure from the Trump White House to undertake midcycle redistricting in their state as Republicans look to offset potential losses in the 2026 midterms and as Democratic states mull redrawing their own lines in response to Texas. Some Republicans have said they support redrawing the lines, while others are reluctant to revisit the issue. New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy (D) said earlier this month when asked about redistricting in New Jersey that it was 'too early to make any definitive statement about it.' But he left the door open to the possibility. 'No news to make, other than I will quote Sean Connery from 'The Untouchables': 'Never bring a knife to a gunfight,'' Murphy said. 'So, if that's the way we're going, we're from Jersey, baby, and we won't be laying down.' Like New York and California, New Jersey also uses a redistricting commission to craft its maps and would likely require a constitutional amendment in order for lawmakers to redraw the maps. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) met with Texas legislators last week and also left the door open to potential midcycle redistricting. Illinois does not use a redistricting commission and only requires its lawmakers to pass its maps through the Legislature — offering an easier pathway with fewer logistical hurdles to do redraw their House lines. 'Everything is on the table,' Pritzker said on Friday. 'We've got to preserve democracy.' Maryland Maryland House Majority Leader David Moon (D) introduced a bill that would allow the state to pursue midcycle redistricting if another state adopts new House lines in the middle of the decade. Maryland operates similar to Illinois in that maps only need to be drawn and approved by state legislators. A spokesperson for Gov. Wes Moore (D) told The New York Times last week that the governor would 'continue to evaluate all options.'
Los Angeles Times
13 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Texas Republicans propose new U.S. House map with more winnable GOP seats
AUSTIN, Texas — Texas Republicans on Wednesday unveiled plans for a new U.S. House map that would deliver on President Trump's goal of creating more winnable GOP seats before the 2026 elections, pushing ahead with a fast and unusual summer redrawing that Democrats have few options to blunt. The new map would create five new Republican-leaning seats that Trump is seeking as his party looks to bolster its chances of maintaining its slim House majority. Republicans hope to pass it during a special 30-day session of the GOP-dominated Legislature called by GOP Gov. Greg Abbott. Most of the changes target Texas' big cities, which are the few strongholds for Democrats in the booming state of more than 30 million residents. Trump had urged Texas to help the GOP, and his team has signaled that efforts could expand to other states, with a similar push underway in Missouri. 'My understanding is that there is a path forward for a Republican to win five more of those seats,' said Republican state Rep. Cody Vasut, chair of the Texas House's redistricting committee, on the new maps. But the effort has spurred a push by Democrats in California and New York to consider redrawing their districts as well to counter the GOP efforts. Democrats in Texas also are considering walking out to prevent the GOP from passing new maps before the special session ends Aug. 19, though Abbott could simply call another one. Republicans hold 25 of the state's 38 seats, and the new map ups the total they could win to 30. Had the same lines been in place in 2024, Trump would have carried each of the 30 districts by at least 10 percentage points, leading to conservative optimism despite what's likely to be a tough midterm environment for the party. Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom said on social media that 'The 2026 election is being rigged.' 'California won't sit back and watch that happen,' he posted on X. Legislators in Texas and and other states have walked out of legislative sessions before, hoping to thwart the other party, with mixed results. In 1979, a dozen liberal Democratic state senators in Texas who became known as the 'Killer Bees' bunked down in a staffer's garage and evaded Texas Rangers for four days, killing a plan to change the date of the state's GOP presidential primary to favor former Gov. John Connally. In 2003, when Texas Republicans also sought to redraw district lines in place for only one congressional election, Democrats fled to Oklahoma and New Mexico but failed to overturn the GOP plan. Republicans had taken full control of the Legislature in the 2002 elections for the first time since the 1870s, and their new congressional map allowed the GOP to pick up six seats in 2004, meaning they held 21 to the Democrats' 11. U.S. Rep. Greg Casar, whose seat would be drawn into a liberal district for Austin and San Antonio with fellow Democratic incumbent Lloyd Doggett, called the proposed changes 'illegal voter suppression,' because his district would be merged with another Democratic-held seat. 'Everyone who cares about our democracy must mobilize against this illegal map,' Casar said in a statement. The new seats come from making two Rio Grande Valley seats that have been narrowly won by Democrats recently slightly more Republican, collapsing the seats held by Casar and Doggett and turning two Democratic-held seats in the Dallas-Ft. Worth area into GOP-majority ones. Adam Kincaid, executive director of the National Republican Redistricting Trust overseeing GOP mapmaking, defended the proposal as beneficial for minority communities in Texas' two largest cities. He said the new map would create two new Black-majority seats, one in Dallas and the other in the Houston area, and one new majority Hispanic one. 'If you go through it, you're going to see that a lot of the communities that were broken up in the previous map were put together in this one,' he said. Trump has been pushing for redistricting in Texas with the explicit goal of making it easier for Republicans to defend their U.S. House majority. And Democrats are limited in their options for countering the GOP's efforts. In California, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom has talked about redistricting, but an independent commission draws political boundaries. In New York, Democrats introduced a proposal this week that would allow a new map ahead of schedule, but it would require amending the state constitution, a change that must pass the Legislature twice and be approved by voters. The soonest new lines could be in place would be 2028. New York also has a nonpartisan commission that is supposed to come up with the state's congressional lines, though Democrats have in the past overridden the commission's map to draw districts that would be more favorable for their party. Democratic state Sen. Michael Gianaris, who is sponsoring the proposal, acknowledged the 2026 shortcomings of his legislation but said 'we can't just sit there and watch' as Texas redraw its maps. 'There may be opportunities elsewhere but this is not a battle that's going to be over in a year,' he said in a phone interview after Texas proposed its new map. 'Unfortunately this is just a new front in the manipulation in our democracy to gain political advantage.' During the first few days of Texas' special session, Republicans faced scathing criticism from Democrats, who questioned the timing of redistricting efforts when lawmakers are supposed to be focused on providing relief following deadly Hill Country floods. In GOP-led hearings, hundreds of residents testified and expressed their concerns about not yet being able to see the maps and what new districts could mean for Democratic voters. Vasut repeatedly denied the maps would harm voters. Cappelletti, Hanna and Lathan write for the Associated Press. Cappelletti reported from Washington and Hanna, from Topeka, Kan. AP writers Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, N.Y., and Nicholas Riccardi in Denver contributed to this report.
