Reeves's CV exaggerated time at Bank of England
Rachel Reeves's online CV exaggerates how long she spent working at the Bank of England.
The Chancellor left the financial institution nine months earlier than she states in her LinkedIn profile. This means she spent five and a half years working at the bank - including nearly a year studying - despite publicly claiming to have spent a decade there.
On the professional networking site LinkedIn, the Chancellor's profile claims she worked at the Bank of England from September 2000 to December 2006.
However, BBC News has established she had left by March 2006 when she began working for Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS) in West Yorkshire.
A photo taken in March 2006 shows her with other HBOS staff at the Council of Mortgage Lenders annual lunch.
A former HR lead for the bank who helped with Reeves's relocation also said she could recall her first day and it was in March 2006.
A spokesman for Reeves confirmed that dates on her LinkedIn were inaccurate and said it was due to an administrative error by the team.
They said the Chancellor hadn't seen it before it was published.
The Chancellor has cited her time as an economist at the Bank of England as part of the reason she can be trusted with the nation's finances and has repeatedly claimed to have spent up to 10 years there.
In a 2021 magazine interview, which she subsequently posted on X, she said: "I spent a decade working as an economist at the Bank of England and loved it."
In a speech to the Labour Party Business Conference in February last year, Reeves said: "I spent the best part of a decade as an economist at the Bank of England."
She said the same thing in a speech at a CEO summit in July 2022, and in a video posted on her Facebook page in the same month.
The claim was also repeated in a Labour party document last year which stated that she spent "most of the first decade of her career at the Bank of England".
As she had already started at HBOS by the spring of 2006, her time at the central bank only amounted to five and half years. This included nearly a year studying for a Masters at the London School of Economics (LSE).
Last year, during previous controversy about Reeves's CV, the Bank of England confirmed that Reeves had left in 2006 but refused to give the month of her departure saying it was a detailed staff record which they couldn't provide.
Reeves also stood for election in Bromley in south-east London more than three months after she had taken a job in West Yorkshire.
She stood in a by-election on 29 June 2006 but had taken up a role at HBOS in March that year and received a relocation package to move from London. It is understood she rented a flat in Leeds and kept a flat in London at this time.
The Chancellor's online CV gives incorrect dates for her time at HBOS as well, which her team also acknowledged. It states that she left in December 2009, five months before she was elected to parliament in May 2010.
In fact, we have established, her employment at HBOS finished in mid-May 2009, when she signed a compromise agreement. An invoice for legal advice on the agreement stated that it arose "from a decision by your employer to terminate your employment".
The bank was undergoing restructuring at the time of Reeves's departure and a spokesman for the Chancellor said she had taken voluntary redundancy.
A compromise agreement, now known as a settlement agreement, is a legal document between an employer and employee which HBOS used when senior managers were made redundant.
Reeves was allowed to continue using a company car for six months, according to her spokesman.
She then spent a year campaigning ahead of the May 2010 general election without seeking further employment.
The MP for Leeds West and Pudsey has previously faced accusations that she has embellished her online CV.
Her LinkedIn profile was changed last year to describe her role at HBOS as "Retail Banking".
It had previously claimed she worked as an economist at the bank but she instead held a management role in the bank's Customer Relations department, which dealt with complaints.
In November, several MPs raised the row in the House of Commons while putting questions to Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner.
The prime minister's spokeswoman also faced questions at that time, with journalists asking if Sir Keir expected members of his Cabinet to tell the truth on their CV.
The spokeswoman said the row related to "the chancellor's time before she was the chancellor".
"The prime minister is very clear that what is most important is having a chancellor who is able to balance the books and who is able to be straight with the public and restore the public finances," she added.
Rachel Reeves's online CV exaggerates how long she spent working at the Bank of England.
The Chancellor left the institution nine months earlier than she states in her LinkedIn profile. This means she spent five and a half years working at the bank - including nearly a year studying - despite publicly claiming to have spent a decade there.
On the networking site, the Chancellor's profile claims she worked at the Bank from September 2000 to December 2006, but BBC News has established she had left by March 2006 when she began working for Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS).
A spokesman for Reeves confirmed that the dates on LinkedIn were inaccurate and said it was due to an error by the team.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
UK Inflation Pressure Is Set To Remain All Year
Newsletter Money Distilled Even assuming oil behaves itself, headline inflation is unlikely to dip below 3% before 2026. By Save Welcome to the award-winning Money Distilled newsletter. I'm John Stepek. Every week day I look at the biggest stories in markets and economics, and explain what it all means for your money. UK headline inflation rose by 3.4% in May compared to last year, as measured by the Consumer Prices Index (CPI). The Bank of England is meant to keep it to within one percentage point in either direction of 2%.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
In Chaotic Times, Leaders Must Focus On Workplace Culture
Jessica Kriegel, Chief Strategy Officer, Culture Partners. getty If your workforce seems tense, disengaged or emotionally drained, it's not your imagination. Employees across America are operating in survival mode, and the root cause isn't laziness or lack of resilience. It's uncertainty. According to 2025 LinkedIn research, employee confidence has dropped sharply. On a scale of -100 to +100, it sits at just 24, down 10 points from 2024. Meanwhile, executive confidence is much higher, at 54. This isn't just a data point. It's a flashing red light for leadership. Because if employees are losing confidence when leaders aren't, the gap between perception and experience widens. When that gap grows too wide, it ends up eroding trust, stifling innovation and hindering results. The American workforce isn't simply navigating a tough quarter. It's weathering a perfect storm of economic instability, AI disruption, geopolitical tension and financial strain. In short, people are feeling the pressure in their wallets, their work and their well-being. This type of ambiguity activates the brain's fear-based operating system. Under threat, people default to survival mode. They avoid risk, stop speaking up and prioritize self-protection. That's not a character flaw—it's biology. Recent neuroscience confirms that when uncertainty hits, older neural circuits trigger the defense and habitual responses that can supersede thoughtful decision-making. The problem? Too many organizations respond by doubling down on pressure, policies and performance metrics. And it's not working. Gallup reported U.S. employee engagement fell to just 31% in 2024—its lowest in a decade. Globally, engagement dropped to 21%, costing an estimated $438 billion in productivity loss. At Culture Partners, we call this the Action Trap. It's the belief that more action, urgency and control will fix declining performance. But while it can deliver a temporary lift, over time, that momentum fades. Soon, burnout creeps in, engagement flatlines and cultural damage takes root. It's the companies that focus on culture—not just compliance—that outperform. Take Service Express, a technology services firm that made a bold cultural shift. Instead of pushing harder, it focused on belief alignment, individual ownership and storytelling. The result? Exponential growth and consistently high engagement, even through economic uncertainty. So, if control doesn't create sustainable results, what does? Workplace culture is how people think and act to get results. It lives in the beliefs people hold and the behaviors those beliefs drive. Too many leaders try to change behavior without changing the belief underneath. But if you want different results, you need to create different experiences that shift belief systems. That's where real transformation begins. In uncertain times, don't tighten your grip. Focus on elements like: • Clarity: Employees can't perform in ambiguity. They need to know the mission, their role and how success is defined. Try setting three nonnegotiable goals for the organization, then make sure every employee knows what they are and how their role connects to them. • Alignment: You can't demand belief. You have to cultivate it through meaningful experiences that shift perspectives. Ask questions like "What beliefs are currently getting in the way of us achieving these goals?" Then design experiences that challenge and reshape those beliefs. • Accountability: When people believe in what they're doing, they hold themselves to higher standards. But instead of treating accountability as enforced compliance, redefine it as a personal choice to focus on what each person can control. When these three elements are in place, control becomes irrelevant. You won't need to push for results once you've created the conditions where they can emerge naturally. If you're wondering why your team is tired, your innovation pipeline is stalled or your engagement scores are slipping, ask yourself, "Am I trying to control my way through uncertainty or lead through it?" Control feels powerful. But it's a brittle strategy. Cultures built on clarity and alignment are resilient. They bend without breaking. They adjust without panicking. They grow even when the ground beneath them shifts. In a chaotic world, the most effective leaders let go of the illusion of control and step into the real work of shaping culture. Because the future won't be won by the most aggressive. It will be won by the most adaptable. Forbes Human Resources Council is an invitation-only organization for HR executives across all industries. Do I qualify?
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
UK inflation eases by less than anticipated ahead of Bank of England rate decision
LONDON (AP) — Inflation in the U.K. dropped modestly in May as a drop in air fares and transport costs were largely offset by rising food prices, particularly chocolate, official figures showed Wednesday. The Office of National Statistics said consumer prices rose by 3.4% in the year to May, down from 3.5% the previous month. That means inflation remains substantially above the Bank of England's target rate of 2%. The bank's rate-setting Monetary Policy Committee is due to announce its latest interest rate decision on Thursday. Most economists expect the nine-member panel, which has cut borrowing rates on a quarterly basis since last August, to keep its main interest rate at 4.25%. The decline was less than expected. Most economists were expecting the rate to come in at 3.3% for May as price rises cooled, following a raft of bill increases the previous month that pushed inflation to the highest level in more than a year. The higher-than-anticipated outcome was largely due to a 4.4% increase in food and non-alcoholic drink prices. Larder items like sugar, jam and chocolate, as well as ice cream, saw the biggest monthly price hikes, while meat costs also rose. Economists, including those at the Bank of England, expect inflation to remain above target over the rest of the year. Uncertainty over U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff agenda and the unrest in the Middle East make it difficult to forecast economic developments and the path of interest rates. 'We are sticking with our call for the Bank of England to continue to reduce rates at a quarterly cadence,' said Felix Feather, economist at asset management firm Aberdeen. 'But geopolitical uncertainty and risks from U.S. trade policy raise both upside and downside risks to this forecast.'
