BBC admits lapse in standards around coverage of Prince Harry interview
The BBC has admitted to 'a lapse in our usual high editorial standards' over its coverage on Radio 4's Today programme of the broadcaster's recent interview with the Duke of Sussex.
The admission came after it failed to include responses from the Home Office and Buckingham Palace to allegations made by the duke.
Prince Harry gave an interview to BBC News on Friday in response to the court of appeal's dismissal of his case over security arrangements for him and his family while in the UK.
On Saturday, the Today programme covered the duke's interview in which he described his court defeat as a 'good old-fashioned establishment stitch-up'. The programme also had an interview with the close protection expert Richard Aitch, where Harry's 'stitch-up' claims were 'repeated', the BBC said.
On its Corrections and Clarifications website, the BBC said on Tuesday: 'The programme covered the latest developments in the story of Prince Harry and his legal case around protection for him and his family in the UK and interviewed former close protection officer Richard Aitch to get a broader understanding of security considerations.
'Claims were repeated that the process had been 'an establishment stitch-up' and we failed to properly challenge this and other allegations. This case is ultimately the responsibility of the Home Office and we should have reflected their statement,' it said.
The BBC then included the Home Office statement: 'We are pleased that the court has found in favour of the government's position in this case. The UK government's protective security system is rigorous and proportionate. It is our longstanding policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements, as doing so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals' security.'
The broadcaster said it should also have given the view of Buckingham Palace. The palace statement after Friday's ruling read: 'All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion.'
The BBC added: 'This was a lapse in our usual high editorial standards.'
During the Today interview, Aitch, who is the director of operations at security services company Mobius International, said he 'was shocked but certainly not surprised' at the judgment.
He claimed that the 'provision of protection should not be based on legal argument', but on assessment of 'risk and threat against Harry' and agreed that it had been a 'stitch-up'.
Posting on X after the BBC clarification, Aitch said: 'There should not be any need to apologise BBC News for opinion-based interviews. Absence of a threat and risk assessment on Prince Harry where the focus is on legal process influenced by the recommendations of a committee that is not independent, it defines 'stitch up'.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
24 minutes ago
- The Sun
Three Met cops who strip-searched black girl, 15, GUILTY of misconduct – but are cleared of racially profiling her
THREE Met Police officers who strip-searched a black 15-year-old girl after wrongly suspecting she had cannabis have been found guilty of misconduct. The teen, known only as Child Q, was removed from an exam at her school in Hackney, East London, by the female cops. She was forced to remove her sanitary towel during the "disproportionate" and "humiliating" strip search. The ordeal sparked fury after the Met were accused of targeting the girl because of her race. PC Kristina Linge and PC Rafal Szmydynski were today found guilty of gross misconduct following a tribunal. PC Victoria Wray was found to have committed misconduct, the panel in South East London found. The panel heard how black schoolchildren were more likely to be treated as older and less vulnerable than their white peers. But the hearing did not find that the officers were influenced by Child Q's race nor was the girl's age a factor in her treatment. Cdr Kevin Southworth said: "The experience of Child Q should never have happened and was truly regrettable. "We have sincerely apologised to Child Q since this incident happened. "Again, I am deeply sorry to Child Q and her family for the trauma that we caused her, and the damage this incident caused to the trust and confidence black communities across London have in our officers." Police were called to the school in December 2020 after believing the teen girl may have been in possession of drugs. She was forced to expose her intimate parts while no appropriate adult was present. No drugs were found during the search, which was described as unjustified, inappropriate, disproportionate humiliating and degrading. 1
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Neighbour beat ‘much-loved' father to death in row over shutting a gate
A man has been jailed for 12 years for killing his 'much-loved' elderly neighbour in a row over shutting a gate. Trevor Gocan, 57, punched and kicked James "Jim" O'Neill, 74, outside their housing estate in Covent Garden, central London, leaving him with a traumatic brain injury. Mr O'Neill died in hospital two weeks later. Southwark Crown Court heard on Thursday how the two exchanged words after Gocan left a gate open on the estate. CCTV showed the confrontation lasted less than 90 seconds before Mr O'Neill was on the ground with serious injuries. The court heard that a 12-year-old boy witnessed the final kick and watched as his mother and grandmother tried to help the victim. Mr O'Neill's widow, Sara, said she had been left 'completely devastated' and haunted by nightmares. 'Jim was not only my husband for 49 years but my soulmate,' she said in a victim impact statement. 'I feel depressed, often crying, haunted by dark thoughts. 'I struggle to sleep and have recurring nightmares witnessing the love of my life bleeding on the floor.' She said she had been forced to put their home up for sale and had not left the flat for weeks after the attack. Their son, Amos O'Neill, said he saw his father 'start to lose consciousness' and told the court: 'We never got justice in the courtroom.' Gocan denied wrongdoing but was convicted of manslaughter by a jury on May 1. Prosecutor Lisa Wilding KC said the violence went 'well beyond' a single punch and involved the use of a 'shod foot' – in a shoe or boot – as a weapon. Defence barrister Benjamin Aina KC said the attack was 'completely out of character' and added that Gocan had no previous convictions. However, he had received a caution in 2012 for pushing his wife. The court also heard how Gocan was a carer for his children, one of whom has autism. In a letter read aloud in court, he said: 'I am so very, very sorry. Words cannot describe the remorse and regret that I feel. 'I take full responsibility for what happened. 'I failed my children, religion, myself, and above all Mr O'Neill.' Judge Hales told him: 'I am satisfied that Mr O'Neill's death was caused in an unlawful act falling just short of GBH. 'You told the jury you dialled 999 – your phone bore no trace of this call. 'The truth is you did absolutely nothing.' Passing her sentencing, Judge Sally-Ann Hales KC said told Gocan: 'Your unlawful actions on October 6 2024 caused the death of Jim O'Neill, a much-loved father and grandfather. 'You did not need to defend yourself – the truth is, you lost your temper and control. You walked away. Mr O'Neill did not. 'He was much older than you. 'In his shorts and Crocs, he presented no serious threat. Had you genuinely felt threatened, you could have walked away.' She said the attack, which included a punch and two kicks, carried a 'high risk' of causing grievous bodily harm or death. 'You did absolutely nothing,' she said. 'Your remorse, if genuine, has taken a long time coming.' Gocan, who wore grey prison-issue sweatpants, showed no emotion as the sentence was passed. He must serve two-thirds of the 12-year sentence in custody before he can be considered for release on licence.
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Subpostmistress ‘vindicated' by OBE but vows to continue Horizon scandal fight
A former subpostmistress who was a victim of the Horizon IT scandal said she feels 'vindicated' but 'the fight continues' after being made an Officer of the British Empire (OBE). Jo Hamilton, 68, was falsely prosecuted for a shortfall of £36,000 at her Post Office branch in South Warnborough, Hampshire, in 2006. Mrs Hamilton, who was played by Monica Dolan in the drama Mr Bates Vs The Post Office, said being honoured for services to justice by the Princess Royal at Buckingham Palace on Thursday was 'beautiful'. She told the PA news agency: 'I feel honoured to be honoured but the fight continues. 'We're still at war until the rest of the postmasters are paid, which is just awful.' She added: 'I do feel vindicated but I can't rest. 'You'd think that after everything that this is the cherry on the cake but I can't stop because I wouldn't be here if it wasn't for my colleagues.' Mrs Hamilton continued: 'Everyone needs to be paid what's right and let everyone get on with their lives because we're all running out of road. 'I'm 22 years older than when it started, I shouldn't have to still be fighting.' On receiving the letter about her honour, she said: 'You can't mistake the envelope, I knew it was something important. 'It was lovely to receive and it's just another step on my journey to get proper redress for everybody.' The Government announced earlier this month that more than £1 billion has been paid out to subpostmasters across the Horizon-related schemes. Between 1999 and 2015, more than 900 subpostmasters were prosecuted after faulty Horizon accounting software made it look as though money was missing from their accounts. Many are still awaiting compensation.
