
US 30-Year Bond (TLT) Yields Drop Sharply Amid Global Debt Market Rally
Long-term Treasury investors breathed a sigh of relief on Tuesday, as a broad global debt rally significantly eased yields, delivering the largest single-day drop in the U.S. 30-year bond (TLT) yield since March. Market participants re-entered longer maturities amid renewed optimism sparked by Japanese authorities considering adjustments to debt issuance, aiming to stabilize their own bond markets after weeks of turmoil. Despite persistent concerns over the U.S. fiscal outlook and recent tariff escalations by President Trump, the solid auction of $69 billion in two-year Treasuries provided additional support, highlighting investor demand at the shorter end of the yield curve. The 30-year U.S. yield dropped notably back under the psychologically important 5% level, tempering anxieties surrounding rising government borrowing costs. Market Overview:
U.S. 30-year bond yield sees sharpest daily decline since late March.
Japanese bond market stabilization efforts boost global bond sentiment.
Robust demand for two-year U.S. Treasuries supports broader bond rally.
Key Points:
Yield retreat occurs despite ongoing U.S. fiscal uncertainty and tariffs.
Japan's possible debt issuance adjustment provides critical market relief.
U.S. Treasury term premiums remain elevated, indicating ongoing caution.
Looking Ahead:
Upcoming U.S. bond auctions and Federal Reserve minutes closely watched.
Persistent fiscal concerns suggest relief rally could be temporary.
Long-term yields likely to remain volatile amid global fiscal pressures.
Bull Case:
A significant global debt rally led to the largest single-day drop in the U.S. 30-year bond yield since March, with the yield falling back below the key 5% level, providing temporary relief to long-term Treasury investors.
Renewed optimism was sparked by considerations from Japanese authorities to adjust their debt issuance to stabilize their own turbulent bond markets, which positively influenced global bond sentiment and U.S. Treasuries.
A solid auction of $69 billion in two-year U.S. Treasuries demonstrated investor demand at the shorter end of the yield curve, contributing to the broader bond market rally.
The return of yield-hungry buyers, capitalizing on higher yields, has temporarily stabilized market sentiment despite underlying fiscal concerns.
Bear Case:
Experts warn that the current relief rally in bond markets might be short-lived due to persistent and unresolved concerns over ballooning U.S. fiscal deficits and the nation's overall fiscal trajectory.
Moody's recent downgrade of U.S. sovereign debt continues to underscore investor anxiety about the sustainability of U.S. government borrowing.
U.S. Treasury term premiums remain elevated, indicating that investors still demand significant compensation for holding long-term U.S. debt due to ongoing caution and perceived risk.
Upcoming auctions of intermediate U.S. debt and forthcoming economic data releases could quickly reverse the positive sentiment and reintroduce volatility.
Structural concerns about the U.S. fiscal outlook and global fiscal pressures suggest that long-term U.S. borrowing costs are likely to remain volatile and potentially elevated.
However, experts warn this relief might be short-lived. Underlying concerns over ballooning U.S. deficits—recently underscored by Moody's downgrade—and persistent investor anxiety about Washington's fiscal trajectory suggest caution is still warranted. Additionally, upcoming auctions of intermediate U.S. debt and forthcoming economic data could quickly shift sentiment again. As markets navigate these turbulent fiscal waters, the return of yield-hungry buyers temporarily stabilizes sentiment. Yet, with structural concerns unresolved, bond investors face continued uncertainty, reinforcing the delicate balance underpinning current market dynamics.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
19 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Should You Invest $1,000 in ExxonMobil Today?
ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM) is an undisputed leader in the oil industry. With a roughly $450 billion market cap, it's the world's biggest international oil company (IOC) -- that is, not state-owned. It leads IOCs in nearly every metric that matters, including earnings, cash flow, and returns. While ExxonMobil is a leader in today's energy industry, its ability to maintain its leadership will be a crucial factor in fueling its ability to grow shareholder value in the future. Here's a look at whether ExxonMobil is worth investing $1,000 into today. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » The best-run oil company by far ExxonMobil delivered industry-leading performance during the first quarter. Even more impressive is that the oil company didn't just beat its peers; it absolutely crushed them. For example, the company led all IOCs by producing $7.7 billion in earnings and $13 billion in cash flow from operations in the first quarter. Here's a look at how that compared with its peers in the period: XOM Net Income (Quarterly) data by YCharts One factor driving Exxon's much higher earnings is its industry-leading structural cost savings initiative. Since launching that program in 2019, Exxon has delivered a cumulative $12.7 billion in structural cost savings. That's more than all other IOCs combined. Exxon is on track to deliver a total of $18 billion in structural cost savings by 2030. That's more than most of its peers aim to deliver. For example, Chevron unveiled a plan last year to achieve $2 billion to $3 billion of structural cost savings by the end of next year. Exxon also leads its peers in several other crucial categories. It has a 7% net debt-to-capital ratio, and 12% after stripping out its massive cash balance, which leads all IOCs. That's well below the average leverage ratio of its peer group and for a company in the S&P 500, which is closer to 20%. The oil giant also leads in delivering value for shareholders. It returned $9.1 billion of cash to investors in the first quarter, including an industry-leading $4.8 billion of share repurchases. Exxon also leads the oil sector in dividend growth. It has increased its dividend payment for 42 straight years, a feat only 5% of companies in the S&P 500 have achieved. Building on its leadership Exxon aspires to build an even better energy company in the coming years. By 2030, it aims to deliver the potential for $20 billion in additional annual earnings and $30 billion in cash flow, assuming a roughly $65 price for Brent oil, the global benchmark, which is right around the current level. That's a massive step up from the $33.7 billion of earnings and $55 billion in cash flow from operations it delivered last year, which was its third-best year in a decade, even though commodity prices were around their historical averages. This forecast implies that the company will deliver compound annual growth rates of 10% for its earnings and 8% for its cash flow over the next several years. A major factor fueling that growth is Exxon's plan to invest about $140 billion into major capital projects, including up to $30 billion of lower carbon investment opportunities, and its Permian Basin development program through 2030. It's pouring this capital into its lowest-cost and highest-margin assets. The company expects this capital to generate robust returns of more than 30% over the life of the investment. On top of that, the company plans to continue executing its structural cost savings program. Exxon anticipates those investments will generate about $165 billion in surplus cash over that period. That will give the oil giant more money to return to shareholders through a growing dividend and a meaningful share repurchase program. Assuming reasonable market conditions, the company plans to repurchase $20 billion of its shares this year and another $20 billion next year. The company's plan will also put it in a stronger position to weather lower oil prices in the future. By stripping out additional structural costs and investing in its lowest-cost assets, Exxon will steadily lower its breakeven level, enhancing its ability to produce strong earnings and cash flow at lower oil prices. A worthwhile investment ExxonMobil is the best-run company in the oil patch. It has a long history of wisely investing capital to grow shareholder value. The company currently plans to deliver 10% compound annual earnings growth through 2030, assuming a relatively conservative oil price point. Add that to its nearly 4%-yielding dividend, and Exxon has robust total return potential. While an unexpected plunge in oil prices could negatively affect Exxon's plan, it's putting itself in a better position to thrive at lower prices in the future. That makes Exxon look like a great place to invest $1,000 right now for those seeking a lower-risk way to invest in the oil sector. Should you invest $1,000 in ExxonMobil right now? Before you buy stock in ExxonMobil, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and ExxonMobil wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025


CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
CTV National News: Elon Musk and Trump lashing out against each other
Watch A war of words is beginning to emerge between U.S. President Trump and Elon Musk following the billionaire's White House exit. Joy Malbon has the details.


Globe and Mail
4 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Takeaways from AP's report on the business interests of Trump's surgeon general pick
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (AP) — President Donald Trump's pick to be U.S. surgeon general has repeatedly said the nation's medical and food systems are corrupted by special interests and people out to make a profit at the expense of Americans' health. Yet as Dr. Casey Means has criticized scientists, medical schools and regulators for taking money from the food and pharmaceutical industries, she has promoted dozens of products in ways that put money in her own pocket. The Associated Press found Means, who has carved out a niche in the wellness industry, set up deals with an array of businesses. In some cases, she promoted companies in which she was an investor or adviser without consistently disclosing the connection, the AP found. Means, 37, has said she recommends products that she has personally vetted and uses herself. Still, experts said her business entanglements raise concerns about conflicting interests for an aspiring surgeon general, a role responsible for giving Americans the best scientific information on how to improve their health. Here are some takeaways from the AP's reporting. Growing an audience, and selling products Means, 37, earned her medical degree from Stanford University, but she dropped out of her residency program in 2018, and her license to practice is inactive. She said she saw firsthand how 'broken and exploitative the healthcare system is" and turned to alternative approaches to address what she has described as widespread metabolic dysfunction driven largely by poor nutrition and an overabundance of ultra-processed foods. She co-founded Levels, a nutrition, sleep and exercise-tracking app that can also give users insights from blood tests and continuous glucose monitors. The company charges $199 per year for an app subscription and an additional $184 per month for glucose monitors. Though scientists debate whether continuous glucose monitors are beneficial for people without diabetes, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has promoted their use as a precursor to making certain weight-loss drugs available to patients. With more than 825,000 followers on Instagram and a newsletter that she has said reached 200,000 subscribers, Means has a direct line to an audience interested in health, nutrition and wellness. Many companies, including Amazon, have affiliate marketing programs in which people with substantial social media followings can sign up to receive a percentage of sales or some other benefit when someone clicks through and buys a product using a special individualized link or code shared by the influencer. Means has used such links to promote various products sold on Amazon. Among them are books, including the one she co-wrote, 'Good Energy"; beauty products; cardamom-flavored dental floss; organic jojoba oil; sunglasses; a sleep mask; a silk pillowcase; fitness and sleep trackers; protein powder and supplements. She also has shared links to products sold by other companies that included 'affiliate' or 'partner' coding. The products include an AI-powered sleep system and the prepared food company Daily Harvest, for which she curated a 'metabolic health collection.' On a 'My Faves' page that was taken down from her website shortly after Trump picked her, Means wrote that some links 'are affiliate links and I make a small percentage if you buy something after clicking them.' It's not clear how much money Means has earned from her affiliate marketing, partnerships and other agreements. Daily Harvest did not return messages seeking comment, and Means said she could not comment on the record during the confirmation process. Disclosing conflicts Influencers who endorse products in exchange for something of value are required by the the Federal Trade Commission to disclose it every time. But most consumers still don't realize that a personality recommending a product might make money if people click through and buy, said University of Minnesota professor Christopher Terry. While Means did disclose some relationships like newsletter sponsors, the AP found she wasn't consistent. For example, a 'Clean Personal & Home Care Product Recommendations' guide she links to from her website contains two dozen affiliate or partner links and no disclosure that she could profit from any sales. Means has said she invested in Function Health, which provides subscription-based lab testing for $500 annually. Of the more than a dozen online posts the AP found in which Means mentioned Function Health, more than half did not disclose she had any affiliation with the company. Though the 'About' page on her website discloses the affiliation, that's not enough, experts said. She is required to disclose any material connection she has to a company any time she promotes it. Representatives for Function Health did not return messages seeking comment. While the disclosure requirements are rarely enforced by the FTC, Means should have been informing her readers of any connections regardless of whether she was violating any laws, said Olivier Sylvain, a Fordham Law School professor, previously a senior advisor to the FTC chair. 'What you want in a surgeon general, presumably, is someone who you trust to talk about tobacco, about social media, about caffeinated alcoholic beverages, things that present problems in public health,' Sylvain said, adding, 'Should there be any doubt about claims you make about products?' Potential conflicts pose new ethical questions Past surgeons general have faced questions about their financial entanglements, prompting them to divest from certain stocks or recuse themselves from matters involving their business relationships for a period of time. Means hasn't yet gone through a Senate confirmation hearing and has not yet announced the ethical commitments she will make for the role. Emily Hund, author of 'The Influencer Industry: The Quest for Authenticity on Social Media,' said as influencer marketing becomes more common, it is raising more ethical questions — like what past influencers who enter government should do to avoid the appearance of a conflict. 'This is like a learning moment in the evolution of our democracy,' Hund said. 'Is this a runaway train that we just have to get on and ride, or is this something that we want to go differently?'