Kejriwal ‘misled' public by inaugurating fake phansi-ghar: Speaker
Addressing the House, Mr. Gupta said that on August 9, 2022, the phansi-ghar was inaugurated. 'We contacted the National Archives to get the map of the building from 1911-12. From that, it was found out that there was no phansi-ghar here,' he said.
The Speaker said the wooden structure in the Assembly was a lift and used as a 'tiffin room' by the members of the Assembly.
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) members demanded an apology from Mr. Kejriwal for 'misleading' the House, while the Aam Aadmi Party members questioned the Speaker for raising the issue at a time when the city was in the grip of several critical problems.
Mr. Gupta said a meeting of historians was called with experts from the Delhi University, Jawaharlal Nehru University, and others. 'They [experts] also said that it [execution room] is fictitious and the wooden structure is a lift. A sensation was created that it was a phansi-ghar. It was a lie,' the Speaker said.
When the AAP members opposed taking up the issue, the Speaker said, 'You are telling lies and distorting the truth... misleading the nation and not even allowing us to discuss the issue.'
BJP member Shikha Roy said the 'false claim' is a 'disrespect' to the dignity of the House. 'It is a criminal offence and there should be an FIR on this,' Ms. Roy said.
However, Leader of the Opposition (LoP) Atishi said that there are numerous issues affecting Delhi, but no discussion is being held on them.
AAP member Virendra Singh Kadian stated that MLAs lack expertise in history and have no experience working with the Archaeological Survey of India.
'This discussion is being done without any prior information. If any mistake has been made, it should be rectified. We should not consider taking criminal action or any similar actions. Many important issues have to be discussed in this session,' said Mr. Kadian.
However, the Speaker stated that the discussion will continue on Wednesday, and the LoP should provide documents to support the declaration of the room as an execution room.
U.K. delegation
Meanwhile, the Speaker held a courtesy meeting with the visiting British parliamentary delegation, led by Nusrat Ghani, Deputy Speaker of the U.K. House of Commons. 'Our shared democratic values and historic ties continue to guide the evolving partnership between India and the U.K.,' the Speaker told the delegation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
6 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Bombay High Court denies bail to ex-BJP MLA for shooting inside police station
Calling the act 'shocking' and 'unacceptable in a civilised society', the Bombay High Court on Tuesday (August 5, 2025) rejected the bail plea of former BJP MLA Ganpat Gaikwad, accused of opening fire on Shiv Sena leader Mahesh Gaikwad inside a police station last year. Justice Amit Borkar, while refusing bail, underscored the gravity of the incident and observed, 'The allegations against the applicant are of extremely grave and disturbing nature. It is the specific case of the prosecution that the applicant, who is a former elected representative (MLA), brazenly entered the cabin of the Senior Police Inspector at Hill Line Police Station, armed with a loaded revolver. It is alleged that he opened fire and discharged two rounds of bullets upon the injured Mahesh Gaikwad, with the clear intention of causing his death. It is further alleged that he also aimed and fired at another person present, Rahul Patil, thereby attempting to cause him fatal injuries as well.' Ganpat Gaikwad, a former MLA from the Kalyan (East) constituency, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), in connection with a case registered at Hill Line Police Station, Ulhasnagar. He is accused of offences under Sections 307 (attempt to murder), 120(B) (criminal conspiracy), 143, 147, 148, 149 (unlawful assembly and rioting), 109 (abetment), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 504 (intentional insult to provoke breach of peace) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, along with Section 30 of the Arms Act. According to the prosecution, on February 2, 2024, the two gathered at Hill Line Police Station, each demanding criminal action against the other. Around 9:30 p.m., Shiv Sena leader Mahesh Gaikwad, along with Rahul Patil and complainant Chainu Jadhav, was inside the Senior Police Inspector's cabin when Ganpat Gaikwad and his associate Vicky Ganatra entered. A heated argument broke out between the two factions. As tensions escalated, Senior PI Anil Jagtap stepped out to control the situation outside the cabin. The prosecution has alleged that after emptying all bullets from the revolver, the applicant noticed that the injured Mahesh was still alive. At this point, the Ganpat is stated to have sat on the Mahesh's chest and inflicted multiple forceful blows on his head using the butt of the revolver, a part not meant for attack, further aggravating the assault. 'Such an act, if taken to be true, demonstrates not only an intention to kill but also reveals the applicant's determination to ensure fatal consequences, irrespective of the location and presence of police officers,' Justice Borkar said, adding that these allegations, viewed in the context of the place where the incident occurred, inside the cabin of a senior police officer within the four corners of a police station, add a serious dimension to the entire episode. 'A police station is presumed to be a secure place for redressal of disputes and protection of life and liberty. If a violent crime of this scale is allowed to take place within such a protected zone, it shakes the confidence of the public in the ability of law enforcement machinery to maintain peace and order. A person, more so a public representative, engaging in such conduct reflects not only disregard for the rule of law but also sends a message of fear and intimidation to the citizens at large,' the court observed. While passing the order, the Judge said that the court is conscious of the fact that an accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty. However, at the stage of considering bail, the court cannot remain oblivious to the gravity of the offence and the manner in which it was committed. 'The nature of the allegations, the place of occurrence, and the conduct of the applicant, as narrated in the FIR and corroborated prima facie by CCTV footage and medical evidence, all suggest that the applicant's act was not one of mere provocation or sudden anger, but a deliberate and violent assault carried out with aggression. Such circumstances militate against the grant of bail at this stage,' the order read. The prosecution has placed significant reliance on CCTV footage from within the police station and the footage has been made part of the case record and, on initial examination, prima facie supports the account given by the first informant and injured eyewitnesses. The court noted that such electronic evidence plays a critical role at the bail stage. The ballistic report submitted by the Forensic Science Laboratory has confirmed that the bullets recovered from the injured victim's body were fired from the revolver seized from the applicant. This scientific evidence forms a critical link in the prosecution's chain of events, establishing a strong prima facie connection between the weapon and the injuries sustained. Ganpat Gaikwad claimed the incident was the result of a sudden fit of rage, lacking any premeditated intent. However, the footage clearly showed him entering the police station armed with a loaded revolver, which itself suggests conscious preparation, not an impulsive emotional outburst, the court said. The prosecution also relied on an audio recording of an interview the applicant allegedly gave to a private news channel, in which he is heard admitting to his intent to kill Mahesh Gaikwad and showing no remorse. This admission was made voluntarily and in the public domain, not under duress. The court noted that it reveals a mindset of justification rather than repentance, reinforcing the prosecution's position that the act was deliberate, intentional, and committed with impunity. The court found that the applicant's explanation lacks credibility, and the material on record clearly discloses a premeditated and violent act. At this stage, such conduct cannot be condoned, and the bail plea deserves to be rejected. 'The offence alleged against the applicant, if ultimately proved, is not only heinous but also indicative of a complete disregard for the rule of law and public safety. The manner in which the offence is alleged to have been committed, the location where it occurred, and the applicant's own post-incident conduct raise serious concerns regarding the possibility of obstruction of justice if he is released on bail/. In such circumstances, the Court finds that no case is made out for grant of bail at this stage,' the order said.
Mint
6 minutes ago
- Mint
Will Ghislaine Maxwell get clemency? US President reveals; rules out pardon for Diddy
Ghislaine Maxwell, sex trafficking accused and Jeffrey Epstein 's former girlfriend, is in the spotlight after US President Donald Trump on Friday said that nobody asked him to grant clemency to the British socialite. It is alleged that she helped sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein with sex trafficking. In an interview with Newsmax, Donald Trump admitted that he knows little about the case and said, 'I'm allowed to do it, but nobody's asked me to do it. I know nothing about it. I don't know anything about the case, but I know I have the right to do it.' Ghislaine Maxwell was found guilty of helping Jeffrey Epstein abuse underage girls and is serving a 20-year prison sentence. Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell on Tuesday said that 63-year-old wants to keep grand jury records secret in the sex trafficking case. This comes as prosecutors urged a court to release some of those records. Amid renewed public attention for the criminal case that generated political firestorm, Ghislaine Maxwell was shifted from a federal prison in Florida to a prison camp in Texas on Friday. Previously held at a low-security prison in Tallahassee, Florida, until her transfer to the Bryan prison camp, Maxwell was convicted in 2021 of luring teenage girls to be sexually abused. Those criminals who are considered to be the lowest security risk by the Bureau of Prisons are housed in minimum-security federal prison camps, some of which don't even have fences. The US President further mentioned that he would not pardon Sean "Diddy" Combs. Convicted in July on prostitution-related charges, the 55-year-old sought a pardon from Donald Trump, one of his lawyers said on August 4. Attorney for Sean 'Diddy' Combs, Nicole Westmoreland, while speaking with CNN said, 'It's my understanding that we've reached out and had conversations in reference to a pardon." Acquitted of sex trafficking and racketeering charges after a marathon trial, Diddy's sentencing is set for October 3.
Hindustan Times
6 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Aur aage jaana hai': PM Modi says ‘just the beginning' as Amit Shah becomes longest-serving home minister
NEW DELHI: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday while acknowledging union minister Amit Shah as the country's longest serving home minister, said this was just 'the beginning' for him, setting off speculation in the Bharatiya Janata Party that the endorsement was not just appreciation but an indication of a bigger role for the 60-year-old lawmaker from Gujarat. Prime Minister Narendra Modi with Union ministers Rajnath Singh, Amit Shah, JP Nadda and others leaves after attending the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) parliamentary party meeting, in New Delhi. (PTI) Also read | Addressing MPs at the NDA parliamentary party meeting, Modi referred to Shah and said he had surpassed the tenure of LK Advani who was previously the longest-serving home minister. 'Yeh to abhi shuruwat hai…abhi aur aage jaana hai (this is just the beginning…he has a long way to go),' a person privy to the meeting quoted the PM as saying. While Advani served as home minister from March 1998 to May 2004, becoming the minister to hold the position for the longest continuous period, Shah who was appointed in May 2019 has surpassed his tenure. 'With 2,258 days in office, he has now surpassed Lal Krishna Advani's tenure of 2,256 days as Home Minister. Before them, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, India's first Home Minister, served for 1,218 days. Union Home Minister Amit Shah's tenure has been marked by bold, historic decisions - from the abrogation of Article 370 to a firm crackdown on terrorism and strengthening of internal security,' the BJP said in a post on 'X'. A senior BJP leader, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that the PM's statement can be interpreted as a reinforcement of the close ties between the two and also suggests a clarity in party hierarchy. 'There is a section of people who have been speculating about some issues including the hierarchy …but the PM's statement seems to have put that perception to rest.' A long-time confidant of the PM, Shah worked closely with Modi in Gujarat; and ran the BJP's campaign in Uttar Pradesh in the 2014 general elections. The party won 71 of the 80 seats in the state, and Shah was widely feted for his social engineering skills; the same year he was appointed as the party chief , replacing Rajnath Singh, who was elevated as the union home minister. 'The PM's endorsement is a recognition of his (Shah's) capacity and capability. As home minister he is credited with reducing left wing extremism, clamping down on terror financing, and has been at the forefront of pushing for the ideological concerns such as the Abrogation of Article 370 (from Jammu and Kashmir), Unified Civil Code…he is rooted in the Sangh's ideology and pragmatic in his political decision making,' said a second senior party leader, speaking on condition of anonymity. Hailing Shah, the PM at the meeting said, he is confident that LWE would end by 2026. In 2017, Shah's organisational skills and adroit election planning saw the BJP come back to power in Uttar Pradesh after 14 years and the set stage of the party's expansion, both in terms of members as well as its presence across the country, winning in states such as Assam, Manipur, and Tripura, regions the party had previously been unable to breach. As home minister he has steered key bills, including the 2019 one that effectively abrogated Article 370, through Parliament. The PM's statement set off a flurry of congratulatory messages on social media from the party leaders. Union minister Kiren Rijiju in a post on 'X' said, 'Heartfelt congratulations to Shri @amitshah ji on becoming the longest-serving Union Home Minister in India's history. His unwavering resolve, from the abrogation of Article 370 to the firm stand against terrorism, continues to shape New India. Wishing him continued strength in building #viskitbharat.'
