
Congress, VCK question Stalin's stand that special law to deal with ‘honour' killing is not required
Tamil Nadu Congress Committee president, K. Selvaperunthagai, on Tuesday said he does not share the Chief Minister's opinion. 'A separate law against 'honour-related crimes' has to be enacted. The Chief Minister had said in the Assembly that he would use an iron hand to end such murders and there is no need for a separate law...but we don't agree with that opinion. A separate law is in place in few other states. It needs to be passed [in Tamil Nadu]. The laws already in place have not been enough to curtail [such] violence,' he told The Hindu.
Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi leader Thol. Thirumavalavan, who had positioned himself as the DMK's 'ideological ally' in 'the fight against Sanathana Dharma', in a statement said he was worried to learn of the caste-violence and murders continuing 'unabated' in Tirunelveli and Thoothukudi districts. He underscored his repeated demands to create an intelligence unit within the police force to tackle caste-related crimes have not been heeded to by the State government.
'The Law Commission of India has already create a draft law which has not been passed for several years now,' he said. His party general secretary D. Ravikumar, said the Supreme Court itself in the Shakti Vahini Vs Union Of India case (2018) had batted for such a legislation.
'While directing the Union Government to enact the law, the SC had said what the State Governments should do in the interim. Guidelines were framed and sent to all the Chief Secretaries of the States. SC has given the Law Commission's draft law to the Union Government. Since 2018, we have urged the Union Government to enact a law. State governments have not implemented the SC order. Why?,' he asked.
CPI(M) state secretary P Shanmugam on Tuesday demanded the arrest of the Sub-Inspector parents of the alleged murderer Surjith. 'The continuing spate of violence reiterates the need for a separate law and undercuts the State Government's argument that existing criminal laws are enough to tackle such crimes,' he said.
A. Kathir of Evidence, a civil rights organisation, said, 'If existing criminal laws were enough, then why do we need a SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act? Why do we need a separate law against harassment of women? A special law brings attention to crimes against the marginalised. We need a broad law to deal with 'honour' related crimes. If, for instance, a backward caste family murders the young woman in their family instead of the Scheduled Caste youth who she falls in love with, will SC/ST Act apply? What if she is killed for falling in love with another BC man,' he asked.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Leaders hail work of visionary scientist M.S. Swaminathan
The immunisation programme led by the country's first Health Minister, Rajkumari Amrit Kaur, and the Green Revolution initiated by M.S. Swaminathan were the reasons for the decrease in the death rate in India, former West Bengal Governor Gopalkrishna Gandhi said in New Delhi on Wednesday (August 6, 2025). Speaking at the launch of The Man Who Fed India, a biography of Dr. Swaminathan by the Singapore-based author Priyambada Jayakumar, Mr. Gandhi said three English words known by all farmers in the country was 'Swaminathan Farmer Commission'. Mr. Gandhi said Dr. Swaminathan had been part of the group of scientists around the world who stood for humanity and nuclear disarmament. 'Swaminathan's works for agriculture has given India's farmers a life,' Mr. Gandhi said. In a panel discussion that followed the book release, Shashi Tharoor, MP, said Dr. Swaminathan worked at a time when the memories of Bengal famine were haunting the country. 'International contacts' Former Planning Board Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia said Dr. Swaminathan revolutionised the country's agriculture through his international contacts. DMK leader Kanimozhi said Dr. Swaminathan's works for empowering women and ensuring ecologically friendly agriculture practices were not discussed the way it deserved.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Snake venom case: Supreme Court halts trial court proceedings against Elvish Yadav
The Supreme Court on Wednesday granted interim relief to YouTuber Elvish Yadav by staying proceedings against him in connection with the snake venom case.A bench led by Justice MM Sundresh issued notice on Yadav's petition challenging the FIR, chargesheet, and the summoning order passed by the trial court. The trial proceedings would not be allowed to procced in the meantime, the bench has approached the top court against the Allahabad High Court's order which had refused to quash the chargesheet and the trial court's cognisance of the case. In his plea filed before the Top court through Advocate Shahrukh Ali, Advocate Raman Yadav and Advocate Aman Jha, Elvish Yadav has argued that and cognisance of the offence under the Wildlife Protection act has been taken without a complaint filed by a competent officer, adding that police have no authority to investigate offences under the WPA or to file a chargesheet in relation with there is no legally admissible complaint against the petitioner, the disclosure statement alone cannot form the basis for prosecution, the court has argued that at the time of the registration of FIR, he was not present at the venue, and no recovery-whether of snakes, venom, or narcotics-has been made from or in connection with plea also claims that the High Court had dismissed the petition for quashing merely on the ground that graver offences were added in the chargesheet, without examining whether the essential ingredients of the alleged offences were made out against CASE AGAINST ELVISH YADAVThe case dates back to a complaint lodged in November 2023 by members of the NGO People For Animals, who accused Elvish Yadav of organising rave parties where snake venom was used as a recreational intoxicant. In a subsequent police raid at a banquet hall in Noida, nine snakes (including cobras and kraits) and around 20ml of snake venom were was arrested on March 17, 2024, based on the FIR filed under several sections of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, sections 284 and 289 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Section120A (criminal conspiracy), and multiple provisions of the NDPS was remanded for 14 days but released on bail shortly after. The chargesheet filed in April 2024 spanned over 1,200 pages and included allegations of exotic snake smuggling, the involvement of foreign nationals in consuming venom, and links to rave the Supreme Court's stay in place, all proceedings before the trial court are paused for now. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on August 29, when responses are sought from the state and the complainant.- EndsTrending Reel


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Kerala Headmistress Booked For "Casteist Slur" Against Students
Kerala: A case has been registered against the headmistress of an aided school for allegedly using casteist remarks against two fourth grade students and their parents in Haripad in the coastal district, police said on Wednesday. Gracy is the headmistress of the aided lower primary school with a strength of only nine students, including the complainant children. According to parents, Gracy is the only permanent teacher in the institution and used to hurl casteist slurs at children belonging to Backward communities. "There are only nine students in the LP school. This particular teacher and three other contract employees are the only staff. The majority of students in the school belong to the scheduled caste community," a police officer said. The parents claimed that the headmistress would call the children by their caste name during class and even mock their skin tone. When the parents confronted the woman, they said she abused them with casteist slurs. A case was registered under various sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and Kayamkulam DySP is currently investigating the veracity of allegations.