
Why India returned Haji Pir Pass to Pakistan after capturing it in 1965
"The [Haji Pir] Pass would have given India a definite strategic advantage. It was a mistake to hand it back. Our people don't read maps," Lieutenant General Ranjit Singh Dayal (retired), the hero of the Battle for Haji Pir (then a Major), said in a 2002 interview.HOW INDIA CAPTURED THE HAJI PIR PASS IN 1965The Haji Pir Pass, located at 2,637 metres in the Pir Panjal range, has been a key land route and was a major infiltration route even during the 1947 mujahideen incursion.In 1965, Pakistan, under its Operation Gibraltar, aimed at inciting rebellion in Kashmir, pushed in infiltrators into the Valley.On August 15, 1965, Indian forces crossed the Ceasefire Line to counter Pakistani shelling and infiltration. The operation, codenamed Bakshi, involved a pincer movement by the 19th Infantry Division, with 1 Para, led by Major Ranjit Singh Dayal.The Indian Army captured Sank by August 27 after a nightlong trek by soldiers in heavy rain.By 10.30 AM on August 28, Dayal's team outflanked the Pakistani defenders, and secured the Haji Pir pass. The victory shortened the Poonch-Uri route from 282 km to 56 km, and enhanced India's logistical control.The pass, when under Indian control, also had the potential to seal the natural gap used by infiltrators for future incursions, but the control was short-lived.1965, - , pic.twitter.com/uycLdhS55k— ADG PI - INDIAN ARMY (@adgpi) September 22, 2017INDIA RELINQUISHED HAJI PIR PASS, RETURNED MORE TERRITORYThe Tashkent Declaration, signed on January 10, 1966, and mediated by the USSR, ended the 1965 war.It mandated both India and Pakistan to withdraw from their pre-August 5, 1965, positions by February 25, 1966.advertisementIndia, under the terms of the Tashkent Agreement, relinquished the Haji Pir Pass and 1,920 square kilometres of captured territory, while Pakistan returned 550 sq km, including Chhamb, according to reports."The both sides will exert all efforts to create good neighbourly relations between India and Pakistan in accordance with the United Nations Charter. They reaffirm their obligation under the Charter not to have recourse to force and to settle their disputes through peaceful means. They considered that the interests of peace in their region and particularly in the Indo-Pakistan Sub-Continent and, indeed, the interests of the peoples of India and Pakistan were not served by the continuance of tension between the two countries. It was against this background that Jammu and Kashmir was discussed, and each of the sides set forth its respective position," said the Tashkent, without naming the Haji Pir Pass.The agreement aimed to restore peace but lacked a no-war pact or measures against guerrilla warfare, which is fueling criticism in India to this day.INDIA'S RETURN OF HAJI PIR ROOTED IN STRATEGIC CALCULATIONSIndia's decision to return to Haji Pir was driven by the need to secure Pakistani withdrawal from Chhamb, near the Akhnoor bridge, a critical supply line.advertisement"When negotiations commenced in January 1966 between India and Pakistan under the aegis of the Soviet Union, India had to view the threat posed by Pakistani dagger into the Indian heart in the Chhamb Sector. Since Pakistani forces had already reached Fatwal ridge only four kilometres from Akhnoor, they could always resume operations for capture of Akhnoor," Major General Sheru Thapliyal (retired) noted in his 2015 piece in the Strategic Study India portal.The Chhamb sector, a flat, open terrain west of the Munnawar Tawi River, is also a critical defensive outpost for India. Its proximity to the Akhnoor bridge, roughly 20 km away, makes it vital for securing the only all-weather road linking Jammu to Poonch and the Kashmir Valley.Journalist Kuldip Nayar, part of PM Shastri's entourage, claimed Soviet pressure and threats to withhold UN veto support on Kashmir influenced the decision of the prime minister, who died the next day in suspicious circumstances.Critics, including Lieutenant General Dayal (retired), argued that retaining Haji Pir would have curtailed infiltration, which continues through the pass today."If we had retained the post, things could have been different," Lieutenant General DB Shekatkar (retired) told Rediff India News in 2015.advertisementThe return, seen as a strategic blunder, has been criticised by experts and stakeholders who noted it enabled ongoing Pakistani infiltration and undermined India's long-term security in Kashmir.That's exactly what PM Modi pointed out, reminding the Congress of the realpolitik and strategic give-and-take that played out back then, and possibly continues to do so even today.- Ends
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Delhi Confidential: Caught in crossfire
Senior BJP leader and Lok Sabha MP Rajiv Pratap Rudy got a taste of the bitterness between TMC leaders Kalyan Banerjee and Mahua Moitra on Monday. Rudy, who is contesting against his party colleague Sanjeev Balyan for the post of secretary (administration), Constitution Club of India, was at the Makar Dwar of the Parliament House when he saw Banerjee leaving the premises. Rudy approached Banerjee, a four-time MP from Serampore, seeking his vote but the latter shouted at him that he would not support anyone who is backed by Moitra. 'You are supported by Mahua Moitra. I will not vote for you,' Banerjee told Rudy. As the stunned BJP leader looked at him, Banerjee announced that he 'would warn everyone who is friendly' with Moitra to stay away from him. Old Practice Revived Rajya Sabha getting adjourned for the day after being informed about the death of former Jharkhand CM and sitting MP Shibu Soren marked a return to a practice which was discontinued a few years ago. The proceedings of the Upper House were adjourned only for a few hours after the death of former Union Ministers Arun Jaitley (2019), Ram Vilas Paswan (2020) and Congress leader Rajeev Satav (2021). On Monday, Opposition leaders led by Congress's Jairam Ramesh suggested that the House should go back to the old practice of adjournment as a mark of respect to the deceased member. Mission Sindoor The invitation cards for Independence Day programme this year carry a logo of Operation Sindoor, an effort by the government to publicise India's military operation against terror targets in Pakistan in May this year. It is learnt that Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi in an address to senior Army officers post-Operation Sindoor had mentioned the decision to imprint the logo on all cards and official correspondence of the defence services. Senior Army officers are also likely to deliver lectures in schools on Operation Sindoor to create awareness among students on the operation.


India.com
28 minutes ago
- India.com
Israel-Gaza War Puts Billion-Dollar IMEC Project At Risk; India-Saudi Strains Leave China Smiling – Why This Corridor Matters
New Delhi: The war in Gaza is not only claiming lives. It is dismantling billion-dollar plans stretching from India to Europe. Among them is the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), a flagship connectivity project backed by India, the United States, Saudi Arabia, the European Union and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The project had a grand vision. Announced during the G20 Summit in New Delhi in September 2023, the IMEC aimed to link India with Europe via the Middle East. A series of modern rail networks, ports, pipelines and digital infrastructure would form its spine. Israel was expected to play a central role as the corridor's critical junction. But war changed that. The fighting in Gaza has triggered diplomatic cold fronts across the Arab world. Hostage crises and hunger deaths have gripped global headlines. Behind the scenes, the IMEC blueprint is beginning to look fragile. Several conversations linked to the corridor's normalisation process have stopped. The air of political instability has raised new doubts. Investors are now cautious. Talks have lost momentum. Security concerns loom larger. Reports from Israeli media outlets such Ynet cite growing fears that the project may now face indefinite delays. The timing has worked in Beijing's favour. The IMEC was widely seen as a counter to China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), with its own web of global infrastructure alliances. A stalled IMEC is a strategic breather for China. It removes immediate competition from a rival corridor that was built to tilt trade flows away from Chinese influence. For India, in addition to being a transport network, the IMEC was a geopolitical leap. With 47 trillion dollars in combined GDP between its partners, it held the potential to upgrade India's role in global trade. The corridor also fit into New Delhi's broader push to develop digital public infrastructure, enhance green energy ties and open secure channels to Europe and the Americas. Though the dream has not died, it has dimmed. The longer the war in Gaza drags on, the harder it gets for IMEC stakeholders to keep the political will alive. Saudi Arabia's frustration over Israel's war posture is deepening. Strategic cohesion among partner countries is thinning. The risk of indefinite pause is no longer a whisper. Whether the IMEC becomes reality or remains a footnote in G20 speeches now depends on what unfolds on the ground in Gaza.


Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
How Nemra's Shibu made Santhal Parganas his citadel
Dumka: The news of the death of the JMM patriarch, Shibu Soren, while being admitted at Sir Gangaram Hospital in New Delhi for the last month, cast a pall of gloom over Dumka in particular and the entire Santhal Pargana at large. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The region proved to be his karma bhumi, having accorded him the status of a towering figure of the tribal society at the national level. Transformed from Shivcharan Marandi (his former name) to Shibu Soren after jointly forming the JMM along with A K Rai and Vinod Bihari Mahto, the separation of Jharkhand from the erstwhile undivided Bihar was its ultimate political objective. His further transformation to be the Dishom Guru (mentor of the tribals across the country) took place in Santhal Pargana, which emerged as the epicentre of the statehood movement that he led for over three decades by mobilising the local tribal community and other native residents. "We learnt about someone called Shibu Soren becoming popular among the tribals and other marginalised communities in terms of raising their voices against exploitation. It was then that we called on him at Tundi in Dhanbad to request him to come to Santhal Pargana in the late seventies to guide the community members against the oppressive practice of money lending and grabbing of tribal lands," veteran JMM leader, the late Simon Marandi, had once said. Due to his charismatic leadership quality, Shibu soon became an iconic figure among the local tribals, particularly Santhals, resisting the administrative arrangements against the proposed meetings elsewhere to undo the same. "It was by then that the slogan 'Kaisi lenge Jharkhand, lad ke lenge Jharkhand' (How to get Jharkhand, to get it by fighting) was coined," recalled Jitendra Singh, a JMM revolutionary. "It was due to Guruji's inclusive philosophy that even the non-tribal populace of Santhal Pargana started admiring him," said Jitendra, now in his late fifties. Shibu was first elected to the Lok Sabha in 1980 from Dumka. He represented this seat in 1989, 1991, 1996, 2004, and 2014 general elections, apart from serving as chief minister of Jharkhand three times.