UK's immigration hotspots revealed where 1 in 20 residents are migrants who arrived last year… how does YOUR town fare?
HERE WE GROW UK's immigration hotspots revealed where 1 in 20 residents are migrants who arrived last year… how does YOUR town fare?
NEW analysis has revealed that up to one in 20 residents in parts of England and Wales are immigrants who moved here in the last year.
Government statistics published last week show the total population change of England and Wales skyrocketed by 700,000 in 2023/24.
It marks the second largest surge in population since World War 2.
The male population grew faster than the female population with net international migration 18,000 higher for males than for females.
The Daily Mail revealed that net international migration, the difference between the number of people arriving and leaving the country, was positive in all but one of 318 local authority areas.
Newham, London, saw an influx of more than 17,000 people in the year to mid-2024.
A total of 17,224 people came to the borough as international migrants, the local authority area is home to just 374,000 people.
The data suggests that migrants arriving from abroad in the last year now make up 4.6 per cent of the London borough's population, roughly one in 20 people.
According to the Office of National Statistics (ONS) Luton and Coventry had similarly high figures with 10,200 international migrants coming to Luton and 15,446 coming to Coventry.
This marked a 4.3 per cent population increase for Luton and a 4.2 per cent increase for Coventry.
Current immigration levels are at an all time high and experts warn that this is pilling pressure on housing, schools and the NHS.
Robert Bates, research director at the Centre for Migration Control told the Daily Mail: "Assimilation has been made impossible by the sheer scale of mass migration and our national culture is damaged as a result.
The Sun watches as hundreds of illegal migrants arrive at Dover
"Stretched public services - from the NHS and GP surgeries to public transport and schools - are being further eroded by a low wage, low-skill immigration system.
"Politicians have ignored the concerns of voters due to a misguided belief that open borders benefit the economy.
"We fast need a government which rejects this dogma and starts work to scrap a whole raft of failed visa routes, end foreign nationals' access to the welfare system, and invests in skills for the British workforce."
He added that mass migration is changing the fabric of Britain.
4
4
The huge number of migrants coming to the UK are split into various groups with asylum seekers staying in hotels making up a small portion of international immigrants
Credit: Louis Wood
According to the ONS' estimates there were roughly 61.8 million people in England and Wales in mid-2024.
This is up from just 61.1 million people in mid-2023.
The increase of 706,881 people was overshadowed by the 821,210 population rise in the months to mid-2023.
Growth in both years was driven almost entirely by record rises in the number of international migrants.
Nearly 1.1 million people are thought to have immigrated in the last 12 months compared to the 450,000 thought to have emigrated.
There were only slightly more births than deaths in the year to mid-2024, adding just 29,982 to the population.
In raw numbers, the larger local authorities had the most international migrants arriving.
The City of London, home to just 15,111 people saw an 11 per cent increase in its population, this was down to net international migration.
Only one local authority area, South Holland, Lincolnshire, experienced more international migrants leaving than arriving.
The ONS said the area had 557 arrivals from abroad last year but 695 people emigrated.
Internal migration - movement within the UK - is recorded separately.
The ONS said there may be some overlap in the data but determining how much is difficult because of the difficulties in examining population flow.
For example, the same person could be classed as an international immigrant and internal emigrant, they could also die, further confusing the picture.
It comes after the Prime Minister announced a crackdown on immigration in May.
His package of policies to curb immigration involved a hiking of the skills threshold for immigrants and a toughening of the rules on fluency in English.
Under the new rules migrants will also be required to wait 10 years for citizenship rather than the current five and face deportation for even lower-level crimes.
Keir Starmer also recently came to a "one in one out" deal with French president Emmanuel Macron in a bid to solve the small boats crisis.
It comes as the total number of migrants who arrived in 2025 by small boat so far reaches 25,436, Home Office figures show.
Some 898 people made the journey in 13 small boats on Wednesday, the arrivals figure is up 51 per cent on this point last year, and is 73 per cent higher than in 2023.
4
Newham, London, saw a huge rise in population, mostly fuelled by net international migration
Credit: Alamy
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
12 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Iran asks Taliban for ‘kill list' leaked in MoD data blunder in plot to hunt down MI6 spies
IRAN has reportedly asked the Taliban to hand over a bombshell list of MI6 spies and British special forces accidentally leaked by the UK government. Fresh fears are brewing that the data breach could now become a tool for international espionage and terror. 9 Iran has reportedly asked the Taliban (pictured) to hand over a 'kill list' of Brit spies and special forces accidentally leaked by the UK government Credit: AP 9 Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks during a meeting in Tehran, 2022 Credit: Reuters 9 Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps has 'formally requested' the Taliban share the list, with MI6 intelligence assets set to take priority Credit: Reuters 9 The astounding list, accidentally leaked by a British soldier in 2022, exposes more than 100 British officials and up to 25,000 Afghans Credit: The Times The shocking move was revealed last night amid claims Tehran is coordinating with Taliban warlords to get their hands on the so-called "kill list". The vast and highly sensitive database exposes more than 100 British officials and up to 25,000 Afghans who worked alongside UK forces. Whitehall insiders are said to be "deeply concerned" by reports that Iran has set up a formal committee to hunt down British intelligence assets using the leaked file. One senior Iranian official told The Telegraph that the Revolutionary Guard Corps had "formally requested" the Taliban share the list, adding that "MI6 intelligence assets will take priority". The explosive revelation threatens to turn a scandalous British blunder into a deadly geopolitical weapon. For two years, the government fought tooth and nail to suppress news of the breach with a super-injunction. But now it's spiralling into an international crisis. Iran's interest in the leak comes as Tehran scrambles for leverage ahead of nuclear negotiations with the West. The Iranian official added: "On the Iranian side, there are also efforts to find the list, with a special committee assigned for it. Defence chiefs braced for £1BILLION compensation bill over Afghan data leak scandal "There have been discussions on cooperation between Tehran and Kabul on this issue as it can help both countries for negotiations with the West." While the data may not explicitly label MI6 agents or special forces, intelligence insiders admit the codes used could still allow foreign actors to identify and target UK operatives. The MoD warned : "It's a longstanding policy of successive governments to not comment on intelligence matters but this once again underlines how serious the original data breach was and why the previous government have serious questions to answer about how this was ever allowed to happen." The Taliban claims it got hold of the list back in 2022. Experts remain sceptical, pointing out that such claims are tailor-made for propaganda. But the chilling reality is that targeted assassinations of Afghans linked to Western forces are already being reported on the ground. Since the breach became public, there has been a wave of killings reportedly linked to the leak. According to the Daily Mail, one man was shot four times in the chest last month, a woman was beaten in the street after her husband, a former interpreter for British troops, went into hiding in Iran. And another former Afghan soldier told how his brother was executed in retaliation for his ties to UK special forces. He said: "If or when the Taliban have this list, then killings will increase – and it will be Britain's fault." The leak — a spreadsheet containing full personal data of 18,714 Afghan applicants to the UK's resettlement programme — was mistakenly emailed in full by a British soldier in February 2022. Instead of a trimmed list of 150 names, Afghan contacts were sent the entire file, exposing names, phone numbers, locations, and even family details. It also included sensitive data on more than 100 British officials — MI6 agents, SAS soldiers, MPs, and even a Royal Marine Major General — who had endorsed the Afghan applications. 9 The Taliban claims it got hold of the list back in 2022 Credit: AFP 9 Whitehall insiders are deeply concerned Iran has set up a formal committee to hunt down British intelligence assets using the leaked file Credit: The Times 9 Defence Secretary John Healey making a statement to MPs in the House of Commons Credit: PA The blunder was swiftly buried by a super-injunction in 2023. And for nearly two years, the public was kept in the dark, Parliament couldn't be told and journalists were gagged. But in July, the wall of secrecy finally cracked. The government abandoned the first super-injunction, revealing a £7billion rescue mission to relocate thousands of Afghans via secret flights and unmarked planes under Operation Rubific. Some 4,500 were quietly flown into Stansted and housed in MoD accommodation. Defence Secretary John Healey later admitted to Parliament that the list "contained names and contact details of applicants – and in some instances, information relating to the applicants' family members." "In a small number of cases, the names of Members of Parliament, senior military officers and government officials were noted as supporting the application," he added. And yet, the government still hasn't come clean. Lawyers for the Ministry of Defence returned to the High Court just last week to defend a second injunction — despite the core details already being read into the parliamentary record. Mr Justice Chamberlain, presiding over the case, promised to "scrutinise very carefully" any attempt to hold more of the hearing in secret. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer slammed the former Conservative government's use of the courts to cover up the disaster. He said "serious questions" remain over how the data was lost — and why the public and Parliament were gagged. Healey, meanwhile, insisted the government acted to protect lives, not to hide embarrassment. His predecessor, Sir Ben Wallace, backed that view, saying he made "no apology" for trying to prevent reprisals. But with Iran now reportedly circling, and Taliban hit squads allegedly targeting refugees linked to the UK, the once-secret blunder is now a full-blown security nightmare. 9 Afghan scandal is the latest evidence public are lied to and ignored by consecutive governments, pictured fall of Kabul in 2021 Credit: Getty Images - Getty
Irish Independent
15 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Moscow claims UK is plotting mass raids on its fleet of tankers to create ‘ecological catastrophe'
The SVR, Moscow's foreign intelligence service, claimed that London was plotting attacks on the fleet of old tankers used to avoid sanctions on oil exports. The attacks would be designed to look like accidents, the SVR said, so the UK and the West could claim that the ships were a danger, and move to restrict their movement. An ecological catastrophe in international waters is being prepared 'British intelligence services are planning to use Nato allies to launch a mass raid on the 'shadow fleet'; for this purpose, an ecological catastrophe in international waters is being prepared,' the SVR report claimed. It suggested the UK planned to commission Ukrainian special forces to sink a vessel in 'one of the bottlenecks of sea communication'. However, the report is likely to raise concerns that Russia is preparing its own 'false flag' − an operation designed to look like an attack − to justify an act of war. Western governments have previously been accused of planning attacks on Russia's liquefied natural gas ports or ageing fleet of tankers, in what could be considered an attempt to widen its war with Ukraine to Nato nations. The UK is often on the receiving end of such allegations as Moscow seeks to deter its support for Kyiv. It is also understood the Kremlin uses this narrative to potentially shift the blame of any oil leaks that may be caused by any one of its ill-maintained vessels. The US and EU sanctions regime against Russia's shadow fleet has started to seriously affect its operations. Moscow has previously signalled its anger at the growing restrictions on the vessels According to the Brookings Institute, a US think-tank, the volume of oil carried on its vessels has fallen from over 50 million barrels a month to less than 20 million a month since the start of 2025. Moscow has previously signalled its anger at the growing restrictions on the vessels by escorting them with military jets, the first time it explicitly acknowledged the shadow fleet as linked to its national security. The SVR report says: 'The impetus for such a campaign, according to London's plan, should be given by a resonant incident with one or several tankers.'
Irish Examiner
20 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: Two-state option is the viable solution for Israel and Palestine
A two-state solution in the Holy Land, whereby a Palestinian nation will be established and allowed co-exist alongside Israel, is once more becoming obvious as the only genuine answer to solving the seemingly endless warfare in the region. The merciless horror that has been visited upon the Palestinian people over the last two years by Israel requires a solution and there is an increasing realisation that the battle lines between moderate and extremist visions for the future of Gaza and the West Bank are becoming clearer. On one hand, you have the views of such as Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his voluble far-right minister for finance, Bezalel Smotrich, backed by the benign inaction of the White House in Washington, trying to bury — literally — the two-state vision. On the other, there are those increasingly nauseated by what the Israeli government is doing, who have finally realised that that goal — of two countries living alongside each other harmoniously — will be dug into Palestinian soil unless they act now. The French and British have indicated their willingness to finally recognise Palestinian statehood, but only because the increasingly genocidal administration in Tel Aviv is demonstrating little enthusiasm for any potential settlement. Certainly, we are going to have to see, amongst other things, a reformed Palestinian Authority come into being if the Israeli government is to stop waging war in Gaza and make the two-state solution workable, but such an outcome is far from being beyond the realms of possibility. Hamas is not helping its cause, or that of the people it claims to represent, by screening images of skeletal hostages. Indeed, it is only buttressing hardline Israeli views. All concerned have to come to the realisation that the two-state option is the only realistic and workable solution and the sooner the increasingly entrenched radical views on either side come to this conclusion, the sooner the bloodshed will stop. Trump silencing critics Not alone has Donald Trump changed the face of global trade with his scattergun tariffs, but he and his administration are engaged in a witchhunt — a favourite word of the US president — against a wide array of American media outlets and outspoken academics, which is threatening the very fabric of democracy there. Trump has effectively silenced much of the media criticism against him personally, and his wider regime, because corporate owners fear his wrath. CBS — along with parent company Paramount — effectively fired the hugely popular late-night show host Stephen Colbert in order to secure administration approval of the sale of Paramount to Skydance. Similarly, Amazon billionaire and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos silenced any criticism of the Trump regime on the editorial pages of his newspaper, because he fears the wrath of Trump will impact on his businesses' profitability. So too American universities — for eons bastions of democracy and free speech — have had to crawl cap in hand to the White House to get funding restored after incurring that wrath because high-profile staffers have criticised his illegal, unconstitutional actions. This silencing of media and universities willing to criticise the notoriously thin-skinned Trump is happening across America. However, the shame is on those media outlets and educationalists that have allowed it. Bezos proudly amplified the Washington Post's 'Democracy Dies In Darkness' tagline when he bought the newspaper. Yet he has himself allowed a darkness to descend on one of America's most valued independent media resources. The silencing of those who have helped America to understand just how alarming this regime has become is a terrible indictment for a country that prides itself on being the leading player in a 'Free World'. What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Sprat ban overdue The Government's proposed ban on the inshore fishing of sprat by large trawlers is not before time. In fact, the move might have come a little too late, as overfishing of the species has already had a dramatic effect on the wellbeing of our native maritime wildlife, from sharks, dolphins, and whales, to sea birds such as puffins and kittiwakes. As a result of large-scale fishing, sprat numbers have seen a huge decline, and thus reduced the food supply to a wide variety of native species. The plan to stop trawlers over 18m in size from fishing within six nautical miles of our coastline can only boost sprat numbers, thus improving prospects for other maritime creatures. Sadly, however, the new restrictions will run only from October 1 until September 30, 2026. And while it may be that the authorities here are only trialling this inshore fishing ban and planning for more focused action in the future, it seems Government action may have come too late. For too many years now, the native Irish fishing industry has been treated as the poor relation to the agriculture sector when it comes to doling out necessary financial supports. This has meant that we have allowed our rich maritime resources to be plundered by other nations who care less about the wellbeing of Irish aquatic wildlife. Their fishing fleets, invariably better resourced and equipped than ours, do not discriminate in what they catch and therefore species which they have little use for, are arbitrarily and routinely over-fished. Hopefully, this limited ban will have an immediate effect in conserving a fish vital to our rich and abundant animal kingdom. It seems almost certain, however, this is a subject that will have to be revisited. Read More Irish Examiner view: Cork Crime series prompts us to seek out the roots of criminality
