Oil firms as investors await next steps in Ukraine peace push
Crude fell more than 1% on Tuesday on optimism that an agreement to end the war seemed closer. However, U.S. President Donald Trump conceded that Russian President Vladimir Putin might not want to make a deal.
Brent crude futures rose 44 cents, or 0.7%, to $66.23 a barrel by 1000 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures for September delivery, set to expire on Wednesday, gained 65 cents, or 1%, to $63.
"It seems oil prices are thrown down one day, followed by a rebound the next day. The API report was on the positive side, so I assume some price support is coming from that," said Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at UBS.
U.S. crude stocks fell by 2.42 million barrels, market sources said on Tuesday, citing American Petroleum Institute figures, ahead of official data at 1430 GMT.
"Not so sure about the peace deal - will have to see if something moves forward over the coming days," Staunovo added.
Trump said on Tuesday the United States might provide air support as part of a deal to end Russia's war in Ukraine.
A day earlier, Trump said he was arranging a meeting between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to be followed by a trilateral summit among the three presidents. Russia has not confirmed it will take part in talks with Zelenskiy.
"The likelihood of a quick resolution to the conflict with Russia now seems unlikely," said Daniel Hynes, senior commodity strategist at ANZ, in a note on Wednesday.
Oil also found support from flooding at a large U.S. refinery.
BP (BP.L), opens new tab said on Tuesday operations at its 440,000-barrel-per-day refinery in Whiting, Indiana, were affected by flooding after a severe thunderstorm, potentially weighing on crude demand at the facility - a key fuel producer for the Midwest market.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Voting machine company linked to Trump conspiracy used LA funds to create slush fund for bribing officials: prosecutors
Employees of Smartmatic, the U.K.-headquartered election technology company, face accusations from federal prosecutors of systematically overbilling Los Angeles County for voting machines used in the 2020 election. The company allegedly used the surplus funds to create a 'slush fund' for bribing government officials, according to a criminal case against three company executives. Smartmatic is involved in a multibillion-dollar defamation lawsuit against Fox News after the network claimed it was involved in conspiracy theories to steal the 2020 election from Donald Trump. Joe Biden defeated the incumbent president in both the popular vote and the Electoral College. Prosecutors in a Florida federal corruption case against Smartmatic co-founder Roger Alejandro Piñate Martinez and two other company officials allege that bribery was part of the company's business model. While the recipients of the alleged misuse of county taxpayer money have not been identified, Dean Logan, the county's top voting official, has reported having regular meetings with Piñate, The Los Angeles Times reports. The allegations also extend internationally with prosecutors claiming similar schemes occurred in the Philippines and Venezuela. Last year, Piñate was charged with bribery and money laundering in the Philippines, where executives are accused of inflating voting machine prices to secure $182 million (£135 million) in contracts for its 2016 election to bribe a top election official. In Venezuela, Smartmatic employees are said to have used a similar fund to buy a home with a pool for a long-time elections official in 2019. This detail surfaced in an August 1 court filing in the Philippines corruption case. In Los Angeles County, where Smartmatic won a $209 million contract for the 2020 election — considered the largest election technology deal in U.S. history — the company allegedly used county money to create a similar type of slush fund. Prosecutors plan to present financial and business records, witness testimony, and electronic communications to strengthen their case, which they claim reveals a broader pattern of bribery. According to the August 1 filing, the company is accused of regularly adding a surplus fee of $10 to $50 per machine sent to the three jurisdictions, with these funds designated for bribes. Federal prosecutors declined to comment on the ongoing criminal case when contacted by the LA Times. Logan, the county's registrar-recorder, stated: 'The county has no knowledge or visibility into how Smartmatic USA used proceeds from that contract. The contract between Los Angeles County and Smartmatic USA was competitively bid, evaluated, and awarded in compliance with the county's open competitive public procurement processes.' A spokesperson for the registrar-recorder's office added that no evidence was found of the surplus charges alleged by federal prosecutors and that the price of machines always remained the same. No federal prosecutors have contacted the department. Smartmatic spokesperson Samira Saba accused the Department of Justice of filing the motion with misrepresentations that were 'untethered from reality.' In a statement, the company asserted: 'Let us be clear: Smartmatic wins business because we're the best at what we do. We operate ethically and abide by all laws always, both in Los Angeles County and every jurisdiction where we operate.' As the federal corruption case against the Smartmatic employees gets underway, L.A. County's Logan faces separate civil allegations that he benefited from a close relationship with company management. This included upscale dinners, a trip to Taiwan and the Maldives, as well as other outings, according to reported county emails and text messages. Logan later stated in a civil case deposition that these were exempt from disclosure because he attended in a 'personal capacity.' The emails and depositions emerged in an unusual 1,000-page public records lawsuit filed this month by Fox News, whose representatives say they need county records to defend themselves against the multibillion-dollar defamation lawsuit brought by Smartmatic. Smartmatic gained widespread recognition in 2020 after Fox News falsely reported that the company, along with Dominion Voting Systems, helped rig the 2020 election against President Trump. This conspiracy was widely pushed by Trump surrogates both on-air and in legal filings that ultimately failed. At the time, Dominion voting machines were used in about two dozen states, while Smartmatic was only used in L.A. County — it's first business in North America. Dominion filed a defamation suit against Fox which was settled for $787.5 million. Smartmatic filed a similar lawsuit in 2021 seeking $2.7 billion. Smartmatic also launched defamation lawsuits against some of its accusers. In addition to Fox News, the company sued Mike Lindell, Newsmax, One America News Network, Sidney Powell, and Rudy Giuliani. As part of its defense, Fox News lawyers have focused on the relationship between Logan and Smartmatic, arguing that the county is withholding crucial records. The network declined to elaborate on the allegations made in the lawsuit when contacted by the LA Times. Logan said in a statement that the county is being used as a pawn in both the civil lawsuit and federal corruption case and said the 'voluminous records' the county released 'refute the salacious allegations.' The federal criminal case against Smartmatic executives started during the Biden administration with charges filed in August 2024. The Trump administration paused most foreign bribery cases after he took office for a second term, but allowed the charges against Smartmatic executives to proceed. Records released to Fox News by L.A. County, which the media company included as exhibits in the civil public records lawsuit, show no evidence of the voter fraud espoused on air by the network's guests in 2020 that led to the whirlwind of conspiracy theories and the subsequent defamation case.
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Costco just made a major change to its food court drinks
Costco has finalized its transition from selling Pepsi products to exclusively Coca-Cola products in its food courts nationwide. The change has generated a mixed reaction among customers, with some expressing disappointment over the loss of Pepsi and others welcoming the return of Coca-Cola. Costco had previously offered Coca-Cola before switching to Pepsi products in 2013, a move reportedly made to maintain the $1.50 price of its popular hot dog combo. The wholesaler's CEO, Ron Vachris, confirmed in January that the company would be converting its food court fountain business back to Coca-Cola. The shift has been noted as triggering a strong customer reaction, reflecting the cultural significance and personal attachment many have to either the Coca-Cola or Pepsi brand.
Scotsman
11 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Huge Scottish forest sold for £145m to Gresham House investors in 'astronomical' sale
The sale illuminates the demand for Scotland's asset-rich landscapes. Sign up to our Scotsman Rural News - A weekly of the Hay's Way tour of Scotland emailed direct to you. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... A forest estate in Scotland has been sold to asset managers for £145 million in one of the biggest deals of its kind. Griffin Forestry Estate, near Aberfeldy in Perthshire, which spans some 5,560 hectares, has been bought by a subsidiary of Gresham House Ltd, a London-based asset management company now owned by a private equity firm headquartered in New York. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Griffin Forestry Estate near Aberfeldy in Perthshire. PIC: Savills. | Savills Griffin Forestry Estate is made up of three separate woodlands and a windfarm. The land was marketed by Savills in 2023 for offers over £130m given its 'exceptional sustainability and income credentials'. The sale of Griffin illuminates the demand for Scotland's asset-rich landscapes and the 'astronomical sums' paid by 'anonymous corporate investors' for the land, Community Land Scotland said. Meanwhile, Andy Wightman, Scotland's land ownership expert, said he believed that Gresham House and its subsidiaries could now be 'on track' to become Scotland's second-largest landowner following the Griffin deal, with his latest research into the company due. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Wightman said: 'It is a unique property as it is so huge and has such valuable assets. This is a straightforward commercial transaction where £145m is deemed to be the price worth paying for that future stream of revenue from windpower and timber.' Griffin Forestry Estate was originally part of the Grandtully Estate and was earlier owned by Guy Hands, an investment manager and former chairman of record company EMI. The new owner is Gresham House FF VI LLP, a limited liability partnership between Gresham House Initial Partner Ltd and Gresham House Forest Fund VI LP, a Scottish Limited Partnership that includes City of Cardiff Pension Fund, Swansea Council Pension Fund and Gresham House Ltd among its limited partners. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dr Josh Doble, director of policy and advocacy at Community Land Scotland , said the sale was another 'concerning example of landownership concentrating in Scotland into the hands of anonymous corporate investors'. He said: 'This sale also sets the remarkable and quite unbelievable precedent that an average sized Highland estate can sell for astronomical sums, which seem completely removed from the reality of many Highland communities who are in dire need of investment in local housing, travel infrastructure and local services. READ MORE: Owner of Scottish castle heads to court amid Net Zero tree planting row 'This disparity raises the serious question of who is benefiting from Scotland's natural resources and how a remote corporate entity such as Gresham House can justify an apparent investment of £145 million in a Highland estate, and how much of that investment will be benefiting the local area.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dr Doble said he hoped the new owners would 'closely and meaningfully engage' with the local community about their plans for the estate and what benefits would be shared with the local community. In February last year, Olly Hughes, managing director of Gresham House, appeared before the net zero, energy and transport committee at Holyrood and told MSPs the company did 'not own any land directly under the name of Gresham House'. However, it is understood the firm and its subsidiaries are namd as General Partner in a number of Scottish Limited Partnerships (SLP) - legal entities which can own land.
