Madras HC reserves order on NEET-UG retest plea over power outage, refuses to extend stay on releasing results
Justice C Kumarappan, before whom the petitions came up for hearing, refused to extend the interim stay, granted already by the court, on the release of the results. As a result, there is no legal bar on publishing the results which was scheduled for June 14.
The petitions were filed by some of the candidates who appeared for the examination at the Kendriya Vidyalaya at Avadi, Government Higher Secondary School in Kundrathur and Padma Seshadri School in KK Nagar.
Additional Solicitor General (ASG) ARL Sundaresan, appearing for the Centre, filed a report on behalf of the National Testing Agency (NTA), saying inquiries revealed that a brief power outage was caused by sudden natural storm and rain in the respective places, but the power supply was restored quickly.
During this period, there was sufficient natural daylight in the classrooms; no contemporaneous complaint or representation was raised by any of the candidates including the petitioners regarding lighting or adverse conditions. Neither the centre superintendent nor any observers or invigilators recommended for compensatory time or reported any procedural irregularity; the examination was conducted strictly as per the NTA protocols, the ASG stated.
He also informed the court that an independent committee of statisticians was constituted to carry out an analysis of the performance of the centre and the students. The committee found no abnormal variation or decline in the number of attempted questions that would suggest disruption or disadvantage.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
HC asks Haryana to detail experience of young HCS officer posted as HSSC secy
Chandigarh: The appointment of Chinmai Garg, a young Haryana Civil Service (HCS) officer of the 2023 batch, as secretary of the Haryana Staff Selection Commission (HSSC) has come under the scanner of the Punjab and Haryana high court. The court had earlier asked the state govt to appoint an experienced person to the post. The court granted two weeks to the counsel of the Haryana govt to get instructions about the experience of the new incumbent, with respect to conducting exams like the controller of examination (CoE) of any state university. Justice Harkesh Manuja passed these orders while hearing a contempt petition filed by one Dhana Ram. During the hearing on Aug 4, the state counsel referred to an office order dated Aug 3, issued by the secretary, Haryana, whereby Garg was posted as secretary, HSSC, as well as controller of examination, HSSC. The court observed that the order dated May 31, 2024, passed by the court, showed that a direction was issued to the chief secretary, Haryana, to take steps to appoint a suitable candidate as secretary of the HSSC, who was experienced in conducting exams as the controller of examination of a state university. The relevant portion of the May order read: "Keeping in view our finding relating to conducting of examination without declaring the result of CET finally by the commission, we direct the chief secretary, Haryana, to take steps to appoint a suitable candidate having experience of conducting examinations as secretary of the Haryana Staff Selection Commission like the controller of examination of any state universities. " The next hearing is scheduled for Aug 20.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Considerable interference by executive in appointment process of judges: Ex-SC judge
New Delhi, Former Supreme Court judge Justice Madan B Lokur on Wednesday said there had been a considerable interference by the executive in the appointment process of judges. Considerable interference by executive in appointment process of judges: Ex-SC judge He was speaking at an event organised by The Global Jurists on the topic 'Morality in Judiciary, A Paradigm or a Paradox'. "Now, about the appointment of judges. We have had a lot of problems in the recent past. There has been, I think, a considerable interference by the executive in the appointment process," he said. "The Memorandum of Procedure was finalised a long time back. But despite the MOP, which was, by the way, drafted in consultation with the Government of India, there have been all kinds of problems in its implementation," Justice Lokur added. In the appointment of judges, the former the former apex court judge said, "I believe, for reasons, that it has nothing to do with his merit. But it has something to do with a few cases that they decided," . He said that if the appointment process of judges was in the hands of the executive, "a kind of mischief" could be played. "You can appoint some person in the beginning, and a senior person can be kept pending for about six months or seven months so that he loses or he or she loses the seniority, and this is what is happening. Outstanding advocates who should have been appointed are not being appointed," Justice Lokur said. He said the process of making the appointment process less opaque needed to be deliberated upon. "Opaque not only from the side of the collegium of the high court or the collegium of the Supreme Court, but also from the side of the government," Justice Lokur said. He said that at present there were two impeachment motions pending against judges, one against Justice Yashwant Varma in the Parliament and the second against Justice Shekhar Yadav with the Rajya Sabha Chairperson. "I think for the first time in the history of the country, two impeachment motions are pending. I think we have to be very careful about the kind of persons that we appoint, and second, to keep a check on the judges while they are on the bench to make sure that these kinds of incidents do not happen," Justice Lokur said. Underlining the importance of delivering easily understandable judgments, he said, "I had to deal with a couple of judgments written by a particular judge. The English that he used, nobody could understand. The judges could not understand it. The lawyers could not understand it. So you know, this kind of quality is being demonstrated now." Regarding the transfer of judges, he said, "On the other hand, we have situations where judges are being transferred left and right without any reason. Delhi has had the experience in the recent past of Justice S Muralidhar everybody knows that this was during the riots in 2020, for passing an order which, for some reason, the government did not like." Justice Lokur, on post-retirement appointment of judges, said, "Now we have had a situation where a former Chief Justice of India has been apparently rewarded by a seat in the Rajya Sabha. We have another judge who has been rewarded with the governorship of one state. The third judge has also been awarded the governorship of another state." "We have had judges who have retired and joined politics immediately after. We had a sitting judge who resigned and joined politics, and actually got elected as a member of Parliament. We need to sort things out," he added. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Interim stay on smart meter case against Karnataka minister George, officials
Bengaluru: The Karnataka high court Wednesday granted an interim stay on proceedings over a complaint against state energy minister KJ George and a couple of Bescom officials. This is in connection with a private complaint filed by BJP functionaries alleging irregularities in the issuance of a tender for procuring and installing smart electric meters across the state. Justice MI Arun also ordered issuance of notices to the complainants and Lokayukta police while adjourning the hearing on the two petitions to Aug 20. Apart from the minister, former Bescom managing director Mahantesh Bilagi — currently Karnataka State Minerals Development Corporation MD — along with Bescom director (technical) HJ Ramesh, sought to quash the July 17 complaint registered under the BNS and the Prevention of Corruption Act. They also sought to quash the order dated July 23, through which a special court directed the superintendent of Lokayukta police to file his report by the next hearing. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru Three BJP MLAs—CN Ashwath Narayan, SR Vishwanath and D Muniraj—lodged a complaint with Lokayukta police in April. Subsequently, they filed the private complaint before the special court for elected representatives, which issued the impugned order.
